3_12_13_bakris

Upload: juliana-feron

Post on 03-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    1/39

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    2/39

    J NC V

    Optimal110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    180

    190200

    210

    220

    J NC BP Classifications: SBP

    J NC I. JAMA. 1977;237:255-261.J NC II.Arch Intern Med. 1980;140:1280-1285.

    J NC III.Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:1047-1057.

    J NC IV.Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:1023-1038.J NC V.Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:154-183.J NC VI.Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2413-2446.

    J NC 7. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-2572.

    J NC I J NC II J NC III J NC IV J NC VI

    Border- l ine

    ISH

    Stage 1 Stage 1

    Stage 2

    Stage 3

    High-normal

    High-normal

    NormalNormal

    Optimal

    SBP(mm Hg)

    Normal

    Border- l ine

    ISH

    Stage 4

    No recommendations

    for SBP in JNC I

    or JNC II

    J NC 7

    Stage 1

    Stage 2

    Prehyper-tension

    Normal

    Stage 3

    Stage 2

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    3/39

    J NC BP Classifications: DBP

    80

    85

    90

    95100

    105

    110

    115120

    125

    130

    J NC I J NC II J NC III J NC IV J NC V J NC VI

    Considertherapy

    Hyper-tensive

    Mild Mild Mild

    Stage 1 Stage 1

    Moderate Moderate Moderate

    Stage 2

    Severe Severe SevereStage 3 Stage 3

    Stage 2

    Stage 4

    High-normal

    High-normal

    High-normal

    High-normal

    Normal Normal Normal Normal

    Optimal

    DBP(mm Hg)

    Optimal

    J NC 7

    Stage 1

    Stage 2

    Prehyper-tension

    Normal

    J NC I. JAMA. 1977;237:255-261.J NC II.Arch Intern Med. 1980;140:1280-1285.

    J NC III.Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:1047-1057.

    J NC IV.Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:1023-1038.J NC V.Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:154-183.J NC VI.Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2413-2446.

    J NC 7. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-2572.

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    4/39

    JNC 8 is not just JNC 7 Retooled or Repainted ,

    but Imploded and Reconstructed

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    5/39

    National High Blood Pressure

    Education ProgramCoordinating Committee

    American Academy of Family Physicians

    American Academy of Neurology

    American Academy of Ophthalmology

    American Academy of Physician AssistantsAmerican Association of Occupational Health Nurses

    American College of Cardiology

    American College of Chest Physicians

    American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

    American College of Physicians

    American Society of Internal Medicine

    American College of Preventive MedicineAmerican Dental Association

    American Diabetes Association

    American Dietetic Association

    American Heart Association

    American Hospital Association

    American Medical Association

    American Nurses AssociationAmerican Optometric Association

    American Osteopathic Association

    American Pharmaceutical Association

    American Podiatric Medical Association

    American Public Health Association

    American Red Cross

    American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

    American Society of Hypertension

    American Society of Nephrology

    Association of Black CardiologistsCitizens for Public Action on High Blood Pressure and Cholesterol, Inc.

    Hypertension Education Foundation, Inc.

    International Society on Hypertension in Blacks

    National Black Nurses Association, Inc.

    National Hypertension Association, Inc.

    National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

    National Medical AssociationNational Optometric Association

    National Stroke Association

    NHLBI Ad Hoc Committee on Minority Populations

    Society for Nutrition Education

    The Society of Geriatric Cardiology

    Federal Agencies:

    Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services

    Department of Veterans Affairs

    Health Resources and Services Administration

    National Center for Health Statistics

    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

    National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    6/39

    National High Blood Pressure

    Education ProgramCoordinating Committee

    American Academy of Family Physicians

    American Academy of Neurology

    American Academy of Ophthalmology

    American Academy of Physician AssistantsAmerican Association of Occupational Health Nurses

    American College of Cardiology

    American College of Chest Physicians

    American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

    American College of Physicians

    American Society of Internal Medicine

    American College of Preventive MedicineAmerican Dental Association

    American Diabetes Association

    American Dietetic Association

    American Heart Association

    American Hospital Association

    American Medical Association

    American Nurses AssociationAmerican Optometric Association

    American Osteopathic Association

    American Pharmaceutical Association

    American Podiatric Medical Association

    American Public Health Association

    American Red Cross

    American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

    American Society of Hypertension

    American Society of Nephrology

    Association of Black CardiologistsCitizens for Public Action on High Blood Pressure and Cholesterol, Inc.

    Hypertension Education Foundation, Inc.

    International Society on Hypertension in Blacks

    National Black Nurses Association, Inc.

    National Hypertension Association, Inc.

