7. lampiran lampiran 1. gambar perbandingan warna ...repository.unika.ac.id/15705/8/13.70.0090 helen...

44

7. LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1. Gambar Perbandingan Warna Mantou Ubi Ungu

Keterangan:

Dari kiri ke kanan secara urut: MUU 50, MUU 40, MUU 30

• Lampiran 2. Perhitungan Total Kalori Mantou Ubi Ungu dan Kebutuhan

Asupan Mantou untuk Sarapan

Rumus:

𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖 (𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙100 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚⁄ ) = (4 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔 ⁄ 𝑥 𝐾) + (4 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙𝑔⁄ 𝑥 𝑃) + (9 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔⁄ 𝑥 𝐿)

Keterengan:

K = Karbohidrat (berat basah)

P = Protein (berat basah)

L = Lemak (berat basah)

• Mantou tanpa penambahan ubi jalar ungu (kontrol)

Air = 33,39 g

Abu = 0,39 g

Karbohidrat = 50,82 g

Protein = 8,78 g

Lemak = 6,62 g


𝑔 ⁄ 𝑥 50,82) + (4 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙𝑔⁄ 𝑥 8,78) + (9 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔⁄ 𝑥 6,62)

𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖 (𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙100 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚⁄ ) = (203,28 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔 ⁄ 𝑥 𝐾) + (35,12 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙𝑔⁄ 𝑥 𝑃) + (59,58 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔⁄ 𝑥 𝐿)

𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖 (𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙100 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚⁄ ) = 297,96 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔 ⁄

45

• Mantou ubi ungu dengan penambahan ubi jalar ungu 50%

Air = 37,82 g

Abu = 0,39 g

Karbohidrat = 46,50 g

Protein = 9,83 g

Lemak = 5,45 g


𝑔 ⁄ 𝑥 46,50) + (4 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙𝑔⁄ 𝑥 9,83) + (9 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔⁄ 𝑥 5,45)


𝑔 ⁄ 𝑥 𝐾) + (39,32 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙𝑔⁄ 𝑥 𝑃) + (49,05 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔⁄ 𝑥 𝐿)

𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖 (𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙100 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚⁄ ) = 274,41 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

𝑔 ⁄

• Kebutuhan Asupan Mantou untuk Sarapan

- Kalori mantou ubi ungu 50% 100 g = 274,41 kkal

- Rata-rata berat mantou ubi ungu 50% = 26,5 gram

- Jumlah mantou ubi ungu 50%

yang dikonsumsi dalam 100 gram = 100 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚

26,5 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚= 3,77 = 4 buah mantou

- Untuk memenuhi kebutuhan sarapan sebanyak 300 kkal =

𝑥

300 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙=

4

274,41 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

274,41 kkal . x = 300 kkal . 4

274,41x = 1200

x = 4,37 = 4 buah mantou

- Kalori mantou kontrol 100 g = 297,96 kkal

- Rata-rata berat mantou kontrol = 25,7 gram

- Jumlah mantou kontrol yang

dikonsumsi dalam 100 gram = 100 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚

25,7 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚= 3,89 = 4 buah mantou

- Untuk memenuhi kebutuhan sarapan sebanyak 300 kkal =

𝑥

300 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙=

4

297,96 𝑘𝑘𝑎𝑙

46

297,96 kkal . x = 300 kkal . 4

297,96x = 1200

x = 4,03 = 4 buah mantou

Lampiran 3. Worksheet dan Kuesioner Uji Sensori Ranking dan Rating

Worksheet Uji Ranking dan Rating Hedonik

Tanggal uji :

Jenis sampel : Mantou Ubi Ungu

Identifikasi sampel: Kode

Mantao dengan penambahan Ubi Ungu 30% A

Mantao dengan penambahan Ubi Ungu 40% B

Mantao dengan penambahan Ubi Ungu 50% C

Kode kombinasi urutan penyajian:

ABC = 1

BCA = 2

CBA = 3

ACB = 4

BAC = 5

Penyajian:

Booth Panelis Kode sampel urutan penyajian

I #1, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31 971 585 2251

II #2, 7, 12, 17, 22, 27, 32 397 253 8182

III #3, 8, 13, 18, 23, 28, 33 112 535 777 3

IV #4, 9 , 14, 19, 24, 29, 34 318 711 7424

V #5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 829 688 5775

Rekap kode sampel:

Sampel A 971 818 777 318 688

Sampel B 585 397 535 742 829

Sampel C 225 253 112 711 577

47

UJI RANKING HEDONIK

Nama : Tanggal:

Produk : Mantou Ubi Ungu

Atribut : Warna

Instruksi :

Berkumur-kumurlah dulu sebelum menguji sampel.

