skripsi penerapan technology acceptance model pada...
TRANSCRIPT
i
SKRIPSI
PENERAPAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL PADA SISTEM
INFORMASI PENDUKUNG MATA KULIAH TUGAS AKHIR (STUDI KASUS S1
INFORMATIKA ST3 TELKOM PURWOKERTO)
Skripsi Disusun Guna Memenuhi Syarat
Kelulusan di Program Studi S1 Informatika
Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Telematika Telkom Purwokerto
DISUSUN OLEH :
AGHASTYA ABIYOGA
13102033
PROGRAM STUDI S1 INFORMATIKA
SEKOLAH TINGGI TEKNOLOGI TELEMATIKA TELKOM
PURWOKERTO
2017
ii
iii
iv
KATA PENGANTAR
Alhamdulillah, puji dan syukur penulis panjatkan ke hadirat Allah SWT karena atas berkat
rahmat-Nya penulis mampu menyelesaikan laporan skripsi ini.
Adapun judul skripsi ini, yaitu “PENERAPAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE
MODEL PADA SISTEM INFORMASI PENDUKUNG MATA KULIAH TUGAS
AKHIR (STUDI KASUS S1 INFORMATIKA ST3 TELKOM PURWOKERTO)”.
Penyelesaian penulisan laporan skripsi ini tidak terlepas dari bimbingan, dukungan,
motivasi, do’a serta bantuan dari berbagai pihak. Oleh sebab itu dalam kesempatan ini
penulis mengucapkan terima kasih yang sebesar-besarnya kepada:
1. Bapak, Ibu, dan keluarga tercinta yang selalu memberikan do’a, nasihat dan motivasi
yang tiada henti bagi penulis.
2. Bapak Didi Supriyadi, S.T, M.Kom. Selaku Ketua Program Studi Informatika yang
telah banyak membantu, mengarahkan dan memberi masukan kepada penyusun
dalam menyelesaikan laporan skripsi ini.
3. Ibu Andika Elok Amalia, M. Kom. Selaku dosen pembimbing I atas waktu dan
kesempatan yang telah diberikan untuk mengarahkan dan membimbing penulis dalam
penyusunan skripsi.
4. Ibu S. Thya Safitri S.T, M.T Selaku dosen pembimbing II atas waktu dan kesempatan
yang telah diberikan untuk mengarahkan dan membimbing penulis dalam penyusunan
skripsi.
5. Bapak dan Ibu dosen ST3 Telkom Purwokerto yang telah memberikan tambahan ilmu
dan wawasan kepada penulis selama perkuliahan.
6. Semua pihak yang telah memberi bantuan dan dukungan yang tidak dapat disebutkan
satu per satu.
Penulis menyadari dalam penyusunan laporan skripsi ini masih banyak kekurangan dan
jauh dari sempurna. Oleh karena itu penulis bersedia menerima masukan dari semua pihak
baik kritik maupun saran yang bersifat membangun. Semoga upaya kecil dan tak seberapa
dari penulis ini dapat bermanfaat bagi para pembaca.
