cover_fix skripsi print

HUBUNGAN ANTARA INKLINASI INSISIF BAWAH TERHADAP BIDANG MANDIBULA DAN GARIS ESTETIK

WAJAH(Studi pada Populasi Jawa Mahasiswa Universitas Airlangga)

SKRIPSI

Oleh:

IYANDA VEMALA

NIM: 021011157

FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN GIGI

UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA BHMN

SURABAYA

i

2013

LEMBAR PENGESAHAN

HUBUNGAN ANTARA INKLINASI INSISIF BAWAH TERHADAP BIDANG MANDIBULA DAN GARIS ESTETIK

WAJAH

SKRIPSI

Diajukan Sebagai Salah Satu Syarat Untuk Menyelesaikan Pendidikan Dokter

Gigi di Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Airlangga

Oleh :

IYANDA VEMALA

NIM: 021011157

Pembimbing Utama Pembimbing Serta

ii

Jusuf Sjamsudin, drg., Sp.Ort (K) Dr. Ida Bagus Narmada,drg.,SpOrt.(K)

NIP. 195411261979011001 NIP. 195601071981031003

KATA PENGANTAR

Puji syukur penulis panjatkan ke hadirat Allah Yang Maha Kasih atas segala

rahmat dam karuniaNya sehingga penulis dapat menyelesaikan skripsi ini dengan

judul “Hubungan antara Inklinasi Insisif Bawah terhadap Bidang Mandibula dan

Garis Estetik Wajah”.

Dalam penulisan skripsi ini, penulis telah banyak mendapat bantuan,

bimbingan, saran maupun ide dan masukan serta pengarahan dari berbagai pihak.

Oleh karena itu dalam kesempatan ini penulis ingin mengucapkan terimakasih

sedalam-dalamnya kepada kedua orangtua serta keluarga yang sudah memberikan

motivasi, doa, bimbingan, perhatian, serta kasih sayang yang selalu tercurah

selama ini.

Ungkapan terimakasih yang sebesar-besarnya saya ucapkan kepada Jusuf

Sjamsudin,drg.,Sp.Ort(K) selaku dosen pembimbing I dan Dr. Ida Bagus

Narmada,drg.,SpOrt.(K) selaku dosen pembimbing II yang telah meluangkan

waktu dan bersedia membimbing serta mengararahkan penulis di dalam

menyelesaikan penulisan skripsi ini dengan baik.

Terimakasih yang sebesar-besarnya kepada seluruh staf pengajar dan pegawai

Departemen Ortodonti Universitas Airlangga yang telah memberikan saran dan

bantuan dalam menyempurnakan skripsi ini. Tidak lupa saya ucapkan terimakasih

kepada Dr. I.G.A. Wahju Ardani,drg.,M.Kes.,Sp.Ort; Achmad

iii

Sjafei,drg.,M.S.,Sp.Ort Prof. Dr. Mieke Sylvia A.R.,drg.,M.S.,Sp.Ort;

Ervina,drg.,Sp.Ort serta Daniel Haryono, drg., Sp. Ort yang turut serta

membimbing dalam penulisan skripsi.

Ucapan terimakasih sebesar-besarnya kepada Adithya Agung Winoto yang

telah membantu memberi semangat dan doa selama 1 tahun 3 bulan dan

seterusnya, serta ungkapan terimakasih sebangga-bangganya kepada sahabat

tercinta, Dina Swasti Prihatini, Small Ainy Fitri, Amel Rihanna, Salma Nur Hijab

Damayanti, Princess Intan dan Frinta, Dii, Nia, Lilis, Ranti, Komting 2013 serta

teman-teman terbaik yang sudah memberikan waktu dan tenaganya untuk

membantu penulis serta dukungan melalui doa dan pesan moril yang menguatkan.

Akhirnya penulis mengucapkan banyak terimakasih kepada semua pihak

yang telah turut membantu terselesaikannya skripsi ini dan memohon maaf

apabila ada kesalahan selama penyusunan skripsi. Oleh karena itu kritik dan saran

sangat penulis harapkan demi perbaikan – perbaikan ke depan.