Di hadapan Anda terdapat 3 sampel Mantou Ubi Ungu. Bandingkan dan amati warna

sampel secara berturutan dari kiri ke kanan, lihatlah masing–masing. Setelah melihat

semua sampel, Anda boleh mengulang mengamati sesering yang Anda perlukan. Urutkan

sampel dari warna yang paling Anda sukai (=3) hingga sampel yang paling kurang Anda

sukai (=1).

Kode Sampel Ranking (jangan ada yang dobel)

Terima Kasih

UJI RANKING HEDONIK

Nama : Tanggal:


Atribut : Overall

Instruksi :


Di hadapan Anda terdapat 3 sampel Mantou Ubi Ungu. Cicipi sampel secara berturutan

dari kiri ke kanan, rasakan masing-masing. Atribut yang dinilai meliputi rasa, warna, dan

tekstur dari mantao. Setelah mencicipi semua sampel, Anda boleh mengulang sesering

yang Anda perlukan. Urutkan sampel dari rasa yang paling Anda sukai (=3) hingga

sampel yang paling kurang Anda sukai (=1).

Kode Sampel Ranking (jangan ada yang dobel)

Terima Kasih

48

UJI RATING HEDONIK

Nama : Tanggal:


Atribut : Warna

Instruksi :


Di hadapan Anda terdapat 3 sampel Mantou Ubi Ungu. Cicipilah sampel lalu berikan

nilai sesuai dengan tingkat kesukaan Anda pada warna mantao tersebut. Beri nilai dari

yang Anda sangat tidak suka (=1), tidak suka (=2), netral (=3), suka (=4), sangat suka

(=5). Setelah mencicipi semua sampel, Anda boleh mengulang mengamati sesering yang

Anda perlukan. Nilai boleh sama untuk sampel yang berbeda.

Kode Sampel Rating

Terima Kasih

UJI RATING HEDONIK

Nama : Tanggal:


Atribut : Rasa

Instruksi :



nilai sesuai dengan tingkat kesukaan Anda pada rasa mantao tersebut. Beri nilai dari yang

Anda sangat tidak suka (=1), tidak suka (=2), netral (=3), suka (=4), sangat suka (=5).

Setelah mencicipi semua sampel, Anda boleh mengulang mengamati sesering yang Anda

perlukan. Nilai boleh sama untuk sampel yang berbeda.

Kode Sampel Rating

Terima Kasih

49

UJI RATING HEDONIK

Nama : Tanggal:


Atribut : Tekstur (keempukan)

Instruksi :



nilai sesuai dengan tingkat kesukaan anda pada tekstur (keempukan) mantao tersebut.

Beri nilai dari yang Anda sangat tidak suka (=1), tidak suka (=2), netral (=3), suka (=4),

sangat suka (=5). Setelah mencicipi semua sampel, Anda boleh mengulang mengamati

sesering yang Anda perlukan. Nilai boleh sama untuk sampel yang berbeda.

Kode Sampel Rating

Terima Kasih

UJI RATING HEDONIK

Nama : Tanggal:


Atribut : Overall

Instruksi :



nilai sesuai dengan tingkat kesukaan anda pada warna, rasa, dan tekstur mantao tersebut.

Beri nilai dari yang Anda sangat tidak suka (=1), tidak suka (=2), netral (=3), suka (=4),

sangat suka (=5). Setelah mencicipi semua sampel, Anda boleh mengulang mengamati

sesering yang Anda perlukan. Nilai boleh sama untuk sampel yang berbeda.

