recent technologies and future perspectives in cancer therapies – pubrica
DESCRIPTION
Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality globally, and many research studies have focused in the last decade on developing novel therapeutics to lessen the negative effects of existing treatment. Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3ymSvaG For our services: https://pubrica.com/sevices/research-services/ Why Pubrica: When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts. Contact us: Web: https://pubrica.com/ Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/ Email: [email protected] WhatsApp : +91 9884350006 United Kingdom: +44-1618186353TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2021 pubrica. All rights reserved 1
Recent Technologies and Future Perspectives in
Cancer Therapies
Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica, [email protected]
Keywords: Cancer, Immunotherapy, Gene therapy,
Radiomics and pathomics, Therapies,
I. INTRODUCTION
Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality
globally, and many research studies have focused in the
last decade on developing novel therapeutics to lessen
the negative effects of existing treatments. Tumors
become extremely heterogeneous as cancer progresses,
resulting in a mixed population of cells with varying
molecular characteristics and therapeutic
responses.This variability may be seen at both a
geographic and temporal level, and it is a significant
element in the establishment of resistance phenotypes,
which is aided by a selection pressure applied during
drug administration[1]. Typically, cancer is treated as a
single, worldwide disease, and tumors are viewed as a
group of cells.. As a result, a thorough knowledge of
these complicated events is critical for developing
accurate and effective treatments. Nanomedicine
provides a diverse platform of biocompatible and
biodegradable technologies for delivering traditional
chemotherapeutic medicines in vivo, boosting their
bioavailability and concentration surrounding tumor
tissues, as well as their release profile. Nanoparticles
can be used for a variety of purposes, from diagnostic
to therapy[2].
II. NATURAL ANTIOXIDANTS IN CANCER
THERAPY
Exogenous assaults to the human body, such
as ultraviolet (UV) rays, air pollution, and tobacco
smoke, cause the creation of reactive species,
particularly oxidants and free radicals, which are
responsible for the start of many diseases, including
cancer. These molecules can be formed as a result of
drug delivery in the clinic, but they can also be formed
spontaneously inside our cells and tissues by
mitochondria and peroxisomes, as well as macrophage
metabolism, during normal physiological aerobic
activities. DNA (genetic changes, DNA double strand
breaks, and chromosomal abnormalities) and other bio-
macromolecules, such as lipids (membrane
peroxidation and necrosis) and proteins (substantially
affecting the regulation of transcription factors and, as a
result, of important metabolic pathways) can be
damaged by oxidative stress and radical oxygen species
[3].
III. TARGETED THERAPY AND
IMMUNOTHERAPY
The low specificity of chemotherapeutic
medicines for cancer cells is one of the key difficulties
with conventional cancer treatments. In fact, most
medications have severe side effects because they act
on both healthy and sick organs.. Clinical Researchers
are working hard to figure out how to target only the
targeted site. Because of their enhanced permeability
and retention effect (EPR), nanoparticles have sparked
a lot of attention because of their tendency to aggregate
more in tumor tissues. The small size of nanoparticles,
as well as the leaky vasculature and poor lymphatic
drainage of neoplastic tissues, are used in this passive
targeting method[4]. Passive targeting, on the other
hand, is difficult to regulate and can result in multidrug
resistance (MDR)[5]. Active targeting, on the other
hand, improves tumor cell uptake by targeting specific
receptors that are overexpressed on the cells[6].
Nanoparticles, for example, can be functionalized with
ligands that attach to specific cells or subcellular
locations in an unambiguous manner[7] .
IV. GENE THERAPY FOR CANCER TREATMENT
Gene therapy entails inserting a healthy copy
of a faulty gene into the genome in order to treat a
specific condition[8]. A retroviral vector was used to
transfer the adenosine deaminase (ADA) gene to T-
cells in patients with severe combined
immunodeficiency (SCID) for the first time in 1990.
Further study revealed that gene therapy might be used
to cure a variety of human uncommon and chronic
diseases, as well as, most significantly, cancer..
Copyright © 2021 pubrica. All rights reserved 2
Approximately 2,900 gene therapy clinical trials are
now underway, with cancer accounting for 66.6 percent
of them[9]. Different strategies are under evaluation for
cancer gene therapy: 1) targeted silencing of oncogenes,
2) expression of pro-apoptotic and chemo-sensitising
genes 3) expression of genes able to solicit specific
antitumour immune responses and 4) expression of wild
type tumour suppressor genes.
V. THERMAL ABLATION AND MAGNETIC
HYPERTHERMIA
The term "thermal ablation of tumors" refers to
a set of procedures that use heat (hyperthermia) or cold
(hypothermia) to eliminate cancerous tissues[10]. Cell
necrosis is reported to occur at temperatures as low as -
40°C and as high as 60°C.. Cell necrosis is reported to
occur at temperatures as low as -40°C and as high as
60°C.Furthermore, cancer cells have been demonstrated
to be more susceptible to high temperatures than
healthy cells.
The production of ice crystals upon cooling
causes hypothermic ablation, which destroys cell
membranes and eventually kills cells.The chosen
cooling agent is argon gas, which may cool surrounding
tissues to -160°C.Also, because nitrogen has a higher
heat capacity than argon, gases at their critical point can
Copyright © 2021 pubrica. All rights reserved 3
be used. However, the technology for controlling and
directing them is still in its infancy[11].
