ke 2-persepsi konsumen thdp pelayanan

Upload: imnotactive

Post on 04-Apr-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    1/41

    PERSEPSI KONSUMENTERHADAP PELAYANAN

    Imanuddin Hasbi

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    2/41

    CUSTOMER PERCEPTION

    How customers perceive services, howthey assess whether they have

    experienced quality service, andwhether they are satisfied.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    3/41

    Customer Perceptions of Quality and

    Customer SatisfactionReliability

    Assurance

    TangibleEmpathy

    Responsiveness

    Service

    Quality

    Product

    Quality

    Situational

    Factors

    Customer

    Satisfaction

    Personal

    FactorsPrice

    Reliability

    Durability

    Repaireability

    Form

    Features

    Performance

    Conformance

    Style

    Design

    Interaction

    Quality

    Reliability

    AssuranceTangible

    Empathy

    Responsiveness

    PhysicalEnvironment

    Quality

    Reliability

    Assurance

    Tangible

    Empathy

    Responsiveness

    Outcome

    Quality

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    4/41

    CUSTOMER

    SATISFACTION What Is Customer Satisfaction? What Determines Customer

    Satisfaction? National Customer Satisfaction

    Indexes

    Outcomes of Customer Satisfaction

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    5/41

    What Is Customer

    Satisfaction?Satisfaction is the consumersfulfillment response. It is a judgement

    that a product or service feature, orthe product or service itself, provide apleasurable level of consumption-related fulfillment.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    6/41

    What Determines

    Customer Satisfaction? Product & Service Feature Consumer Emotions

    Attributions for Service Success orFailure Perceptions of Equity or Fairness

    Other Consumers, Family Members,and Coworkers

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    7/41

    National Customer

    Satisfaction Indexes The American Customer SatisfactionIndex (ACSI)

    Indonesian Customer SatisfactionIndex (ICSI)

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    8/41

    Measurement CS QSS= Quality Satisfaction Score/kepuasan terhadap kualitas produk/layanan

    VSS=Value Satisfaction Score/kepuasan

    terhadap harga berdasarkan kualitas yangditerima PBS=Perceived Best Score/persepsi bahwa

    merek secara keseluruhan (kualitas produk,harga, dll.) merupakan yang terbaikdibandingkan semua merek lain.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    9/41

    Measurement CS Mengukur QSS dan VSS masing-masing merekdigunakan skala Likert 1-5 (1=sangat tidakpuas,2=tidak puas,3=biasa saja,4=puas,5=sangatpuas).

    Mengukur PBS menggunakan skala binomial, yakninilai 1 atau 0. Kalau suatu merek dipersepsisebagai merek yang secara keseluruhan(harga,kualitas produk, dll.) terbaik danmemuaskan, maka diberi nilai 1. Sebaliknya, diberi

    nilai 0. Misal angka PBS 70%, artinya 70 diantara100 orang menganggap merek tersebut sebagaiyang terbaik.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    10/41

    Measurement CS Mengukur TSS=Total Satisfaction Score/nilaitotal kepuasan pelanggan, merupakan nilai relatif(bisa positif atau negatif), yang tujuannya untukmembuat rangking.

    Angka TSS nol, berarti merek tersebut hanyamampu memuaskan pelanggan sama dengan rata-rata industrinya. Bila positif, berarti merek itumampu memuaskan pelanggan di atas rata-rataindustrinya. Sebaliknya bila negatif, merek itu

    berada di bawah rata-rata industrinya.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    11/41

    ICSI 2001 PER INDUSTRY

    No. KategoriProduk QualitySatis-factionScore

    (QSS)

    ValueSatis-factionScore

    (VSS)

    Perce-ivedBest

    Score

    (PBS)1 Handphone 3,96 3,67 62,0%

    2 Simcard 3,86 3,65 67,1%

    3 Printer 3,89 3,64 65,1%4 Mobil 3,95 3,67 44,4%

    5 Tabungan 3,89 3,65 55,3%

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    12/41

    ICSI 2001 PER KATEGORI PRODUK

    No. MerekHandphone

    QualitySatis-faction

    Score (QSS)

    Value Satis-factionScore (VSS)

    Perce-ivedBest

    Score(PBS)

    TotalSatis-factionScore(TSS)

    1 Nokia 4,09 3,72 74,6% 0,63

    2 Siemens 4,05 3,71 68,6% 0,51

    3 Ericsson 3,81 3,64 51,1% -0,06

    4 Samsung 3,81 3,66 29,8% -0,32

    5 Motorolla 3,79 3,46 44,3% -0,35

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    13/41

    Outcomes of Customer

    Satisfaction Many believe that customersatisfaction is correlated with other

    measures of economic health such ascorporate earnings and stock value

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    14/41

    Outcomes of Customer

    Satisfaction Medio 1998, masyarakat pasar modal Amerika Serikatdisentakkan oleh temuan penelitian National QualityResearch Center, University of Michigan Business School.Bukan temuan tentang penyebab terpuruk ataumelambungnya harga-harga saham di bursa-bursa saham AS,

    tetapi mengenai korelasi antara indeks kepuasan pelangganAmerika (ACSI) dan indeks saham di bursa Dow Jons (DowJones Industrial Average). Riset ini menyipulkan, adakorelasi positif kuat antara naik-turunnya indeks ACSIdengan indeks saham Dow Jines. Setiap terjadi kenaikanatau penurunan indeks ACSI selalu diikuti tren yang samaoleh indeks Dow Jones pada kuartal (Quarter) berikutnya(lihat grafik). Ini terbukti, pada kurun survei kuartalI/1995 hingga kuartal III/1997.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    15/41

