central bureau of statistics (bps) noted: the total of...

1 | P a g e BTN Hartaco Indah Blok IV AD No.2 Parang Tambung Makassar, SULSEL, Tlp: 0411-869092

Jl. Pondok Kelapa Raya Rukan Medical Blok E Kav. 7 Pondok Kelapa, Jakarta Timur-13450,

INDONESIA, email : [email protected], www.eit-indonesia.org

Proposal of Humanity Program -- EIT INDONESIA

2017

Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) noted:

The total of poverty Indonesians is 28.01

million or 10.86 percent in March 2016

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.eit-indonesia.org/





CONTENS : A. INTRODUCTION 3 B. HOW TO DEFINE A POVERTY LINE 3 C. CLASSIFICATION OF TARGETING 4 D. SCALE OF TARGETING 4 E. IDENTIFICATION OF THE POVERTY 5 F. THE POVERTY LINE 6

G. PROGRAM HUMANITARIAN AID IN THE FORM OF CARDS EITI -5 YEARS 9

1. DEFINITIONS 9

1.1. CARDS EITI 9

1.2. GROCERY 9

1.3. AGENCY EITI 9

1.4. OFFICER POPULATION EITI 10

1.5. FUNCTION 10

1.6. TARGET 10

1.7. CALCULATION 10

2. HOW TO DATA: 11 3. TOTAL POVERTY POPULATION IN INDONESIA 2016 12

H. PROFILE EIT INDONESIA 13 I. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGs) 15 J. SUMMARY EIT INDONESIA 17 K. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOVEMBER 2016 – MARCH 2017 18







A. INTRODUCTION Poverty targeting, defined as the use of policy instruments to channel resources to a target group identified below an agreed national poverty line, is used by all governments in Asia in one form or another, either to ‘protect’ the poor from adverse shocks or ‘promote’ their long-run move out of poverty. Such measures typically include reaching the poor with credit, food, employment, access to health and other social facilities and occasionally cash transfers. The EIT Indonesia has conducted surveys of the experiences with poverty targeting in anumber of large economies in South Asia (India), South East Asia (Thailand, Philippines and Indonesia) as well as in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). In some of these countries poverty targeting has a relatively lengthy history stemming from longstanding social welfare concerns (India and to some extent the Philippines and PRC), whilst elsewhere it originated principally in the late 1990’s in response to the impact of the regional Financial Crisis (Thailand and Indonesia). Errors of targeting can in principle arise for several reasons: inaccurate specification of who are in fact poor; poorly designed programs that do not reach the target group even if it is known accurately; and poor governance in the implementation of schemes so that benefits leak to the non-poor. Since targeting has been widely used over the past two decades there is now a relatively long record of experience that can be surveyed. Experiences in the five case-study countries suggest that errors have been very significant, leakage rates have been high and many of the poor have not been covered, with the implication that in some cases these programs have had only a minor impact on poverty reduction. One cannot conclude from this, however, that no special efforts should be made to promote or protect the poor, rather that the impact and costeffectiveness of all schemes need to be reviewed regularly.

B. HOW TO DEFINE A POVERTY LINE

Let us assume that we have chosen a measure of household well-being - say consumption expenditure. The next step is to choose a poverty line. Households whose consumption expenditure falls below this line are considered to be poor. Following common practice, the poor are defined as those who lack command over basic consumption needs, including food and non-food components. Thus, the poverty line, thus, is obtained by specifying a consumption bundle considered adequate for basic consumption needs and then by estimating the cost of these basic needs. In other words, the poverty line may be thought of as the minimum expenditure required by an individual to fulfill his or her basic food and non-food needs. Once we have computed a household’s consumption, we need to determine whether that amount places the household “in poverty”, or defines the household as “poor”. The threshold that we use for this is the poverty line. The poverty line defines the level of consumption (or income) needed for a household to escape poverty.







