laporan tugas akhir - repository.uph.edurepository.uph.edu/1449/9/bibliography.pdf · pengaruh...

90

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Adams , Martin R., dan Moss, M. O. 2008. Food Microbiology. Cambridge :RSC Publishing.

Agustinisari, I, Widyaningrum, dan Ridwan, R. 2010. Mutu Bayam (Amaranthustricolor L.) hasil Pengeringan Teknologi Far Infra Red (FIR) selamaPenyimpanan. [Skripsi]. Fakultas Teknologi Hasil Pertanian .IPB. Bogor.

Anggraini, N. 2002. Pengaruh Konsentrasi Tepung Tapioka, Suhu, dan WaktuPerebusan terhadap Mutu Kamaboko Ikan Bawal Air Tawar (Colossomamacropomum). [Skripsi]. Fakultas Teknologi Hasil Perikanan. IPB. Bogor.

AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemistry). 1995. Method of Analysis.Washington, D.C : AOAC, Inc.

AOAC (Association off Official Analytical Chemistry). 2005. Official Methods ofAnalysis of AOAC Internationl. Madison : AOAC International.

Arkanti, L.W. 2007. Karakterisasi Sifat Fisiko-Kimia dan Sensori Beras PandanWangi, Morneng, dan BTN. [Skripsi]. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian IPB.Bogor.

Azriani, Y. 2006. Pengaruh Jenis Kemasan Plastik dan Kondisi PengemasanTerhadap Kualitas Mi Sagu selama Penyimpanan. [Skripsi]. FakultasTeknologi Pertanian IPB. Bogor.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN)1. 2009. SNI 3549-2009. Tepung beras.Jakarta: BSN.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN)2. 1995. SNI 01.2802.1995. Agar-agarTepung. Jakarta : BSN.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN)3. 2008. SNI 2997 : 2008. Metode PengujianCemaran Mikroba dalam Daging, Telur, dan Susu, serta Hasil Olahannya.Jakarta : BSN.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional (BSN)4. 2009. SNI 2690.1 : 2009. Rumput LautKering 3 Bagian 1: Spesifikasi. Jakarta : BSN.

BeMiller, J. N. dan Whistler, R. L. 2009. Starch : Chemistry and Technology.New York : Elsevier.

91

Boobathy,S., Soundarapandian, P., Prithivraj, M., dan Gunasundari, V. 2010.Biochemical Characterization of Protein Isolated from Seaweed, Gracilariaedulis, Journal of Biological Sciences 2 (1) :35-37.

Bourne, M. 2002. Food Texture and Viscosity : Concept and Measurement.California : Academic Press.

BPS. 2009. Produktivitas produksi Tanaman Padi Seluruh Provinsi. Availablefrom http://www.bps.go.id/tnmn_pgn.php ; Internet; Diakses 9 September2011.

Brown, A. 2011. Understanding Food : Principles and Preparation. New Zealand: Cengage Learning, Inc.

Brownlee, A. 2009. The Physiological Roles of Dietary Fiber. Journal of FoodHydrocolloids 25 (2) : 238-250.

Caballero, B. 2009. Guide to Nutritional Supplements. Oxford : Elsevier, Ltd.

California Rice Commision. 2010. Variety Average for U.S. Market and QualityType. Available fromhttp://www.crrb.com/datasheets/Variety_Avarages.pdf.; Internet; diakses 9September 2011.

Chawla, H.S. 2002. Introduction to Plant Biotechnology. New Hampshire :Science Publishers, Inc.

Clark, S., Costello, M., Drake, M., dan Bodyfelt, F. 2009. The Sensory Evaluationof Dairy Products. New York : Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cofrades, S., Lopez, I., Solas, M.T., dan Bravo, L. 2008. Influence of DifferentTypes and Proportions of Added Edible Seaweeds on Characteristics ofLow-Salt Gel/Emulsion Meat Systems. Journal of Meat Science 79 (4) :767-776.

Dawczynski, C., Schubert, R., dan Jahreis, G. 2007. Amino Acids, Fatty Acids,and Dietary Fiber in Edible Seaweed Products. Journal of Food Chemistry103 (3): 891 -899.

Dewi, E.N. 2011. Quality Evaluation of Dried Noodle with Seaweeds PureeSubstitution. Journal of Coastal Development 14 (2) : 151-158.

Djuwardi, A. 2005. Cassava : Solusi Pemberagaman Kemandiriang Pangan.Jakarta : Grasindo.

Edwards, W.P. 2000. The Science of Sugar Confectionery. Cambridge : The RoyalSociety of Chemistry.

92

Evans, J.A. 2008. Frozen Food Science and Technology. Oxford : BlackwellPublishing Ltd.

FAO stat. 2009. World Wheat, Corn & Rice. Home page online. Available fromhttp://nue.okstate.edu/crop_information/world_wheat_production.htm;Internet ; Diakses 7 September 2011.

FMC Corp. 1997. Marine Colloid Monograph Number One. Marine ColloidDivision FMC Corporation. New Jersey : Springfield.

Fotedar, R., dan Phillips, B. 2011. Recent Advances and New Species inAquaculture. Oxford : Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Frame, N.D. 1999. Technology of Extruction Cooking. Maryland : AspenPublisher, Inc.

Fu, B. X. 2008. Asian Noodles : History, Classification, Raw Materials, andProcessing. Journal of Food Research International 41 (9) : 888-902.

Gropper, S.S., Smith, Jack, L., dan Groff, J.L. 2009. Advanced Nutrition andHuman Metabolism. Wadsworth, California.

Goni, L., Valdivieso, A., dan Alonso, G. 2000. Nori Seaweed ConsumptionModified Glycemic Response in Healthy Volunteers. Journal of Nutrition20 (10) :1367-1375.

Gupta, S., dan Ghannam, N.A. 2011. Recent Developments in the Application ofSeaweeds or Seaweed Extract for Enhancing the Safety and QualityAttributes of Foods. Journal of Food Science and Emerging Technologies12 : 600 K 609.

Hattunisa, R.S. 2011. Optimasi Proses Dehidrasi dan Formulasi BahanTambahan Pangan pada Mie Jagung Instan dengan Metode Ekstruksi.[Skripsi]. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian . IPB. Bogor.

He, M.L. Holwick, W., dan Rambec, W.A. 2002. Supplementation of Algae to thediet of pigs : A new Possibility to improve the iodine content in the meat.Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 86 (4) : 97-104.

Hormdok, R., dan Noomhorm, A. 2007. Hydrothermal Thermal Tretments of RiceStarch for Improvement of Rice Noodle Quality. Journal of Food Scienceand Technology 40 (10) : 1723-1731.

Hou, G.G. 2010. Asian Noodles : Science, Technology, and Processing. NewJersey : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Hui, Y. H. dan Corke H. 2006. Bakery Products : Science and Technology. NewYork : Blackwell Publishing.

93

Imeson, A. 1999. Thickening and Gelling Agents for Food. New York : Chapman& Hall.

Imeson, A. 2010. Food Stabilisers, Thickeners and Geliing Agents. Oxford : JohnWiley & Sons Ltd.

Inglett, G. E., Steven C. P., Carriere C.J., dan Saipin M. 2005. Rheological,Textural. And Sensory Properties of Asian Noodles Containing an OatCereal Hydrocolloid. Journal of Food Chemistry 90 (1) : 1-8.

IPTEK. 2005. Rumput Laut/Alga. Available fromhttp://www.iptek.net.id/ind/pd_alga/index.php?mnu=2&alga=merah&id=33; Internet; diakses 12 Februari 2012.