    Korelasi Antara Index ASCIDengan Index Dow Jones

    18%

    9%

    0

    -9%

    -18%

    2%

    1%

    0

    -1%

    -2%

    Percent change inDow Jones

    industrial average*

    Percentchange inACSI

    *Average for last month of the quarter

    Q1

    95

    Q2

    95

    Q3

    95

    Q4

    95

    Q1

    96

    Q2

    96 Q396

    Q4

    96

    Q1

    97

    Q2

    97 Q3

    97

    Q3

    97

    Q4

    94

    Q1

    95

    Q295

    Q3

    95

    Q4

    95

    Q1

    96

    Q2

    96

    Q3

    96

    Q4

    96

    Q1

    97

    Q2

    97

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    16/41

    Relationship between Customer Satisfaction & Loyalty in

    Competitive Industries

    1 2 3 4 5

    Very Dissatisfied Neither Satisfied Very

    Dissatisfied Satisfied Satisfied

    nor Dissatisfied

    Satisfaction Measure

    Loyalty

    (retention) (%)

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    17/41

    SERVICE QUALITY Outcome, Interaction, PhysicalEnvironment Quality

    Service Quality Dimensions E-Service Quality

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    18/41

    Outcome, Interaction, PhysicalEnvironment Quality

    Brady & Cronin: Outcome quality,Interaction quality, & Physical

    Environment Quality. Gronroos: Two types quality-

    technical and functional-referring to

    the outcome of the service and themanner in which it is delivered.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    19/41

    Outcome, Interaction, PhysicalEnvironment Quality

    Rust & Oliver: Three aspects of servicequality as service product, servicedelivery, and service environment.

    Bitner: the evidence of service quality asconsisting of the three new Ps forservices: People, Process, and Physical

    Evidence.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    20/41

    Outcome, Interaction, PhysicalEnvironment Quality

    Example: A Restaurant

    A restaurant customer will judge the serviceon her perceptions of the meal (technical

    outcome quality) and on how the meal wasserved and how the employees interactedwith her (interaction quality). The decor andsurrounding (physical environment quality) ofrestaurant will also impact the customersperceptions of overall service quality.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    21/41

    Outcome, Interaction, PhysicalEnvironment Quality

    Technical outcome quality for manyservices is highly complex and sometimesambiguous, the quality of the technical

    outcome is not always evident.For example, the technical quality ofservices offered by lawyers, doctors,

    engineers, college professors,accountants, and architects.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    22/41

    Service Quality Dimensions

    Quality of Automobiles is judge by suchfactors as reliability, serviceability,prestige, durability, functionality, and

    ease of use. Quality of food products: flavor,

    freshness, aroma, and so on.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    23/41

    Service Quality Dimensions(Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry)

    RATER or TERRA

    Reliability: ability to perform the promisedservice dependably and accurately.

    Assurance: employees knowledge andcourtesy and their ability to inspire trust

    an confidence.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    24/41

    Service Quality Dimensions

    Tangibles: appearance of physical facilities,equipment, personnel, and writtenmaterials.

    Emphaty: caring, individualized attentiongiven to customers.

    Responsiveness: willingness to helpcustomers and provide prompt service.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    25/41

    E-Service Quality (e-SQ)

    e-SQ is defined as the extent towhich a website facilitatesefficient and effective shopping,purchasing, and delivery.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    26/41

    E-Service Quality

    (11 Dimensions)1. Access2. Ease of navigation

    3. Efficiency

    4. Flexibility5. Reliability

    6. Personalization

    7. Security/privacy

    8. Responsiveness

    9. Assurance/trust10. Site aesthetics

    11. Price knowledge

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    27/41

    E-Service Quality

    (4 core dimensions)1. Efficiency: the ease and speed of accessing andusing the site.

    2. Fulfillment: the extent to which the sites

    promises about order delivery and itemavailability are fulfilled.

    3. Reliability: the correct technical functioning ofthe site.

    4. Privacy: the degree to which the site is safe andprotects customer information.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    28/41

    E-Service Quality

    (3 additional dimensions)1. Responsiveness: handling problems andreturns through the site.

    2. Compensation: the degree to whichcustomers are compensated for problems.

    3. Contact: the degree to which help can beaccessed by telephone or online

    representatives.