It is sometimes argued that the notion of a poverty line implies a distinct “turning point” in the welfare function. That is, by rising from just below to just above the poverty line, households (and individuals therein) move from considerable misery to an adequate minimum amount of well-being. However, given that well-being follows a continuum, and given how arbitrary the choice of poverty line is, the notion of such a “turning point” is not very compelling. A corollary is that it may make sense to define more than one poverty line. For example, one common approach is to define one poverty line that marks households that are "poor," and another lower level that indicates those that are "extremely poor." Another approach is to construct a “food poverty line,” which is based on some notion of minimum amount of money a household needs to purchase some basic-needs food bundle and nothing more. If the cost of basic non-food needs is estimated, then the food poverty line added to the non-food needs will equal the overall poverty line.

C. CLASSIFICATION OF TARGETING Measures to reach the poor can be classified in different ways. For example:

• Targeting by activity, such as primary health care and primary education, where it is established that the distribution of benefits tends to be progressive. It has become commonplace to argue that these types of activity should have priority over for example urban hospitals or higher education on the grounds of the lower uptake of such services by the poor. This has been termed ‘broad targeting’, as compared with narrower forms of targeting that attempt to identify the poor more precisely.

• Targeting by indicator, where alternatives to income, that are expected to be correlated with poverty, are used to identify the poor. These can include lack of, or size of, ownership of land, form of dwelling, and type of household, for example number of children or gender of the head of family.

• Targeting by location, where area of residence becomes the criteria for identifying the target group, as a particular form of indicator targeting. Poor area programs, where all residents are assumed to be poor, have become relatively common and, for example, were a central element in poverty reduction initiatives in PRC.

• Targeting by self-selection or self-targeting, where programs are designed to be attractive only to the poor. An example is employment creation or ‘workfare’, where payment is either in cash or in food, at equivalent wage rates that are below market-clearing levels and therefore only of interest to those with no opportunity to work at the market wage. Another self-selection procedure is the subsidization of low quality foodstuffs (like high-broken rice).

D. SCALE OF TARGETING

The scale of resource devoted to targeting is important not just in assessing the overall impact of such expenditures on the poor, but also in terms of the potential trade-off between poverty alleviation and economic growth. In most countries, however, the scale of public poverty focused expenditures has not been large enough to raise the issue of a potential or actual trade-off. India is the country with the longest record of povertyfocused







interventions and of our cases the one where such expenditures appear to have taken the highest share of the budget of central and state or local governments. Estimation of total expenditure on poverty-targeted programs in India is difficult because of the variety of schemes and the range of financing whether at the central, state or district level. Excluding fertilizer subsidies, which are not explicitly targeted at poor farmers, it is estimated that the largest targeted programs were about 11 % of the central government expenditure and 2% of GDP. If fertilizer subsidies are treated as poverty targeted interventions the proportions rise to 15% and 3%, respectively. Indonesia is the other case where poverty targeted expenditures took close to 10% of central government expenditure. The maximum estimate is for around 9% at the peak of these programs in the late 1990’s in the immediate aftermath of the Financial Crisis, although the figure has probably declined significantly since then. In other countries the proportions taken by these activities in central government expenditure are estimated to be much lower: around 5% in PRC over most of the period since the mid-1980s, somewhere between 3% and 5% in 2000 in Thailand (depending upon whether or not the education loans program is included as a poverty targeting expenditure) and no more than 1.5% in the Philippines in the immediate pre-Financial Crisis period. With the exception of India, none of these programs seems large enough to suggest a major diversion of resources away from directly productive activities and hence a tradeoff with growth objectives.

E. IDENTIFICATION OF THE POVERTY

Apart from self-targeting and the use of broad targeting -- that focuses on particular categories of activities rather than their users -- other forms of targeting, by definition, require inclusion and exclusion criteria, so that the poor can be separated from the nonpoor. However, collecting accurate data on household income or consumption is difficult. The use of modern ‘poverty mapping’ techniques, which combine data from household surveys (that allow a link between consumption levels and various household characteristics) with data from population censuses that collect detailed location-based data on households, is very recent for our country cases. Hence in practice up to very recently all of the countries used approximate indicators for identifying the poor; for example various basic need measures or rough estimates of average income in a particular village or larger geographic unit. In India there was a serious effort in the 1990s at administrative identification of the poor as a means of targeting the food and other subsidies from the public distribution system. As income estimates were uncertain, other additional criteria included housing conditions, number of family earners, land access and ownership of livestock and consumer durables. State governments had the responsibility for identifying the poor, although the process was slow and incomplete and even where surveys were undertaken identification cards were not provided to a significant number of poor families.







