Working Group USO Era KonvergensiStudy Group Regulasi 2011Medan, 29 Juli 2011

Agenda2

WG USO era Konvergensi Medan, 29 Juli 2011

1. Pendahuluan

2. Meeting dan Progres Kerja WG

3. Pembahasan Pleno II

4. Penutup

PENDAHULUAN

Medan, 29 Juli 2011

3

WG USO Era Konvergensi

Visi dan Misi

WG USO Era Konvergensi

4

Medan, 29 Juli 2011

Visi Terwujudnya penyelenggaraan USO yang efektif dan efisien dalam

rangka penyediaan infrastruktur telematika di daerah USO sebagai landasan bagi pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar dan kebutuhan sosial ekonomi serta menjembatani kesenjangan digital.

Misi Penyusunan Model kelembagaan USO yang efektif dan akuntabel Keterjangkauan dan ketersediaan layanan dan informasi di seluruh

wilayah nusantara Keterjangkauan layanan untuk seluruh lapisan masyarakat Pemanfaatan teknologi secara tepat guna mendorong terciptanya

konvergensi infrastruktur dan layanan terpadu sesuai kebutuhan pengguna sehingga tercipta efektifitas penyelenggaraan.

Penggunaan sumber daya nasional secara efisien.

Meeting dan Progress Kerja WG

Medan, 29 Juli 2011 WG USO Era Konvergensi

Progress6

WG USO Era Konvergensi Medan, 29 Juli 2011

Tanggal Kegiatan

25 Mei 2011 (Telkom Bandung)

Diskusi membahas masalah kondisi USO saat ini membahas agenda kedepan

6- 7 Juni 2011 (Telkom Bandung)

Pertemuan kedua, membahas Regulasi USO eksisting membahas Progres implementasi USO Menyusun kerangka kerja dan draft dokumen white

paper

14 Juni 2011 (Batam)

Pleno Studi Group II

4 – 5 Juli 2011 (Akmani Jakarta)

Bentuk USO era Konvergensi Migrasi USO Fund ke ICT Fund Kelembagaan menuju USF/ICT Fund Program menuju broadband meaningfull

29 Juli 2011 (Medan)

Pleno Studi Group III

Rencana Kerja & Target

WG USO Era Konvergensi Medan, 29 Juli 2011

Rencana Kerja SGR

2011

Finalisasi White paper

Draft White paper

Diskusi , Materi & distribusi kuisioner

Penyusunan hasil kuis , penyusunan kerangka WP dan Agenda Kegiatan

selanjutnya

7

Pleno I

Pleno II

Pleno III

Pleno IV

Pleno V

Pleno VI 26/04/2011

14/06/2011

29/07/2011

03/10/2011

31/10/2011

05/12/2011

04/07/2011

12/09/2011

10/10/2011

07/11/2011

25/05/2011

19/09/2011

17/10/2011

14/11/2011

Pertemuan

WG

Pertemuan WG

Pertemuan

WG Pertemuan

WG Pertemuan

WG

PEMBAHASAN PLENO II

Medan, 29 Juli 2011

8

WG USO Era Konvergensi

Definisi USO Era Konvergensi9

Medan, 29 Juli 2011 WG USO Era Konvergensi

Definisi USO Era Konvergensi10

WG USO Era Konvergensi Medan, 29 Juli 2011

Definisi:“Menyediakan sarana/infrastruktur TIK dan memberdayakan masyarakat dalam menggunakan sarana tersebut dalam rangka meningkatkan kesejahteraan bagi masyarakat itu sendiri menuju Meaningful Broadband”.

11

Medan, 29 Juli 2011 WG USO Era Konvergensi

Funding Model12

UAF/USF (Universal Access Funds, Universal Service Funds)

Stimulus Funds to develop Next Generation AccessFocused on Next Generation Access (fibre optic) and widespread broadband access.

