DESIGN PLTN

LAMPIRAN I.

Kesimpulan kelompok A

to.)aU1

No.Jenis DesignTeknalogiPartisiposi Industri DN.

IBWRFuel el emen1. Memerl ukan perkayaanDesign dan fabrikasi sangat sulitTidak mungkin.

2. Design yang rumit, meng_(khususnya masal ah pengkayaan

gunakan kemarnpuan teknologiU-235 )

tinggi. 3. Performance cukup baik.4. Pengol ahan ul ang diperl ukan.Struk tur

1. Pressure Vessel: Sistim PV sangat sophisticated.Partisipasi dalarn civil engineeringa. Terbuat dari pada Carban

dapat dilakukan. Teknologi PVsteel dilapisi austenit steel

bel urn dapat dilaksanakan diyang tebal.

dalarn negeri.b. Sangat berat, 600 MWe_ 500 ton.c. Di Indonesia kiranya tidakmungkin welding on site.d. Banyak rnasalah teknis yangrei atip bel um terpecahkan.2. Dry_well terbuat dari steelstructure. Terus terbuat daribeton dengan lapison SS.Containment Iuar terbuat daribeton pratekan.

Komponen

1. Control rod drives: Control drive:Partisipasi nasional belum mungkinReaktor

a. Sistim hydrolic servo danDesign & fabrikasi songat sulit.b. Metalurgi sophisticated.

t-.)a0-

2. Sistim pendingin reaktor:a. Pergunakan pendi ng inlangsung ke turbin, sehinggamemungkinkan penyebaranradioaktivitas ke turbin donpengurusan $Ompah relatipsuI it.b. Kebocoran dari condensordapat Iangsung mengotorireaktor.

II

PWRFuel el emen1. Memerl ukan pengkayaan ter_Design don fabrikasi $Ongat sulit,Tidak mungkin.tinggi

khususnya masal ah perkayaan.2. Design yang rumi t karena bekerj a pada tekanan yanglebih besar.3. Performance cukup baik.4. Pengolahan ulang diperl ukanuntuk penggunaan bahan bakarmaksi mum.

Struktur

1. Pressure Vessel: Pressure VesselTerbatas dalam civil

a. Terbuat dari pada bajaDesign don fabrikasi $Ongat sulit.engineering.

karbon dilapis baja austenit. b. Sangat berat, kurang dariBWR.c. Tidak mungkin welding onsite.d. Banyak masalah teknis yangbel um terpecahkan.2. Containment terdiri dari duolapis baja di dalam betonpratekan.

~o......•

Komponen

1. Control rod drives: Design don fobrikosi songot sui itTidok mungkin.Reok tor

o. Sistim mognetik songot rumitb. Metolurgi sophisticated.2. Sistim pendingin reoktorterpisoh dori sistim turbin.

III

HWRFuel el emen1. Uranium olom. Design don fobrikosi sederhono.Design don fobrikosi secoro teknis

2. Design song at sederhono.

dopot dil okukon sel uruhnyo •

3. Performance cukup boik, kebocoron fuel dopot longsungdiotosi.4. Pengolohon ulong tidok mutlokdiperl ukon .Struktur

1. Colondrio voul t (tempot colon_Design don fobrikosi sederhono.Sel uruhnyo dopot dilokukon.

drio) terbuot dori beton ber_ tulong dilopisi oleh SS diisidengon oi r, mudoh dibuot.2. Containment terbuot dori betonprotekon dengon lopison bojo.Komponen

1. Colondrio terbuot dori bojo SSDesign don fobrikosi sederhono.Kebonyokon komponen mungkin

Reoktc,

tidok tebol. dopot dibuot dolom negeri.

2. Pressure tube (tobung tekon) terbuot dori oloi zirkonium.Bilo ado kebocoron dopot long_sung diotosi.3. Mosoloh air berot biso ditong_gulongi.4. Sistim pendingin reoktor ter_pisoh dori sistim turbin •5. Mesin pengisi ulong mosihsongot rumit.

Seperti: Fak tor Iangsung'"o(X)

IV. KRITERIA PENENTUAN LOKASI DAN SAFETY

MeteorologiSeismik

HidrologiGeologiPendudukToto Kota

ManpowerInventarisasi + penambahan data

Faktor tak langsung _ load centreinfra struk tur

_ sumber_sumber tenaga lain.

Dari tahap_tahap persiapan sudah disimpulkan dol am seminar PLTN. Data_data belum ada, karena belum adokelompok yang ditugaskan khusus untuk itu. Karena itu perlu adanya group inti yang bertugas mendapatkan

data_data yang .bisa digunakan untuk memil ih lokasi suatu PLTN.