In Indonesia, receipt of food subsidies was determined by the classification scheme of the National Family Planning Coordinating Board, which covers households across the archipelago. This classified households into a number of categories on the basis of criteria including food consumption patterns, access to health care and possession of alternative sets of clothing. Village-based programs were also an important part of targeted poverty measures in Indonesia. Here poor villages were designated using a scoring system covering social and economic characteristics, including infrastructure, housing and population. Classification of a village as poor (‘neglected’) was based on its position relative to the provincial average and a subjective assessment from a field inspection by local officials. By this twin approach, 31% of villages in the country were classed as neglected in 1993. In PRC geographic targeting has been the key approach (until 2001) with poor counties being the basic units for central government poverty reduction funds. Although originally when the poor county designation system was initiated in 1986 the aim was to base this on average per capita income of rural residents, this came to be superseded by other criteria, with counties in areas of revolutionary bases and minority communities, as well as pastoral areas, receiving the ‘poor’ designation despite the fact that their income per capita was well above the initial norm. In 2001 the focus shifted from ‘poor county’ to ‘poor village’ designation, so that in principle poor villages could receive poverty funding even if they were not located within a poor county. Poor village designation was carried out using a weighted poverty index generated by the scores under various indicators: including grain production, cash income per person year; housing quality and access to potable water, electricity and all weather roads. In Thailand, poverty estimates have traditionally been based on income and expenditure data from the Socio-Economic Survey of the National Economic and Social Development Board. In principle regional targeting of poverty funds should have been important, but in practice there was only a very weak correlation between provincial incomes and the allocation of central government expenditure. In the Philippines, again location targeting was significant with priority provinces identified for most schemes; within these provinces the most depressed districts (barangays) were to be the main beneficiaries. Where feasible poverty was defined in terms of unmet basic needs (in terms of shelter, health and education, for example). Where data were unavailable, local social workers were consulted in the identification of the poor. More recent initiatives, combine a location targeting approach with poverty mapping within provinces. Within provinces the poorest 25% of municipalities are selected using a poverty map. All districts within the chosen municipalities can receive funds.

F. THE POVERTY LINE

The poverty threshold, poverty limit or poverty line is the minimum level of income deemed

adequate in a particular country. In practice, like the definition of poverty, the official or

common understanding of the poverty line is significantly higher in developed countries

(with HDI of under than 0.700 score) than in developing countries.







In 2008, the World Bank came out with a figure (revised largely due to inflation) of $1.25 at

2005 purchasing-power parity (PPP). In October 2015, the World Bank updated the

international poverty line to $1.90 a day. The new figure of $1.90 is based on ICP purchasing

power parity (PPP) calculations and represent the international equivalent of what $1.90

could buy in the US in 2011. The new IPL replaces the $1.25 per day figure, which used 2005

data. Most scholars agree that it better reflects today's reality, particularly new price levels

in developing countries.The common international poverty line has in the past been roughly

$1 a day. At present the percentage of the global population living under extreme poverty is

likely to fall below 10% according to the World Bank projections released in 2015.

Determining the poverty line is usually done by finding the total cost of all the essential

resources that an average human adult consumes in one year. The largest of these expenses

is typically the rent required to live in an apartment, so historically, economists have paid

particular attention to the real estate market and housing prices as a strong poverty line

affector. Individual factors are often used to account for various circumstances, such as

whether one is a parent, elderly, a child, married, etc. The poverty threshold may be

adjusted annually.