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    29/41

    SERVICE ENCOUNTERS: THE FOUNDATIONSFOR SATISFACTION & SERVICE QUALITY

    Service Encounters or Moments of Truth The Importance of Encounters Type of Service Encounters

    Sources of Pleasure and Displeasure in ServiceEncounters General Service Behaviors Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service

    Encounters The Evidence of Service

    Service Encounters or

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    30/41

    Service Encounters orMoments of Truth

    Check-in

    Bellperson takes to room

    Restaurant meal

    Wake-up call

    Checkout

    A Service Encounter

    Cascade for Hotel Visit

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    31/41

    The Importance of Encounters

    Any encounter can potentially bycritical in determining customer

    satisfaction and loyalty

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    32/41

    Type of Service Encounters

    Remote encounters (ATM)

    Phone encounters (goods

    manufacturers or service business) Face-to-face encounters (at Disney

    theme parks)

    S i E

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    33/41

    Service Encounters

    Customers (either internal or external) are asked thefollowing questions:

    Think of a time when, as a customer, you had aparticularly satisfying (or dissatisfying)interaction with____

    When did the incident happen? What specific circumstances led up to this

    situation? Exactly what did the employee (or firm) say or

    do? What resulted that made you feel the interaction

    was satisfying (or dissatisfying)? What could or should have been done differently?

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    34/41

    General Service Behaviors

    Recovery: Employee Response toService Delivery System Failures

    Adaptability: Employee Response toCustomer Needs and Requests

    Spontaneity: Unprompted (tdk tepat)& Unsolicited (tdk memohon)Employee Action

    Coping: Employee Response toProblem Customer.

    GENERA SERVICE BEHAVIORS DOS AND DONTS

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    35/41

    GENERAL SERVICE BEHAVIORS-DOS AND DONTS

    THEME DO DONT

    RECOVERY

    Acknowledge problem

    Explain causesApologize

    Compensate/upgrade

    Lay out options

    Take responsibility

    Ignore customer

    Blame customerLeave customer to fendfor (bertanggung jawabatas) him/herself

    Downgrade

    Act as if nothing is wrongPass the buck

    ADAPTABILITY

    Recognize the seriousness ofthe need

    Acknowledge

    AnticipateAttempt to accommodate

    Adjust the system

    Explain rules/policies

    Take responsibility

    Ignore

    Promise, but fail to followthrough

    Snow unwillingness to tryEmbarrass the customer

    Laugh at the customer

    Avoid responsibility

    Pass the buck

    GENERAL SERVICE BEHAVIORS DOS AND DONTS

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    36/41

    GENERAL SERVICE BEHAVIORS-DOS AND DONTS

    THEME DO DONT

    SPONTANEITY

    Take time

    Be attentive

    Anticipate needs

    Listen

    Provide informationShow empathy

    Exhibit impatience

    Ignore

    Yell(menakuti)/laugh/swear(mencaci)

    Steal from customersDiscriminate

    COPING

    Listen

    Try to accommodate

    Explain

    Let go of thecustomer

    Take customersdissatisfaction personnaly

    Let customersdissatisfaction affectothers

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    37/41

    Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters

    Solved an intensified need: Customers in thiscategory were thrilled (merasa) that thetechnology could bail (jaminan keluar) them out

    of a difficult situation. Better than the alternative: Many SSTstories related to how the technology-basedservice was in some way in some better thanalternative-easy to use, saved time, availablewhen and where the customer needed it, savedmoney.

    Did its job: Because there are so many failuresof technology, many customers are simply

    thrilled when the SST works as it should.

    For Satisfying Self-Service Technologies (SSTs)

    l

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    38/41

    Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters

    Technology failure: Many dissatisfying SSTstories relate to the technology simply notworking as promised-it isnt available when

    needed, PIN numbers dont work, or systemsare off line. Process failure: Often the technology seems to

    work, but later the customer discovers that aback-office or follow-up process, which theyassumed was connected, doesnt work. Forexample, a product order seems to be placedsuccessfully, but it never arrives or the wrongproduct is delivered.

    For Dissatisfying SSTs

    f h h l

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    39/41

    Satisfaction with Technology-Based Service Encounters

    Poor design: Many stories relate to thecustomers dissatisfaction with how thetechnology is designed, in terms of either the

    technical process (technology is confusing,menu options are unclear) or the actual servicedesign (delivery takes too long, service isinflexible).

    Customer-driven failure: In some cases thecustomers told stories of technology or thecompany.

    For Dissatisfying SSTs

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    40/41

    The Evidence of Service

    Process

    Contact employees

    Customer him/herself

    Other Customers

    Tangible communication

    Servicescape

    GuaranteesTechnology

    People

    Physical

    Evidence

    Operational flow of

    activities

    Step in process

    Flexibility vs Standard

    Technology vs Human

    (from the customers point of view)

  • 7/30/2019 Ke 2-Persepsi Konsumen Thdp Pelayanan

    41/41

    STRATEGIES FOR INFLUENCINGCUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS

    Measure and Manage Customer Satisfaction andService Quality (Track trends, diagnose problems,& other customer focus strtegies).

    Aim for Customer Quality and Satisfaction inEvery Service Encounter (Many firms air forZero defects : Recovery, Adaptability,Spontaneity, and Coping).

    Manage the Evidence of Service to Reinforce

    Perceptions (Service mix 8P).