    National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

    National Medical AssociationNational Optometric Association

    National Stroke Association

    NHLBI Ad Hoc Committee on Minority Populations

    Society for Nutrition Education

    The Society of Geriatric Cardiology

    Federal Agencies:

    Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services

    Department of Veterans Affairs

    Health Resources and Services Administration

    National Center for Health Statistics

    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

    National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    7/39

    J NC 7 Algorithm for Treatment of Hypertension

    Not at Goal Blood Pressure (100 mmHg)

    2-drug combination for most (usuallythiazide-type diuretic and

    ACEI, or ARB, or BB, or CCB)

    Stage 1 Hypertension(SBP 140159 or DBP 9099 mmHg)

    Thiazide-type diuretics for most.May consider ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB,

    or combination.

    Without Compelling

    Indications

    Not at Goal

    Blood Pressure

    Optimize dosages or add additional drugsuntil goal blood pressure is achieved.

    Consider consultation with hypertension specialist.

    J NC 7. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-2572.

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    8/39

    J NC 7 Compelling Indications

    BB, beta blocker; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker;CCB, calcium channel blocker; AA, aldosterone antagonist; HF, Heart Failure;MI, myocardial infarction; CAD, coronary artery disease; DM, diabetes mellitus

    J NC 7. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-2572.

    Heart Failure

    Post MI

    CAD risk

    Diabetes Mellitus

    Renal disease

    Recurrent strokeprevention

    BB

    ACEI

    ARB

    CCB

    AADiuretic

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    9/39

    ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Hierarchical Grading System

    ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Hierarchical Grading SystemClass I

    ( Useful &

    Effective )

    (Benefit >>>risk)(Highly

    recommended)

    Class II

    ( Conflicting Evidence )

    Class III

    (Not useful/

    effective, may

    be harmful )(No benefit/Harm)(Not

    recommended)

    IIa

    (Benefit >>risk)(Reasonably

    recommended)

    IIb

    (Benefit ?risk)

    (May be

    considered)

    Level A

    (Multiplerandomized

    clinical trials)

    Level B(Single

    randomized trial

    ornonrandomized

    studies

    Level C(Consensus

    opinion, case

    studies, orstandard of care)

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    10/39

    Scientific Evidence Underlying the

    ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines Among ACC/AHA guidelines updated by Sept. 2008:

    48% increase (1330 to 1973) in # of recommendationsoccurred, the largest # being Class II (conflictingevidence)

    Of 16 current guidelines with level of evidence recs:

    12% (314/2711) are Level A (multiple RCTs)46% (1246/2711) are Level C (expert opinion, no

    RCTs)

    Only 9% (245/2711) are Class I and Level A

    Increased Resources($) are needed to fund trialssupporting guideline development

    Tricoci, et al. JAMA. 2009; 301: 831 - 841

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    11/39

    Update clinical recommendations on BP, cholesterol, and obesity

    Use systematic evidence review process

    Use evidence & recommendations grading Standardize & coordinate approaches Develop consistent recommendations for lifestyle & risk

    assessment

    Create integrated CV risk reduction recommendations Individual risk factor guidelines + lifestyle and risk assessment

    + additional CVD risk reduction approaches

    Develop comprehensive approach to implementation

    Write guidelines clearly so they are implementable Address patient, clinician, and systems levels Develop and disseminate materials & tools Develop an evidence-based implementation plan

    Establish a National Program to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk

    NHLBI Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines

    New Directions

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    12/39

    NHLBI Systematic Review and

    Guideline Development Process

    Literature Searched;Eligible Studies

    Identified

    Studies Quality Rated;Data Abstracted

    Evidence Tables

    Developed;

    Body of Evidence

    Summarized

    External Review

    of Recommendation

    Drafts; Revisedas Needed

    GuidelinesDisseminated &

    Implemented

    Graded Evidence

    Statements &

    Recommendations

    Developed

    Expert PanelSelected

    Topic Area

    Identified

    Critical Questions&Study Eligibility

    Criteria Identi fied

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    13/39

    NHLBI Evidence Quality Rating and

    Recommendation Strength

    Evidence Quality

    High Well-designed andconducted RCTs

    Moderate RCTs with minor limitations

    Well-conductedobservational studies

    Low RCTs with major limitations

    Observational studies withmajor limitations

    Recommendation Strength

    A Strong

    B Moderate

    C Weak

    D Against

    E Expert Opinion

    N No Recommendation

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    14/39

    JNC 2013:

    Initial Question Areas Being Addressed Among adults, does treatment with antihypertensive

    pharmacological therapy to a specific BP goal lead to

    improvements in health outcomes? (how low shouldyou go)

    Among adults with hypertension, does initiating

    antihypertensive pharmacological therapy at specific BPthresholds improve health outcomes? (when to initiatedrug treatment)

    In adults with hypertension, do various antihypertensive

    drugs or drug classes differ in comparative benefits andharms on specific health outcomes? (How do we getthere?)