Absolute poverty is the level of poverty as defined in terms of the minimal requirements

necessary to afford minimal standards of food, clothing, health care and shelter. For the

measure to be absolute, the line must be the same in different countries, cultures, and

technological levels. Such an absolute measure should look only at the individual's power to

consume and it should be independent of any changes in income distribution. The intuition

behind an absolute measure is that mere survival takes essentially the same amount of

resources across the world and that everybody should be subject to the same standards if

meaningful comparisons of policies and progress are to be made. Notice that if everyone's

real income in an economy increases, and the income distribution does not change,

absolute poverty will decline.

Measuring poverty by an absolute threshold has the advantage of applying the same

standard across different locations and time periods: it makes comparisons easier. On the

other hand, it suffers from the disadvantage that any absolute poverty threshold is to some

extent arbitrary; the amount of wealth required for survival is not the same in all places and

time periods. For example, a person living in far northern Scandinavia requires a source of

heat during colder months, while a person living on a tropical island does not.

This type of measure is often contrasted with measures of relative poverty (see below),

which classify individuals or families as "poor" not by comparing them to a fixed cutoff

point, but by comparing them to others in the population under study.

The term absolute poverty is also sometimes used as a synonym for extreme poverty.

Absolute poverty is the absence of enough resources to secure basic life necessities.







According to a UN declaration that resulted from the World Summit on Social Development

in Copenhagen in 1995, absolute poverty is "a condition characterised by severe deprivation

of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health,

shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to

services."

David Gordon's paper, "Indicators of Poverty & Hunger", for the United Nations, further

defines absolute poverty as the absence of any two of the following eight basic needs:

Food: Body Mass Index must be above 16.

Safe drinking water: Water must not come solely from rivers and ponds, and

must be available nearby (less than 15 minutes' walk each way).

Sanitation facilities: Toilets or latrines must be accessible in or near the home.

Health: Treatment must be received for serious illnesses and pregnancy.

Shelter: Homes must have fewer than four people living in each room. Floors

must not be made of dirt, mud, or clay.

Education: Everyone must attend school or otherwise learn to read.

Information: Everyone must have access to newspapers, radios, televisions,

computers, or telephones at home.

Access to services: This item is undefined by Gordon, but normally is used to

indicate the complete panoply of education, health, legal, social, and financial

(credit) services.

For example, a person who lives in a home with a mud floor is considered severely deprived

of shelter. A person who never attended school and cannot read is considered severely

deprived of education. A person who has no newspaper, radio, television, computer, or

telephone is considered severely deprived of information. All people who meet any two of

these conditions – for example, they live in homes with mud floors and cannot read – are

considered to be living in absolute poverty.

The term "Absolute Poverty" is slightly misleading when defined in this manner, as there are

great numbers of people who have none of these eight basic needs met, but are still

grouped with those who lack only 2.







G. PROGRAM HUMANITARIAN AID IN THE FORM OF CARDS EITI -5 YEARS

FACILITIES OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES HUMANITARIAN PROGRAM

Donors will provide Humanitarian Grants Program Facility (WHF) to cooperate with the EIT

Indonesia Bulog, Bank BRI, BNI, Indo Wholesale to provide humanitarian facilities to the

population throughout the region in Indonesia.

1. DEFINITIONS

1.1. CARDS EITI

• EITI Card is a card issued / made by the Bank, the card is distributed to the poor in

Indonesia, which has entered the age of productive between the ages of 17 years s /

d infinite.

• Each person / citizen gets EITI card containing cash amounting to 1 million rupiah,

which is given every month for Humanity Program 5-year term.

• Cards can be redeemed at Agencies EITI in each village respectively.

• Every citizen who already have cards EITI can directly take the groceries in Agency

EITI, which is located in a village.

