Embed Size (px)
Banyak Perusahaan Tidak Mempunyai Standar Dokumentasi Pengembangan SoftwareApril 2, 2008 oleh Arry Akhmad Arman Bagaimanapun bentuknya, saya kira perusahaan-perusahaan besar pada umumnya mempunyai standar proses pengembangan software yang secara umum biasanya disebut SDLC (Software Development Life Cycle). Di beberapa perusahaan yang manajemen TI nya sudah mapan, SDLC tersebut biasanya diterapkan secara konsisten baik untuk pengembangan software oleh pihak internal, maupun pengembangan software yang melibatkan pihak eksternal (outsourcing). SDLC yang diterapkan secara ketat secara tidak langsung akan meningkatkan kualitas software yang dihasilkan. Bagian dari SDLC juga mensyaratkan adanya dokumentasi software yang baik. Apakah SDLC saja serta keberadaan dokumentasi software sudah cukup? Jawabannya biasanya baru diketahui setelah ada masalah-masalah berkaitan dengan software aplikasi yang sudah pernah dibuat. Beberapa permasalahan tipikal diantaranya adalah sebagai berikut: 1. Dokumentasi software ternyata tidak lengkap, ada bagian penting dari software yang tidak dijelaskan dengan cukup, sehingga sulit untuk memahaminya. 2. Format dan struktur dokumen berbeda-beda 3. Cara pemodelan berbeda-beda. Mungkin ada yang masih menggunakan flowchart + ER Diagram saja, ada yang menambahkan Data Flow Diagram (DFD), ada yang mencampur adukan UML dengan DFD, atau ada yang secara penuh sudah menerapkan UML. Permasalahan-permasalahan tersebut di atas akan menghambat tujuan-tujuan sebagai berikut: 1. Melakukan modifikasi software menjadi sulit dilakukan. Kadang perusahaan ingin melakukan modifikasi kecil dari software yang sudah dibuat dan sudah diluar masa garansi. Tapi sulit dilakukan karena hambatan dokumentasi. 2. Melakukan pengembangan lebih lanjut menggunakan vendor lain. Dokumentasi yang buruk, yang hanya dimengerti oleh pembuatnya saja, menyulitkan dipahami oleh pihak lain yang akan meneruskan pekerjaan tersebut. 3. Melakukan integrasi dengan aplikasi lain. Ketika sistem berkembang dan ada tuntutan integrasi, dokumentasi yang buruk mungkin akan menyulitkan untuk memahami struktur data, cara berkomunikasi data, apalagi kalau ada keperluan modifikasi algoritma untuk mencapai tujuan integrasi. Bagaimana solusinya? Sederhana! Buatlah standar (template) dokumentasi pengembangan software aplikasi di perusahaan anda. Standar dokumentasi berbeda dengan standar proses pengembangan (SDLC). Semua pengembangan software, baik yang dilakukan oleh pihak internal maupun cara outsource harus membuat dokumentasi sesuai standar tersebut. Hal yang harus diingat adalah:
Jangan membuat standar dokumentasi yang bentuknya tidak biasa. Saya sarankan untuk mengadopsi dari suatu standar, lalu lakukan penyesuaian minor. Untuk pemodelannya, saya menganjurkan untuk menggunakan UML secara penuh. Nah, kalau ini sudah tercapai, anda buka dokumen software manapun selalu sama bentuknya dan kelengkapannya cenderung lebih terjamin karena mengikuti template yang sudah ada. Semoga bermanfaat! Ditulis dalam Manajemen TI, Teknologi Informasi | Bertanda software, standar dokumentasi, standar dokumentasi pengembangan software, UML | 6 Komentar Suka Be the first to like this post.
1. pada April 2, 2008 pada 9:48 am | Balas
Tulisan artikel di blog Anda bagus-bagus. Agar lebih bermanfaat lagi, Anda bisa lebih mempromosikan dan mempopulerkan artikel Anda di infoGue.com ke semua pembaca di seluruh Indonesia. Salam Blogger! http://www.infogue.com/ http://www.infogue.com/bisnis_keuangan/banyak_perusahaan_tidak_mempunyai_sta ndar_dokumentasi_pengembangan_software/
2. pada April 2, 2008 pada 12:32 pm | Balas Identifikasi Ancaman dalam Disaster Recovery Jangan Terfokus Hanya Pada Bencana Alam | Sharing Vision [...] Artikel diambil dari sini, dari Blog Arry Akhmad [...]