Surabaya, Desember 2013

Penulis,

Iyanda Vemala

iv

DAFTAR ISI

Halaman Judul............................................................................................................ i

Lembar Pengesahan...................................................................................................ii

Kata Pengantar........................................................................................................... iii

Daftar Isi..................................................................................................................... v

Daftar Tabel............................................................................................................... vii

Daftar Gambar............................................................................................................ viii

BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN....................................................................................... 1

1.1 Latar Belakang..................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Rumusan Masalah................................................................................................ 4

1.3 Tujuan Penelitian................................................................................................. 4

1.4 Manfaat Penelitian............................................................................................... 5

BAB 2 TINJAUAN PUSTAKA.............................................................................. 6

2.1 Inklinasi Insisif Bawah terhadap Bidang Mandibula........................................

6

2.2 Bibir...................................................................................................................... 8

2.3 Radiografi Sefalometri......................................................................................... 9

2.4 Analisis Jaringan Lunak Wajah........................................................................... 11

v

2.5 Analisis Menurut Ricketts.................................................................................... 12

2.6 Suku Jawa............................................................................................................. 13

BAB 3 KERANGKA KONSEPTUAL...................................................................... 15

3.1 Penjelasan Kerangka Konsep............................................................................... 16

BAB 4 METODE PENELITIAN............................................................................... 17

4.1 Jenis Penelitian..................................................................................................... 17

4.2 Lokasi Penelitian.................................................................................................. 17

4.3 Waktu Penelitian.................................................................................................. 17

4.4 Subjek Penelitian.................................................................................................. 17

4.5 Sampel.................................................................................................................. 17

4.5.1 Kriteria Sampel................................................................................................. 17

4.5.2 Cara Pengambilan Sampel................................................................................ 18

4.6 Variabel dan Definisi Operasional ...................................................................... 18

4.6.1 Variabel Penelitian............................................................................................ 18

4.6.2 Definisi Operasional Variabel........................................................................... 18

4.7 Bahan dan Alat Penelitian.................................................................................... 19

4.8 Cara Kerja............................................................................................................ 19

4.9 Analisis Data Hasil Penelitian.............................................................................. 21

4.10 Alur Penelitian................................................................................................... 23

BAB 5 HASIL PENELITIAN ..................................................................................24

BAB 6 PEMBAHASAN ...........................................................................................28

BAB 7 KESIMPULAN .............................................................................................34

vi

DAFTAR PUSTAKA……….................................................................................... ix

LAMPIRAN............................................................................................................... xii

........................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................

........................................................................................................................BAB 7 KESIMPULAN

34

DAFTAR TABEL

5.1 Pengukuran < L1 pada subyek laki-laki dan perempuan dengan uji t

berpasangan......................................................................................................... 24

5.2 Pengukuran Ls– E line dan Li– E line pada subyek laki-laki dan perempuan

dengan uji t berpasangan .................................................................................... 25

5.3 Hasil uji Kolmogorov-smirnov ...................................................................... 26

5.4 Hubungan antara <L1 ; Ls- E line ; dan Li- E line menggunakan uji korelasi

Pearson ............................................................................................................... 26

vii

DAFTAR GAMBAR

2.1 Sudut Inklinasi Insisif Bawah........................................................................... 7

2.2 Tweed’s Triangle.............................................................................................. 8

2.3 Sefalogram Frontal............................................................................................ 10

2.4 Sefalogram Lateral............................................................................................ 11

2.5 Titik – titik Analisis Jaringan Lunak................................................................. 12

2.6 Analisis Ricketts................................................................................................ 13

5.1 Ukuran < L1 pada subyek laki-laki dan perempuan......................................... 24

5.2 Ukuran Ls–E line dan Li–E line pada subyek laki-laki dan perempuan..........

25

viii

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

A.Al-Tamimy, Ebtisam. The reliability of Rickett’s Analysis Using Cephalometric Tracing on Iraqi Sample Aged 8-10 Year. Mustansiria DJ. 2006; 3(2): 1-10.

Agha, Ne'am F et al. Correlation of Incisors Inclination and Position with Facial Profile. Al – Rafidain Dent J; 2011; 11(1): 154-160.

Arnett, G. William. Original Article: Soft Tissue Cephalometric Analysis: Diagnosis and Treatment Planning of Dentofacial Deformitiy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116(3): 239-253.