Kode Sampel Rating

Terima Kasih

50

Lampiran 4. Uji Kruskal Wallis Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Warna, Rasa,

Tekstur dan Overall Mantou

Test Statisticsb,c

Warna Rasa Tekstur Overall

Chi-Square 35.699 3.066 36.886 27.986

df 2 2 2 2

Asymp. Sig. .000 .216 .000 .000

Monte Carlo Sig. Sig. .000a .227a .000a .000a

95% Confidence Interval Lower

Bound .000 .219 .000 .000

Upper

Bound .000 .235 .000 .000

a. Based on 10000 sampled tables with starting seed 2000000.

b. Kruskal Wallis Test

c. Grouping Variable: Perlakuan

Lampiran 5. Uji Mann Whitney Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Warna Mantou

• Mantou Ubi Ungu 30% vs Mantou Ubi Ungu 40%

Test Statisticsb

Warna

Mann-Whitney U 241.000

Wilcoxon W 706.000

Z -3.374

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .001

Monte Carlo Sig. (2-tailed) Sig. .001a

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound .000

Upper Bound .001

Monte Carlo Sig. (1-tailed) 95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound .000

Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a


b. Grouping Variable: Perlakuan

51


Test Statisticsb

Warna


Wilcoxon W 554.000

Z -5.681




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a




Test Statisticsb

Warna


Wilcoxon W 706.000

Z -3.372




Upper Bound .002


Upper Bound .001

Sig. .001a



52

Lampiran 6. Uji Mann Whitney Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Tekstur Mantou


Test Statisticsb

Tekstur


Wilcoxon W 657.500

Z -4.135




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a




Test Statisticsb

Tekstur


Wilcoxon W 542.500

Z -5.854




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a



53


Test Statisticsb

Tekstur


Wilcoxon W 777.500

Z -2.233




Upper Bound .030


Upper Bound .015

Sig. .013a



Lampiran 7. Uji Mann Whitney Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Overall Mantou


Test Statisticsb

Overall


Wilcoxon W 666.500

Z -3.951




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a



54


Test Statisticsb

Overall


Wilcoxon W 593.500

Z -5.055




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a




Test Statisticsb

Overall


Wilcoxon W 846.500

Z -1.105




Upper Bound .310


Upper Bound .160

Sig. .153a



55

Lampiran 8. Uji Kruskal Wallis Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Warna, Rasa,

Tekstur, dan Overall Mantou

Test Statisticsb,c

WARNA RASA TEKSTUR OVERALL

Chi-Square 26.546 13.586 35.144 26.634

df 2 2 2 2

Asymp. Sig. .000 .001 .000 .000

Monte Carlo Sig. Sig. .000a .000a .000a .000a

95% Confidence Interval Lower

Bound .000 .000 .000 .000

Upper

Bound .000 .001 .000 .000


b. Kruskal Wallis Test

c. Grouping Variable: PERLAKUAN

Lampiran 9. Uji Mann Whitney Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Warna Mantou


Test Statisticsb

WARNA


Wilcoxon W 625.500

Z -4.422




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a


b. Grouping Variable: PERLAKUAN

56


Test Statisticsb

WARNA


Wilcoxon W 623.000

Z -4.430




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a




Test Statisticsb

WARNA


Wilcoxon W 857.000

Z -.900




Upper Bound .382


Upper Bound .195

Sig. .188a



57

Lampiran 10. Uji Mann Whitney Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Rasa Mantou


Test Statisticsb

RASA


Wilcoxon W 726.000

Z -2.936




Upper Bound .004


Upper Bound .002

Sig. .001a




Test Statisticsb

RASA


Wilcoxon W 704.500

Z -3.242




Upper Bound .001


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a



58


Test Statisticsb

RASA


Wilcoxon W 850.500

Z -1.035




Upper Bound .317


Upper Bound .165

Sig. .158a



Lampiran 11. Uji Mann Whitney Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Tekstur Mantou