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    15/39

    Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria for Studies

    Randomized Controlled trials

    1966-present

    Minimum one year follow-up

    Studies with samples size

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    16/39

    JNC 2013:

    Initial Question Areas Being Addressed

    (how low should you go) N=56

    (when to initiate drug treatment) N=26

    (How do we get there?) N=66

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    17/39

    BP Level-How Low to go General population

    Elderly

    Kidney Disease

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    18/39

    2013 BP Guideline Goal

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    19/39

    ONTARGET: Relationships Between

    Outcome Risks and In-Trial BP

    J-shaped curve (nadir 130 mm Hg) for primary outcomea, MI, CV mortality (not st roke) Continual risk increase (no J-shaped curve) for stroke Suggests increased risk of events in patients with extensive vascular disease when BP is

    decreased below a cr itical level

    Ad

    justed4.5-yRisk

    ofEvents(%

    )

    In-treatment SBP, deciles (mmHg)

    Sleight P, et al. J Hypertens. 2009;27:1360-1369.

    HR,

    95%ConfidenceInterval

    Primary study outcome

    a

    Composite of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, orhospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF).

    112 121 126 130 133 136 140 144 149 161

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    20/39

    Weber M et.al. submitted Am J Med.

    CV outcomes from the ACCOMPLISH trial

    16.3

    8.6

    9.6

    5.1

    9.9

    5.3

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    Primary Endpoint

    Death/MI/stroke/revascularization

    All-causemortality

    Outcome(%)

    SBP > 140 mmHg

    SBP 130140 mmHg

    SBP < 130 mmHg

    OUTCOMES: (MI, stroke, revascularization, all-cause mortality)

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    21/39

    ACCF/AHA 2011 Expert Consensus

    Document on Hypertension in theElderly

    A Report of the American College of CardiologyFoundation Task Force on Expert ConsensusDocuments

    Aronow W et.al. JACC 2011;57:2037-2114

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    22/39

    Percentage of People in Outcome Trials of the

    Elderly Taking > 2 Antihypertensive Medication

    STONE (147 mmHg)

    MRCelderly (153 mmHg)

    EWPHE (151 mmHg)Australian HTN (142 mmHg)

    INVEST (136 mm Hg)

    ALLHAT (138 mm Hg)

    ACCOMPLISH (131 mmHg)

    STOP2 (151 mmHg)

    SYSTChina (not reported)

    SystEur (151 mmHg)

    HYVET (138 mmHg)

    CONVINCE (136 mmHg)SHEP (146 mmHg)

    LIFE (143 mmHg)

    Trial/SBP Achieved

    %patientsN=14 studies;43% >2 drugs

    ACC Guidelines in Elderly 2011- J ACC 2011

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    23/39

    Major Take Home Message of Elderly

    Guidelines-Management1) Original goal by evidence

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    24/39

    BP level and CKD

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    25/39

    Composite Ranking for Relative Risks by glomerularfi ltration rate (GFR) and Albuminuria (Kidney Disease:

    Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2009

    25

    Levey AS et.al. Kidney Int 2010; doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.483

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    26/39

    RiskofcoronaryeventsinpeoplewithCKDcompared

    with

    diabetes:

    a

    population

    level

    cohort

    study

    Tonelli Met.al.TheLancet2012;380:807812;Polonsky&BakrisLancet2012;380:783785

    NHANES20032006

    48monthFU

    N=1,268,029

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    27/39

    AssociationsofCKDwithmortalityandendstagerenaldisease

    inindividualswithandwithouthypertension:ametaanalysis

    Mahmoodi Ket.al.LancetSept24 2012 Ref.pt.=eGFR95withouthypertension

    Interaction

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    28/39

    Steno-2: Intensive Multiple Risk FactorManagement

    Cardiovascular Events

    Years of Follow-up

    No. at RiskIntensive therapy 80 72 65 61 56 50 47 31Conventional therapy 80 70 60 46 38 29 25 14

    Intensive

    Therapy

    Conventional

    Therapy

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13CumulativeI

    ncidenceofAny

    Cardiovasc

    ularEvent(%

    )

    0

    1

    0

    2

    0

    30

    4

    0

    5

    0

    6

    0

    70

    8

    0

    HR=0.41; p< 0.001

    Absolute RR= 29%HR for TotalMortality: 0.54;p=0.02Absolute RR= 20%

    Gaede P, et al. NEJM. 2008;358:580-591.

    Ch i S l t d Ri k F t d i th

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    29/39

    Changes in Selected Risk Factors during theInterventional Study and Follow-up Period (13.3 years).