3. pada April 2, 2008 pada 1:01 pm | Balas SW = program + data + dokumentasi Tepat sekali bu!
4. pada Desember 16, 2008 pada 8:45 pm | Balas
Buatlah standar (template) dokumentasi pengembangan software aplikasi di perusahaan anda. Standar dokumentasi berbeda dengan standar proses pengembangan (SDLC).?? standardnya apa ya?
5. pada Desember 17, 2008 pada 7:19 am | Balas
Arry Akhmad Arman
SDLC hanya menjelaskan siklus. Pengembangan yang menggunakan siklus yang sama bisa mempunyai cara mendokumentasikan yang berbeda-beda. MUngkin semuanya benar, tidak ada yang salah, tetapi itu akan menyulitkan bagi perusahaan yang sering melakukan outsource pengembangan aplikasi, karena style-nya berbedabeda. Standar dokumentasi adalah buku panduan standar menyajikan report pengembangan aplikasi, dalam hal ini untuk kemudahan perusahaan yang sering melakukan outsource. SDLC bisa dipilih yang manapun. Walaupun paling kuno, Waterfall masih sering digunakan, karena lebih memudahkan dari sisi manajemen proyek. Standar dokumentasi, sebaiknya simbol-simbolnya menggunakan UML dan diatur penulisannya dengan ketat.
6. pada Juli 22, 2010 pada 5:50 pm | Balas Maaf pak, punya contoh format dokumentasi yang baik? boleh saya minta? untuk dijadikan referensi. thanks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search
A sample Entity-relationship diagram using Chen's notation In software engineering, an entity-relationship model (ERM) is an abstract and conceptual representation of data. Entity-relationship modeling is a database modeling method, used to produce a type of conceptual schema or semantic data model of a system, often a relational database, and its requirements in a top-down fashion. Diagrams created by this process are called entity-relationship diagrams, ER diagrams, or ERDs. The definitive reference for entity-relationship modeling is Peter Chen's 1976 paper. However, variants of the idea existed previously, and have been devised subsequently.
1 Overview 2 The building blocks: entities, relationships, and attributes 3 Diagramming conventions o 3.1 Crow's Foot Notation 4 ER diagramming tools 5 See also 6 References 7 Further reading 8 External links
 OverviewThe first stage of information system design uses these models during the requirements analysis to describe information needs or the type of information that is to be stored in a
database. The data modeling technique can be used to describe any ontology (i.e. an overview and classifications of used terms and their relationships) for a certain area of interest. In the case of the design of an information system that is based on a database, the conceptual data model is, at a later stage (usually called logical design), mapped to a logical data model, such as the relational model; this in turn is mapped to a physical model during physical design. Note that sometimes, both of these phases are referred to as "physical design".
 The building blocks: entities, relationships, and attributes
Two related entities
An entity with an attribute
A relationship with an attribute
Primary key An entity may be defined as a thing which is recognized as being capable of an independent existence and which can be uniquely identified. An entity is an abstraction from the complexities of some domain. When we speak of an entity we normally speak of some aspect of the real world which can be distinguished from other aspects of the real world. An entity may be a physical object such as a house or a car, an event such as a house sale or a car service, or a concept such as a customer transaction or order. Although the term entity is the one most commonly used, following Chen we should really distinguish between an entity and an entity-type. An entity-type is a category. An entity, strictly speaking, is an instance of a given entity-type. There are usually many instances of an entity-type. Because the term entity-type is somewhat cumbersome, most people tend to use the term entity as a synonym for this term. Entities can be thought of as nouns. Examples: a computer, an employee, a song, a mathematical theorem. A relationship captures how two or more entities are related to one another. Relationships can be thought of as verbs, linking two or more nouns. Examples: an owns relationship between a company and a computer, a supervises relationship between an employee and a department, a performs relationship between an artist and a song, a proved relationship between a mathematician and a theorem. The model's linguistic aspect described above is utilized in the declarative database query language ERROL, which mimics natural language constructs.
Entities and relationships can both have attributes. Examples: an employee entity might have a Social Security Number (SSN) attribute; the proved relationship may have a date attribute. Every entity (unless it is a weak entity) must have a minimal set of uniquely identifying attributes, which is called the entity's primary key. Entity-relationship diagrams don't show single entities or single instances of relations. Rather, they show entity sets and relationship sets. Example: a particular song is an entity. The collection of all songs in a database is an entity set. The eaten relationship between a child and her lunch is a single relationship. The set of all such child-lunch relationships in a database is a relationship set. In other words, a relationship set corresponds to a relation in mathematics, while a relationship corresponds to a member of the relation. Certain cardinality constraints on relationship sets may be indicated as well.