Test Statisticsb

TEKSTUR


Wilcoxon W 622.000

Z -4.490




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a



59


Test Statisticsb

TEKSTUR


Wilcoxon W 556.000

Z -5.432




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a




Test Statisticsb

TEKSTUR


Wilcoxon W 795.000

Z -1.849




Upper Bound .071


Upper Bound .037

Sig. .033a



60

Lampiran 12. Uji Mann Whitney Nilai Ranking pada Parameter Overall Mantou


Test Statisticsb

OVERALL


Wilcoxon W 725.000

Z -2.969




Upper Bound .004


Upper Bound .002

Sig. .001a




Test Statisticsb

OVERALL


Wilcoxon W 601.500

Z -4.800




Upper Bound .000


Upper Bound .000

Sig. .000a



61


Test Statisticsb

OVERALL


Wilcoxon W 727.500

Z -2.952




Upper Bound .003


Upper Bound .002

Sig. .001a



Lampiran 13. Normalitas Uji proksimat dan Nilai Kalori Mantou

Tests of Normality

perlakuan

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

kadar_air Mantou Kontrol .206 6 .200* .902 6 .384

Mantou Ubi Ungu 50% .183 6 .200* .910 6 .440

kadar_abu Mantou Kontrol .261 6 .200* .866 6 .211

Mantou Ubi Ungu 50% .237 6 .200* .917 6 .485

kadar_lemak Mantou Kontrol .246 6 .200* .926 6 .547

Mantou Ubi Ungu 50% .179 6 .200* .921 6 .513

kadar_protein Mantou Kontrol .246 6 .200* .916 6 .474

Mantou Ubi Ungu 50% .275 6 .174 .857 6 .181

karbohidrat Mantou Kontrol .209 6 .200* .965 6 .860

Mantou Ubi Ungu 50% .250 6 .200* .866 6 .211

kalori Mantou Kontrol .164 6 .200* .961 6 .826

Mantou Ubi Ungu 50% .292 6 .119 .859 6 .187

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

62

Lampiran 14. Independent Sample T-Test Uji Proksimat dan Nilai Kalori Mantou

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for

Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means

F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean

Difference

Std. Error

Difference

95% Confidence Interval

of the Difference

Lower Upper

kadar_air Equal variances assumed .512 .491 -10.096 10 .000 -4.427682 .438542 -5.404815 -3.450549

Equal variances not assumed -10.096 9.335 .000 -4.427682 .438542 -5.414340 -3.441023

kadar_abu Equal variances assumed 7.842 .019 -.674 10 .516 -.002065 .003066 -.008898 .004767

Equal variances not assumed -.674 7.251 .521 -.002065 .003066 -.009266 .005135

kadar_lemak Equal variances assumed .673 .431 6.083 10 .000 1.166167 .191701 .739029 1.593304

Equal variances not assumed 6.083 9.253 .000 1.166167 .191701 .734308 1.598025

kadar_protein Equal variances assumed 9.572 .011 -3.009 10 .013 -1.049500 .348734 -1.826527 -.272473

Equal variances not assumed -3.009 5.480 .027 -1.049500 .348734 -1.922841 -.176159

karbohidrat Equal variances assumed 2.995 .114 6.404 10 .000 4.313167 .673531 2.812447 5.813886

Equal variances not assumed 6.404 7.926 .000 4.313167 .673531 2.757486 5.868847

kalori Equal variances assumed 2.808 .125 14.493 10 .000 23.551667 1.625009 19.930921 27.172412

Equal variances not assumed 14.493 8.004 .000 23.551667 1.625009 19.804732 27.298601

63

Lampiran 15. Normalitas Aktivitas Antioksidan Mantou

Tests of Normality

Perlakuan



Kadar_Antioksidan Kontrol .233 6 .200* .928 6 .566

Ubi Ungu 30% .174 6 .200* .956 6 .787

Ubi Ungu 40% .218 6 .200* .945 6 .702

Ubi Unggu 50% .245 6 .200* .844 6 .141



Lampiran 16. Duncan Aktivitas Antioksidan Mantou

Kadar_Antioksidan

Duncan

Perlakuan N

Subset for alpha = 0.05

1 2 3 4

Kontrol 6 .292008

Ubi Ungu 30% 6

6.678972E

0

Ubi Ungu 40% 6

1.205241E

1

Ubi Unggu 50% 6

1.611756E

1

Sig.

