critical challenges of plant-based meat alternatives in new food product development
DESCRIPTION
Is plant-based meat the future of food? If yes, Why? Because of plant-based meat’s ability to deliver high-quality protein to the Post COVID world while demanding far fewer resources and generating far less pollution than conventional meat. 1.Challenges of PBMA in food product development 2.Recreating meat-like colour and flavour 3.Procurement and selection of plant-protein sources 4.Food supply chain To Read More : http://bit.ly/3vbzszz To Contact us: Website: https://foodresearchlab.com/ Contact No: +91 9566299022 Email: [email protected]TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2021 Food Research Lab. All rights reserved
1
Meatless meat- Critical challenges of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives in
New Food Product Development
Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head,
Technical Operations, FoodResearchLab
I. INTRODUTION
Is plant-based meat the future of food? If
yes, Why? Because of plant-based meat's
ability to deliver high-quality protein to
the Post COVID world while demanding
far fewer resources and generating far less
pollution than conventional meat. Do food
manufacturers face hurdles during the new
food product development process? Let's
take a few minutes to read this Food
Research Lab blog to know more about it.
The manufacturing of Plant-based meat
alternatives (PBMA) includes three stages,
creating a meat-like structure, creating a
meat-like appearance, and recreating a
meat flavour. Moreover, the selection of
plant-protein sources and safety controls
are vital for the Production of PBMA.
The structuring process is the most
fundamental PBMA manufacturing step,
as it is the foundation of meat-like texture
formation. The significant feature of
PBMA is the fibrous structure and texture
(1). The techniques used by the food
manufactures as well as newly developed
procedures during the structuring process
is different for various meat analogues.
However, these techniques can be
categorized as either top-down or bottom-
up (2). Top-down is widely accepted for
commercial operations due to its
robustness and ability to produce a larger
volume.
Protein-Based Tofu as chicken
alternative
II. CHALLENGES OF PBMA IN FOOD
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Premixing
Mixing is one of the most dynamic steps in
the manufacturing process of PBMAs.
Plant-based meat substitutes are often
processed, transferred and packaged in a
continuous process. This is a struggle for
products that are sticky and do not flow
easily. Ingredients that degrade upon
exposure to atmospheric oxygen is another
major hurdle. The base mix of PBMA
often contains over 30 different ingredients
with different physical and functional
properties that vary in moisture content,
particle size, rheology and stability (3).
Continuous production processes cannot
deal with frequent recipe changes and too
many individual components that need to
Copyright © 2021 Food Research Lab. All rights reserved
2
be premixed. Moreover, the percentage of
soluble and insoluble components in the
premix is important for structure
formation. This array of ingredients
showcases various behaviours when
dispensed, making it difficult to automate
this processing step for a continuous
process (3,4). Manufacturers stick with
batch production methods to prepare
interim mixtures to avoid complications,
which prove extremely costly in the long
run.
Processing
Real meat products require only one
thermal processing, however, PBMA
much more intricate thermal treatments
during the structuring process. A group of
process parameters determines the final
product quality. Twin-screw extruders are
widely accepted for their versatility and
used to achieve higher energy consistency
and uniform heat distribution (3). For
example, the final product's texture is
heavily dependent on the temperature of
the extrusion process, as it involves
various cross-linked reactions and specific
melting temperatures. Shear-induced
structuring methodology achieves a small
size shear cell. An optimum processing
temperature of 95 C and rotating the raw
materials at 20 RPM improved the fibre
structure. The final product produced
through extrusion achieved a thickness of
5-10mm, whereas shear-induced
structuring achieves 30mm thickness (4,5).
However, shear-induced structuring is still
not commercially available and yet brings
out new opportunities to improve the
flexibility in product shape.
Recreating meat-like colour and
flavour
Colour is the main contributor to
perception in taste and overall product
acceptance as it is the first element to be
noticed in food. Meat alternatives should
strive the obtain a similar appearance to
red colour when uncooked and brown
upon cooking. However, most alternatives
containing gluten or soy are yellow or
beige (6). In the Production of PBMA, the
red colour of raw meat is obtained by
adding beet juice or soy leghemoglobin.