Jennings, P.R., Coffman, W.R., dan Kauffman, H.E. 1979. Rice Improvement. LosBanos : IRRI.

Institute of Medicine (U.S.). 2005. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy,Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and AminoAcids. Washington : The National Academies Press.

International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).1979. Chemical Aspects of RiceGrain Quality. Manila : IRRI, 1979.

Kartika, E. 2010. Pembuatan Mie Kering dengan Penambahan Tepung DagingSapi. [Skripsi]. Fakultas Peternakan. IPB. Bogor.

Kasemsuwan, T., Bailey, T., dan Jane, T. 1998. Preparation of Clear Noodles withMixtures of Tapioca and High-Amylose Starches. Journal of CarbohydratePolymers 32 (6) : 301-312.

Kaur, L., Singh, J., dan Singh Khomsatin, N. 2005. Effect of GlycerolMonostearate on The Physico-Chemical, Thermal, Rheological and NoodleMaking Properties of Corn and Potato Starches. Journal of FoodHydrocolloids 19 (5) :839-849.

Khatar, J.I.S., Singh, D.P, dan Gurpreet, K. 2009. Algal Biology andBiotechnology. India : International Publishing House.

Kim, S.K. 2011. Marine Medicinal Foods : Implications and Applications, Macroand Microalgae. Amsterdam : Elsevier, Inc.

Kim, Y.S., Wiesenborn, D.P., dan Lorenzen, J.H. 1996. Suitability Edible Beanand Potato Starches for Starch Noodles. Journal of Cereal 73 (3) : 302-308.

Lawless, H. T. dan Hidegarde, H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food : Principlesand Practices. London : Springer Science+Business Media LLC.

94

Marquart, L. dan Mclintosh, Graeme H. 2007. Whole Grain and Health. NewYork : Blackwell Publishing.

Maskan, M., dan Altan. A. 2011. Advances in Food Extrusion Technology.Florida: CRC Press.

Matz. Samuel A. 1999. The Chemistry and Technology of Cereal as Food andFeed. New York : Pan-Tech International, Inc.

McGee, H. 2004. On Food and Cooking : The Science and Lore of The Kitchen.New York: Simon & Schuster.

Moksness, E., Kjorsvik, E., dan Olsen Y. 2004. Culture of Cold-Water MarineFish. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mutters, R. G. dan Thompson, J. F. 2009. Rice Quality Handbook. California :The Regents of the University of California Agriculture and NaturalResources.

Ngamnikom, P. dan Songsermpong, S. 2011. The Effects of Freeze, Dry, and WetGrinding Processes on Rice Flour Properties and Their EnergyConsumption. Journal of Food Engineering 104 : 632-638.

Nielsen, S.S. 2010. Food Analyis. London : Springer.

Njintang, Y.N dan Mbofung, C.M.F. 2003. Development of Taro (Colocasiaesculenta (L.) Schott) flour as an ingredient for food processing : Effect ofGelatinisation and Drying Temperature on the Dehydration Kinetics andColour of Flour. Journal of Food Engineering 58 (3) : 259-265.

Norziah, M.H., dan Ching, C.Y. 1999. Nutritional Composition of EdibleSeaweed Gracilaria changgi. Journal of Food Chem 68 : 69-76.

Olivera, Daniela F., dan Salvadori, Viviana O. 2009. Effect of Freezing Rate inTextural and Rheological Characteristics of Frozen Cooked Organic Pasta.Journal of Food Engineering 90 (2) : 271-276.

Ordonez, E. G., Escrig, A.J., dan Ruperez, P. 2010. Dietary Fiber andPhysicochemical Properties of Several Edible Seaweeds from TheNorthwestern Spanish Coast. Journal of Food Research International 43 (9): 2289-2294.

Passmore, R., Bruce M., dan Narayana R. 1980. Handbook on Human NutritionalRequirements. Rome : FAO and WHO.

Patricia, F. 2006. Addition of Seaweed (Eucheuma cottonii and Gracilaria edulis)Flour to Produce High Fiber Rice Vermicelli .[Skripsi]. Jurusan TeknologiPangan UPH. Tangerang.

95

Potter, N.N. dan Hotchkiss, J. H. 1995. Food Science. New York : Chapman &Hall.

Preedy, V. R., Burrow, G.N., dan Watom, R.R. 2009. Comprehensive Handbookof Iodine : Nutritional, Biochemical, Pathological, and Therapeutic Aspects.New York : Elsevier, Inc.

Purwani, E.Y., Widyaningrum, dan Muslich, T. R. 2006. Effect of Heat MoistureTreatment of Sago Starch on Its Noodle Quality. Journal of Agric Sci 7 :8-14.

Rachtanapun,P., dan Tangnonthaphat, T. 2004. Effect of Packaging Types on ShelfLife of Fresh Rice Noodles Under Vacuum Condition. Chiang Mai : ChiangMai University.

Richardson, T. 1985. Chemical Changes in Food During Processing. New Jersey: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Sanchez, P.C. 2008. Philippine Fermented Foods. Quezon City : The Universityof The Philippines Press.

Selamet, D.S., Mahmud, M.K., Fardiaz, M.D., dan Simarmata, J.P. 1990.Pedoman Analisa Pangan dan Zat Gizi. Departemen Kesehatan RI. Jakarta.

Singh, B. P. 2010. Industrial Crops and Uses. New York : CAB International.

Singhal, R.S., Kulkrni, P.R., dan Rege, D.V. 1997. Handbook of Indices of FoodQuality and Authenticity. Cambridge : Woodhead Publishing Limited.

Soriano, E., dan Bourret, E. 2005. Polysaccharides from The Red SeaweedGracilaria dura (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta). Journal of BiosourceTechnology 96 (3) : 379-382.

Smith, S.J., dan Hui, Y.H. 2004. Food Processing : Principles and Applications.Oxford : Blackwell Publishing.

Suryaningrum, T.D. dan Utomo, B.S. 2002. Petunjuk Analisis Rumput Laut danHasil Olahannya. Jakarta : Pusat Riset Pengolahan Produk dan SosialEkonomi Perikanan dan Kelautan.

Teas, J., Pino, S., Critichley, A., dan Braverman, L.E. 2004. Variability of IodineContent in Common Commercially Available Edible Seaweeds. Journal ofTyroid 14 (10) : 836-841.

Tjitroresmi, E. 2008. Potensi dan Pemanfaatan Hasil Sumber Daya Ekonomi BudiDaya Rumput laut. Available fromhttp://www.journal.pdii.lipi.go.id/admin/jurnal/; Internet; diakses 20September 2011.

96

USDA National Nutriet Database. 2009. Home page on-line. Available fromhttp://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/cgi-bin/list_nut_edit.pl; Internet;diakses 9 Februari 2012.

William, P. A. dan Philips, G. O. 2010. Gums and Stabilisers for the FoodIndustry. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Wiravan, K., Piengchai, K., Kaew, K., Anong, T., Wannee, K.R., dan Chaniphun,B. 2006. Nutritive Evaluation and Anticlastogenic Potencial of Gracilariasp. International Research Conference on Food, Nutrition, and Cancer.

Wisnu, C. 2008. Determination OF Iodine Species Content In Iodized Salt andFoodstuff During Cooking. Journal of Food Research International 15 (3) :1-6.

Yada, R.Y. 2004. Proteins in Food Processing. Florida : CRC Press..