ANNUAL COST CALCULATION OF SYSTEM (PLAN _ B3) *

LAMPIRAN 9

Financial Analysis

12345678910 11

1978

1979198019811982198319841985198619871988Total

1

Fuel Cost (mill ions US$)

_ Heavy Oil

32,1640,4049,5061,0475,2439,82tfJ,1475,96105,08132,18169,74_ Ida

1,440,30 0,02_ Nuclear Total Variable Cost

33, tfJ40,7049,5061,0475,2639,82tfJ,1475,96105,08132,18169,74843,02

(millions US$)2

Fixed Cost (millions US$)

_ 100 MW_ 200 MW (T)58,5658,5658,5658,5658,56

_ 300 MW _ 400 MW_ 500 MW (T)256,20128,10128,10128,10

_ tfJO MW (H)249,30

Total Fixed Cost58,5658,5658,5658,5658,56249,30 256,20128,10128,10128,101182, tfJ

(millions US$)

-

3

Total Annual Cost92,1699,26108,06119,tfJ133,82289,1260,14332,16233,182tfJ,28297,842025,62

(millions US$)4

Present Worth Factor 0,890,800,710,640,570,510,450,400,360,320,29

5

Present Worth in 197782,02

79,4176,7276,5476,28147,4527,06132,8683,9583,2986,37951,87(millions US$)

6

Generation 106 KWH 132443

7

Generation Cost (Rp/ KWH) 2,983

8

Expansion Capacity (MW) 4100

9

Construction Cost (Rp/ KW) 96348

~T = Thermal N = Nuclear H = Hydro * Fuel cost at Rp 16,0/liter

>()0. ANNUAL COST CALCULATION OF SYSTEM (PLAN _ E3) *

1234567891011Total1978

1979198019811982198319841985198619871988

1

Fuel Cost (mill ions US$)

_ Heavy Oil

32,1640,4049,5061,0475,2439,8260,1414,3813,8612,4817,52_ Ida

1,440,30 0,02_ Nuelear

13,0719,3725,4132,31

Total Variobie Cost33,6040,7049,5061,0475,2639,8260,1427,4533,2337,8949,83508,46

(millions US$)2

Fixed Cost (mill ions US$)

_ 100 MW_ 200 MW (T)58,5658,5658,5658,5658,56

_ 300 MW _ 400 MW_ 500 MW (N)429,60214,80214,80214,80

_ 600 MW (H)

249,30

Total Fixed Cost58,5658,5658,5658,5658,56249,30 429,60214,80214,80214,801616,10

(millions US$)

-

3

Total Annual Cost92,16

99,26108,06119,60133,82289,1260,14437,05248,03252,69264,632124,56(millions US$)

4

Present Worth Foetor 0,890,800,710,640,570,510,450,400,360,320,29

5

Present Worth in 197782,02

79,4176,7276,5476,28147,4527,06182,8289,29 76,74(millions US$)

80,86995,19

6

Generation 10 6 KWH 132433

7

Generation Cost (Rp/ KWH) 3,118

8

Expansion Capacity (MW) 4100

9

Construction Cost (Rp/ KW) 100733

LAMPIRA N 8

Finonci 01 Anal ysis

T = Thermal N = Nuel ear H = Hydro * Fuel cost at Rp 16,00/1 iter

THE SPECIFIC FUEL CONSU:V\PTION OF THE POWER PLANTS

LAMPIRAN 5

-0W

Specific FuelSpeci fi c Fuel

Power PIantConsumption atFuel TypeUnit Fuel CostConsumption cost

Nom inal Load

at Nomi nal Load

MW

liter/kWh Rp/ IiterMills/liteMills/kWh

Existi ng Power PIant

Gas Turbi ne200,45 I. D.O.9,5022,89 10,30

(Up to 1977)Diesel

250,29 I.D.O.9,5022,89 6,64

Thermal

25'0,35Heavy Oil8,0019,28 6,75

Thermal

500,27Heavy Oil8,0019,28 5,21

100

0,26Heavy Oil8,0019,28 5,01

New Power PIant

Thermal1000,26Heavy Oil8,0019,28 5,01

(After 1977)2000,25Heavy Oil8,0019,28 4,82

300

0,24Heavy Oil8,0019,28 4,63

400

0,23Heavy Oil8,0019,28 4,43

500

0,22Heavy Oil8,0019,28 4,24

Nucl ear

300-UF617,60*)1,90

400

-UF617,601,85

500

-UF617,601,80

* ) $ /kg

IS THE CAPITAL COST OF THE POWER PLANT

LAMPIRAN 4

(1 ) Plant Capacity[MW]100200 300 400500600

(2 )

Type of PIant TTTNTN TN H

(3)

