j. biol. chem.-1993-yang-4600-3

Upload: an-nisa-khoirun-ummi

Post on 02-Jun-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 J. Biol. Chem.-1993-Yang-4600-3

    1/4

    Communication

    Vol.

    268

    Xo.

    7,

    Issue of March

    5

    p 4600-4603,

    1993

    0

    1993

    by

    The American Society for Biwhemistry and Mo ku lar Biology Inc.

    Printed n U S.A.

    T H E J O U R N A LF BIOLOGICALHEMISTRY

    Comparison

    of

    GLUT4 and

    GLUT1 Subcellular Trafficking in

    Basal and Insulin-stimulated

    3T3-Ll Cells*

    (Received for publication, November 9, 1992)

    Jing Yang and

    Geoffrey D.

    Holman

    From the Department o Biochemistry, University o Bath,

    Bath BA2 7AY United Kingdom

    The two glucose transporter isoforms GLUT4 and

    GLUTl present in 3T3-Ll cells were labeled in the

    insulin-stimulated and basal stateswith the imper-

    meant bis-mannose photolabel, 2-N-4-(1-azi-2,2,2-tri-

    fluoroethyl)benzoyl-1,3-bis- D-mannos-4-yloxy)-2-

    propylamine. The redistributions of these labeled

    transporters from the plasma membrane to the low

    density microsome membrane fraction were followed

    while cells were maintained at either insulin-stimu-

    lated or basal steady states. In both these steady states

    GLUT4nd GLUTlwere continuously recycled.

    Analysis of the time courses for tracer-tagged GLUT4

    and GLUTl redistribution showed that the endocytosis

    rate constants were only ~ 3 0 lower in the insulin-

    stimulated (0. 08 and 0.093 min) compared with the

    basal (0.1

    16

    and 0.12 1 min) state. In the insulin-

    stimulated state, the rate constants for GLUT4 and

    GLUTl exocytosis (0. 086 and 0. 09 6 rnin) were sim-

    ilar to those of endocytosis. In contrast, the exocytosis

    rate constants of GLUT4 andGLUTl in the basal state

    were 0.01 and 0.0 35 min.

    W e

    therefore conclude that

    the main effect of insulin is to increase GLUT4 and

    GLUTl exocytosis rate constants by

    =9-

    and 3-fold,

    respectively, and that the unique feature of the GLUT4

    isoform is the veryslowrate of exocytosis n the

    basal state.

    The acute insulin regulation of glucose transport in target

    tissues is now known to involve the specialized glucose trans-

    porter isoform GLUT4. This isoform was cloned andse-

    quenced in 1989 (1-5) and has been shown to be ocalized

    only in insulin-responsive tissues. It is expressed at high levels

    in white (6) and brown (7) adipose tissue, and in skeletal (8)

    and heart(9) muscle. It is the propensity of the GLUT4

    isoform to remain localized in the cytoplasmic tubulo-vesic-

    ular system in the absence of insulin (7) tha t allows GLUT4-

    containing cells to respond acutely to insulin within minutes

    and to produce, in response to this stimulation, over 20-fold

    increases of glucose transport activity. The GLUT4 isoform

    has also been shown

    t o

    be sequestered to the intracellular-

    *

    This workwas supported by the Medical Research Council

    (United Kingdom) and the British Diabetic Association for financial

    support. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part

    by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby

    marked uduertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734

    solely to indicate this fact.

    3

    To whom correspondence should be addressed Dept. of Biochem-

    istry , University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United

    Kingdom. Tel.: 44-225-826874;Fax: 44-225-826449.

    vesicle pool in transfection and expression systems including

    3T3-Ll and NIH-3T3 fibroblasts (10, ll ) , oocytes (12), COS

    cells (13), and Chinese hamster ovary cells (14,

    15).

    As

    discussed by James and colleagues (7, 15, 16), the se-

    questration

    of

    GLUT4 could be due either to a very rapid

    removal of this protein from the plasma membrane

    or

    to a

    very slow rate of exocytosis in the basal state. This is an

    important question, as heGLUT4 protein sequence may

    contain information that allows a unique cellular processing

    by vesicle trafficking and sequestration machinery. If endo-

    cytosis is unusual, then the unique processing may occur in

    the plasma membrane, whereas if exocytosis is slow, the

    targeting recognition events may occur intracellularly. Slot et

    al.