97

LAMPIRAN

98

Lampiran 1. Kuesioner uji hedonik untuk kwetiau dengan varietas beras berbeda

Nama :Uji Hedonik

Jangan membandingkan sampel1= sangat tidak suka2= tidak suka3= agak tidak suka4= netral5= agak suka6= suka7= sangat suka

Kode

Kekenyalan

Warna

99

Lampiran 2. Kuesioner uji hedonik untuk kwetiau dengan penambahan tepungtapioka

Nama :Uji Hedonik


Kode

Kekenyalan

Warna

100

Lampiran 3. Kuesioner uji skoring untuk kwetiau dengan penambahan tepungtapioka

Nama :Uji skoring

Jangan membandingkan sampel1= sangat tidak kenyal / sangat tidak putih2= tidak kenyal/ tidak putih3= agak kenyal/ agak putih4= kenyal/ putih5= sangat kenyal/sangat putih

Kode

Kekenyalan

Warna

101

Lampiran 4. Kuesioner uji hedonik kwetiau dengan penambahan tepungrumput laut

Nama :Uji Hedonik


Kode

Kekenyalan

Warna

102

Lampiran 5. Kuesioner uji skoring untuk kwetiau dengan penambahan tepungrumput laut

Nama :Uji skoring

Jangan membandingkan sampel1= sangat tidak kenyal / sangat tidak hijau2= tidak kenyal/ tidak hijau3= agak kenyal/ agak hijau4= kenyal/ hijau5= sangat kenyal/sangat hijau

Kode

Kekenyalan

Warna

103

Lampiran 6. Kuesioner uji hedonik untuk kwetiau selama penyimpanan

Nama :Uji Hedonik


Kode

Kekenyalan

Warna

104

Lampiran 7. Kuesioner uji skoring untuk kwetiau selama penyimpanan

Nama :Uji skoring

Jangan membandingkan sampel1= sangat tidak kenyal / sangat tidak hijau2= tidak kenyal/ tidak hijau3= agak kenyal/ agak hijau4= kenyal/ hijau5= sangat kenyal/sangat hijau

Kode

Kekenyalan

Warna

105

Lampiran 8. Hasil uji proksimat tepung beras

1. Kadar air

Sampel Cawan (%) Berat sampelawal (g)

Berat cawan +sampel akhir

(g)

Kadar air (%)

IR 64 41.3453 7.0076 47.9487 5.7665IR64 42.7147 7.0034 49.3098 5,8300IR 42 42.3645 7.0003 49.0046 5,1455IR 42 40.4989 7.0011 47.1356 5,2049

C4 39.8967 7.0020 46.3848 7,3393C4 37.2227 7.0046 43.7077 7,4180

Contoh perhitungan kadar air :

% kadar air = 7.0046 K (43.7077-37.2227) x 100% = 7.42%7.0046

2. Kadar lemak

Sampel Berat sampelawal (g)

Berat timbelawal (g)

Berat timbelakhir (g)

Kadar lemak(%)

IR 64 5.0058 6.1320 6.0268 2.1016IR 64 5.0005 6.1905 6.1591 0.6279IR 42 5.0066 6.0687 5.9560 2.2510IR 42 5.0075 6.0279 5.9478 1.5996

C4 5.0025 6.0239 5.9548 1.3813C4 5.0010 6.1962 6.1784 0.3559

Contoh perhitungan kadar lemak :

% kadar lemak = 6.1962 K 6.1784 x 100% = 0.3559%5.0010

3. Kadar protein

Sampel Berat sampel (g) Volume HCl (ml) Kadar Protein (%)Blanko - 0 0IR 64 2.0573 5.44 4.53IR 64 2.0726 5.65 4.54IR 42 2.0121 2.04 1.69IR 42 2.0256 0.93 0.76

C4 2.0272 5.11 4.20C4 2.0552 2.95 2.39

Contoh perhitungan kadar protein

% protein = (0.2 x 5.11 ml) x 14.007 x 5.75 x 100% = 4.20%2.0272 x 1000

106

4. Kadar abu

Sampel Berat cawan(g)

Berat sampel(g)

Cawan + sampel akhir(g)

Kadar abu(%)

IR 64 20.5474 4.0018 20.5761 0.7172

IR 64 21.0990 4.0078 21.1284 0.7336

IR 42 21.2733 4.0052 21.2039 0.7640

IR 42 20.7132 4.0054 20.7351 0.5468

C4 19.1942 4.0012 19.2192 0.6248

C4 23.9846 4.0048 24,0052 0.5143

Contoh perhitungan kadar abu

% kadar abu = 21.1284 -21.0990 x 100 = 0.7336 %4.0078

5. Karbohidrat (by difference)

Parameter (%) Data IR 64 IR 42 C4Kadar Air 1

2Rata-rata

5.835.675.75

5.205.155.18

7.387.347.38

Kadar Abu 12

Rata-rata

0.720.73

0.725

0.760.550.66

0.620.520.57

Kadar protein 12

Rata-rata

4.534.54

4.535

1.690.761.23

4.202.393.30

Kadar lemak 12

Rata-rata

0.632.101.36

1.602.251.93

0.361.380.87

Karbohidrat 12

Rata-rata

88.1986.7387.46

90.6691.2590.96

87.1988.2587.72

Contoh perhitungan karbohidrat :

% Karbohidrat = 100 K (5.83 K 0.72 -4.53 K 0.63) = 88.19%

Lampiran 9. Hasil uji hedonik terhadap kwetiau dari tiga varietas beras berbedaPanelis Kekenyalan Warna

107

C4 IR 42 IR 42 C4 IR 42 IR 641 5 6 4 4 5 32 2 1 2 4 6 43 5 4 5 5 3 44 6 4 6 5 5 45 1 2 4 6 6 66 4 3 5 5 5 57 3 2 2 5 6 48 4 3 5 5 2 49 2 4 4 3 4 5

10 2 2 4 5 5 511 6 3 6 4 5 412 3 5 3 4 3 413 5 3 6 6 6 614 6 2 6 6 6 615 5 3 2 4 4 416 2 3 3 4 4 617 6 3 4 6 5 418 7 4 5 6 6 619 2 5 2 3 6 220 3 2 3 6 3 421 5 3 3 4 5 422 1 3 5 2 6 423 2 5 7 5 6 324 2 6 5 6 6 525 5 3 6 6 5 526 6 6 2 5 5 527 6 3 6 5 3 628 2 3 6 5 4 429 4 5 6 4 6 530 2 5 6 3 4 631 3 3 4 6 6 332 5 3 6 6 6 433 5 2 5 5 4 534 6 6 6 6 6 635 5 3 3 4 5 536 5 3 4 6 5 237 5 6 1 5 5 338 3 5 3 4 5 239 2 2 3 6 5 440 5 5 6 4 4 441 2 2 6 4 6 442 6 3 4 6 5 443 5 3 6 5 4 544 6 2 1 6 3 545 4 7 6 6 5 446 4 1 3 6 6 647 4 4 6 4 3 648 2 3 6 6 6 649 1 5 6 6 3 350 5 3 6 6 6 551 1 5 6 6 3 552 2 6 5 5 5 553 1 3 3 6 6 554 4 5 6 4 6 555 2 5 6 4 4 656 2 4 4 6 6 657 6 3 3 2 4 1

108

58 6 3 3 2 4 159 2 6 1 6 6 560 5 3 6 6 6 561 4 5 5 6 5 562 4 5 5 5 4 463 6 2 5 5 3 664 2 2 4 3 6 265 2 5 6 2 6 566 5 2 2 7 6 667 3 5 2 4 4 468 3 4 6 6 6 669 2 1 1 5 5 570 3 6 6 6 6 6

109

Lampiran 10. Hasil ANOVA uji hedonik kwetiau dari varietas beras berbeda

1. Uji kekenyalan

ANOVAKekenyalan

Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 23.124 2 11.562 4.570 .011Within Groups 523.657 207 2.530Total 546.781 209

Uji lanjutKekenyalan

Tukey HSD

Sampel N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2

IR 42 70 3.60C4 70 3.69IR 64 70 4.34Sig. .946 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets aredisplayed.a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 70.000.