Purwokerto, 16 Juli 2017
Aghastya Abiyoga
v
DAFTAR ISI
HALAMAN SAMPUL DALAM ........................................................................................... i
HALAMAN PENGESAHAN ............................................................................................... ii
HALAMAN PERNYATAAN ANTI PLAGIAT ................................................................. iii
KATA PENGANTAR .......................................................................................................... iv
DAFTAR ISI ......................................................................................................................... v
DAFTAR GAMBAR ............................................................................................................ ix
DAFTAR TABEL ................................................................................................................. x
DAFTAR SINGKATAN ...................................................................................................... xi
DAFTAR LAMPIRAN ....................................................................................................... xii
ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... xiii
ABSTRAK.......................................................................................................................... xiv
BAB I PENDAHULUAN ..................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Latar Belakang ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Rumusan Masalah ................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Tujuan Penelitian .................................................................................................... 3
1.4 Batasan Penelitian ................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Manfaat Penelitian .................................................................................................. 3
1.6 Metode Penelitian ................................................................................................... 4
1.6.1 Studi literatur ................................................................................................... 4
1.6.2 Pengembangan sistem informasi tugas akhir................................................... 4
1.6.3 Pengambilan data dan uji sampel .................................................................... 4
1.6.4 Pengujian model evaluasi TAM menggunakan algoritme PLS...................... 4
1.6.5 Penarikan kesimpulan ...................................................................................... 5
1.7 Kontribusi Penelitian .............................................................................................. 5
1.8 Sistematika Penulisan ............................................................................................. 5
BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA DAN DASAR TEORI ...................................................... 6
2.1 Tinjauan Pustaka ..................................................................................................... 6
2.2 Dasar Teori............................................................................................................ 10
2.2.1 Sistem Informasi ............................................................................................ 10
2.2.2 Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) ......................................................... 11
2.2.3 Penetapan Alternatif Jawaban ....................................................................... 13
2.2.4 Uji Validitas ................................................................................................... 13
2.2.5 Uji Reliabilitas ............................................................................................... 14
2.2.6 Algoritma PLS (Partial Less Square) ........................................................... 14
2.2.7 Convergent Validity ....................................................................................... 17
vi
2.2.8 Discriminant Validity .................................................................................... 18
2.2.9 Average Variance Extracted .......................................................................... 18
BAB III MODEL ATAU PERANCANGAN SISTEM ...................................................... 19
3.1 Jenis dan Rancangan Penelitian ............................................................................ 19
3.2 Langkah Penelitian................................................................................................ 19
3.3 Perancangan Sistem .............................................................................................. 21
3.3.1 Proses Bisnis Mata Kuliah Tugas Akhir Satu Yang Sudah Berjalan ............ 21
3.3.1.1 Pendaftaran Judul Tugas Akhir .................................................................. 21
3.3.1.2 Pemilihan Pembimbing Dua ...................................................................... 22
3.3.1.3 Bimbingan Tugas Akhir dengan Dosen ..................................................... 23
3.3.1.4 Pendaftaran Seminar Tugas Akhir ............................................................. 24
3.3.2 Proses Bisnis Sistem Informasi Tugas Akhir ................................................ 25
3.3.2.1 Pendaftaran Judul Tugas Akhir .................................................................. 25
3.3.2.2 Pemilihan Pembimbing Dua ...................................................................... 26
3.3.2.3 Bimbingan Tugas Akhir dengan Dosen ..................................................... 27
3.3.2.4 Persetujuan Proposal Untuk Seminar......................................................... 28
3.3.2.5 Pendaftaran Seminar Tugas Akhir ............................................................. 29
3.4 Use Case Diagram ................................................................................................ 30
3.5 Perancangan Basis Data ........................................................................................ 31
3.6 Perancangan Data.................................................................................................. 32
3.6.1 Deskripsi Entitas User ................................................................................... 32
3.6.2 Deskripsi Entitas Dosen................................................................................. 32
3.6.3 Deskripsi Entitas Mahasiswa ......................................................................... 32
3.6.4 Deskripsi Entitas Proposal ............................................................................. 33
3.6.5 Deskripsi Entitas Bimbingan ......................................................................... 33
3.6.6 Deskripsi Entitas Nilai_Bimbingan ............................................................... 34
3.6.7 Deskripsi Entitas Pembimbing2 .................................................................... 34
3.6.8 Deskripsi Entitas Proposal ............................................................................. 34
3.6.9 Deskripsi Entitas Seminar ............................................................................. 35
3.6.10 Deskripsi Entitas Berita ................................................................................. 36
3.7 Activity Diagram ................................................................................................... 36