    (7), in theirmmunocytochemistry study on brown adipose

    tissue, observed that in the nsulin-stimulated state the pro-

    portion of GLUT4 in the plasma membrane was increased to

    a level that was ~4 0- fo ld igher than in the basal state. In

    the insulin-stimulated state, the proportion of GLUT4 asso-

    ciated with coated pits and early endosomes increased 3- and

    4-fold, respectively, above basal levels. These authors there-

    fore suggested that themain effect of insulin was to increase

    exocytosis of GLUT4 from tubulo-vesicular structures to the

    plasma membrane and thence into the endosome pathway.

    However, such studies on the steady-state level of transporters

    do not unequivocally distinguish between an increased exo-

    cytosis or decreased endocytosis or to a modification of both

    these steps in cycling.

    Kinetic, rather han steady-state distribution, studies of

    transporter cycling should be able to directly determine and

    quantify the site of insulin action on trafficking. Jhun et al.

    (17) have recently used a photoreactive probe (B3-GL) to

    study insulins effect on GLUT4 translocation kinetics in rat

    adipose cells. They have reported tha t insulin has equal effects

    on endocytosis and exocytosis, the former being reduced and

    the latter ncreased by ~3 -fold. Th etudy by Jhun et

    al.

    is at

    variance with our own investigations of GLUT4 trafficking

    kinetics in rat adipose cells and with the hypothesis (15, 16,

    19) that themain effect of insulin is to increase exocytosis of

    GLUT4. In viewof this controversy, and because

    of

    the

    importance of resolving from kinetic studies the site of insulin

    action on GLUT4 trafficking, we have carried out a study

    similar to that described by Jhun et al. (17).

    GLUT4 and GLUTl are both present t high levels n 3T3-

    L1 cells (16,20,21), and o we have been able t o compare the

    trafficking of GLUT4 and GLUT1. In contrast to the study

    of Jhun

    et al.

    (17), we have shown that insulin does not

    markedly reduce glucose transporter endocytosis but instead

    increases exocytosis. This kinetic approach has allowed us to

    determine that GLUT4 is unique because of its very low

    exocytosis rate in the absence of insulin.

    E XPE RI ME NT AL

    PROCEDURES

    Materials-ATB-[2-3H]BMPAZspecific activity

    10

    Ci/mmol) was

    prepared as described (18).DMEM was romFlow Laboratories.

    S.

    Satoh, H. Nishimura, A. E. Clark,

    I. J.

    Kozka,

    S. J.

    Vannucci,

    I.

    A. Simpson, M. J. Quon, S.

    W .

    Cushman, and

    G .

    D. Holman,

    submitted for publication.

    The abbreviations used are: ATB-BMPA, 2-N-4-(1-azi-2,2,2-

    trifluoroethyl)benzoyl-l,3-bis- D-mannos-4-yloxy~-2-propylamine;

    DMEM, Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium; ClzEs, nonoethylene-

    glycol dodecyl ether.

    4600

  • 8/10/2019 J. Biol. Chem.-1993-Yang-4600-3

    2/4

    Insulin-stimulated GLUT4 Exocytosis

    in 3T3-Ll

    Cells 4601

    Fetal bovine serum was from Gibco Laboratories. Dexamethasone,

    isobutylmethylxanthine, and protein A-Sepharose were from Sigma.

    Nonaethyleneglycol dodecyl ether (CIzEg)was from Boehringer.

    Monocomponent porcine insulin was a gift from Dr. Ronald Chance,

    Eli Lilly Laboratories. Polyclonal antisera were raised against the C-

    terminal peptides of GLUT4 CSTELEYGPDEND) and GLU Tl

    (CGEELFHPLGADSQV) as described (22, 23).