2. Uji warna

ANOVAWarna

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.


Uji lanjutWarna

Tukey HSD

Sampel N Subset for alpha= 0.05

1

IR 64 70 4.53C4 70 4.87IR 42 70 4.90Sig. .156

Means for groups in homogeneoussubsets are displayed.a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =70.000.

110

Lampiran 11. Hasil fisik kekenyalan kwetiau darti tiga varietas beras berbeda

SampelHardness

(g)Cohesiveness

(kg.sec)Springiness

(mm)chewiness

(g.mm) Rata-rata

C4

7472.68 0.72 2.48 13343.2213943.16

7040.96 0.81 2.55 14543.1

8441.65 0.79 1.69 11270.4510830.06

6902.52 0.71 2.12 10389.67

7040.93 0.81 2.53 14428.9812783.02

8441.64 0.79 1.67 11137.06

IR 42

10158.48 0.69 2.48 17383.1915678.52

9554.77 0.75 1.95 13973.85

9250.94 0.69 2.15 13723.7713998.23

8447.37 0.66 2.56 14272.68

9240.94 0.69 2.15 13708.9313630.86

8347.37 0.66 2.46 13552.79

IR 64

10106.32 0.72 2.27 16517.7714379.59

8448.18 0.69 2.10 12241.41

10206.33 0.71 2.29 16594.4714458.77

8548.18 0.68 2.12 12323.06

9387.65 0.74 2.14 14866.2814970.66

9738.40 0.72 2.15 15075.04

Contoh perhitungan Chewiness :

Chewiness (g.mm) = 7472.68 x 0.72 x 2.48 = 13343.22

111

Lampiran 12. Hasil uji fisik warna kwetiau dari tiga varietas beras berbedaL* (D65) a* (D65) b* (D65) Rata-rata L

C4

77.87 -1.68 0.5878.63

79.39 -1.29 -0.07

78.66 1.38 -0.4476.30

73.94 -1.59 0.67

77.87 -1.68 0.5871.51

65.15 -0.84 7.92

IR 42

73.93 -1.64 0.4473.16

72.39 -1.45 -0.97

71.73 -1.80 -0.4671.94

72.16 -1.58 -1.22

71.72 -1.70 -0.4571.94

72.15 -1.56 -120

IR 64

75.00 -1.61 1.1374.86

74.73 -1.28 1.67

71.85 -1.77 0.5973.06

74.27 -1.87 1.61

74.73 -1.27 1.6574.50

74.26 -1.85 1.59

112

Lampiran 13. Hasil ANOVA uji fisik kwetiau dari tiga varietas beras berbeda

1. Uji kekenyalan

ANOVAKekenyalan



Uji lanjutkekenyalan

Tukey HSD

sampel N Subset for alpha= 0.05

1

C4 3 12518.7467IR 42 3 14435.8700IR 64 3 14603.0067Sig. .136


2. Uji warna

ANOVAwarna



Uji lanjutwarna

Tukey HSD

sampel N Subset for alpha= 0.05

1

IR 42 3 72.3467IR 64 3 74.1400C4 3 75.4800Sig. .267


113

Lampiran 14. Hasil uji hedonik kekenyalan kwetiau dengan berbagai konsentrasitepung tapioka

Panelis Konsentrasi tepung tapioka0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

1 2 2 5 2 4 4 22 6 5 4 5 5 5 23 5 2 3 3 2 1 14 2 7 1 1 2 6 25 4 5 1 4 4 4 56 5 5 6 5 4 4 47 7 5 6 1 6 2 18 4 5 2 5 4 5 29 6 5 6 3 6 2 3

10 5 5 4 2 4 4 511 4 4 4 4 4 4 412 5 3 3 5 4 6 513 4 3 4 3 3 2 314 4 6 3 2 5 3 215 2 1 6 4 2 2 216 6 5 6 4 2 4 317 2 5 3 2 3 2 318 6 7 7 2 6 6 219 2 2 3 4 2 2 220 6 5 1 5 5 3 221 2 1 1 2 2 1 222 2 3 5 2 2 1 123 6 4 6 5 4 5 424 1 2 7 6 5 2 525 5 6 2 5 5 3 226 2 5 5 3 2 2 127 4 3 4 3 4 4 328 3 3 6 4 6 5 229 3 5 5 3 3 3 230 6 4 6 4 5 6 531 2 4 6 4 5 3 132 5 2 5 3 5 2 633 2 5 7 5 6 4 234 4 4 4 5 6 3 635 2 5 2 7 6 6 236 4 2 6 3 6 2 237 3 6 6 1 3 5 238 3 3 5 3 4 4 339 5 5 6 6 3 2 140 4 2 5 5 5 3 441 3 4 3 4 3 4 442 5 4 4 3 4 4 543 6 6 5 4 3 2 144 3 4 6 4 4 4 345 6 5 5 4 6 2 346 5 3 6 5 3 3 547 5 5 6 4 5 6 548 5 2 5 4 3 5 149 2 6 6 5 4 2 250 3 4 4 5 2 3 6

114

Lampiran 15. Hasil uji hedonik warna kwetiau dengan berbagai konsentrasitepung tapioka


1 6 5 3 6 2 3 42 6 6 6 6 6 6 63 5 3 4 2 2 2 34 3 2 3 3 2 3 65 4 4 5 6 4 4 46 6 5 5 6 5 5 57 6 2 6 5 6 5 68 6 5 2 5 6 3 59 6 5 6 6 5 6 2

10 4 4 6 6 4 4 411 4 4 4 6 2 6 512 3 5 5 4 3 5 413 4 5 4 4 4 4 414 6 3 6 6 6 6 615 2 2 4 2 2 6 216 6 4 5 5 2 4 417 4 4 2 3 2 4 118 6 3 6 6 3 6 619 6 6 6 6 6 6 620 4 6 4 5 6 4 521 5 5 6 6 6 4 522 6 5 6 6 6 5 623 4 4 4 4 4 4 424 7 2 4 7 2 2 325 4 6 3 4 5 5 426 6 2 3 2 4 6 627 5 4 4 3 4 4 328 5 6 6 5 5 6 629 5 5 6 3 5 5 630 6 5 6 5 5 5 531 2 3 3 3 4 4 432 5 2 4 3 5 6 433 5 6 7 6 6 6 534 5 5 4 4 6 5 535 4 4 4 4 4 4 436 6 5 6 5 6 6 337 4 6 6 4 6 6 338 5 5 5 5 5 5 539 5 4 6 6 6 6 640 6 4 6 6 6 6 641 4 5 1 3 3 2 342 6 6 6 3 6 6 743 6 6 6 6 6 6 644 5 5 5 5 5 5 545 5 5 6 6 6 5 646 5 5 5 5 5 5 547 4 4 3 2 6 4 348 4 4 4 4 3 4 449 4 5 4 3 3 4 350 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

115

Lampiran 16. Hasil uji skoring kekenyalan kwetiau dengan berbagai konsentrasitepung tapioka