1.2. GROCERY

Staple food stands Nine Staples, namely nine kinds of basic needs of society, especially in

Indonesia. According to the decision of the Minister of Industry and Trade no. 115 / MPP /

Kep / 2/1998 dated February 27, 1998, the Ninth ingredients are:

1. rice and sago

2. sugar

3. vegetables and fruits

4. beef and chicken

5. cooking oil and margarine

6. milk

7. corn

8. kerosene or LPG gas

9. iodized salt

1.3. AGENCY EITI

• Agency EITI is GROCERY Distributors, who have a place to accommodate GROCERY,

each Agency EITI given a maximum ration of 500 residents.

• EITI Agencys appointed by the Head of EITI province.

• Agency EITI has the task, namely: Distributing GROCERY (Nine Basic Materials)

• EITI Agencys are required to have a bank account designated Implementing WHF

Program, point to transaction GROCERY, and Agency EITI profit from transactions

each month.

• Agency Card Machine EITI received from a designated bank, and got GROCERY from

BULOG and Indo Wholesale, according to the needs of citizens who already

allocated.







• Agency EITI ascertained own facilities Card Machine, which serves to store data and

purchase transactions, every citizen who shop in Agency EITI processed cards in card

machine is automatically saved in the database

1.4. OFFICER POPULATION EITI

• Each Chief Officer Population EITI must provide data - population data (Identity Card)

to the Central Board of EIT Indonesia Banking, so that the data of the population will

be made by the Bank EITI card designated by donors.

• Once the card is complete EITI, the EITI card immediately ready to be distributed to

residents by the Population Officer EITI.

• Head of the Population Officer EITI should coordinate and establish Agency EITI

Agency in every village throughout the province.

• Before implementation, the chief officer EITI population accompanied by a Bank

officer, and the officer nor the Indo Wholesale Bulog must implement EITI Card

socialization to residents throughout the area.

• Each month the Chief Officer is required to provide population EITI EITI Reports

Agency activities as Distributor GROCERY to the Central Board of EIT Indonesia

Finance. And HR - Program.

1.5. FUNCTION

• Bank Function: To make the EITI Card plus Card Machine

• Function Bulog: To provide Cheap Rice

• Indo Wholesale Function: To provide nine basic commodities with low price / affordable

1.6. TARGET

INDONESIA EAST REGION • PAPUA 469 963 POPULATION-OFFICERS MELKIAS IMMANUEL RUNTUBOY, STH • WEST SULAWESI 95 211 POPULATION-OFFICERS BAHARUDIN MARE • SOUTH SULAWESI 65 696 POPULATION-OFFICERS RAMLI SAMAD • SOUTHEAST SULAWESI 94 624 POPULATION-OFFICERS RAMLAN, SH • MALUKU 54 063 POPULATION-OFFICERS SOSIMUS FATUBUN, S.PD • NORTH MALUKU 3,442 POPULATION-OFFICERS MARTHA F. FANGHOY, S.SOS • NORTH EAST NUSA 741 POPULATION-OFFICERS AGATA OME • BANTEN 698 POPULATION-OFFICERS HARIS ROHMAN NURHAKIM

784 438 TOTAL POPULATION

1.7. CALCULATION

Humanitarian Program Facility (WHF) which is planned to last approximately 5 years, the

Pilot Projoect Humanitarian expected amenities as the basic reference for the

implementation of the UN Declaration on Human Rights for the Living. The calculation of the

value of the fund / budget of Grants planned for: every citizen / person gets Rp.1.000.000, -

per month for 5 years multiplied by 784 436 people / population of eastern Indonesia:

Assumption :







Rp.1.000.000, - x 784 438 x 12 x 5 = Rp.47,066,280.000.000, -

(Forty-seven trillion Sixty-Six Billion Two Hundred Eighty Million)

Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) noted:

The number of poor Indonesians is 28.01 million or 10.86 percent in March 2016

BPS data records the poor:

1. MALUKU AND PAPUA 21.98 percent (1.55 million people)

2. BALI AND NUSA TENGGARA 14.72 percent (2.11 million people)

3. SULAWESI 10.97 percent (2.09 million people)

4. JAVA 10.09 percent (14.83 million people)

5. SUMATRA 11.03 percent (6.21 million people)

6. KALIMANTAN 6.45 percent (0.97 million people)

In suppressing the poverty rate and the gap the government provides a number of programs

to the community that is realized with the provision of the Village Fund. Data from the