    Cell Culture-3T3-Ll fibroblasts were differentiated to adipocytes

    as described (20). Fully differentiated cells were washed with phos-

    phate-buffered saline (154 mM NaCl, 12.5 mM sodium phosphate, pH

    7.4) and were then incubated for 2 h in serum-free medium containing

    25 mM D-glucose. This was followed byhree washes in Krebs-Ringer-

    Hepes buffer (KRH buffer, 136 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KC1,1.25 mM

    CaCl,, 1.25 mM MgSO,, 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4).

    A T B - B M P A Photolabeling-Cells in 35-mm dishes were main-

    tained a t 37 C either in he absence or the presence of 100 nM insulin

    in 1 mlof KRH buffer for 30 min. The buffer was emoved and

    replaced by350

    p1

    of KRH buffer, either with or without insulin

    respectively, containing 250 pCi (insulin samples) or 500 pCi (basal

    samples) of ATB-[2-3H]BMPA at

    18

    C. The dishes were placed

    between two 2-mm glass plates and were irradiated for 1 min in a

    Rayonet photochemical reactor equipped with eight 300-nm bulbs

    and eight 350-nm bulbs. The irradiated cells were then either washed

    rapidly and immediately homogenized in Tris-EDTA-sucrose (TES

    buffer, 10 mM Tris-HC1,0.5 mM EDTA, 255 mM sucrose at

    18 c)

    r

    were maintained a t 37 C in 1ml of KRH buffer containing 10 mM

    D-glucose for the times indicated in the figure legends before washing

    and homogenization. For each time point he combined material from

    two 35-mm dishes was pooled.

    Immunoprecipitation and Electrophoresis-The 3T3-Ll cells were

    vigorously homogenized to ensure all cell material was broken. This

    was carried out in

    2

    ml of TE S buffer, using a tightly fitting Teflon

    homogenizer operating at 1500 rpm and with 15 full strokes. Samples

    were then centrifuged at 12,500 X gmaxor 20 min. The crude plasma

    membrane and post-plasma membrane supernatants were then solu-

    bilized in 1.5mlof detergent buffer containing 2% CI2E9, 5 mM

    sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, and with the proteinase inhibitors anti-

    pain, aprotinin, pepstatin, and leupeptin, each at 1 pg/ml (24). Any

    non-solubilized material was then removed by centrifugation at

    20,000 X gmaxor 20 min. Antisera (50 p1 of anti-GLUT4 and 100 pl

    of anti-GLUT1) were premixed with 30

    11

    of swollen protein A-

    Sepharose, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and thenmixed with

    the solubilized membranes for

    2

    h at 0-4 C. The immunoprecipitates

    were washed four times (insulin) or five times (basal) in 0.1% then

    once in 0.01% Cl2E, detergent buffer. The extent of washing of the

    immunoprecipitates was more extensive than previously reported (24)

    because of the low counts recovered in basal cells. The labeled glucose

    transporters were released from the antibody complexes with 10%

    SDS,6 M urea,

    10%

    mercaptoethanol and subjected to electrophoresis

    on 10% acrylamide gels. The radioactivity in gel slices was extracted

    with hydrogen peroxide as described (24). For the insulin-treated

    samples the background was determined by estimating the radioac-

    tivity of slices on either side of the transporter peak. The background

    radioactivity in basal samples was determined by immunoprecipitat-

    ing with preimmune serum and then running this material on the

    same gel as the other basal samples. The preimmune serum did not

    produce a peak of radioactivity but allowed a correction of background

    from slices, which exactly corresponded to the position of the trans-

    porter peak.

    Estimation

    of

    Rate Constants-The glucose transporter levels as

    determined from electrophoresis (above) were used to calculate the

    fractional loss of plasma membrane label. These data were then fi tted

    to an integrated rate equation, describing transporter recycling, by

    least squares analysis (weighted for relative error) using Fig P soft-

    ware (Biosoft).