    Gde P et al. N Engl J Med 2008;358:580-591.

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    30/39

    WhatistheGoalBPandInitialTherapyinKidneyDiseaseorDiabetestoReduceCVRisk?

    * Indicates use with d iuretic

    GroupGoal BP

    (mmHg)Initial Therapy

    ADA(2012)

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    31/39

    SBP=systolic blood pressure. *Target blood pressure control groups in ACCORD defined as

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    32/39

    Blood Pressure Targets in Chronic Kidney

    Disease: Proteinuria as an Effect Modifier 3 RCTs (8 reports) with a total of 2272 participants

    MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease)

    Study

    AASK (African American Study of Kidney Disease

    and Hypertension) Trial

    REIN-2 (Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy 2) trial

    2- to 4-year trial follow-up

    Upadhyay A, et al. Annals Intern Med 3/2011

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    33/39

    G id t KDIGO G d

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    34/39

    GuidetoKDIGOGrades

    GRADE PATIENTS CLINICIANS POLICY

    1

    WeRecommend

    Mostpeopleinyour

    situationwouldwantthe

    recommendedcourseof

    actionandonlyafew

    wouldnot.

    Mostpatients

    shouldreceivetherecommended

    courseofaction.

    The

    recommendation

    canbeevaluatedas

    acandidatefor

    developingapolicy

    oraperformance

    measure.

    2

    WeSuggestThemajorityofpeoplein

    yoursituationwould

    wanttherecommended

    courseofaction,but

    manywouldnot.

    Differentchoiceswill

    beappropriatefor

    differentpatients.

    Eachpatientneedshelptoarriveata

    management

    decisionconsistent

    withherorhisvalues

    andpreferences.

    Thereisaneedfor

    substantialdebate

    andinvolvement

    ofstakeholders.

    I m p l i c a t i o n s

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    35/39

    Grade Qualityof

    Evidence

    Meaning

    A High Weareconfidentthatthetrueeffectliesclosetothatoftheestimateofthe

    effect.

    B Moderate Thetrueeffectislikelytobeclosetotheestimateoftheeffect,butthereisa

    possibilitythatitissubstantially

    different.

    C Low Thetrueeffectmaybesubstantially

    differentfromtheestimateoftheeffect.

    D VeryLow Theestimateofeffectisveryuncertain

    and

    often

    will

    be

    far

    from

    the

    truth.

    GuidetoKDIGOGrades

    KDIGO BP G id li 2012

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    36/39

    KDIGO BP Guidelines 2012-BLOODPRESSUREMANAGEMENTINCKDWITHOUTDIABETES WerecommendthatnondiabeticadultswithCKDandurine

    albuminexcretion140mmHgduringsystoleor>90mmHgduringdiastolebetreatedwithBPloweringdrugstomaintainaBPthat

    isconsistently 140mmHgsystolicand 90mmHgdiastolic.

    GRADE1B

    WesuggestthatnondiabeticadultswithCKDandwithurine

    albuminexcretionof30to300mg/24h(orequivalent*)whose

    officeBPisconsistently>130mmHgduringsystoleor>80mmHg

    duringdiastolebetreatedwithBPloweringdrugstomaintainaBPthatisconsistently 130mmHgsystolicand 80mmHg

    diastolic.

    GRADE2D

    Kidney Int Suppl Dec 2012

    KDIGO BP G id li 2012 OO SS

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    37/39

    KDIGO BP Guidelines 2012-BLOODPRESSUREMANAGEMENTINCKDWITHOUTDIABETES WesuggestthatnondiabeticadultswithCKDandurine

    albuminexcretion>300mg/24h(orequivalent*)whoseoffice

    BP

    is

    consistently

    >130

    mm

    Hg

    during

    systole

    or

    >80

    mm

    Hg

    duringdiastolebetreatedwithBPloweringdrugstomaintaina

    BPthatisconsistently 130mmHgsystolicand 80mmHg

    diastolic.

    GRADE2C

    WesuggestthatanARBorACEIbeusedasfirstlinetherapyin

    nondiabeticadultswithCKDandwithurinealbuminexcretion

    of30to300mg/24h(orequivalent*)inwhomtreatmentwithBPloweringdrugsisindicated.

    GRADE2D

    Kidney Int Suppl Dec 2012

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    38/39

    Initial Combinations of Medications*

    Thiazide-Like Diuretics

    ACE inhibitorsor

    ARBs

    Calciumantagonists

    * Compelling indications may modify this.

    -blockers should be included in the regimen ifthere is a compelling indication for a -blocker

  • 7/28/2019 3_12_13_bakris

    39/39

    Conclusion (my opinion) The BP for everyone will be 60- 20/10

    mmHg above goal