Ministry of Finance as of December 23, 2016, the government has disbursed as much as

681.4 trillion rupiahs

2. HOW TO DATA: 1. EIT Indonesia officers with special duties to register the poor must coordinate with Civil Records or Village Heads who keep the database of the poor. EIT Indonesia Officers must introduce themselves to the Head of Civil Records or Village Heads by explaining that we are the EIT Indonesia Data Assistants who are on humanitarian missions as a form of EIT Indonesia participation that actively participates in assisting the government in reducing poverty in Indonesia. By way of seeking Fund Assistance from world organizations, such as the UN, Foundation / Foundation in Europe, USA and others. The data of the poor are indispensable as one of the main conditions, to complement the Fund Assistance Search proposal. The data is a photo copy of ID card (BW / Color) of the poor. So Indonesian EIT Officers do not have to go to people's homes, or no longer need to collect poor people, except EIT Officers Indonesia who have enough funds to give money of 10 thousand / 5 thousand to citizens who want to give photo copy / scan ID. It is prohibited to charge any fees to the poor, under the pretext of administration fees and so on. Indonesian EIT Officers are prohibited from promising or liquefying the Fund Disbursement, the Indonesian EIT Officer only explains that: "We are the EIT Assignment Officer in charge of collecting ID cards of the poor for Humanitarian Survey. 2. Data or photocopy of KTP (BW / Color) of the poor who have been collected by Indonesian EIT Officers should be reported to the Central Data Section, as they will be scanned and included in the database. If an Indonesian EIT Officer residing away from the EIT Indonesia Data Center Headquarters, then it can be done online and sending via email.







3. TOTAL POVERTY POPULATION IN INDONESIA 2016







H. PROFILE EIT INDONESIA

That based on the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights set forth in 30 Articles, is a Human Rights Platform agreed upon by the state of the world, where each country is obliged and accountable to its people in order to have a decent, prosperous, secure, comfortable life And peaceful. To implement the 30 Articles, the world's institutions agreed to create a humanitarian program, one of which originated from the European Parliament named EIT Europe, has successfully coordinated World Humanitarian Ambassadors spread over the world to provide information on the World Human Facilitation Program, World Human Facility (WHF) to governments in their respective countries, so that human rights about decent living can be realized and enjoyed by its citizens. In connection with this Humanitarian Program activity, one of the European EIT representatives has appointed and appointed EIT Humanitarian Ambassadors worldwide including in Indonesia. For that reason the presence of World Human Faculty Humanitarian Ambassadors (WHF) adopted from the UN Declaration on Human Rights, is expected to cooperate with the Indonesian government. In accordance with the ideals and objectives of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is to build a just, prosperous and prosperous Indonesian society based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution; That the people of Indonesia as human beings of God and part of a civilized human being, uphold human rights, religious values, democracy, law, and cultural values living in indigenous and tribal peoples, and have the right to enjoy the results of development Reasonable; Whereas the system of government of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia according to the 1945 Constitution recognizes and respects special or special regional government units regulated by law; And also in accordance with ILO Convention No. K.169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples that Must Be Protected and In accordance with the Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, the State recognizes and respects the unity of indigenous and tribal peoples as long as they are alive and in accordance with the development of society and The principle of the Unitary State of the Republic. EIT INDONESIA The European EIT Representative serves as:

• Representative of IET (Institut Europeen Technoloy) based in Brussels, Residence Palace UN - 155 rue de la Loi BE-1040;

• Coordinator of Ambassadors - Humanitarian Ambassadors WHF Special Programs in Indonesia.

• Independent Institution in cooperation with the Government of Indonesia, in order to realize the WHF Program (World Human Facility) in Indonesia.