1 1 1 2 2 4 5 52 1 1 2 2 3 4 53 2 2 3 3 3 4 54 3 3 2 2 3 4 55 2 2 3 2 4 5 56 2 2 3 3 4 4 57 2 2 4 4 3 3 58 2 2 2 3 4 4 59 1 1 3 4 2 2 510 2 2 2 4 3 3 411 1 1 2 3 4 3 512 1 1 2 3 3 3 513 2 2 2 3 4 3 514 2 2 3 3 4 3 515 1 1 3 3 4 4 416 3 3 2 2 5 3 517 2 2 3 3 4 3 518 2 2 3 3 4 3 519 2 2 4 3 4 3 520 2 2 3 3 4 3 521 2 2 3 3 4 4 422 2 2 3 3 4 3 523 1 1 2 3 4 4 424 2 2 3 3 4 5 525 2 2 3 3 4 5 526 2 2 3 3 4 5 527 1 1 3 3 4 5 528 2 2 3 3 4 5 529 3 3 1 2 4 5 530 2 2 3 3 4 5 531 2 2 1 1 4 4 432 2 2 3 4 5 5 533 2 2 1 3 4 3 434 3 3 2 3 4 4 535 4 4 2 3 4 4 336 4 4 4 3 4 4 437 1 1 1 3 5 5 538 2 2 3 3 3 4 439 1 1 3 4 5 3 440 1 1 3 4 1 4 541 2 2 4 4 4 3 442 1 1 2 5 4 3 243 4 4 4 4 5 3 544 3 3 5 5 4 1 345 3 3 5 5 3 4 446 3 3 5 3 4 5 547 4 4 2 4 3 1 348 3 3 4 4 2 3 449 1 2 3 3 4 4 550 1 2 3 3 4 4 5

116

Lampiran 17. Hasil uji skoring warna kwetiau dengan berbagai konsentrasi tepungtapioka


1 3 3 3 2 4 4 52 5 5 3 3 3 3 43 4 4 4 4 4 4 44 5 5 4 4 5 5 55 5 5 4 5 4 5 56 4 4 4 4 5 4 57 4 4 4 3 3 4 48 4 4 5 4 5 4 49 5 5 4 4 5 4 510 4 4 4 4 3 4 411 4 4 4 4 4 4 412 5 5 5 5 5 3 513 5 4 5 4 4 4 414 4 4 4 4 4 4 415 5 5 4 5 4 4 516 5 5 5 5 5 4 517 4 4 4 4 5 4 418 4 5 5 5 5 5 519 4 4 4 4 4 4 420 4 4 4 4 4 4 421 5 4 4 4 4 5 422 4 4 4 4 4 4 423 4 4 4 4 5 4 424 5 4 5 4 4 5 425 4 4 4 3 3 4 426 5 4 4 5 4 5 527 5 5 5 5 5 5 528 4 3 5 4 5 4 529 3 5 3 4 5 3 430 5 5 5 5 5 5 531 4 5 5 5 5 3 432 5 5 2 2 2 2 233 4 4 2 4 5 4 534 2 2 2 4 4 4 535 5 3 4 5 2 4 436 4 4 4 4 4 4 437 4 4 5 4 5 3 538 5 5 4 4 5 4 439 5 5 5 5 5 5 540 5 3 5 4 2 5 541 4 5 5 4 4 4 442 5 5 5 2 5 4 543 4 5 4 4 4 4 444 4 5 2 4 3 5 145 4 5 4 5 5 5 546 2 2 5 4 5 5 447 4 5 3 4 3 3 448 3 5 4 3 3 5 449 5 3 3 2 4 3 450 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

117

Lampiran 18. Hasil ANOVA uji organoleptik kwetiau dengan berbagaikonsentrasi tepung tapioka

1. Uji Hedonik kekenyalan

ANOVAkekenyalan hedonik



Uji lanjutkekenyalan hedonik

Tukey HSD

konsentrasi tepung tapioka N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2 3

0 % 50 2.945 % 50 3.48 3.4815 % 50 3.74 3.74 3.7430% 50 3.96 3.9610 % 50 4.00 4.0025 % 50 4.06 4.0620% 50 4.52Sig. .120 .476 .140

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 50.000.

2. Uji Hedonik warna

ANOVAwarna hedonik


Between Groups 7.897 6 1.316 .780 .586Within Groups 578.460 343 1.686Total 586.357 349

Uji lanjutwarna hedonik

Tukey HSD

konsentrasi tepung tapioka N Subset for alpha= 0.05

1

25 % 50 4.4210 % 50 4.520 % 50 4.5615 % 50 4.6220% 50 4.725 % 50 4.7630% 50 4.90Sig. .516


118

3. Uji Skoring kekenyalan

ANOVAkekenyalan skoring


Between Groups 260.920 6 43.487 60.116 .000Within Groups 248.120 343 .723Total 509.040 349

Uji lanjut

kekenyalan skoringTukey HSD

konsentrasi tepung tapioka N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2 3 4

0 % 50 2.045 % 50 2.0810 % 50 2.8015 % 50 3.1625 % 50 3.7020% 50 3.7630% 50 4.58Sig. 1.000 .345 1.000 1.000


4. Uji skoring warna

ANOVAwarna skoring


Between Groups 4.434 6 .739 1.170 .322Within Groups 216.620 343 .632Total 221.054 349

Uji lanjutwarna skoring

Tukey HSD

konsentrasi tepung tapioka N Subset for alpha= 0.05

1

15 % 50 4.0010 % 50 4.0625 % 50 4.1020% 50 4.160 % 50 4.2630% 50 4.285 % 50 4.32Sig. .408


119

Lampiran 19. Hasil uji fisik kekenyalan kwetiau dengan berbagai konsentrasitepung tapioka

Hardness(g)

Cohesiveness(kg.sec)

Springiness(mm)

Chewiness(g.mm)

Rata-rata

0%

13880.44 1.601 0.128 2844,49 4649.62

13927.05 1.063 0.436 6454,74

13463.06 2.034 0.191 5230,32 3167,58

13166.88 0.567 0.148 1104,84

13199.18 1.452 0.177 3392,24 3301,58

13558.61 1.323 0.179 3210,91

5%

12448.92 0.660 0.326 2678,51 1869,70

12816.65 1.075 0.077 1060,90

13224.54 1.051 0.578 8033,62 7707,66

13440.57 1.079 0.509 7381,71

13290.75 1.411 0.691 1295,85, 13031,71

13135.32 2.402 0.785 24767,57

10%

8282.79 0.686 4.986 20330,42 15316, 005

8829.30 0.237 4.923 10301,59

8971.19 0.766 4.350 2989,90 15985,18

8858.72 0.716 4.569 28980,45

8714.89 0.233 4.976 10104,11 7721,56

8117.29 0.154 4.271 5339,02

15%

11767.75 1.297 1.681 25656,72 20923,08

11028.98 0.699 2.100 16189,44

11320.19 0.827 3.562 26475,16 15101,82

11608.17 0.108 2.982 3728,48

11189.02 0.122 2.877 3927,29 4174,05

11183.99 0.135 2.928 4420,81

20%

11644.3 1.871 1.469 32001,13 33941,13

11603.9 1.627 1.900 35881,13

11745.11 2.087 1.236 30298,96 30265,09

11645.41 1.838 1.412 30231,22

11182.99 1.174 2.232 29302,59 29028,80

11410.07 1.035 2.435 28755,01

25%

8250.30 0.668 4.732 26079,00 24018,52

10289.24 0.363 5.879 21958,03

8206.52 0.884 4.544 32964,74 32456,70

8239.36 0.847 4.578 31948,66

8225.45 0.948 4.589 35783,77 37282,14

8219.16 1.032 4.572 38780,50

30%

8276.97 0.552 4.825 22044,88 26433,83

8200.12 0.793 4.740 30822,78

8286.27 1.271 4.472 47098,43 38789,54

8255.53 0.844 4.372 30462,64

8059.07 1.013 4.970 41581,20 37257,01

8093.11 0.913 4.457 32932,82

120

Lampiran 20. Hasil uji fisik warna kwetiau dengan berbagai konsentrasi tepung tapioka