Arrietta, Rr. Ratna., Mindya Yuniatuti., & Lakshmi A. Leepel. Rahang dan Gigi Sebagai Saran Identifikasi Forensik untuk Menentukan Ras, Umur, dan Jenis Kelamin. IJD. 2003; 13(2): 99-102.

Asad, Saad. et al. Assesment of Antero-Posterior Position of Lips E-Line S-Line. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2011; 31(1): 84-87.

ix

Bhattarai, P dan RM Shrestha. Tweeds analysis of Nepalese people. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011; 13(2): 103-106.

Cumba Morán, Aracely. Comparative Analysis of Final Inclination of Incisors After Space Closure. a Comparison between Sliding and Translation Mechanical Techniques. Revista Odontológica Mexicana. 2012; 16(3)3: 159-163.

D. Viazis, Anthony. Atlas of Orthodontics Principles and Clinical Applications. USA: W.B.Saunders. 1993; p. 47-48.

Foster, T.D. Buku Ajar Ortodonsi. Jakarta: EGC. 1997; p. 17.

Ghaleb, Nathalie et al. Aesthetic Evaluation of Profile Incisor Inclination. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010; 33: 228–235.

Hashim, Abdallah Hayder et al. Soft Tissue Profile Analysis between Two Different Ethnic Groups: A Comparative Study. The journal of temporary dental practice. 2003; 4(2): 1-9.

Heryumani, JCP. Profil wajah orang jawa dewasa berdasarkan proporsi hidung, bibir dan dagu. Jakarta: IJD. 2006; 13(3): 148-152.

Heryumani, JCD. Proporsi Sagital Wajah Laki-Laki dan Perempuan Dewasa Etnik Jawa. M.I Kedokteran Gigi. 2007. 22(1): 22-27.

Houston, W.J.B. Diagnosis Ortodonti. Jakarta: EGC. 1993; p. 59.

Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry from Basics To 3-D Imaging, 2nd Edition. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. 2006; p. 33-125.

Jonas, Rio dan Hamilah D. Koesoemahardja. Peran Genetik pada kelainan dentofasial. MIKG. 2005; 20(60): 89-93.

Kokich, Vincent O et al. Perceptions of Dental Professionals and Lay Persons to Altered Dental Esthetics:Asymmetric and Symmetric Situations. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2006; 130(2): 141-151.

Korrodi A. The Use of Model Templates for Class ii Treatment. http://orthocj.com/2001/09 (mei 07.2013).

Kuramae, Mayury et al. Analysis of Tweed’s Facial Triangle in Black Brazilian Youngsters with Normal Occlusion. Braz J Oral Sci. 2004; 3: 401-403.

Q. Closs, Luciane. Changes in Lower Incisor Inclination and The Occurrenceo of Gingival Recession. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2009; 14(4): 66-73.

x

http://orthocj.com/2001/09

Quartana, Ira Rahmayani., Prihandini., & Pinandi Sri Pudyani. Hubungan Antara Perubahan Kecembungan Profil Skeletal dan Jaringan Lunak Wajah pada Pasien Bimaksilar Protrusif. J. Ked. Gigi. 2010; 1(3): 192-198.

R. Al-Labban, Yasir. A Cephalometric Lips Analysis and Its Relation to OtherCephalometric Measurements in Iraqi Adult Individuals. J Bagh College Dentistry. 2011; 23(3): 156-159.

Rahardjo, Pambudi. Diagnosis Ortodontik. Surabaya: AUP. 2011; p. 40-41.

Rahardjo, Pambudi. Ortodonsi Dasar. Surabaya: UAP. 2012; p. 14-34.Singh, Gurkerat. Textbook of Orthodontics, 2nd edition. New Delhi: Jaypee. 2007; p. 119.

Susilowati. Hubungan Antara Sudut Interinsisal dengan Derajat Konveksitas Profil Haringan Lunak Wajah pada Suku bugis dan Makassar. Dentika Dental Journal. 2009; 14(2): 125-128.

Walianto, Surwandi. Berbagai Macam Metode untuk mendapatkan Gambar Sefalogram Digital. MIKG. 2005; 20(63); 146-153.