    RESULTS

    We have used the im perm eant glucose transporter photo-

    label , AT B-B MP A, o racer-tag cel l surface GL UT 4a nd

    G L U Tl in 3T 3- Ll cells. We have then followed the removal

    of these ransporters from theplasmame mb rane of cells

    maintained in ei ther basal or insulin-stimulated sta tes. T he

    maintenance of a steadystate of non-labeled ransporter

    distribution w as confirmed by comp aring heamounts of

    immunode tec table GLUT4 and GLUTl a t the in i t i a labeling

    time and following an addit ional 40 min

    of

    incubation at

    bl 40 m8n

    D

    t

    800

    0 1

    O L

    0 2

    4 6 8 1 0 1 2

    0 2

    4

    6

    8 1 0 1 2

    Sl lce

    Number

    Sl lce

    Number

    FIG. 1. Equilibration of tracer-tagged

    GLUT4

    with the in-

    tracellular membrane pool in 3 T3-Ll cells. Confluent 3T3-Ll

    cells (two 35-mm dishes) were stimulated for 30 min with 100 nM

    insulin and then abeled with 250 pCi of ATB-[2-3H]BMPA.Follow-

    ing labeling, the dishes were either homogenized immediately (a) or

    were maintained at 37 C in the continuous presence of insulin for

    another 40 min and then homogenized b ) .GLUT4 was immunopre-

    cipitated from either the plasma membrane 0 ) r the post plasma

    membrane supernatant (low density microsomes) 0 ) nd then ana-

    lyzed by electrophoresis.

    37 C 3 Fig.

    l a

    shows a n SDS-polyacrylamide gel electropho-

    resis profile obtained by labeling and mm unopre cipitating

    GL UT 4 in insulin- treated 3T3 -Ll cel ls . Th e label recovered

    in hepost-plasmamem brane ract ion of cells th at were

    homogenized immediately was very low. Thi s suggests tha t

    tracer-tagged GLUT4was not significantly tran sfer red to the

    low density m icrosomes duri ng the processing period. Our

    resultscontrastwi th hose of Jhu n

    et al.

    (17), who have

    rep orte d that in rat adipose cells approx imately on e-third of

    the labeled GL UT 4 was recovered in the post plasm a m em-

    brane fraction in s amples which were processed immediately

    after labeling.

    Following 40 min of incubation of the cells

    at

    37

    C,

    the

    label in the plasma membranewas reduced to approxim ately

    one-half its initial value. Th e label tha t was lost from the

    plasma mem brane was recovered in the low density micro-

    some fraction (Fig. lb). We have not routinely analyzed the

    mate rial transf erred to the low density microsome fraction

    because of th e need to sim ultane ously process multiple im-

    munoprecipi ta ted samples obtained for est imating GLU T4

    and GLUTl in the p lasma membrane . Previous s tudiesave

    demon strated that const i tut ive turnover of t ransporters oc-

    curs (23, 24)' an d tha t label which is lost from the plasma

    mem brane is ecovered in the ow density microsome fraction.

    In basal cells the labeling of GL UT 4 and GL UT l was low

    (Fig.

    2,

    a and b), and following 40 min of incubation of the

    labeled cells at 37

    C,

    the level of tracer-tagged transporters

    in the plasma mem brane were reduced tow ard background

    levels.

    We have used least squaresurve fittin g to irectly estim ate

    exocytosis an d endocytosis rate co nstan ts fro m tim e courses

    of loss of t race r- tagged GLU T4 and GLU Tl f rom the p lasma

    membrane (Fig.

    3,

    a a n d b ) . For analytical purposes the rate

    of loss of label from th e plasm a mem bran e is assum ed to be

    dependenton ust two rateconstants; onedescribing the

    exocytosis

    (kex)

    nd one t hendocytosis

    (ken).

    Th e rate f loss

    of labeled tran spo rter s is then iven by Equation 1 where Lp

    is the fract ion f the label in the plasma mem brane.

    J.

    Yang and G. D. Holman, unpublished results.

  • 8/10/2019 J. Biol. Chem.-1993-Yang-4600-3

    3/4

    4602 Insulin-stimulated GLUT4 Exocytosisn 3T3-Ll Cells

    a1

    G lu t4

    9

    b l G lu t1

    4

    *

    0 2 4 5 8 1 0 1 2 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2

    Slice Number Sl iceumber

    FIG.

    2.

