perbandingan kbar dan kbat

2
. 1 P er ban di n gan Teor i B er kai tan K B A R dan K B A T  K em ahi r anB er ki r A r as R endah( K B A R ) K em ahi r anB er ki r A ras Ti ngg i ( K B AT ) L o w e r - o r d e r t h in ki n g ( LO T ) i s o f ten ch a r a ct e r i ze d b y t h e r e ca l l o f i n f o r m a t i o n o r t h e a p p l i ca t i o n o f co n ce p t s o r kn o w le d g e t o f a mil i a r si t u a t i o n s a n d c o n te x t s ”. Resni ck ( 19 87 ) C h aract e ri ze d h i g h e r- o r d e r t h in ki n g ( H O T ) a s “ n o n -a l g o r i t h m i c. R esnick (19 87 ) LOTt a sks r e qu ires a st u d e n t “ to re ca ll a f act , p er f or m a si m p le o p e ratio n , o r so l ve a f a mi l i a r typ e o f p r o b l e m . I t d o e s n o t req u i r e t h e st u d e n t t o w o r k o u tsi d e t h e f a mi l i a r” S chm al z ( 197 3) T h e u se of co m p lex, n o n - a l g o r it h m i c t h i n ki n g t o so lve a t a sk in whicht h ere is n o t a p r e d ict a b l e , w e l l -r e h e a r se d a p p ro a ch o r p at h w ay exp l i ci t l y su g ge st e d b y t h e t a sk , ta sk i n str u ction , o r a w o r ke d o u t exa m p l e . S t ei n an d La ne ( 19 96 ) LO T is i nvo lved w he n st ud e nt s a r e so l vin g tasks w h e r e t h e so lution r e q uir e s a p p l yi n g a w e l l- kn ow n a l g o r it h m , o ften w i th n o j u sti c a ti o n, e xp la n a t i o n, o r p r o o f req u i r e d , a n d w h ere o n l y a si n gle co r rect a n sw e r i s p o ssi ble”. S enk, Beck m an, & Thom pson (1997) H OT as so lvi ng t asks w he r e n o a l go r i t hm ha s bee n tau gh t , w he r e  j u s t i cation or e x p l a n ation a r e r e q u i red , an d w he re mor e t ha n on e solut i on m ay b e p o ss ible .S e n k, et a l ( 19 9 7)  LO T a s s o l ving t a sks w h i l e w o r ki n g in f a mi l i a r s it u a t i o ns a n d co n te x t s ; o r , a p p l yi n g a l g o r i t h m s a l r e a d y f a m i l i a r t o t h e st u d e n t”. Thompson (2008) H O T i nvo l ves so l vi n g tas ks w he re an a l g o r i t h m h a s not b e e n t a u g h t o r u si n g kn ow n a l g or i t h m s w h i l e w or ki n g i n u n f a m i l i a r c o n te x t s o r si tu a t i o ns . Thom pso n ( 2008)  

Upload: aini

Post on 23-Feb-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Perbandingan Kbar Dan Kbat

7/24/2019 Perbandingan Kbar Dan Kbat

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/perbandingan-kbar-dan-kbat 1/1

.1 Perbandingan Teori Berkaitan KBAR dan KBAT

 

Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Rendah (KBAR) Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT)

“Lower-order thinking (LOT) is often

characterized by the recall of information

or the application of concepts or

knowledge to familiar situations and

contexts”.Resnick (1987)

Characterized higher-order thinking

(HOT) as “non-algorithmic.”

Resnick (1987)

LOT tasks requires a student “… to recall

a fact, perform a simple operation, or

solve a familiar type of problem. It does

not require the student to work outside the

familiar”Schmalz (1973)

“The use of complex, non-algorithmic

thinking to solve a task in which there is

not a predictable, well-rehearsed

approach or pathway explicitly suggested

by the task, task instruction, or a worked

out example.”Stein and Lane (1996)

“LOT is involved when students are

solving tasks where the solution requires

applying a well-known algorithm, often

with no justification, explanation, or proof

required, and where only a single correct

answer is possible”.

Senk, Beckman, & Thompson (1997)

“HOT as solving tasks where no

algorithm has been taught, where

 justification or explanation are required,

and where more than one solution may

be possible”.Senk, et al (1997)

 

“LOT as solving tasks while working in

familiar situations and contexts; or,

applying algorithms already familiar to the

student”.Thompson (2008)

“HOT involves solving tasks where an

algorithm has not been taught or using

known algorithms while working in

unfamiliar contexts or situations”.

Thompson (2008)