3.7.1 Activity Diagram Bimbingan Proposal (Dosen Pembimbing) ...................... 36
3.7.2 Activity Diagram Bimbingan Proposal (Mahasiswa) .................................... 36
3.7.3 Activity Diagram Melihat Nilai Tugas Akhir (Tim Tugas Akhir) ................. 37
vii
3.7.4 Activity Diagram Memilih Pembimbing Satu (Tim Tugas Akhir) ................ 38
3.7.5 Activity Diagram Mengirim Persetujuan Seminar (Mahasiswa) ................... 38
3.7.6 Activity Diagram Menilai Bimbingan (Dosen Pembimbing) ........................ 39
3.7.7 Activity Diagram Menilai Kehadiran (Tim Tugas Akhir) ............................. 39
3.7.8 Activity Diagram Menilai Seminar (Dosen Pembimbing) ............................ 40
3.7.9 Activity Diagram Menyetujui Permohonan Seminar (Tim Tugas Akhir) .........
....................................................................................................................... 40
3.7.10 Activity Diagram Mereview Proposal Awal (Dosen Pembimbing) .............. 41
3.7.11 Activity Diagram Pendaftaran Seminar (Mahasiswa) ................................... 41
3.7.12 Activity Diagram Pendaftaran Pembimbing Dua (Mahasiswa) ..................... 42
3.7.13 Activity Diagram Pendaftaran Pembimbing Dua (Dosen Pembimbing) ....... 42
3.7.14 Activity Diagram Upload Proposal Awal (Mahasiswa) ................................ 43
3.7.15 Activity Diagram Memilih Reviewer (Tim Tugas Akhir) ............................. 43
3.8 Class Diagram ...................................................................................................... 44
3.9 Penerapan Metode TAM ....................................................................................... 44
3.10 Teknik dan Instrumen Penelitian .......................................................................... 45
3.10.1 Penyusunan Kuesioner Penelitian ................................................................. 46
BAB IV HASIL PENGUJIAN DAN ANALISIS ............................................................... 51
4.1 Uji Validitas .......................................................................................................... 51
4.2 Uji Reliabilitas ...................................................................................................... 53
4.3 Analisis Data Dengan Algoritma PLS .................................................................. 54
4.3.1 Perancangan Inner Model .............................................................................. 54
4.3.2 Perancangan Outer Model ............................................................................. 55
4.3.3 Perancangan Diagram Jalur ........................................................................... 55
4.3.4 Estimasi Model .............................................................................................. 56
4.3.5 Evaluasi Model .............................................................................................. 56
4.3.6 Pengujian Hipotesis ....................................................................................... 61
BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN .............................................................................. 63
5.1 Kesimpulan ........................................................................................................... 63
1. Pengaruh user interface terhadap perceived ease of use ....................................... 63
2. Pengaruh user ability and skill terhadap perceived ease of use ............................ 63
3. Pengaruh perceieved ease of use terhadap perceived usefulness .......................... 63
4. Pengaruh perceieved ease of use terhadap attitude toward using ......................... 64
5. Pengaruh perceieved usefulness terhadap attitude toward using .......................... 64
viii
6. Pengaruh perceieved usefulness terhadap behavioral intention............................ 64
7. Pengaruh attitude toward using terhadap behavioral intention ............................. 64
8. Sistem tugas akhir berdasarkan konstruk .............................................................. 64
5.3 Saran ..................................................................................................................... 65
DAFTAR PUSTAKA .......................................................................................................... 66
ix
DAFTAR GAMBAR
Gambar 2.1 Skema Technology Acceptance Model......................................................................... 12
Gambar 2.2 Skema Technology Acceptance Model yang dijabarkan .............................................. 13
Gambar 3.1 Langkah Penelitian ...................................................................................................... 20
Gambar 3.2 Flow Map Pendaftaran Judul Tugas Akhir (yang sudah berjalan) ............................... 21