    Equilibrationof tracer-tagged GLUT4 and GLUTl

    in basal 3T3-Ll cells. Confluent 3T3-Ll cells

    ( two 35-mm

    dishes)

    were labeled in the basal state with 500 pCi

    of

    ATB-[2-3H]BMPA.

    Following labeling the dishes

    were

    either homogenized immediately

    0,

    A)

    or were maintained at 37 C for another 40 min and then

    homogenized 0,A ) . GLUT4 a ) and GLUTl b ) were then immu-

    noprecipitated

    from

    the plasma membrane

    fractions

    and analyzed by

    electrophoresis.

    10

    20 3 4

    5

    10 20 3 40

    T l m s

    (minrl T lme rn inrl

    GLUT4 and GLUTl in

    3T3-Ll cells. Confluent 3T3-Ll

    cells

    FIG.

    3.

    Time courses for equilibration of tracer-tagged

    were labeled eithe r in the basal 0 ) r insulin-stimulated

    A) tates

    and were then maintained in these steady

    states

    for the indicated

    time s before homogenization to obtain the plasma membrane frac-

    tion. GLUT4 a ) nd GLUTl

    b )were

    then immunoprecipitated and

    analyzed by electrophoresis.The lines through the data were derived

    from least squares fitting to Equation 2.

    (see

    Results ). The results

    are

    the mean f S.E. from three separate experiments,

    except

    in the

    case

    of GLUT4 in basal cells, where the

    data

    are

    from

    four experi-

    ments.

    Integrat ion of Equation

    1

    with

    L p

    = 1.0

    at

    t = 0 gives

    Equa t ion 2.

    In the experiments escribed here we have used this equa-

    tion to analyze the red istribu tion of label und er ste ady- state

    condit ions, but Equation is equally applicable to an analys is

    of label equilibration under non-steady-state conditions. All

    tha t s required is hat he ota l pool of transp orters be

    conserved. It is only necessary to consider the concentration

    of unlabeled transporters if there are saturation steps in the

    flux path way , as would be the cas e if one were analyzing

    equilibrium exchange by a carrier protein.

    In the continuous presence of insulin both tracer-tagged

    GLUT4 and GLUTl were rapidly removed from the plasma

    mem brane. The values of

    k,,

    a n d

    k n

    erived from the m ean

    results of three separate experimen ts are shown in Table

    I .

    TAB LE

    Kinetic parameters forlucose tran sporter trafficking in 3T 3- Ll cells

    Kinetic parameters were calculated from the mean data shown in

    Fig. 3. These data were from three separate experiments (Insulin)

    and three separate experiments Basal)

    except

    in the case of GLUT4

    in basal cells where the results were f rom four separate experiments.

    The data were fitted oEquation 2 using east

    squares

    analysis

    (weighted

    for

    relative error).

    kx

    k.

    t1 2

    min

    min

    min

    Basal

    GLUT4

    0.010 k 0.001 0.116 f 0.006

    5.6

    f .3

    GLUTl

    0.035 f

    0.009

    0.121 0.020

    4.4

    f

    0.6

    GLUT4 0.086 f

    0.011

    0.080 f

    0.007

    4.2 f .3

    GLUTl 0.096 .023

    0.093 f

    0.017

    3.7 f .6

    Insulin

    The es t imated ra te co ns tants were s imila r for both GL UT l

    and GLUT4. In addit ion, the end points f the equil ibrat ion

    of the tracer -tagg ed transp orter s ere not significantly differ-

    ent . At

    0

    min the evels of t racer-tagged GL UT4 and GL UTl

    remaining in the plasma mem brane ere 51.1 f 1.7% n 3)

    a n d

    53

    f .2% n= 3), respectively, of the initial values. Th e

    maintenance of the nsulin steady-state n which approxi-

    mately one-half of the total t ransp orter ool is a t th e urface

    (24) th us occurs because th e exocytosis of transp orter s (de-

    pendent n ,) matches an equalate of endocytosis

    (dependent onken).