Heat stable ingredients, such as caramel,
malt extracts, reducing sugars (upon
Maillard reaction), are usually added to
replicate the final product with a brown
appearance. These colour ingredients also
help in thermal stability and pH sensitivity.
Maltodextrin and hydrated alginates are
also used as colouring agents that help
retain the colour by reducing the colour
migration in the final product (7).
The process of flavour formation is
complex than colour formation. The
flavouring agents can be categorized as
either volatile or non-volatile based on the
aroma and taste. Due to the complexity of
meat aroma, it has proved to showcase a
significant challenge to replicate the aroma
of meat in PBMA (8). Although Maillard
reaction and lipid degradation can be
carried out in the cooking of PBMA, the
slightest differences in PBMA and real
meat displays a great variance in the
resulting aromatic compounds. In addition
to aromatic ingredients such as spices and
salt, manufacturers also add vitamin
thiamine, amino acids and reducing sugars
to create the impression of aromatic meat
in PBMA. Moreover, chicken-like and
beef-like flavours are produced from
hydrolyzed soybean protein.
Shear-induced structuring methodology
achieves a small size shear cell. An
optimum processing temperature of 95 C
and rotating the raw materials at 20
RPM improved the fibre structure.
Copyright © 2021 Food Research Lab. All rights reserved
3
Procurement and selection of
plant-protein sources
The structural and functional organization
of PBMA is dependent on protein
properties such as its ability to retain its
moisture, gelation and solubilizing
capabilities. Currently, a wide array of
plant-based proteins are used, ranging
from non-meat proteins to insect proteins.
However, soy and peas are fundamental
sources due to their low costs. As
previously discussed in our previous
PBMA blog, proteins obtained from
legumes such as chickpeas and soybeans
are ideal due to their heightened functional
properties.
Food supply chain
The supply chain has significantly changed
in the last few years as food ingredients
travel farther than ever and must follow
strict regulations. Ingredients suppliers,
retailers and manufacturers in the supply
chain need to be transparent to ensure food
safety compliance. Many organizations in
the food supply chain are looking for new
applications or technology like IoT,
automation, and blockchain to curb food
safety issues. Shortly, technology will
make manufacturers' lives easier with food
safety regulations while attending to
customer demands for PBMA and organic
options while creating a sustainable supply
chain.
REFERENCE
1. Listrat, A., Lebret, B., Louveau, I., Astruc, T., Bonnet,
M., Lefaucheur, L., ... & Bugeon, J. (2016). How muscle
structure and composition influence meat and flesh
quality. The Scientific World Journal, 2016.
2. Dekkers, B. L., Hamoen, R., Boom, R. M., & van der
Goot, A. J. (2018). Understanding fiber formation in a
concentrated soy protein isolate-pectin blend. Journal of
Food Engineering, 222, 84-92.
3. Grabowska, K. J., Zhu, S., Dekkers, B. L., de Ruijter,
N. C., Gieteling, J., & van der Goot, A. J. (2016). Shear-
induced structuring as a tool to make anisotropic
materials using soy protein concentrate. Journal of Food
Engineering, 188, 77-86.
4. Schreuders, F. K., Dekkers, B. L., Bodnár, I., Erni, P.,
Boom, R. M., & van der Goot, A. J. (2019). Comparing
structuring potential of pea and soy protein with gluten
for meat analogue preparation. Journal of Food
Engineering, 261, 32-39.
5. Krintiras, G. A., Göbel, J., Van der Goot, A. J., &
Stefanidis, G. D. (2015). Production of structured soy-
based meat analogues using simple shear and heat in a
Couette Cell. Journal of Food Engineering, 160, 34-41.
6. Kyriakopoulou, K., Dekkers, B., & Van der Goot, A.
J. (2019). Sustainable meat production and processing.
7. Bohrer, B. M. (2019). An investigation of the
formulation and nutritional composition of modern meat
analogue products. Food Science and Human Wellness,
8(4), 320-329.
8. Kumar, P., Chatli, M. K., Mehta, N., Singh, P., Malav,
O. P., & Verma, A. K. (2017). Meat analogues: Health
promising sustainable meat substitutes. Critical reviews
in food science and nutrition, 57(5), 923-932.
Maillard reaction: A
chemical reaction between amino acids
and reducing sugars that gives browned
food its idiosyncratic flavor.