Unit Construction Cost

ko

[ US$ ] 220200185300180270175240250KW

(4 )

Total Fixed Cost Correction1,4641,4641 1,4641,7901,4641,7901,4641,7901,662Factor *)

k cc

(5 )

Corrected Unit Construction322,080292,800270,840537,000263,520483,300256,200429,600425,500

Cost k (5) = (3) x (4) (6)

Total Fixed Cost[Millions US$]

32,20858,56081,252161,100105,408193,320128,100214,800249,300

kP(6)=(1)x(5) (7)

Total Fixed Cost Correction0,6390,6390,6390,9410,6390,9410,6390,9410,445Factor *)

k cc

(8)

Corrected Unit Construction140,580127,800118,215282,300115,020254,070111,825225,840111,250

Cost k (8) = (3) x (7) (9)

Total Fixed Cost[Millions US$]

14,05825,56035,64584 , 69046,008101,62855,913112,92066,750

kP(9)=(1)x(8)

T = ThermalN = NuclearH = Hydro* ) See Tobie: 13 and Page 80 of Appendi x 2

PICKERING GENERAT'NG STATION

UNIT POWER GENERATION

/1. I/ '

/' I '

/, I' UNIT 1

./ I CAPACITY FACTOR,

0\0/ ' MAY 30/71_&7 JUNE 30/72

/ 71.9%///'

FIRST FULLPOWERUNIT 2NOV 7

/

/'1UNIT 1

/' CAPACITY FACTORI OCT. 23/72 _ JUL. 31/73

/' 189.4%/' ,~/' /., / I

/ / I

"0/ /' I UNIT 2'O'O' I CAPACITY FACTOR

/" '/' OCT. 23/72 _ JUL. 31/73162.5%

/' ,/' )/ 'I, /

a.,o/ ' 1 UNIT 3,,&/ / CAPACITY FACTOR

/ /' OCT. 23/72 _ JUL. 31/73, 83.4%

/,' /'/'//Y\O''O'O"./

./

44 09030 _8OCT 13 1973

I

IFIRST FULL I

POWER UNIT 4UNIT 4 CAPACITY FACTOR

MAY 28 0\'0' ,JUN, 1/73 - JUL. 31/73

, "'O'O·NIT185.8%IN SERVI E

MAY JUN JULJAN FEB MAR APR1973

UNIT 2 iCAPACITY FACTOR

NOV. 7/71 _

JUNE 30/72 I86.5%

I

I

UNIT 3 ICAPACITY FACTORMAY 12/72 _

! JUNE 30/72 I

192.3% ,

: UNit 3 STATION I

~ IN SER 'E HUT DOW~MAY JUN BECAUSE O~ NOV DECOPERATORS' 1972STRIKE

FIRST FULLPOWERUNIT 3MAy 12

FEB MAR APR

UNIT 1 INSERVICE

APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN1971 1972

7.0

6.5

7.5

6.0

5.5

2.0

1.0

1.5

0.5

FIGURE 2

£:

TABLE 1 ESTIMATED WORLD RESOURCES OF URANIUM (Data Available January 1973)

~

Price Range $ 1) 10/lb U30aPrice Range $ 10_15/lb U30aResources Reasonabl y Assured

Estimated AdditionalReasonabl y AssuredEstimated Addi tionalResources (Reserves)

ResourcesResourcesResources

Country

103 tonnes103 short103 tonnes103 short103 tonnes103 short103 tonnes103 short

uraniumtons U30auraniumtons U30auraniumtons U30auraniumtons U30a

Argentino

9.21214187.7102330Australia

719278.510229.538.32938Brazil

--2.52)3.30.70.9--

Canada185241190247122158219284

Central Afri can Republ ic310.5810.5----

Denmark (Greenland)5.67.01013----

Finland----1.31.7--

France36.647.524.331.520262532.5

Gabon202656.5--56.5

Indio----2.3

30.81

Italy

1.21.6------Japan

2.83.6--4.2504--

Mexi co1.01.3--0.91.2--

Niger4052202610131013

Portugal (Europe)

6049.35.97.711.31013

(Angola)

------1317South Afri co

2022638lOA6280.62633.8

Spain

8.511--7.710--Sweden

----2703514052

Turkey

2.22.8 -0.50.6--USA

2593375383)700141183231300

Yugoslavia

67.81013----Zaire

1.82.31.72.2----TOTAL (rounded)

86611269161191680884632821

1) $ Value of March 1973: 1 $ = 0.829 EMA u/a = 0.829 SDR (Special Drawing Rights). This $ value corresponds to $ 42.22 perfine ounce of gold.

2) Plus 70,000 tonres U by-product from phosphates.3) Plus 70,000 tonres U by-product from phosphate and copper production.