    In the basal sta te t racer-tagged GLU T4 was more exten-

    sively removed from the plasma membrane than in the insu-

    l in-st imulated sta te . At 40 m in he fract ion of the tracer-

    tagged GLU T4 rem aining in the p lasma mem braneas only

    8.4 f 2.0%

    n

    = 4) of the nitia l value. Bycontrast , he

    fract ion of the tracer-tagged GLU Tl rem aining in the plasma

    membrane was 20.8 f 1.3% n = 3) of the nit ial value.

    Analysis of the ime course

    of

    tracer-tagged GLUT4and

    G LU Tl redis t ribution (Table I) showed tha t the endocytosis

    r at e c o ns ta n ts w e re o nly ~ 3 0 %lower in the insulin-st imu-

    lated comp ared with the basal sta te . However, the GLU T4

    an d G LU Tl exocytosis ra te constants were 8.6 and 3 t imes

    higher, respectively, in the insulin -stim ulated compared with

    the basa l s ta te (Table ).

    Although we have used curve fittin g to directly obta in th e

    rate constants

    ke,

    and ken, he half-tim e or label equilibration

    can also be easily calculated from least squares curve fitting

    using Equation 2. The half-t ime s only dependent on he

    expo nentia l term , as hown by the following equation.

    t1/2

    =

    ln2/ ke. +

    k

    (Eq. 3)

    T h e values for the half-tim es for equilibration of tracer-

    tagged transporte r were therefore calculated from sum ming

    the ra te cons tants

    e,

    a n d

    kn

    s

    in Equation 3 and are shown

    in Table I . The ha l f - times for GLU T4 and GLU Tl equi l ibra -

    tion in basal cells were 5.6 a nd 4.4 m in, respectively. Thes e

    values are similar to, but slightly faster than, the half-times

    (6.5 min ) for he decrease in glucose transpor t activity n

    3T 3- Ll cells following removal of insulin (24). The calcula ted

    half-times for lossof tracer-tagged transporters in the contin-

    uous presence of insulin were slightly faster than in its ab-

    sence because of the greate r contr ibutio nf t he re-exocytosis,

    t he

    ke,

    term in Equation 3, to the equil ibrat ion rate .

    DI SCUSSI ON

    Use of bis-hexoses with photorea ctive substituents (17,23)'

    has shown that GLU T4 const i tut ively recycles between th e

    plasma mem brane and the intracel lular vesicle pool of ra t

    adipose cells, and we have also demonstrated this phenome-

  • 8/10/2019 J. Biol. Chem.-1993-Yang-4600-3

    4/4

    Insulin-stimulated

    GLUT4

    Exocytosis in 3T3 Ll Cells

    4603

    non in 3T3-Ll cells (Ref. 24 and this tudy). In the ontinuous

    presence of insulin, the GLUT4 and GLUTl soforms recycle

    at a similar rates and redistribute to the ntracellular pool SO

    that at quilibrium only approximately one-half of the labeled

    transporters remain in the plasma membrane. This is to be

    expected if all the cellular transporters are involved in the

    recycling process and is consistent with our previous studies

    on the photolabeling of t he cell-surface and otal-cellular

    pools of glucose ransporters in 3T3-Ll cells, where we showed

    that approximately one-half of the otal cellular pool of

    GLUT4 andGLUTl transporters isocated at the ell surface

    of insulin-stimulated cells.

    In the basal state a much greater proportion of labeled

    GLUT4 transporters are lost from the plasma membrane.

    This is the result that would be expected if over 90% of the

    transporters were intracellularly localized. However, he half-

    time for removal of these labeled transporters in the basal

    state is somewhat slower than is observed in the insulin

    steady-state. These results contrast with those of Jhun et al.

    (17), who have reported that in basal rat adipose cells the

    half-time for tracer-tagged GLUT4 quilibration is faster than

    that observed in insulin-stimulated cells. This discrepancy

    maybe related to the need to rapidly process samples to

    determine thefraction of label removed from the plasma

    membrane. This is particularly important in the basal state,

    where the fraction of the label removed rom the plasma

    membrane is more extensive.

    Our data show that the calculated endocytosis rate con-

    stants (ken)are similar for GLUT4 and GLUTl and thathese

    endocytosis rate constants are only -30% slower in the in-

    sulin-stimulated compared with the basal state. These find-

    ings are consistentwith our previous observations on the rate

    of loss of cell-surface transporters from 3T3-Ll cells under

    conditions in which insulin was removed by a low pH buffer.

