How to ConductMeta-Analysis andAnalysis Data

An Academic presentation byDr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, PubricaGroup:  www.pubrica.comEmail: sales@pubrica.com

TODAY'S DISCUSSIONIn Brief

Introduction

Principles of meta-analysis

A generic inverse-variance approach to meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of rare events

Interpretation of subgroup Analysis and meta-regressions

Conclusion

About Pubrica

The statistical combining of data from two or moredistinct research is known as meta-analysis.

Meta analysis research may provide benefits such asincreased precision, the capacity to answer problemsnot addressed by individual research, and the abilityto resolve disagreements resulting from competingclaims.

IN BRIEF

However, if specific research designs, within-study biases, variance among studies, andreporting biases are not adequately evaluated, they can mislead substantially.

It's critical to appreciate the data types that emerge from measuring an outcome in asingle research and select appropriate effect measures for comparing intervention groups.

INTRODUCTION

The critical examination of whether it issuitable to integrate all numerical data, orpossibly some, the research is a crucial stagein a systematic review.

An overall statistical data analysis thatdescribes the efficacy of an experimentalintervention compared to a comparatorintervention is produced by such a meta-analysis. Some of the potential advantages ofmeta-Analysis include:

Contd...

To improve precision. Many studies are toosmall to give conclusive data on the impact ofinterventions on their own. Estimation is frequentlyenhanced when additional data is available.

To provide answers to questions that were notaddressed in the individual research. Aspecified type of participant and well-definedinterventions are common in primary research. Agroup of studies with different features canexamine the consistency of impact over a widervariety of people and treatments. It may alsoenable the investigation of causes for variationsin impact estimates, if applicable.

Contd...

To resolve conflicts resulting from apparently contradictory studies, the degree ofdisagreement may be officially examined. The causes for various outcomes can bestudied and quantified using a statistical synthesis of findings.

PRINCIPLES OF META-ANALYSIS

Meta-analysis is usually done in two stages.

A summary statistic is computed for each research inthe first step to reflect the observed intervention effectacross all studies consistently.

If the data are binary, the summary statistic may be arisk ratio; if the data are continuous, it might be adifference between means.

The following are the main concepts that most meta-analysis methodologies follow:

Contd...

In the second step, a weighted average of the intervention effects assessed in thevarious studies is used to calculate a summary (combined) intervention effectestimate.

The assumption that the studies are not all assessing the same intervention effectbut rather estimate intervention effects that follow a supply across studies mightbe included in the combination of intervention effect estimates across studies.

A random-effects meta-analysis is based on this foundation.

On the other hand, a fixed-effect systematic review meta analysis is undertakenif it is considered that each research is estimating the same quantity.

Contd...

For both individual studies and meta-Analysis, a forest plot presents effect estimatesand confidence ranges. A block depicts each research with a horizontal line extending oneach side to estimate intervention impact. The block area represents performing a metaanalysis burden assigned to that research, while the horizontal line represents theconfidence interval.

Contd...

Pubrica medical writers help you to write and edit the introduction, by introducing thereader of the shortcomings or emptyspaces in the identified meta anlysis research field.

Pubrica's team of researchers and authors develop Scientific and medical researchpapers that can act as an indispensable tool to the practitioner/authors.

A GENERIC INVERSE-VARIANCEAPPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS

The inverse-variance approach is a persistentand straightforward variation of the meta-analysisprocedure.

This method is utilised behind the scenes in manymeta-Analysis of dichotomous and continuousdata, and it is implemented in RevMan in its mostbasic version.

Contd...

The inverse-variance technique gets its name becauseeach study's weight is set to equal the inverse of the impactestimate's variance.

This balancing strategy reduces the pooled impactestimate's imprecision (uncertainty).

As a result, more extensive research with more minorstandard errors receive more credit than smaller studieswith more significant common mistakes.

META-ANALYSIS OF RARE EVENTS

Meta-analysis may be the only option to provide credibleevidence of the effects of healthcare treatments forunusual outcomes.

Individual studies are typically underpowered to detectdifferences in uncommon outcomes.

Still, a meta-analysis of several studies may havesufficient power to evaluate whether treatments affect theoccurrence of the rare event.

However, many meta-analysis approaches rely on largesample approximations, which are ineffective when rarecircumstances occur.

INTERPRETATION OF SUBGROUPANALYSIS AND META-REGRESSIONS

Subgroup comparisons are observationalSubgroup Analysis, and meta-regressions areobservational studies that look for differencesbetween researches.

They have the same limitations as anyobservational research, including the possibility ofbias due to other study-level variables.

Even if there is an actual difference between subgroups, thecategorisation of the subgroups is not always the cause ofthe difference.

A subgroup study of bone marrow transplantation for thetreatment of leukaemia, for example, may reveal animportant link between the recipient's age and that of theirsibling.

While specific statistical Research analysis service Analysiscan be described in the study protocol, many acceptableissues for sensitivity analysis are only discovered during thereview process.

Contd...

When sensitivity Analysis reveal specific judgments or missing data that significantlyimpact the review's results, more resources might be allocated to resolvinguncertainties.

If this isn't feasible, the results should be approached with care. Such findings maylead to requests for more studies and investigations.

CONCLUSIONTo summarise the findings of this meta analysiswriting service, this would say that the studiesincluded in the comments were heterogeneous,that their effects were minor, and that moststudies pointed to a small amount of reductionthat might not be clinically very relevant, andthat this meta analysis has missed smallstudies with effect estimates in oppositedirections, leaving room for publication bias andneed to do further research on the associationbased on this meta analysis.

ABOUT PUBRICA

Pubrica's team of researchers and authorsdevelop Scientific and medical research papersthat can act as an indispensable tool to thepractitioner/authors.

Our experts are aware of the structure thatfollows the broad topic, the problem, andbackground and advance to a narrow topic tostate the hypothesis.

+44 1618186353UNITED KINGDOM

+91-9884350006INDIA

EMAILsales@pubrica.com

Contact Us