Sampel Ulangan L A B Rata-rata L

Tapioka 0 %

1 69.74 -1.46 -0.18 71.20

72.65 -1.68 0.602 72.33 -1.38 0.33 71.90

71.48 -1.55 0.873 71.50 -1.48 0.43 71.58

71.66 -1.47 0.51

Tapioka 5% 1 73.25 -1.83 1.32 73.60

73.96 -1.72 0.192 74.11 -1.65 0.43 74.03

73.95 -1.78 1.313 73.82 -1.75 0.83 73.88

73.94 -1.76 0.72

Tapioka 10 % 1 69.75 -1.58 0.39 69.64

69.52 -1.68 0.542 71.93 -1.71 0.81 72.14

72.35 -1.71 -0.063 69.30 -1.68 0.32 70.34

70.77 -1.65 0.34

Tapioka 15 % 1 71.43 -1.75 0.25 70.60

69.77 -1.82 0.602 70.62 -1.85 0.64 71.12

71.62 -2.17 1.343 71.33 -1.78 0.78 70.63

69.92 -1.80 0.82

Tapioka 20 % 1 70.27 -1.91 0.24 70.09

69.91 -1.75 -0.732 71.67 -1.67 -0.51 71.28

70.90 -1.88 0.583 70.85 -1.73 0.31 70.48

70.12 -1.82 0.42

Tapioka 25 % 1 69.08 -1.65 -0.17 68.73

68.38 -1.52 -0.792 70.5 -1.73 -0.90 70.07

69.64 -1.86 0.033 69.70 -1.73 -0.63 69.35

69.00 -1.79 -0.65

Tapioka 30 %

1 67.95 -1.85 -1.27 67.38

66.8 -1.86 -0.552 66.27 -1.74 -0.70 66.40

66.53 -1.78 -0.993 66.32 -1.75 -0.64 66.76

67.19 -1.76 -0.63

121

Lampiran 21. Hasil ANOVA uji fisik kwetiau dengan berbagai konsentrasi tepungtapioka

1. Kekenyalan

ANOVAKekenyalan


Between Groups2743337350.08

16 457222891.680 11.997 .000

Within Groups 533577174.508 14 38112655.322

Total3276914524.58

820


Tukey HSD

texture analyzer N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2

0% 3 3706.26005% 3 9480.136710% 3 13144.416715 3 13399.646720% 3 31078.340025% 3 31252.453330 3 34157.1267Sig. .498 .995


2. Warna

ANOVAWarna



Uji lanjutWarna

Tukey HSD

Kromameter N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2 3

7 3 66.80336 3 69.36673 3 70.5867 70.58674 3 70.5933 70.59335 3 70.6167 70.61671 3 71.55002 3 71.8933Sig. 1.000 .340 .295


122

Lampiran 22. Hasil uji proksimat tepung rumput laut

1. Kadar air

Berat Cawan(g)

Berat awal(g)


Kadar air(%)

Rata-rata

30.9066 5.0579 35.3915 11.3288 11.3427.2085 5.0383 31.6748 11.3530

2. Kadar abu

Berat cawan(g)

Tepung awal(g)

Berat akhir(g)

Kadar abu(%)

Rata-rata

30.8815 5.0881 39.5309 12.7631 9.7831.9261 5.0097 32.2671 6.8068

3. Kadar Lemak

Kertas + benang(g)

Berat awal(g)

Berat awal total(g)

Berat akhir total(g)

Kadar lemak(%)

Rata-rata

1.6026 5.0012 6.6038 6.5812 0.3422 0.871.1027 5.0040 6.1067 6,0211 1,4017

4. Kadar protein

Berat sampel HCl titrasi (ml) Kadar protein (%) Rata-rata2.0189 3.01 2,6104 2.302.0483 2.33 1.9918

5. Kadar karbohidrat

Kadar karbohidrat (%) Rata-rata72.9555 74.2175.4685

123

Lampiran 23. Hasil uji proksimat kwetiau kontrol

1. Kadar air

Berat awal(g)

Cawan(g)


Kadar air(%)

Rata-rata

10.9200 21.6372 24.6170 72.712 71.823410.4606 19.7934 22.8338 70.9347

2. Kadar abu

Cawan(g)

Berat awal(g)

Berat akhir(g)

Kadar abu(%)

Rata-rata

22.2228 5.5908 22.2801 1.0249 1.1320.7258 5.4453 20.7930 1.2341

3. Kadar lemak

Kertas + benang(g)

Berat sampel(g)

Berat awal(g)

Berat akhir(g)

Kadar lemak(%)

Rata-rata

1.8766 6.0184 7.895 7.7213 1.5808 1.671.8513 6.1221 7.9734 7.7857 1.7348

4. Kadar protein

Berat HCl titrasi (ml) % protein Rata-rata2,0113 1,14 0.9924 1.032.0851 1,28 1.0748


Kadar karbohidrat (%) Rata-rata23.6899% 24.355825.0216%

124

Lampiran 24. Hasil uji proksimat kwetiau dengan penambahan tepung rumput laut

1. Kadar air

Berat cawan(g)

Berat awal(g)

Berat cawan + sampel akhir(g)

Kadar air(%)

Rata-rata

21.6372 7.9601 23.8270 72.4905 % 74.9119.7934 7.9613 21.8501 74.1657 %

2. Kadar abu

Berat cawan(g)

Berat awal(g)

Berat akhir(g)

Kadar abu(%)

Rata-rata

21.7108 5.2472 21.9075 3.7487 4.4017.3508 5.1477 17.6103 5.0410

3. Kadar lemak

Kertas + benang(g)

berat sampel(g)

Berat awal(g)

Berat akhir(g)

Kadar lemak(%)

Rata-rata

0.7010 3.0371 3.7381 3.7320 2.5119% 1.690.6773 3.3701 4.0473 4.0120 0.8722%

4. Kadar protein

Berat sampel (g) HCl titrasi (ml) Kadar protein (%) Rata-rata2,0012 1,50 1.3124 1.302,0010 1,48 1.2950


Kadar karbohidrat (%) Rata-rata40.3352 39.6939.0374

125

Lampiran 25. Hasil uji fisiko-kimia tepung rumput laut

Parameter Tepung rumput laut Rata- rata

kekuatan gel (g.cm) 368,11 372,21

376,31

Titik leleh (ºC) 56 54,5

53

Titik jendal (ºC) 32 33

34

Derajat putih (%) 52,46 51,9

51,34

Kadar air (%) 11,33 11,34

11,35

Kadar abu (%) 12,76 9,78

6,81

Kadar sulfat (%) 19,42 21.29

23,15

Kadar serat pangan larut (%) 35,1

Kadar serat pangan tak larut 62,7

Kadar iodium (µg/100g) 547,05

Contoh perhitungan kadar sulfat

% kadar sulfat = 0.1983 x 0.412 x 100% = 19.4221%1.0210

126

Lampiran 26. Hasil uji hedonik kwetiau dengan penambahan tepung rumput lautPanelis Konsentrasi tepung rumput laut