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

64

Lampiran 17. Normalitas Volume Pengembangan Mantou

Tests of Normality

Perlakuan



Volume_Pengembangan Kontrol .157 6 .200* .978 6 .944

Ubi Ungu

30% .294 6 .113 .772 6 .033

Ubi Ungu

40% .162 6 .200* .973 6 .912

Ubi Ungu

50% .233 6 .200* .932 6 .595



Lampiran 18. Duncan Volume Pengembangan Mantou

Volume_Pengembangan

Duncan

Perlakuan N


1 2 3 4

Ubi Ungu 50% 6

2.133667E

1

Ubi Ungu 40% 6

2.652426E

1

Ubi Ungu 30% 6

3.467207E

1

Kontrol 6

5.086823E

1

Sig.

1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

65

Lampiran 19. Normalitas Hardness, Cohesiveness, Springiness, dan Adhesiveness

Mantou

Tests of Normality

Perlakuan



Hardness Kontrol .286 6 .137 .755 6 .022

Ubi Ungu 30% .178 6 .200* .962 6 .839

Ubi Ungu 40% .258 6 .200* .878 6 .261

Ubi Ungu 50% .299 6 .101 .781 6 .039

Cohesiveness Kontrol .257 6 .200* .913 6 .457

Ubi Ungu 30% .173 6 .200* .955 6 .782

Ubi Ungu 40% .166 6 .200* .978 6 .944

Ubi Ungu 50% .198 6 .200* .966 6 .863

Springiness Kontrol .292 6 .121 .897 6 .354

Ubi Ungu 30% .197 6 .200* .932 6 .593

Ubi Ungu 40% .315 6 .063 .797 6 .056

Ubi Ungu 50% .243 6 .200* .938 6 .643

Adhesiveness Kontrol .302 6 .091 .879 6 .264

Ubi Ungu 30% .184 6 .200* .906 6 .408

Ubi Ungu 40% .306 6 .083 .776 6 .035

Ubi Ungu 50% .151 6 .200* .961 6 .830



66

Lampiran 20. Duncan Hardness, Cohesiveness, Springiness, dan Adhesiveness

Mantou

Hardness

Duncan

Perlakuan N


1 2 3

Kontrol 6

4.679517E

2

Ubi Ungu 30% 6

5.481050E

2

Ubi Ungu 40% 6

5.576317E

2

5.576317E

2

Ubi Ungu 50% 6

5.979450E

2

Sig.

1.000 .660 .073


cohesiveness

Duncan

perlakuan N


1 2

Mantou Kontrol 6 .40872

Mantou Ubi Ungu 30% 6 .42115



Sig. .165 .457


67

Springiness

Duncan

Perlakuan N


1

Ubi Ungu 50% 6 11.4433

Ubi Ungu 40% 6 11.7297

Ubi Ungu 30% 6 11.8032

Kontrol 6 12.0653

Sig. .076

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed

.

Lampiran 21. Normalitas Nilai Rata-rata Diameter Pori Mantou

Tests of Normality

Perlakuan



Diameter_Pori Kontrol .216 5 .200* .927 5 .574

Ubi Ungu 30% .154 5 .200* .985 5 .961

Ubi Ungu 40% .237 5 .200* .947 5 .719

Ubi Ungu 50% .151 5 .200* .991 5 .982



Lampiran 22. Duncan Nilai Rata-rata Diameter Pori Mantou

Diameter_Pori

Duncan

Perlakuan N


1 2 3 4

Ubi Ungu 50% 5 .607929

Ubi Ungu 40% 5 .788914

Ubi Ungu 30% 5 .836367

Kontrol 5 .948461

Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000


Adhesiveness

Duncan

Perlakuan N


1 2

Ubi Ungu 50% 6 .018541

Ubi Ungu 40% 6 .020068

Ubi Ungu 30% 6 .020181

Kontrol 6 .034243

Sig. .242 1.000


68

Filename: Novita_Sari_Helen_PENGARUH_PENAMBAHAN_UBI_JALAR_UNGU_TERHADAP_KARAKTERISTIK_SENSORI_DAN_FISIKOKIM

IA_SERTA_KA.doc Date: 2017-10-19 06:15 UTC

Results of plagiarism analysis from 2017-10-19 06:21 UTC 3128 matches from 117 sources, of which 2 are online sources. PlagLevel: 8.2%/87.8%