 Diagramming conventionsEntity sets are drawn as rectangles, relationship sets as diamonds. If an entity set participates in a relationship set, they are connected with a line. Attributes are drawn as ovals and are connected with a line to exactly one entity or relationship set. Cardinality constraints are expressed as follows:
a double line indicates a participation constraint, totality or surjectivity: all entities in the entity set must participate in at least one relationship in the relationship set; an arrow from entity set to relationship set indicates a key constraint, i.e. injectivity: each entity of the entity set can participate in at most one relationship in the relationship set; a thick line indicates both, i.e. bijectivity: each entity in the entity set is involved in exactly one relationship. an underlined name of an attribute indicates that it is a key: two different entities or relationships with this attribute always have different values for this attribute.
Attributes are often omitted as they can clutter up a diagram; other diagram techniques often list entity attributes within the rectangles drawn for entity sets.
Two related entities shown using Crow's Foot notation Chen's notation for entity-relationship modeling uses rectangles to represent entities, and diamonds to represent relationships appropriate for first-class objects: they can have attributes and relationships of their own. Related diagramming convention techniques:
Bachman notation EXPRESS IDEF1X Martin notation (min, max)-notation of Jean-Raymond Abrial in 1974 UML class diagrams
 Crow's Foot Notation
Crow's Foot notation is used in Barker's Notation, SSADM and Information Engineering. Crow's Foot diagrams represent entities as boxes, and relationships as lines between the boxes. The ends of these lines are shaped to represent the cardinality of the relationship. Usage of Chen notation is more prevalent in the United States, while Crow's Foot notation is used primarily in the UK. Crow's Foot notation was used in the 1980s by the consultancy practice CACI. Many of the consultants at CACI (including Barker) subsequently moved to Oracle UK, where they developed the early versions of Oracle's CASE tools, introducing the notation to a wider audience. Crow's Foot notation is used by these tools: ARIS, System Architect, Visio, PowerDesigner, Toad Data Modeler, DeZign for Databases, Devgems Data Modeler, OmniGraffle, and MySQL Workbench. CA's ICASE tool, CA Gen aka Information_Engineering_Facility also uses this notation.
 ER diagramming toolsThere are many ER diagramming tools. Some free software ER diagramming tools that can interpret and generate ER models, SQL and do database analysis are MySQL Workbench (formerly DBDesigner), and Open ModelSphere (open-source). A freeware ER tool that can generate database and application layer code (webservices) is the RISE Editor. The Open Source Erviz takes a simple textual description of the ERD and then uses Graphviz to automatically produce a nice, if slightly spaced out, layout. Some of the proprietary ER diagramming tools are ARIS, Avolution, Aqua Data Studio, dbForge Studio for MySQL, DeZign for Databases, ER/Studio, Devgems Data Modeler, ERwin, MEGA International, ModelRight, OmniGraffle, Oracle Designer, PowerDesigner, Rational Rose, Sparx Enterprise Architect, SQLyog, System Architect, Toad Data Modeler, SQL Maestro, Microsoft Visio, Visible Analyst, and Visual Paradigm. Some free software diagram tools just draw the shapes without having any knowledge of what they mean, nor do they generate SQL. These include Gliffy, Kivio and Dia. DIA diagrams, however, can be translated with tedia2sql.
Database design is the process of producing a detailed data model of a database. This logical data model contains all the needed logical and physical design choices and physical storage parameters needed to generate a design in a Data Definition Language, which can then be used to create a database. A fully attributed data model contains detailed attributes for each entity. The term database design can be used to describe many different parts of the design of an overall database system. Principally, and most correctly, it can be thought of as the logical design of the base data structures used to store the data. In the relational model these are the tables and views. In an object database the entities and relationships map directly to object classes and named relationships. However, the term database design could also be used to apply to the overall process of designing, not just the base data structures, but also the forms and queries used as part of the overall database application within the database management system (DBMS).
The process of doing database design generally consists of a number of steps which will be carried out by the database designer. Usually, the designer must:
Determine the relationships between the different data elements. Superimpose a logical structure upon the data on the basis of these relationships.