Yusra, Yohana., Widhayanti D., & Widijanto Sudana. Evaluasi Jaringan Lunak Fasial Finalis Abang-None Jakarta 2002. M.I Kedokteran gigi. 2005; 59: 5-13.

Zen, Yuniar. Pola Hubungan Antara Konfeksitas, Posisi Gigi Insisivus, dan Posisi bibir dalam Analisi Ricketts. M.I. Kedokteran gigi. 2003; 63: 160-168.

xi

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1

Hasil Analisis StatistikT-Test

Group Statistics

22 20,0455 1,52682 ,32552

42 19,7143 1,31197 ,20244

SexL

P

UmurN Mean Std. Deviation

Std. ErrorMean

Independent Samples Test

,503 ,481 ,906 62 ,368 ,33117 ,36542 -,39929 1,06163

,864 37,511 ,393 ,33117 ,38333 -,44518 1,10752

Equal variancesassumed

Equal variancesnot assumed

UmurF Sig.

Levene's Test forEquality of Variances

t df Sig. (2-tailed)Mean

DifferenceStd. ErrorDifference Lower Upper

95% ConfidenceInterval of the

Difference

t-test for Equality of Means

NPar Tests

xii

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

64 64 64 64 64 64

-1,6266 -1,6478 -,6755 -,6755 94,4281 94,6094

2,02715 1,99091 2,11146 2,03984 6,49123 7,06122

,143 ,152 ,101 ,114 ,090 ,072

,143 ,152 ,101 ,078 ,090 ,072

-,107 -,122 -,096 -,114 -,050 -,062

1,145 1,219 ,811 ,913 ,719 ,574

,145 ,103 ,527 ,375 ,679 ,897

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Normal Parameters a,b

Absolute

Positive

Negative

Most ExtremeDifferences

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

Ls = E line 1 Ls = E line 2 Li = E line 1 Li = E line 2 < L1 1 < L1 2

Test distribution is Normal.a.

Calculated from data.b.

General Linear Model

Between-Subjects Factors

L 22

P 42

1,00

2,00

SexValue Label N

Descriptive StatisticsSex Mean Std. Deviation N

Ls – E line L P Total

-.6000-2.1643-1.6266

2.110861.780582.02715

2242

Li – E line L p Total

.2068-1.1376

-.6755

2.287151.880082.11146

2242

<L1 L P Total

93.072795.138194.4281

5.635536.853956.49123

2242

Multivariate Testsb

1,000 1E+009a 9,000 54,000 ,000

,000 1E+009a 9,000 54,000 ,000

2E+008 1E+009a 9,000 54,000 ,000

2E+008 1E+009a 9,000 54,000 ,000

,586 8,499a 9,000 54,000 ,000

,414 8,499a 9,000 54,000 ,000

1,416 8,499a 9,000 54,000 ,000

1,416 8,499a 9,000 54,000 ,000

Pillai's Trace

Wilks' Lambda

Hotelling's Trace

Roy's Largest Root

Pillai's Trace

Wilks' Lambda

Hotelling's Trace

Roy's Largest Root

EffectIntercept

Sex

Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig.

Exact statistica.

Design: Intercept+Sexb.