ICT fundsCovering a much wider range of projects then USO/UAF/USF to develop ICT, e.g. ICT in schools, healthcare facilities

Medan, 29 Juli 2011 WG USO Era Konvergensi

Source: Universal Access and Service: New Direction? Example from the East Asia and Pasific RegionNatasha Beschorner, The World Bank

STUDY FROM WORLD BANK

Medan, 29 Juli 2011

13

WG USO Era Konvergensi

Kemkominfo

14

Universal Service : Perbedaan “Access Gap”

The key USF features & trends1. Funding targets

Access networks for Voice & Internet – Public Access, POPs, Mobile Penetration Network Backbone – increasing number of cases School Internet access – usually Internet only on declining subsidy basis Other Essential Facilities – Local Government, Health clinics, Security Content & Capacity / Training National Internet Exchanges

2. USFs moving from purely access to backbone Broadband demands backbone upgrades – mostly to fibre OECD countries tend to finance direct but USFs still important for non OECD

3. Operators, especially mobile, have greater interest in reaching rural areas commercially which reduces required subsidies Well over 90% of population of the World now in coverage of 2G mobile service 3G now the de facto means to reach rural areas with Internet Operators can reach most areas commercially if backbone is supplied and

frequency allocations are suitable for rural coverage

Key operational principles & elements of best practice USFs

The Tool for a liberalized market – Subsidy replaces obligations on Monopoly Incumbent & direct Government financial involvement in the sector A form of PPP, but Government’s main role is to provide direction and targets The money comes from the operators The money returns to the operators, usually under a competitive auction process A practical “pay or play” concept – all operators pay their obligation, while those

who wish can compete for the money

Competition for funds - transparent, impartial & fair

The account is independent of Government budget - but audited & publicly reported

The Subsidy - awarded to the winning operator as a capital contribution

Consultation - USF programs developed with industry & stakeholder views

32%

68%

Global dispersal of UAS Funds since inception

% of funds dispersed% of funds not dispersed

2010 Survey: How much in USFs?Imbalance between receipts and expenditures caused mainly by

a few large funds who charge too much

DESCRIPTION VALUE

Number of questionnaires sent out 67

Total no. of completed questionnaires 30

Total value of funds collected since inception (US$, excl. USA) US$ 11,565 Mn

Total value of funds dispersed since inception US$ 3,676 Mn

% of funds dispersed 32%

• Most USFs levy between 1-2% of revenue• Indonesia’s levy of 1.25% is about right• Malaysia has charged 6%, India & Colombia 5%

How do USFs disperse funds?Description Value

Total number of questionnaires sent out 67

Total number of completed questionnaires 50

Number of countries where provision of USF funds is conducted by competitive least subsidy tender

37

% of countries where provision of USF funds is conducted by competitive least subsidy tender

74%74%

26%

4%

% competitive tender

% Not by competitive tender

Ccombination of mechanisms

Those which are not competitive typically use direct allocations & obligations on incumbent, or invite application submissions from operators

Trend is increasingly towards competitive tender

Key international approaches to BroadbandApproach Leading country examples

1 Competitive tender &/or Government initiative to build new backbone &/or access infrastructure, incl. use of USF

Canada, Chile, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia, other USF countries

2 Create / Underwrite Demand Malaysia, Singapore, OECD countries

3 Stimulate Private Demand in the ICT Sector – e.g., PC initiatives, industry & educational initiatives, local services

Korea, China, Egypt, Thailand, OECD countries

4 Regulatory Reform, liberalisation, competitive fixed & unified licensing, creative spectrum policies

Pakistan, India, S. Africa, Chile, Brazil, Peru, New Zealand, Germany, UK, USA

5 Integral part of an Economic Stimulus package (1.38% GDP growth/10% Internet penetration)

USA, UK, Canada, Japan, Finland, Singapore, Korea, Australia

• These address the main obstacles to broadband development

• Several may be pursued in combination

USF DI NEGARA LAIN

Penutup23

Rencana Pembahasan untuk Pleno berikut:1. Kelembagaan USO era Konvergensi2. Program-program USO era Konvergensi

WG Layanan Konvergensi Medan, 29 Juli 2011

24

WG USO Era Konvergensi Medan, 29 Juli 2011

Terima kasih