Gambar 3.3 Flow Map Pemilihan Pembimbing Dua (yang sudah berjalan) .................................... 22
Gambar 3.4 Flow Map Bimbingan Tugas Akhir dengan Dosen (yang sudah berjalan) ................... 23
Gambar 3.5 Flow Map Pendaftaran Seminar Tugas Akhir (yang sudah berjalan) ........................... 24
Gambar 3.6 Flow Map Pendaftaran Judul Tugas Akhir (Sistem Informasi) .................................... 25
Gambar 3.7 Flow Map Pemilihan Pembimbing Dua (Sistem Informasi) ........................................ 36
Gambar 3.8 Flow Map Bimbingan Tugas Akhir dengan Dosen (Sistem Informasi) ....................... 27
Gambar 3.9 Flow Map Persetujuan Proposal untuk Seminar (Sistem Informasi) ............................ 28
Gambar 3.10 Flow Map Pendaftaran Seminar Tugas Akhir (Sistem Informasi) ............................. 29
Gambar 3.11 Use Case Diagram Sistem Tugas Akhir .................................................................... 30
Gambar 3.12 ER Diagram basis data Sistem Tugas Akhir .............................................................. 31
Gambar 3.13 Activity Diagram Bimbingan Proposal (Dosen Pembimbing) .................................... 36
Gambar 3.14 Activity Diagram Bimbingan Proposal (Mahasiswa) ................................................. 37
Gambar 3.15 Activity Diagram Melihat Nilai Tugas Akhir (Tim Tugas Akhir) .............................. 37
Gambar 3.16 Activity Diagram Memilih Pembimbing Satu (Tim TugasAkhir) .............................. 38
Gambar 3.17 Activity Diagram Mengirim Persetujuan Seminar (Mahasiswa) ................................ 38
Gambar 3.18 Activity Diagram Menilai Bimbingan (Dosen Pembimbing) ..................................... 39
Gambar 3.19 Activity Diagram Menilai Kehadiran (Tim Tugas Akhir) .......................................... 39
Gambar 3.20 Activity Diagram Menilai Seminar (Dosen Pembimbing).......................................... 40
Gambar 3.21 Activity Diagram Menyetujui Permohonan Seminar (Tim Tugas Akhir) ................... 40
Gambar 3.22 Activity Diagram Mereview Proposal Awal (Dosen Pembimbing) ............................ 41
Gambar 3.23 Activity Diagram Pendaftaran Seminar (Mahasiswa) ................................................ 41
Gambar 3.24 Activity Diagram Pendaftaran Pembimbing Dua (Mahasiswa) .................................. 42
Gambar 3.25 Activity Diagram Pendaftaran Pembimbing Dua (Dosen Pembimbing) .................... 42
Gambar 3.26 Activity Diagram Upload Proposal Awal (Mahasiswa).............................................. 43
Gambar 3.27 Activity Diagram Memilih Reviewer (Tim Tugas Akhir) .......................................... 43
Gambar 3.28 Modifikasi Model TAM ............................................................................................ 44
Gambar 3.29 Modifikasi Model TAM ............................................................................................ 44
Gambar 4.1 Perancangan Inner Model ............................................................................................ 54
Gambar 4.2 Perancangan Outer Model ........................................................................................... 55
Gambar 4.3 Perancangan Diagram Jalur ......................................................................................... 55
Gambar 4.4 Loading Factor Setiap Indikator Pada Konstruk .......................................................... 56
x
DAFTAR TABEL
Tabel 2.1 Penelitian Yang Terkait Dengan Sistem Informasi Tugas Akhir dan Penerapan Model
Evaluasi TAM ................................................................................................................................... 6
Tabel 2.2 Perbandingan Model Evaluasi ........................................................................................... 9
Tabel 3.1 Entitas User ..................................................................................................................... 32
Tabel 3.2 Entitas Dosen .................................................................................................................. 32
Tabel 3.3 Entitas Mahasiswa ........................................................................................................... 32
Tabel 3.4 Entitas Proposal ............................................................................................................... 33
Tabel 3.5 Entitas Bimbingan ........................................................................................................... 33
Tabel 3.6 Entitas Nilai Bimbingan .................................................................................................. 34
Tabel 3.7 Entitas Pembimbing2 ...................................................................................................... 34