Total

T-Test

xiii

Paired Samples Test

2,09844 12,10226 1,51278 -,92462 5,12149 1,387 63 ,170

-,87500 4,53732 ,56717 -2,00839 ,25839 -1,543 63 ,128

,18125 4,01287 ,50161 -,82114 1,18364 ,361 63 ,719

-,02125 ,52175 ,06522 -,15158 ,10908 -,326 63 ,746

,00000 ,54397 ,06800 -,13588 ,13588 ,000 63 1,000

,18125 4,01287 ,50161 -,82114 1,18364 ,361 63 ,719

,73328 4,69947 ,58743 -,44061 1,90717 1,248 63 ,217

,21469 1,68601 ,21075 -,20647 ,63584 1,019 63 ,312

,51875 5,08837 ,63605 -,75229 1,78979 ,816 63 ,418

-,00266 ,09143 ,01143 -,02549 ,02018 -,232 63 ,817

FMA2 - FMA1Pair 1

FMIA2 - FMIA1Pair 2

IMPA2 - IMPA1Pair 3

Ls = E line 2 - Ls = E line 1Pair 4

Li = E line 2 - Li = E line 1Pair 5

< L1 2 - < L1 1Pair 6

TAFH2 - TAFH1Pair 7

UAFH2 - UAFH1Pair 8

LAFH2 - LAFH1Pair 9

% 2 - % 1Pair 10

Mean Std. DeviationStd. Error

Mean Lower Upper


Difference

Paired Differences

t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Laki-laki

T-Test

xiv

Paired Samples Statistics

30,9297 64 11,55761 1,44470

28,8313 64 7,08667 ,88583

55,8672 64 5,40667 ,67583

56,7422 64 5,87434 ,73429

94,6094 64 7,06122 ,88265

94,4281 64 6,49123 ,81140

-1,6478 64 1,99091 ,24886

-1,6266 64 2,02715 ,25339

-,6755 64 2,03984 ,25498

-,6755 64 2,11146 ,26393

94,6094 64 7,06122 ,88265

94,4281 64 6,49123 ,81140

114,2413 64 7,87397 ,98425

113,5080 64 7,37688 ,92211

52,4022 64 3,07146 ,38393

52,1875 64 2,96272 ,37034

61,8397 64 6,46498 ,80812

61,3209 64 5,67494 ,70937

,8542 64 ,09273 ,01159

,8569 64 ,07451 ,00931

FMA2

FMA1

Pair1

FMIA2

FMIA1

Pair2

IMPA2

IMPA1

Pair3

Ls = E line 2

Ls = E line 1

Pair4

Li = E line 2

Li = E line 1

Pair5

< L1 2

< L1 1

Pair6

TAFH2

TAFH1

Pair7

UAFH2

UAFH1

Pair8

LAFH2

LAFH1

Pair9

% 2

% 1

Pair10

Mean N Std. DeviationStd. Error

Mean


34,3636 22 17,14169 3,65462

28,2500 22 8,19807 1,74783

57,0227 22 7,04489 1,50197

58,6818 22 6,82877 1,45590

92,7045 22 7,07049 1,50743

93,0727 22 5,63553 1,20150

-,6823 22 2,10741 ,44930

-,6000 22 2,11086 ,45004

,1032 22 2,14088 ,45644

,2068 22 2,28715 ,48762

92,7045 22 7,07049 1,50743

93,0727 22 5,63553 1,20150

120,8468 22 6,85931 1,46241

120,3545 22 5,93276 1,26487

54,9432 22 2,76159 ,58877

54,2973 22 2,73120 ,58229

65,9045 22 6,94328 1,48031

66,0577 22 5,10046 1,08742

,8445 22 ,12550 ,02676

,8273 22 ,07376 ,01572

FMA2

FMA1

Pair1

FMIA2

FMIA1

Pair2

IMPA2

IMPA1

Pair3

Ls = E line 2

Ls = E line 1

Pair4

Li = E line 2

Li = E line 1

Pair5

< L1 2

< L1 1

Pair6

TAFH2

TAFH1

Pair7

UAFH2

UAFH1

Pair8

LAFH2

LAFH1

Pair9

% 2

% 1

Pair10


Mean

Paired Samples Test

6,11364 19,18328 4,08989 -2,39176 14,61903 1,495 21 ,150

-1,65909 5,24719 1,11870 -3,98556 ,66738 -1,483 21 ,153

-,36818 3,77288 ,80438 -2,04098 1,30462 -,458 21 ,652

-,08227 ,41328 ,08811 -,26551 ,10096 -,934 21 ,361

-,10364 ,64256 ,13699 -,38853 ,18126 -,757 21 ,458

-,36818 3,77288 ,80438 -2,04098 1,30462 -,458 21 ,652