VI. RADIOMICS AND PATHOMICS
The term "radiomics" refers to the high-
throughput quantification of tumor features based on
medical image analysis [12]. Pathomics, on the other
hand, is dependent on the creation and analysis of high-
resolution tissue images[13]. Many clinical research
projects are focusing on the development of novel
image processing techniques in order to extrapolate
information through quantification and disease
classification[14].To detect disease phenotypes, flexible
databases are necessary to accommodate large amounts
of data from gene expression, histology, 3D tissue
reconstruction (MRI), and metabolic characteristics
(positron emission tomography, PET)[15].
VII. CONCLUSION
In recent years, cancer research has made
significant progress toward more effective, precise, and
less intrusive cancer treatments.While nanomedicine in
combination with targeted therapy improved the
biodistribution of new or already tested
chemotherapeutic agents around the specific tissue to
be treated, additional techniques, such as gene therapy,
siRNA delivery, immunotherapy, and antioxidant
compounds, provide cancer patients with new
options.Thermal ablation and magnetic hyperthermia,
on the other hand, are potential alternatives to tumor
resection.Finally, radiomics and pathomics techniques
aid in the handling of large data sets generated by
cancer patients in order to enhance prognosis and
outcomes.
REFERENCES
[1] I. Dagogo-Jack and A. T. Shaw, “Tumour
heterogeneity and resistance to cancer
therapies,” Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol., vol. 15, no.
2, pp. 81–94, Feb. 2018, doi:
10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.166.
[2] C. Martinelli, C. Pucci, and G. Ciofani,
“Nanostructured carriers as innovative tools for
cancer diagnosis and therapy,” APL Bioeng.,
vol. 3, no. 1, p. 011502, Mar. 2019, doi:
10.1063/1.5079943.
[3] B. Halliwell, “Oxidative stress and cancer: have
we moved forward?,” Biochem. J., vol. 401, no.
1, pp. 1–11, Jan. 2007, doi:
10.1042/BJ20061131.
[4] R. Bazak, M. Houri, S. El Achy, S. Kamel, and
T. Refaat, “Cancer active targeting by
nanoparticles: a comprehensive review of
literature,” J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., vol.
141, no. 5, pp. 769–784, May 2015, doi:
10.1007/s00432-014-1767-3.
[5] S. Barua and S. Mitragotri, “Challenges
associated with penetration of nanoparticles
across cell and tissue barriers: A review of
current status and future prospects,” Nano
Today, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 223–243, Apr. 2014,
doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.04.008.
[6] S. Xu, B. Z. Olenyuk, C. T. Okamoto, and S. F.
Hamm-Alvarez, “Targeting receptor-mediated
endocytotic pathways with nanoparticles:
Rationale and advances,” Adv. Drug Deliv.
Rev., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 121–138, Jan. 2013,
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.041.
[7] C. Pucci, C. Martinelli, and G. Ciofani,
“Innovative approaches for cancer treatment:
current perspectives and new challenges,”
Ecancermedicalscience, vol. 13, Sep. 2019, doi:
10.3332/ecancer.2019.961.
[8] T. Friedmann, “A brief history of gene
therapy,” Nat. Genet., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–98,
Oct. 1992, doi: 10.1038/ng1092-93.
[9] S. L. Ginn, A. K. Amaya, I. E. Alexander, M.
Edelstein, and M. R. Abedi, “Gene therapy
clinical trials worldwide to 2017: An update,”
J. Gene Med., vol. 20, no. 5, p. e3015, May
2018, doi: 10.1002/jgm.3015.
[10] H. J. W. L. Aerts, “The Potential of Radiomic-
Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine,”
JAMA Oncol., vol. 2, no. 12, p. 1636, Dec.
2016, doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2631.
[11] A. Hervault and N. T. K. Thanh, “Magnetic
nanoparticle-based therapeutic agents for
thermo-chemotherapy treatment of cancer,”
Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 20, pp. 11553–11573,
2014, doi: 10.1039/C4NR03482A.
[12] P. Lambin et al., “Radiomics: Extracting more
information from medical images using
advanced feature analysis,” Eur. J. Cancer, vol.
48, no. 4, pp. 441–446, Mar. 2012, doi:
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036.
[13] J. Kong et al., “Machine-Based Morphologic
Analysis of Glioblastoma Using Whole-Slide
Pathology Images Uncovers Clinically Relevant
Molecular Correlates,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no.
11, p. e81049, Nov. 2013, doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0081049.
[14] L. P. Clarke, B. S. Croft, R. Nordstrom, H.
Zhang, G. Kelloff, and J. Tatum, “Quantitative
Imaging for Evaluation of Response to Cancer
Therapy,” Transl. Oncol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp.
195–197, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1593/tlo.09217.
[15] D. Romo-Bucheli, A. Janowczyk, H. Gilmore,
E. Romero, and A. Madabhushi, “Automated
Tubule Nuclei Quantification and Correlation
Copyright © 2021 pubrica. All rights reserved 4
with Oncotype DX risk categories in ER+
Breast Cancer Whole Slide Images,” Sci. Rep.,
vol. 6, no. 1, p. 32706, Dec. 2016, doi:
10.1038/srep32706.