Tabel 3.8 Entitas Review ................................................................................................................ 34
Tabel 3.9 Entitas Seminar ............................................................................................................... 35
Tabel 3.10 Entitas Berita ................................................................................................................. 36
Tabel 3.11 Daftar Konstruk dan Indikator Modifikasi Model TAM................................................ 46
Tabel 3.12 Item Pada Konstruk User Interface ............................................................................... 47
Tabel 3.13 Item Pada Konstruk Kemampuan Dan Skill Pengguna.................................................. 47
Tabel 3.14 Item Pada Konstruk Kegunaan (Perceived Usefulness) ................................................. 48
Tabel 3.15 Item Pada Konstruk Kemudahan (Perceived Ease of Use) ............................................ 48
Tabel 3.16 Item Pada Konstruk Sikap Penggunaan (Attitude Toward Use) .................................... 49
Tabel 3.17 Item Pada Konstruk Keinginan Menggunakan (Behavioral Intention) .......................... 49
Tabel 3.18 Skala Likert ................................................................................................................... 49
Tabel 3.19 Responden Penelitian .................................................................................................... 50
Tabel 4.3 Hasil Uji Validitas Konstruk User Interface .................................................................... 51
Tabel 4.4 Hasil Uji Validitas User Ability and Skill ........................................................................ 51
Tabel 4.5 Hasil Uji Validitas Pervceived Usefulness ...................................................................... 52
Tabel 4.6 Hasil Uji Validitas Perceived Ease of Use ...................................................................... 52
Tabel 4.7 Hasil Uji Validitas Behavioral Intention ......................................................................... 52
Tabel 4.8 Hasil Uji Validitas Attitude Toward Use ......................................................................... 53
Tabel 4.9 Hasil Uji Relibilitas ......................................................................................................... 53
Tabel 4.10 Ouput Loading Factor ................................................................................................... 57
Tabel 4.11 Ouput Cross Loading Factor ......................................................................................... 58
Tabel 4.12 Ouput Average Variance Extracted (AVE) .................................................................... 59
Tabel 4.13 Ouput Latent Variable Correlation ............................................................................... 59
Tabel 4.14 Ouput Cronbach Alpha.................................................................................................. 59
xi
Tabel 4.15 Ouput Composite Reliability ......................................................................................... 60
Tabel 4.16 Ouput R Square ............................................................................................................. 60
Tabel 4.17 Ouput t statistic ............................................................................................................. 61
xii
DAFTAR SINGKATAN
No. Singkatan Kepanjangan
1. TAM : Technology Acceptance Model
2. PLS : Partial Least Square
3. TRA : Theory of reasoned Action
4. SEM : Structural Equation Modeling
5 AVE : Average Variance Extracted
6. UI : User Interface
7. UAS : User Skill and Ability
8. PU : Perceived Usefulness
9. PEU : Perceived Ease of Use
10. ATU : Attitude Toward Using
11. BI : Behavioral Intention
xii
DAFTAR LAMPIRAN
Lampiran1 – Hasil Pearson Correlation Konstruk UI
Lampiran 2 – Hasil Pearson Correlation UAS
Lampiran 3 – Hasil Pearson Correlation PU
Lampiran 4 – Hasil Pearson Correlation Konstruk PEU
Lampiran 5 – Hasil Pearson Correlation Konstruk BI
Lampiran 6 – Hasil Pearson Correlation Konstruk ATU
Lampiran 7 – Hasil Cronbach’s Alpha Konstruk UI
Lampiran 8 – Hasil Cronbach’s Alpha Konstruk UAS
Lampiran 9 – Hasil Cronbach’s Alpha Konstruk PU
Lampiran 10 – Hasil Cronbach’s Alpha Konstruk PEU
Lampiran 11 – Hasil Cronbach’s Alpha Konstruk BI
Lampiran 12 – Hasil Cronbach’s Alpha Konstruk ATU
Lampiran 13 – Hasil Loading Factor Setiap Point Konstruk
Lampiran 14 – Hasil Cross Loading Factor Setiap Point Konstruk
Lampiran 15 – Hasil Average Variance Extacted dan Composite Reliability Setiap Konstruk
Lampiran 16 – Hasil Latent Variable Correlations
Lampiran 17 – Hasil R Square Setiap Konstruk
Lampiran 18 – Hasil t Statistics Hubungan Setiap Konstruk
xiii