    In those experiments we simply estimated the proportions of

    transporters remaining at the cell surface by labeling at dif-

    ferent time points following insulin removal. We observed

    that cell-surface levels of GLUT4 and GLUTl decreased at a

    similar rate. We observed that the fractional loss of GLUTl

    was slightly less than GLUT4 and suggested that this was

    due to a greater re-exocytosis of th is isoform (24).

    We have now shown quantitatively that insulin increases

    the rate constantkex) or glucose transporter exocytosis. The

    exocytosis of t he GLUT4 isoform is 8.6-fold faster in insulin-

    stimulated cells compared with basal cells. The basal exocy-

    tosis rate constant may be overestimated because of some

    plasma-membrane contamination from label, which transfers

    to the ntracellular pool. However, he observed level of stim-

    ulation of GLUT4 exocytosis is almost sufficient to account

    for the -12-15-fold stimulations of cell-surface appearance of

    GLUT4 previously observed using ATB-BMPA

    (20,

    21,

    24).

    In turn, this level of recruitment of GLUT4 is almost suffi-

    cient to account for the increase in glucose transport activity

    in these cells (=l& O-fold). Insulin also stimulates GLUTl

    exocytosis but only to -3-fold above basal levels. Again, this

    level of stimulation of exocytosis accounts for the smaller, 3-

    5-fold increases in cell-surface GLUTl accessible to thepho-

    tolabel that we have observed in our previous studies.

    The major difference between the trafficking of the GLUT4

    and GLUTlsoforms is the much slower exocytosis of GLUT4

    in the basal state. However, in the presence of insulin, both

    isoforms are processed in the same way. Our data therefore

    supports the suggestion tha t in basal cells intracellular proc-

    essing steps remove GLUT4 from the normal endosome re-

    cycling pathway, possibly to a specialized compartment within

    the tubulo-vesicular system

    (7).

    Insulin may then re-commit

    or re-target these transporters from the tubulo-vesicular sys-

    tem to the plasma membrane and thence to the early endo-

    some system. Both intracellular transporter pools would then

    be in rapid equilibrium with each other in the insulin-stimu-

    lated state, as our photolabel equilibration data shows tha t

    the cells entire complement of glucose transporters are in-

    volved n the recycling process both in 3T3-Ll cells (this

    study) and in rat adipose cells.'

    We have consistently observed that the half-time for the

    initialstimulation of glucose transporter ranslocation by

    insulin is faster than the half-time for steady-state recycling

    of transporters and the half-timeor loss of transporters when

    insulin is removed (18,24).' We have suggested hat this may

    occur because, immediately following insulin addition, trans -

    porters are rapidly committed to the plasma membrane at a

    vesicle docking and fusion step and that, once transporters

    are committed in this way, they are then recycled at a slower

    rate within the early endosomes. The kinetic effects expected

    from this type of multiple pool-trafficking system have been

    analyzed and have been shown to account for the observed

    disparity between the half-times for insulin stimulation of the

    initial translocation and he steady-state rates of transporter

    recycling?

    REFERENCES

    2. Charron, M. J. , Brosius, F. C., Alper, S. L., and Lodish, H. F. (19 89) Proc.

    1. Jam es, D. E., Strube, M.

    I.,

    and Mueckler, M. (1989) Nature 3 3 8 , 8 3 - 8 7

    Natl. Acad.

    Sci.

    U S.

    A . 86 , 2535-2539

    3. Birnbaum, M. J. (1989) Cell 57 , 305-315

    4. Kaestner, K. H., Christy, R. J., McLenithan, J. C., Braiterman, L. T.,

    Cornelius, P., Pekela,

    P.

    H., and Lane, M . D. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad.

    Sci. U .

    S.

    A . 86,3150-3154

    5. Fukumoto, H., Kayano, T., Buse, J. B., Edwards Y., Pilch, P. F., Bell,

    G.

    I. and Seino,

    S.