,49227 6,56036 1,39867 -2,41643 3,40097 ,352 21 ,728

,64591 1,68958 ,36022 -,10321 1,39503 1,793 21 ,087

-,15318 7,23933 1,54343 -3,36292 3,05656 -,099 21 ,922

,01727 ,13163 ,02806 -,04109 ,07563 ,616 21 ,545

FMA2 - FMA1Pair 1

FMIA2 - FMIA1Pair 2

IMPA2 - IMPA1Pair 3



< L1 2 - < L1 1Pair 6

TAFH2 - TAFH1Pair 7

UAFH2 - UAFH1Pair 8

LAFH2 - LAFH1Pair 9

% 2 - % 1Pair 10


Mean Lower Upper


Difference

Paired Differences


Perempuan

T-Test

xv


29,1310 42 6,71643 1,03637

29,1357 42 6,51680 1,00556

55,2619 42 4,29014 ,66198

55,7262 42 5,10524 ,78776

95,6071 42 6,93131 1,06953

95,1381 42 6,85395 1,05759

-2,1536 42 1,74744 ,26964

-2,1643 42 1,78058 ,27475

-1,0833 42 1,88422 ,29074

-1,1376 42 1,88008 ,29010

95,6071 42 6,93131 1,06953

95,1381 42 6,85395 1,05759

110,7812 42 5,95746 ,91926

109,9217 42 5,22134 ,80567

51,0712 42 2,30445 ,35558

51,0824 42 2,45509 ,37883

59,7105 42 5,10102 ,78710

58,8398 42 4,22081 ,65128

,8593 42 ,07121 ,01099

,8724 42 ,07091 ,01094

FMA2

FMA1

Pair1

FMIA2

FMIA1

Pair2

IMPA2

IMPA1

Pair3

Ls = E line 2

Ls = E line 1

Pair4

Li = E line 2

Li = E line 1

Pair5

< L1 2

< L1 1

Pair6

TAFH2

TAFH1

Pair7

UAFH2

UAFH1

Pair8

LAFH2

LAFH1

Pair9

% 2

% 1

Pair10


Mean

Paired Samples Test

-,00476 4,83594 ,74620 -1,51175 1,50222 -,006 41 ,995

-,46429 4,12664 ,63675 -1,75024 ,82167 -,729 41 ,470

,46905 4,14802 ,64005 -,82357 1,76166 ,733 41 ,468

,01071 ,57251 ,08834 -,16769 ,18912 ,121 41 ,904

,05429 ,48417 ,07471 -,09659 ,20516 ,727 41 ,472

,46905 4,14802 ,64005 -,82357 1,76166 ,733 41 ,468

,85952 3,44151 ,53104 -,21293 1,93197 1,619 41 ,113

-,01119 1,65944 ,25606 -,52831 ,50593 -,044 41 ,965

,87071 3,54574 ,54712 -,23422 1,97565 1,591 41 ,119

-,01310 ,06038 ,00932 -,03191 ,00572 -1,405 41 ,167

FMA2 - FMA1Pair 1

FMIA2 - FMIA1Pair 2

IMPA2 - IMPA1Pair 3



< L1 2 - < L1 1Pair 6

TAFH2 - TAFH1Pair 7

UAFH2 - UAFH1Pair 8

LAFH2 - LAFH1Pair 9

% 2 - % 1Pair 10


Mean Lower Upper


Difference

Paired Differences


xvi

Lampiran 2

Foto Profil Wajah

xvii

Correlations

1 ,828** -,111 -,105 -,046 -,029

,000 ,382 ,409 ,721 ,823

64 64 64 64 64 64

,828** 1 -,099 -,110 -,136 -,123

,000 ,435 ,386 ,283 ,332

64 64 64 64 64 64

-,111 -,099 1 ,966** ,827** ,783**

,382 ,435 ,000 ,000 ,000

64 64 64 64 64 64

-,105 -,110 ,966** 1 ,845** ,817**

,409 ,386 ,000 ,000 ,000

64 64 64 64 64 64

-,046 -,136 ,827** ,845** 1 ,966**

,721 ,283 ,000 ,000 ,000

64 64 64 64 64 64

-,029 -,123 ,783** ,817** ,966** 1

,823 ,332 ,000 ,000 ,000

64 64 64 64 64 64

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

Pearson Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed)

N

< L1 1

< L1 2

Ls = E line 1

Ls = E line 2

Li = E line 1

Li = E line 2

< L1 1 < L1 2 Ls = E line 1 Ls = E line 2 Li = E line 1 Li = E line 2

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).**.

Foto Siluet

Tracing Sefalometri

xviii

cover_fix skripsi print

Documents