[0] (544 matches, 0.0%87.8%) from your PlagScan document "Novita_Sari...IMIA_SERTA_KA.doc" dated 2017-10-19

[1] (78 matches, 5.4%/8.5%) from your PlagScan document "Samantha_Da...N_YANG_DISUB.docx" dated 2017-10-19 [2] (68 matches, 5.0%/7.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...pung_Pati_Ja.docx" dated 2017-10-19 [3] (57 matches, 3.6%/6.4%) from your PlagScan document "KIKI_CHRIST..._JALAR_PUTIH.docx" dated 2017-07-07 [4] (57 matches, 3.6%/6.2%) from your PlagScan document "KIKI_CHRIST..._JALAR_PUTIH.docx" dated 2017-07-19 [5] (60 matches, 2.4%/6.2%) from your PlagScan document "Theo_Rony_Y...rakteristik_F.doc" dated 2017-07-06 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [7] (56 matches, 2.3%/5.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...SELLA_SEBAGAI.doc" dated 2017-06-05 [8] (36 matches, 1.3%/3.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Juliana Finda.doc" dated 2016-07-15 [9] (33 matches, 1.3%/3.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...DAN_STROBERI.docx" dated 2016-11-07 [10] (33 matches, 1.1%/2.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...DAP_PERUBAHA.docx" dated 2017-02-09 [11] (33 matches, 1.2%/3.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation... Nining Ayu W.pdf" dated 2016-02-19 [12] (34 matches, 0.8%/3.5%) from your PlagScan document "Gabryella_S...N_JAMBU_BIJI.docx" dated 2017-07-24 [13] (35 matches, 0.5%/3.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...0.0032 Kumala.doc" dated 2016-05-10 [14] (30 matches, 1.4%/3.3%) from your PlagScan document "Yohana_Mari...is_Tepung_Ga.docx" dated 2017-07-09 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [16] (28 matches, 1.4%/2.7%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...700093 cyntya.pdf" dated 2016-02-25 [17] (32 matches, 1.6%/2.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...0113 STEFANUS.pdf" dated 2016-07-12 [18] (30 matches, 1.3%/2.7%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation... Julian Vinda.doc" dated 2016-07-19 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [20] (35 matches, 0.8%/3.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...033 Melina 1.docx" dated 2016-05-10 [21] (31 matches, 0.8%/3.2%) from your PlagScan document "Gabryella_S...N_JAMBU_BIJI.docx" dated 2017-07-28 [22] (30 matches, 0.9%/2.6%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...penaeus_vann.docx" dated 2017-06-15 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [24] (29 matches, 0.7%/2.8%) from your PlagScan document "Gabryella_S...N_JAMBU_BIJI.docx" dated 2017-07-25 [25] (31 matches, 1.3%/2.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ISOLAT_PROTE.docx" dated 2017-03-03 [26] (27 matches, 1.2%/2.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ana Vinda (3).doc" dated 2016-07-19 [27] (28 matches, 1.1%/2.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...INGKAT_PENER.docx" dated 2016-11-07 [28] (24 matches, 1.2%/2.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...PERKAYA_DENG.docx" dated 2016-11-30 [29] (28 matches, 1.0%/2.3%) from your PlagScan document "Dewi_Melian...thylcellulos.docx" dated 2017-10-18 [30] (24 matches, 1.0%/2.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ng_Gandum,_T.docx" dated 2017-03-04 [31] (25 matches, 1.0%/2.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ISOLAT_PROTE.docx" dated 2017-03-03 [32] (23 matches, 0.6%/2.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...a_platensis_.docx" dated 2017-03-02 [33] (25 matches, 0.7%/2.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation....0142 Renega.docx" dated 2016-07-14 [34] (26 matches, 0.9%/2.4%) from your PlagScan document "Eunike_Lana...teristik_Fis.docx" dated 2017-10-18 [35] (27 matches, 0.6%/2.2%) from your PlagScan document "Sri_Wuning_..._Rumput_Laut.docx" dated 2017-10-18 [36] (26 matches, 0.9%/2.3%) from your PlagScan document "Eunike_Lana...okimia_Roti_.docx" dated 2017-10-19 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [38] (25 matches, 1.4%/2.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...an_Snack_Bar.docx" dated 2017-03-15 [39] (25 matches, 0.4%/2.0%) from your PlagScan document "Kriswanto_M...PADA_ES_KRIM.docx" dated 2017-07-19 [40] (24 matches, 1.1%/1.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...illien Wibowo.pdf" dated 2016-02-01 [41] (22 matches, 0.7%/1.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...lius)_dan_Spi.doc" dated 2017-03-06 [42] (26 matches, 1.1%/1.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...TEIN_DAUN_YA.docx" dated 2017-03-06 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [44] (23 matches, 0.7%/1.9%) from your PlagScan document "Maria_Winda...rasi_Bakteri.docx" dated 2017-07-28 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [46] (19 matches, 0.4%/1.8%) from your PlagScan document "Arief_wiyar...ristik_fisik.docx" dated 2017-07-28 (+ 1 documents with identical matches)