EIT INDONESIA as an Institution domiciled in Indonesia functions:

1. Organizing Seminars, Conferences and Meetings in order to provide information about the WHF Program (World Human Facility) to all levels of Indonesian society.







2. Holding Early Childhood Education Kindergarten, Primary, Junior High School, High School to Higher Education.

3. Delivering Sports Development. 4. Establishing Hospitals, Polyclinics, Ministry Services, Shelters, Refugee Shelters

Human Rights and the Environment. 5. Establish House of Worship, Medical Center, Orphan Orphanage, Nursing Home and

Maintenance of Taman Makam. 6. Delivering Social Assistance. 7. Establishing Training and Skills Courses. 8. Managing the Heritage of Culture and Tourism 9. Managing Youth Activities, sports and art. 10. Assisting People's Economy, Cooperatives, Agriculture, Plantation, Animal

Husbandry, Freshwater Fishing and Fishing Water Links. The concept of sustainable development and social responsibility are often used interchangeably. Sustainable development refers to economic, social and environment for all people, while social responsibility refers to the responsibility of the organization to the community and the environment. So when an organization or a legal entity decides to undertake and fulfill its social responsibility, the overall goal is to contribute to sustainable development (Rosenfeld and Martínez. ISOfocus) The presence of Indonesian EIT very precisely in order to succeed on Sustainable Development in Indonesia, is an independent law firm that is partnering with the government, and his whereabouts adoption of Regulation (EC) No 294/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council, on March 11, 2008 establishing the European Institute of Innovation and Technology, (04/09/2008 -EN-Official Journal of the European Union-L 97/1). EIT Indonesia has a vision and mission, namely:

• EIT Vision Indonesia is a nation Characters Come build with education and sustainable development.

• Indonesia EIT's mission is to contribute to sustainable economic growth Indonesia

and competitiveness by strengthening the capacity of community innovation. By promoting and integrating higher education, research and innovation of the highest standards.

EIT on the basis that Indonesia strives to: • address the long-term strategic challenges and innovate in Indonesia, including those

already identified at international level. Thus, Indonesia EIT should promote periodic dialogue with civil society.

• give priority to the transfer of education, research and innovation are higher in the context of business and commercial applications, as well as to support the creation of start-ups, spin-offs (a source of additional income) and small and medium enterprises (SMEs).







• operates through excellence, autonomous partnership of higher education institutions, research organizations, companies and other stakeholders in the form of non-governmental network.

• provide academic awards to individuals who excel in their activities to pursue, so the above achievements can give to the treasury of scientific disciplines.

• Long-term strategic and sustainable in the innovation process. • raise increasing financial contributions from the private sector and from income

generated by its own activities. Therefore, the expected industrial, financial and service sectors will contribute significantly to Indonesia EIT budget.

I. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGs)

EIT Indonesia strives to join the success of all areas that are beneficial to society, such as: Following up on the success achieved by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (MDGs), which is guided by global development efforts over the period 2000-2015, governments in the world have negotiated a set of Sustainable Development Goals (Sustainable Development Goals) (SDGs) for the period 2016-2030. MDGs will continue efforts to eradicate poverty by lifting every individual human being as a dignified human being for Decent Living according to the Humanitarian Program and adds to the challenge to ensure equitable development and sustainability of the environment, in particular the main target for minimizing the dangers of human-caused climate change. Sustainable Development Goals, or in English known as the Sustainable Development Goals shortened by SDGs are 17 destinations with 169 achievement of measurable and deadlines that have been set by the UN as the world's development agenda for the benefit of people and planet earth The aim is declared by jointly by countries cross-government in the UN resolution, published on October 21, 2015 as a joint development ambitions until 2030. This objective is a continuation or replacement of the Millennium Development Goals signed by the leaders of 189 countries as the Millennium Declaration at the UN headquarters in 2000 and no longer valid since the end of 2015. This objective is formulated since July 19, 2014 and submitted to the United Nations General Assembly by the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals. In this proposal there are 17 destinations with 169 achievement covering issues of sustainable development issues. They include eradicating poverty and hunger, improving health and education, development of a more sustainable city, address climate change, while protecting the forest and the sea. In August 2015, 193 countries agreed on 17 of the following purposes:

1. Eradication of poverty. Ending poverty in all its forms in all places. 2. Reduction of hunger. Ending hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition,

and promoting sustainable agriculture. 3. Life healthy. Promoting healthy living and support welfare for all ages. 4. Quality education. Guarantee fair and quality education, and to support the

opportunity to study with stable throughout life to all people without exception. 5. Gender equality. Achieving gender equality and empowering women.