    (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264 , 7736-7779

    6. Smith,R. M., Charron, M.

    J.,

    Shah, N ., Lodish, H. F., and Jarrett, L.

    (1991)

    Proc. Natl. Acad. SCL.

    U

    S.

    A . 88,

    6893-68977 . Slot, J. W., Gueze, H. J. , Gigengack,

    S.,

    Lienhard, G. E., and James, D.

    E.

    (1991)

    J .

    CellBiol. 11 3, 123-135

    8.

    Klip, A,, Rampall,

    T.,

    Bilan, P. J. ,Cartee,G.

    D.,

    Gulve, E. A,, and Ho lloszy,

    J. 0 1990)

    Biochim. Biophys.

    Res.

    Commun.

    172,728-736

    9. Slot, J.

    W.,

    Gueze, H. J., Gigengack,

    S.,

    James, D. E ., and Lienhard, G.

    E.

    (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.

    S.

    A . 88,7815-7819

    10. Haney , P. M ., Slot, J. W., Piper, R. C., James, D. E., and M ueckler, M.

    (1991)

    J .

    Cell Biol. 114 , 689-699

    11. H udson, A. W., R ulz, M., and Birnhaum, M. J. (1992) J . Cell Biol. 1 1 6 ,

    7QK 707

    12.

    13.

    14.

    15.

    16.

    17.

    18.

    19.

    20.

    21.

    22.

    23.

    24.

    Gould,

    G.

    W., Thomas, H. M., Jess,

    .

    J., and Bell, G. I. (1991) Biochemistry

    Asano, T. , Takata, K., Katagiri,

    H.

    Tsukuda, K., Lin, J. J., Ishihara,

    H.

    30,5139-5145

    Inukai, K., Hirano, H., Yazaki,

    .,

    and Oka,Y. (1992) J. Biol. Chem.

    2 6 7 , 19636-19641

    Schurmann, A., Monden,

    I.,

    Joost,

    H.

    G., and Keller, K. (1992)

    Biochim.

    Biophys. Acta 1 1 3 1 , 2 4 5 - 2 5 2

    Piper, R. C., Tai, C., Slo t, J. W., Hahn, C . S., Rice, C. M., Huang, H., and

    James,

    D.

    E. (1992)

    J .

    Cell Biol. 1 1 7 , 729-743

    Robinson, L. J., Pang,

    S.,

    Harris, D.

    A,,

    Heuser, J., and James, D. . (1992)

    J. Cell Biol. 11 7, 1181-1196

    Jhun, B. H., Rampal,

    A.

    L., Liu, H., Lachaal, M., and Jung, C. Y. (1992)

    J .

    Biol. Chem. 2 6 7 , 17710-17715

    Clark, A. E., Holman,

    G. D.,

    and Kozka, I. J. (1991)Biochem. J . 2 7 8 , 2 3 5 -

    241

    Karnreli, E., Zarnowski, M. J., H issin, P . J ., Simpson

    I. A

    Salans, L. B.,

    and Cushman, S. W. (1981) J . Biol. Chem. 256 , 4732-4777

    Calderhead, D.M., Kitagawa, K., Tanner, L. I., Holman,

    G.

    D., and

    Lienhard,

    G.

    E. (1990) J . Biol.

    Chem.

    26 5, 13800-13808

    Palfreyman, R. W., Clark, A. E., Den ton,R. M., Holman,

    G.

    D. , and Kozka,

    I. J. (1992) Blochem. J . 2 8 4 , 2 7 5 - 2 8 1

    Holman, G. D., K ozka, I. J., Clark, A. E., Flower,

    C.

    J., Sa ltis, J., Hahher-

    field, A. D., Simpson,

    I.

    A.,

    and Cushman, S. W . (1990) J. Biol. Chem.

    Holman, G. D ., Karim, A. R., and Karim,

    B.

    (1988)Biochim.

    Biophys.

    Acta

    2 6 5 , 18172-18179

    Yang, J., Clark, A. E., Harrison, R., Kozka, I.

    A,,

    and Holman, G. D. (1992)

    9 4 6 , 7 5 4 4

    Blochem. J . 2 8 1 , 8 0 9 - 8 1 7

    . I ,