http://www.plagscan.com/highlight?doc=116121088&source=0
















































69

[48] (23 matches, 0.2%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "Ananta_Levi...n_dan_Jenis_.docx" dated 2017-07-21 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [50] (21 matches, 0.4%/1.7%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...HU_PENGERING.docx" dated 2017-02-28 [51] (19 matches, 1.0%/1.5%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...n_Yakon_(Sma.docx" dated 2017-03-06 [52] (19 matches, 0.4%/1.7%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...eta Suprajogi.pdf" dated 2017-03-08 [53] (22 matches, 0.2%/1.8%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...a_Saus_Cabai.docx" dated 2017-02-14 [54] (18 matches, 0.9%/1.6%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Benny Irawan.docx" dated 2016-07-14 [55] (19 matches, 0.7%/1.6%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...0.0086 Greta.docx" dated 2016-05-24 [56] (21 matches, 0.2%/1.4%) from your PlagScan document "Ananta_Levi...n_dan_Jenis_.docx" dated 2017-07-24 [57] (18 matches, 0.5%/1.5%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...chifolius)_T.docx" dated 2017-02-09 [58] (17 matches, 0.4%/1.7%) from your PlagScan document "Arief_wiyar...-Kimia_Serta.docx" dated 2017-07-19 [59] (16 matches, 0.3%/1.7%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...na Chandra P.docx" dated 2016-06-30 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [61] (20 matches, 0.3%/1.5%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...Toni Hartanto.doc" dated 2016-07-19 [62] (16 matches, 0.0%1.7%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...p_Kualitas_J.docx" dated 2017-02-09 [63] (17 matches, 0.2%/1.7%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...uk_bit_merah.docx" dated 2016-02-09 [64] (19 matches, 0.3%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "Regina_Tani..._FISIKOKIMIA.docx" dated 2017-10-18 [65] (17 matches, 0.7%/1.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...onchifolius).docx" dated 2017-02-09 [66] (17 matches, 1.2%/1.5%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...an_Snack_Bar.docx" dated 2017-03-15 [67] (16 matches, 0.1%/1.6%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...elle Darmawan.doc" dated 2016-07-19