6. Water and sanitation. Ensure access to water and sanitation for all. 7. Energy Clean and cheap. Ensure access to energy that is cheap, reliable, sustainable

and modern for all. 8. Decent work and economic growth. Supporting sustainable economic growth for all,

where there is decent work for those who need them. 9. Industry, innovation, infrastructure. Building infrastructure that resists change,

support sustainable industrialization, and support innovations. 10. Reduce the gap. Reducing inequalities within countries and between countries. 11. City sustainable cities and communities. Creating cities safe for all, resistant to

change, and sustainable. 12. Consumption and production are responsible. Ensure consumption and supporting

sustainable patterns of production. 13. ACTION for the climate. Take measures and emergency measures are needed to

combat climate change and its impacts. 14. Promoting peace and justice ... a peaceful and open society for sustainable

development, providing access to justice for everyone and building effective institutions, responsible, and open at all levels.

15. Partnerships for sustainable development ... Strengthening means of enforcement and revive the global partnership for sustainable development.

16. Promote a peaceful and inclusive society for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and building effective institutions, accountable and inclusive at all levels.

17. Strengthen implementation and revive the global partnership for sustainable development.

Sustainable development does not just concentrate on environmental issues. Wider than the scope of sustainable development includes three policies: economic development, social development and environmental protection. The documents of the UN, especially the 2005 World Summit outcome document called the three-dimensional things are interrelated and are the pillars of the driving force for sustainable development. Sustainable development scheme: at the intersection of the three pillars, the Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity (UNESCO, 2001) further explore the concept of sustainable development, by stating that "... cultural diversity is important for humans as well as the importance of biodiversity for nature". Thus the "development not only conceived as economic development, but also as a means to achieve the satisfaction of intellectual, emotional, moral, and spiritual". in this view, cultural diversity is the fourth policy from the scope of sustainable development policies.







J. SUMMARY EIT INDONESIA

1. Organization Name: EIT INDONESIA 2. Field of Activity: Humanity and Education 3. Office Address: Jl. Dg. Tata Hartaco Indah Blok 4AD no. 2 Kel. Parang Tambung Kec. Tamalatae Kota Makassar 4. Place and Time of Establishment: Makassar, 17 November 2016 5. Legality of Organization:

• Decree of The Ministry of Law and Human Rights of Indonesia, No: AHU-0078446.AH.01.07 2016

• The Director General Kesbangpol No: 220/525 / Pelpum of Feb, 2017 • Domicile No: 86/517 / KPT / XII / 2016 Lurah Makassar

6. Bank Account: Bank BNI account number : 538100298 EIT INDONESIA 7. The principle feature of the Organization: Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution 8. Vision and Mission Organization: Community rose by independent business 9. Organizational Objectives: Welfare and Advancing Society 10. Name of Founder:

• Rantasia Nur Alangan (Chairman) • Ramli Samad (Member) • Anrizal Qamran, ST (Member)

11. Name of Trustees: Ir. Anwar Qamran, MSi 12. Name Advisory: Rusman 13. Name Management

• President : Rantasia Nur Alangan • Secretary General : Anrizal Qamran, ST • Deputy : Ramli Samad

14. Management of Bhakti Period: 5 Years 15. Decision of Supreme Organization: Plenary Meeting 16. Financial Resources Organizations: Member Dues and donations Voluntary







K. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOVEMBER 2016 – MARCH 2017



central bureau of statistics (bps) noted: the total of...

Documents