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%1 3 6 5 4 4 3 32 6 5 5 5 6 3 63 5 6 6 5 5 5 24 6 5 2 5 2 2 25 5 4 5 6 3 3 66 6 2 3 5 2 4 47 2 6 6 3 6 4 38 4 2 4 6 2 4 29 4 4 4 4 4 3 210 6 5 4 5 3 4 311 5 6 4 5 3 2 212 6 5 5 5 3 6 513 2 5 5 2 3 5 514 5 5 5 5 5 5 515 3 6 4 3 1 5 316 2 2 5 6 2 5 517 4 3 6 5 5 4 318 6 6 6 6 4 6 319 1 5 3 4 4 2 620 1 2 6 5 1 1 121 3 3 3 5 2 4 422 6 5 6 5 5 5 323 3 6 6 1 5 5 324 6 6 3 5 6 6 425 4 3 2 3 2 1 226 6 5 6 2 6 2 627 4 4 2 1 3 4 328 3 3 2 4 2 4 229 6 5 2 2 5 2 230 4 6 4 4 3 4 431 3 7 6 3 4 3 332 3 5 5 6 6 7 333 3 2 6 5 5 3 534 4 3 6 1 3 4 235 3 6 4 4 4 3 336 2 5 5 3 4 3 437 3 5 3 3 3 2 238 2 5 4 3 3 2 239 3 4 6 3 4 2 240 3 5 5 3 4 2 241 2 4 6 3 3 2 242 3 3 2 2 3 3 543 2 4 6 5 3 5 344 3 6 5 4 4 3 345 3 5 6 6 5 6 346 3 5 6 3 3 4 447 3 6 5 5 3 4 448 3 6 5 5 3 3 449 3 6 5 3 3 3 350 3 6 5 5 4 3 3

127

Lampiran 27. Hasil uji hedonik warna kwetiau dengan penambahan tepungrumput laut

Panelis Konsentrasi tepung rumput laut0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

1 6 6 3 2 2 2 22 6 5 2 3 3 3 33 5 6 3 2 2 2 24 6 5 2 5 2 2 55 6 4 3 3 3 3 26 4 6 1 2 4 3 17 7 5 4 4 4 4 68 6 2 4 2 2 4 29 4 4 3 4 4 4 410 6 2 6 5 6 3 411 6 6 1 2 2 2 212 2 3 3 5 3 5 513 6 5 2 2 3 4 214 6 2 2 2 2 2 115 4 6 6 4 3 6 316 6 2 2 3 3 3 317 7 5 2 3 3 4 518 7 6 6 2 5 2 319 4 5 6 4 5 6 620 2 2 3 5 3 3 221 6 3 2 3 3 3 222 6 4 2 2 2 1 223 6 6 5 3 5 5 324 7 4 5 3 6 6 625 7 5 2 2 2 2 126 7 5 3 2 2 2 327 6 2 2 2 2 2 228 1 2 4 7 6 7 529 6 5 2 2 2 2 230 6 3 2 2 2 2 231 7 7 6 3 4 5 232 7 4 5 5 3 6 333 4 2 5 4 4 4 434 5 5 4 3 3 3 335 6 3 3 3 3 3 336 6 4 3 3 3 2 237 5 4 5 3 2 4 538 4 3 4 3 3 4 339 6 3 2 2 2 2 240 7 5 2 2 2 2 141 6 4 4 4 2 2 242 6 6 3 2 3 2 243 5 2 3 2 2 3 444 5 4 4 3 3 2 245 5 3 3 4 2 2 246 5 5 3 3 2 2 247 6 3 2 2 2 3 248 6 2 3 4 3 3 349 4 2 3 2 3 2 250 3 5 2 3 2 4 3

128

Lampiran 28. Hasil uji skoring kekenyalan kwetiau dengan penambahantepung rumput laut

Panelis

Konsentrasi tepung rumput laut0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

1 1 2 4 4 4 5 32 2 5 2 5 4 5 43 5 5 5 3 5 3 14 2 5 2 2 5 2 25 3 3 2 3 3 2 26 4 4 5 5 2 3 37 5 4 5 3 4 2 58 4 3 2 2 4 2 29 5 5 5 5 4 5 510 2 4 5 2 5 5 311 5 4 4 5 5 5 512 3 2 4 4 3 2 413 1 2 5 4 4 4 414 5 5 3 3 4 3 515 5 5 4 5 3 5 216 2 2 5 4 4 4 217 2 2 2 5 4 3 418 5 5 4 4 2 2 319 3 5 3 2 4 3 220 3 4 4 3 2 4 421 4 5 4 5 3 2 222 2 5 4 2 4 4 223 4 4 3 4 4 3 124 4 5 4 3 3 4 225 2 5 4 2 4 4 226 4 4 3 3 4 3 127 4 5 4 3 3 4 228 5 4 3 3 4 3 129 4 5 4 3 3 4 330 5 4 3 4 4 2 231 3 5 4 4 4 5 532 5 5 4 4 4 5 533 3 5 4 3 4 3 334 3 4 3 3 3 2 235 4 3 3 3 4 3 236 3 4 3 3 3 3 337 3 4 3 3 3 2 238 3 4 3 3 4 3 339 4 4 3 2 3 2 240 2 3 3 3 3 2 241 2 4 4 3 3 3 242 2 4 3 4 3 2 243 2 4 3 3 3 3 444 2 5 4 3 2 2 245 2 3 3 4 4 3 246 1 4 4 3 3 4 347 2 5 4 3 3 4 348 2 5 4 4 3 2 249 2 3 4 5 3 3 350 2 4 3 4 3 2 2

129

Lampiran 29. Hasil uji skoring warna kwetiau dengan penambahan tepung rumputlaut

Panelis Konsentrasi tepung rumput laut0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

1 1 2 4 4 5 5 52 3 4 5 5 5 5 53 1 3 3 3 4 3 14 1 3 5 5 5 5 55 2 2 3 4 5 5 56 1 2 3 5 5 5 47 1 4 5 5 5 5 58 1 4 5 5 2 5 29 1 4 5 5 4 5 510 1 1 5 5 5 5 511 1 3 4 4 5 5 512 1 2 4 4 5 5 513 1 2 4 4 5 5 514 1 2 4 3 5 4 415 1 3 4 4 5 5 516 1 2 3 3 4 5 517 1 2 3 4 5 5 518 1 2 2 3 3 5 519 1 2 3 3 5 5 520 1 2 3 5 5 5 521 1 2 3 3 5 5 522 1 3 4 4 5 5 523 1 2 3 4 4 5 524 1 2 4 5 5 5 525 1 2 3 3 5 5 526 3 3 3 3 3 3 327 1 3 3 3 5 5 528 1 2 3 4 5 5 529 1 3 3 4 5 5 530 1 3 3 5 5 5 531 1 2 3 5 5 5 532 3 4 5 4 4 4 533 1 2 3 3 4 5 534 1 2 3 3 5 5 535 1 3 4 4 4 5 536 1 2 4 4 5 5 537 1 2 4 4 5 5 538 1 3 3 5 5 5 539 1 2 3 3 4 5 540 1 3 4 5 5 5 541 1 2 3 3 4 5 542 2 3 3 4 5 5 543 1 3 4 3 4 5 544 2 3 4 4 5 5 545 1 3 3 4 5 5 546 1 3 4 5 5 5 547 1 2 2 4 3 5 548 1 3 4 2 3 5 549 1 3 3 4 5 5 550 2 4 3 4 5 5 5

130

Lampiran 30. Hasil ANOVA uji organoleptik kwetiau dengan penambahan tepungrumput laut

1. Uji hedonik kekenyalan

ANOVA




Tukey HSD

konsentrasi rumput laut N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2

30% 50 3.3225% 50 3.6015% 50 3.620% 50 3.6820% 50 4.00 4.0010% 50 4.605% 50 4.66Sig. .167 .196


2. Uji hedonik warna

ANOVAWarna



Uji lanjutwarna

Tukey HSD

konsentrasi rumput laut N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2 3

30% 50 2.8615% 50 2.9820% 50 3.0425% 50 3.1810% 50 3.245% 50 4.040% 50 5.44Sig. .785 1.000 1.000