[68] (17 matches, 0.5%/1.6%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...A_ABU_DAN_GL.docx" dated 2017-03-05 [69] (16 matches, 0.4%/1.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation..._adonan_tepu.docx" dated 2016-02-05 [70] (20 matches, 1.1%/1.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...iawan Santoso.pdf" dated 2016-02-01 [71] (15 matches, 0.4%/1.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...tepung_ketan.docx" dated 2016-02-05 [72] (15 matches, 0.0%1.6%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...iliam Wibowo.docx" dated 2016-03-10 (+ 2 documents with identical matches) [75] (17 matches, 0.5%/1.4%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...0162 Melinda.docx" dated 2016-09-15 [76] (17 matches, 0.1%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "Raynaldi_Su...Ayam_Broiler.docx" dated 2017-07-22 [77] (13 matches, 0.2%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...tepung_ketan.docx" dated 2016-02-05 [78] (17 matches, 0.4%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...elia Claudia.docx" dated 2016-04-05 [79] (15 matches, 0.0%/1.5%) from your PlagScan document "Anita_Widia..._dengan_Sola.docx" dated 2017-10-19 [80] (11 matches, 0.0%1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...57 Francisca.docx" dated 2016-08-04 [81] (14 matches, 0.2%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...lia Eka Putri.pdf" dated 2017-03-08 [82] (16 matches, 0.1%/1.2%) from your PlagScan document "Raynaldi_Su...Ayam_Broiler.docx" dated 2017-07-24 [83] (15 matches, 0.4%/1.3%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...0.0024 Sella.docx" dated 2016-05-25 [84] (14 matches, 0.4%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...tepung_ketan.docx" dated 2016-02-05 [85] (14 matches, 0.2%/1.1%) from https://nurulintenaulya2013.wordpress.com/tugas-kuliah/pemanfaatan-ekstrak-umbi-ungu/ [86] (12 matches, 0.5%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...a 12.70.0086.docx" dated 2016-03-10 [87] (14 matches, 0.3%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...lyzabeth D.A.docx" dated 2016-06-30 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [89] (15 matches, 0.4%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...an_Non_Vakum.docx" dated 2016-02-09 [90] (12 matches, 0.2%/1.2%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ORBET_HERBAL.docx" dated 2016-02-05 [91] (10 matches, 0.2%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ella REVISI.docx" dated 2016-02-09 [92] (19 matches, 0.0%0.9%) from your PlagScan document "Rosa_Xena_M...elas_1_dan_2.docx" dated 2017-10-17 [93] (12 matches, 0.0%1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...0163 Yeskiel.docx" dated 2016-06-20 (+ 2 documents with identical matches) [96] (14 matches, 0.3%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ephanie Scan.docx" dated 2016-03-10 [97] (13 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/12.../Chapter II.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y [98] (10 matches, 0.1%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation....0049 RAISSA.docx" dated 2016-07-12 [99] (12 matches, 0.0%1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation....70.0002 BUDI.pdf" dated 2016-06-13 [100] (12 matches, 0.0%1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...yo 12.70.0002.pdf" dated 2016-06-13 [101] (11 matches, 0.0%1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...3 yeski baru.docx" dated 2016-07-11 [102] (11 matches, 0.2%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...a Aulia Sani.docx" dated 2016-07-21 [103] (15 matches, 0.1%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...70.0053 Reza.docx" dated 2016-06-20 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [105] (11 matches, 0.0%1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...NIKA KRIS. H.docx" dated 2016-08-04 [106] (12 matches, 0.2%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ana Tara Dewi.pdf" dated 2017-03-08 [107] (13 matches, 0.1%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation..._KETAN_CIASEM.doc" dated 2017-03-07 [108] (12 matches, 0.3%/1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...70.0025 lULU.docx" dated 2016-07-01 [109] (13 matches, 0.4%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...IKO HERMAWAN.docx" dated 2016-06-22 [110] (10 matches, 0.0%1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...litas_Kencur.docx" dated 2017-02-09 [111] (9 matches, 0.0%1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ACIA ARSANTI.docx" dated 2016-08-04





































https://nurulintenaulya2013.wordpress.com/tugas-kuliah/pemanfaatan-ekstrak-umbi-ungu/











http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/65434/Chapter%20II.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y















70

[112] (13 matches, 0.3%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ira (revisi).docx" dated 2016-07-11 (+ 1 documents with identical matches) [114] (13 matches, 0.3%/0.9%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...anti Fidelia.docx" dated 2016-07-21

[115] (9 matches, 0.0%1.1%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation...ACIA ARSANTI.docx" dated 2016-08-04 [116] (14 matches, 0.3%/1.0%) from a PlagScan document of your organisation... PERMATASARI.docx" dated 2016-07-01

Settings

Sensitivity: Medium Bibliography: Bibliography excluded Citation detection: Reduce PlagLevel Whitelist: --

Analyzed document

=====================1/44======================






7. lampiran lampiran 1. gambar perbandingan warna ...repository.unika.ac.id/15705/8/13.70.0090 helen...

Documents