1 ER Diagram (Entity-relationship model) 2 The Design Process 3 Determining data to be stored 4 Normalization 5 Types of Database design o 5.1 Conceptual schema o 5.2 Logically structuring data o 5.3 Physical database design 6 See also 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External links
 ER Diagram (Entity-relationship model)
A sample Entity-relationship diagram Database designs also include ER(Entity-relationship model) diagrams. An ER diagram is a diagram that helps to design databases in an efficient way.
Attributes in ER diagrams are usually modeled as an oval with the name of the attribute, linked to the entity or relationship that contains the attribute. Within the relational model the final step can generally be broken down into two further steps, that of determining the grouping of information within the system, generally determining what are the basic objects about which information is being stored, and then determining the relationships between these groups of information, or objects. This step is not necessary with an Object database.
 The Design ProcessThe design process consists of the following steps: 1. Determine the purpose of your database - This helps prepare you for the remaining steps. 2. Find and organize the information required - Gather all of the types of information you might want to record in the database, such as product name and order number. 3. Divide the information into tables - Divide your information items into major entities or subjects, such as Products or Orders. Each subject then becomes a table. 4. Turn information items into columns - Decide what information you want to store in each table. Each item becomes a field, and is displayed as a column in the table. For example, an Employees table might include fields such as Last Name and Hire Date. 5. Specify primary keys - Choose each tables primary key. The primary key is a column that is used to uniquely identify each row. An example might be Product ID or Order ID. 6. Set up the table relationships - Look at each table and decide how the data in one table is related to the data in other tables. Add fields to tables or create new tables to clarify the relationships, as necessary. 7. Refine your design - Analyze your design for errors. Create the tables and add a few records of sample data. See if you can get the results you want from your tables. Make adjustments to the design, as needed. 8. Apply the normalization rules - Apply the data normalization rules to see if your tables are structured correctly. Make adjustments to the tables.
 Determining data to be storedIn a majority of cases, a person who is doing the design of a database is a person with expertise in the area of database design, rather than expertise in the domain from which the data to be stored is drawn e.g. financial information, biological information etc. Therefore the data to be stored in the database must be determined in cooperation with a person who does have expertise in that domain, and who is aware of what data must be stored within the system. This process is one which is generally considered part of requirements analysis, and requires skill on the part of the database designer to elicit the needed information from those with the domain knowledge. This is because those with the necessary domain knowledge frequently cannot express clearly what their system requirements for the database are as they are
unaccustomed to thinking in terms of the discrete data elements which must be stored. Data to be stored can be determined by Requirement Specification.
 NormalizationMain article: Database normalization In the field of relational database design, normalization is a systematic way of ensuring that a database structure is suitable for general-purpose querying and free of certain undesirable characteristicsinsertion, update, and deletion anomaliesthat could lead to a loss of data integrity. A standard piece of database design guidance is that the designer should create a fully normalized design; selective denormalization can subsequently be performed, but only for performance reasons. However, some modeling disciplines, such as the dimensional modeling approach to data warehouse design, explicitly recommend non-normalized designs, i.e. designs that in large part do not adhere to 3NF.
 Types of Database designThis section does not cite any references or sources.Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2010)
 Conceptual schemaMain article: Conceptual schema Once a database designer is aware of the data which is to be stored within the database, they must then determine where dependancy is within the data. Sometimes when data is changed you can be changing other data that is not visible. For example, in a list of names and addresses, assuming a situation where multiple people can have the same address, but one person cannot have more than one address, the name is dependent upon the address, because if the address is different, then the associated name is different too. However, the other way around is different. One attribute can change and not another. (NOTE: A common misconception is that the relational model is so called because of the stating of relationships between data elements therein. This is not true. The relational model is so named because it is based upon the mathematical structures known as relations.)
 Logically structuring dataOnce the relationships and dependencies amongst the various pieces of information have been determined, it is possible to arrange the data into a logical structure which can then be mapped into the storage objects supported by the database management system. In the case of relational databases the storage objects are tables which store data in rows and columns. Each table may represent an implementation of either a logical object or a relationship joining one or more instances of one or more logical objects. Relationships between tables may then
be stored as links connecting child tables with parents. Since complex logical relationships are themselves tables they will probably have links to more than one parent. In an Object database the storage objects correspond directly to the objects used by the Object-oriented programming language used to write the applications that will manage and access the data. The relationships may be defined as attributes of the object classes involved or as methods that operate on the object classes.
 Physical database designThe physical design of the database specifies the physical configuration of the database on the storage media. This includes detailed specification of data elements, data types, indexing options and other parameters residing in the DBMS data dictionary. It is the detailed design of a system that includes modules & the database's hardware & software specifications of the system.