131

3. Uji skoring kekenyalan

ANOVAkekenyalan skoring



Uji lanjutkekenyalan skoring

Tukey HSD

Skoring sampel N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2 3

30 % 50 2.880 % 50 3.08 3.0825 % 50 3.14 3.1420 % 50 3.52 3.5215 % 50 3.54 3.5410 % 50 3.64 3.645 % 50 4.00Sig. .860 .087 .217


4. Uji skoring warna

ANOVAwarna skoring



Uji lanjutwarna skoring

Tukey HSD

Skoring sampel N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2 3 4

0 % 50 1.165 % 50 2.5810 % 50 3.5815 % 50 3.9820 % 50 4.5830 % 50 4.7825 % 50 4.88Sig. 1.000 1.000 .059 .308


132

Lampiran 31. Hasil uji fisik kekenyalan kwetiau dengan penambahan tepung rumput laut

Sampel Hardness Cohesivness Springiness Chewiness Rata-rata

0% 8705.971 1.006 1.555 13615.5883 13911.33

4822.709 1.632 1.805 14207.0842

9233.23 1.632 1.695 9591.5077 5292.45

9527.109 0.576 2.100 11523.9910

8571.125 1.027 1.974 17520.7708 18625.05

12422.829 1.243 1.974 19729.3857

5% 5910.577 0.242 2.865 33275.2715 18690.63

6799.861 1.039 1.335 4106.0038

7010.571 1.227 1.485 12775.4532 14328.43

6520.797 1.168 2.864 15881.4230

5046.705 1.043 2.015 36645.4123 25874.41

8494.724 1.043 1.525 15103.4587

10% 13640.926 1.458 1.904 17808.3356 10727.90

7280.333 3.353 1.68 3647.4650

12821.512 1.095 1.485 20684.5704 22037.09

8424.358 1.653 1.485 20684.5704

8172.442 0.845 1.695 11699.7521 21222.45

13856.46 1.395 1.59 30745.1503

15% 7056.668 1.120 1.269 7997.0858 10176.90

7925.35 1.087 1.695 12356.7210

6913.967 1.074 1.481 10994.2146 10260.50

8254.852 1.287 1.485 9526.7783

9229.578 1.282 1.590 11449.0954 18958.04

11301.543 1.105 2.120 26466.9928

20% 13446.133 1.213 1.800 29366.2424 22939.10

12964.213 1.481 1.886 16511.9671

13611.448 1.173 1.694 19096.9089 22379.08

13281.175 1.438 1.588 25661.2530

12323.951 1.417 1.910 33345.6228 37847.36

13374.679 1.066 2.970 42349.1004

25% 16102.202 1.279 1.804 37153.6809 47859.62

15309.936 1.722 2.222 58565.5657

18022.232 1.324 1.909 45558.0605 40385.35

17233.893 1.089 2.225 35212.6386

16998.101 1.310 1.695 37753.1957 74212.97

10842.775 2.913 3.504 110672.7503

30% 14978.3651 2.058 1.989 61311.8703 55986.55

21458.0759 2.071 1.140 50661.2297

16303.1912 1.478 2.014 48529.5790 54133.64

19897.3102 1.406 2.145 60007.7010

19453.8841 1.451 2.015 56878.5855 62574.15

18429.1095 1.723 2.150 68269.7145

133

Lampiran 32. Hasil uji fisik warna kwetiau dengan penambahan tepung rumput laut

Sampel L a b Rata-rata L

Rumput laut 0% 75.49 -1.68 0.54 74.32

74.15 -1.75 1.47

74.55 -1.72 1.31 74.75

74.31 -1.77 1.40

74.98 -1.52 1.52 74.32

73.77 -1.65 -0.23

TRL 5% 56.12 -0.51 7.44 56.39

56.86 -0.25 7.26

59.21 -0.70 6.65 58.52

58.42 -0.77 6.87

54.99 -0.20 8.97 54.47

53.99 -0.04 9.55

TRL 10% 45.70 -0.23 8.25 45.65

45.63 -0.02 7.73

46.82 -0.05 6.53 47.40

47.98 -0.02 7.67

48.08 -0.09 6.59 48.66

49.24 -0.05 6.80

TRL 15% 44.75 -0.15 6.85 44.71

44.67 -0.06 6.76

47.45 -0.00 5.46 46.63

46.12 -0.11 6.07

47.18 -0.07 6.00 47.63

48.09 -0.19 6.01

TRL 20% 46.10 -0.21 7.14 46.09

46.16 -0.30 7.44

44.76 -0.22 7.40 43.33

43.73 -0.35 7.65

43.19 -0.24 6.90 44.20

43.53 -0.23 7.56

TRL 25% 42.68 -0.23 6.21 42.76

42.90 -0.35 6.04

42.35 -0.29 6.12 41.46

42.63 -0.19 7.94

42.10 -0.67 6.52 41.17

40.42 -0.16 7.10

TRL 30% 40.75 -0.19 7.90 40.15

39.59 -0.24 7.08

44.19 -0.32 5.81 42.05

39.92 -0.34 6.38

44.72 -0.25 6.19 43.93

43.15 -0.35 6.40

134

Lampiran 33. Hasil ANOVA uji fisik kwetiau dengan penambahan tepung rumputlaut

1. Uji kekenyalan

ANOVAtekstur kekenyalan


Between Groups4196937931.19

96 699489655.200 6.918 .001

Within Groups1415527925.62

514 101109137.545

Total5612465856.82

320

Uji lanjuttekstur kekenyalan

Tukey HSD

sampel N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2

0% 3 12609.610015% 3 13131.813310% 3 17995.81335% 3 19631.156720% 3 31059.2667 31059.266725% 3 54152.646730% 3 57564.7833Sig. .096 .141

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets aredisplayed.a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.

2. Uji warna

ANOVAkroma



Uji lanjutkroma

Tukey HSD

sampel N Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2 3 4

30% 3 42.043325% 3 42.130020% 3 44.5400 44.540015% 3 46.373310 3 47.23675% 3 56.46000% 3 74.4633Sig. .408 .327 1.000 1.000

135

Lampiran 34. Hasil uji organoleptik kwetiau selama penyimpanan

1.Penyimpanan minggu IHasil uji hedonik terhadap kekenyalan kwetiau pada penyimpanan minggu I

Panelis Metode PenyimpananKering Beku

1 2 52 2 23 2 14 2 55 3 56 2 57 3 58 2 19 1 5

10 2 211 1 412 3 213 1 414 2 515 3 516 2 517 2 518 2 419 1 420 2 521 3 322 1 323 2 424 3 525 3 326 4 527 2 228 1 429 2 430 2 431 1 432 1 333 2 434 2 435 3 536 3 637 2 338 2 339 4 340 2 541 2 442 3 343 3 544 2 445 3 346 3 547 3 548 2 449 1 450 2 4

136

Hasil uji Hedonik warna kwetiau pada penyimpanan minggu IPanelis Metode Penyimpanan

Kering Beku1 3 32 2 23 1 14 3 45 2 26 2 27 3 28 2 29 2 1

10 2 211 2 212 3 313 1 114 2 515 3 616 3 317 3 318 3 219 3 220 3 221 4 522 3 623 3 324 2 225 2 226 1 127 3 428 4 429 3 530 4 431 2 332 3 333 2 234 4 435 4 436 3 337 2 438 3 339 3 440 3 341 2 242 4 443 2 344 4 545 2 546 3 347 2 548 3 349 3 450 4 4

laporan tugas akhir - repository.uph.edurepository.uph.edu/1449/9/bibliography.pdf · pengaruh...

Documents