kontrasepsi
DESCRIPTION
KedokteranTRANSCRIPT
Gunawan Dwi PrayitnoDepartemen Obstetri & Ginekologi
RSPAD-Gatot SoebrotoJakarta
Kontrasepsi Definisi : Usaha-usaha untuk
mencegah terjadinya konsepsi/ kehamilan.
Sifat : Sementara Permanent
Syarat-Syarat Terjadinya Kehamilan
Adanya Oosit/ telur yang matang : Ovulasi Qualitas telur yang baik.
Adanya sperma yang mampu membuahi telur
Transport telur dan sperma, adanya proses fertilisasi dan implantasi
Reseptivitas endometrium
Orkestra Siklus Haid
Transport Sperma, Sel telur dan Embrio
Cara Kerja Kontrasepsi
Mencegah ovulasi Menurunkan kemampuan sperma/
menghambat sperma Mencegah :
Fertilisasi Implantasi
METODE KONTRASEPSI
Metode Amenorea Laktasi Keluarga Berencana Alamiah (KBA) Sanggama Terputus Metode Barier Kontrasepsi Kombinasi Kontrasepsi Progestin Alat Kontrasepsi Dalam Rahim
(AKDR) Kontrasepsi Mantap
Faktor yang berpengaruh dalam pemilihan kontrasepsi
Usia Lama pernikahan Riwayat kehamilan Riwayat kesehatan Jumlah atau jarak anak Pendidikan Pengetahuan.
Kontrasepsi Mekanik/ Antisperma
Menghambat transport sperma Cegah fertilisasi Cegah implantasi
IUD
Kontrasepsi Hormonal
Mencegah ovulasi Menghambat transport oosit /
telur dan sperma Menghambat implantasi
embrio
IMPLANTS
Kontrasepsi MantapMOW : Tubektomi
MOP : Vasektomi
Tubektomi (MOW)
Memilih Kontrasepsi Ideal Aman Nyaman Reversibilitas tinggi Efektivitas maksimal Kontrol Manfaat non kontraseptif
Urutan Efektivitas metode kontrasepsi
SterilisasiPil KombinasiInjeksi/ depotIUDKondomDiafragma+spermaticidDiafragmaSpermaticidKoitus interuptus
Efektivitas
Keuntungan Pil kombinasi Paling efektif Paling banyak diteliti Menormalkan siklus haid Tidak ada nyeri ovulasi Menguragi rasa tegang payudara Mengurangi jerawat (yang mengandung
CPA) Pengobatan PMS
Keuntungan tambahanMengurangi risiko terjadinya :
- Kehamilan di luar kandungan s/d 90 %- Kista ovarium s/d 80 %- PID s/d 50 %- PMS / PMDD s/d 50 %- Anemia dan defisiensi zat besi s/d 50 %- Kanker ovarium dan endometrium s/d 40 %- Benjolan jinak payudara s/d 40 %- Infertilitas primer s/d 40 %- Mioma uteri (setelah 5 tahun penggunaan ) s/d
20%)
ENDOMETRIOSIS NYERI HAID
NYERI HUBUNGAN
PERUT BAWAH KAKU
INFERTILITAS
TERGANTUNG LOKASI
SINDROMA OVARIUM POLIKISTIK (SOPK ) GANGGUAN HAID
OBESITAS
HIPERANDROGEN (BULU,KUMIS,JAKUN)
INFERTILITAS
Jerawat/ Acne : Hiperandrogen
KONTRASEPSI SUNTIK
* Sangat efektif
* Resiko kesehatan kecil
* Tidak mempengaruhi hubungan suami istri
* Terdiri dari 2 jenis :
Gol. Progestin : Depo Provera, Depo Geston, Noristerat.
Gol. Progestin + Estrogen Propionat : Cyclo Provera
* Selang waktu (interval) pemberian :
Noristerat 2 bulan
Cyclofem (cycloprovera) setiap bulan.
DMPA diberikan setiap 12 minggu.
Cara kerja
- Mengentalkan lendir serviks sehingga
menyulitkanmasuknya sperma.
- Menekan ovulasi.
Efektifitas :
Sangat efektif 99,6 %
IUD (Intra Uterine Device)/ AKDR (Alat Kontrsepsi Dalam Rahim
Penggolongan :
1. First generation device (unmedicated) tanpa tambahan tembaga atau hormon : Ota ring, grafenberg ring, saf T coil, Lippes loop dll.
2. Second generation device (medicated) dengan tambahan tembaga atau hormon :
a. Logam Cu generasi I : Cu T 200, Cu 7, ML Cu 250 b. Logam Cu generasi II : CuT 380 A, CuT 380 Ag, CuT
220C Nova T, Delta T, ML Cu 375.c. Hormon progesteron: Progestasert, LNG 20/ MIRENA
INDIKASI PEMAKAIAN
- 48 Jam Pasca Persalinan- Antara 6-9 Minggu Post Partum- Bagi Ibu Menyusui Secara
Penuh, Dapat Ditunda 6 Bulan Dengan Catatan :
a. Tetap Tidak Haid b. Tidak memberikan Makanan
Tambahan Pada Bayinya
MEKANISME KERJA IUD :
IUD CuT : MENCEGAH BERTEMUNYA SPERMA DAN SEL TELUR
DENGAN CARA PENGURANGAN JUMLAH SPERMA MENCAPAI
SEL TELUR
DAN DAYA SPERMA UNTUK MEMBUAHI SEL TELUR
PRINSIP MENCEGAH TERJADINYA FERTILISASI.
IUD DENGAN PROGESTIN SPERMA DAPAT DICEGAH MELEWATI
SERVIKS DAN DIBUNUH OLEH SEL DARAH PUTIH YANG TIMBUL
DALAM CAIRAN UTERUS SEBAGAI HASIL RANGSANGAN IUD
IMPLANT (SUBDERMAL)= AKBK (Alat Kontrasepsi Bawah Kulit)
Dua macam implant :1. Non-Biogradable Implant
a. Norplant (6 kapsul) Levonorgestrel daya kerja 5 tahunb. Norplant-2 (2 batang) idem daya kerja 3 tahunc. Satu batang hormon ST-1435 daya kerja 2 tahun
d. Satu batang 3-keto desogestrel daya kerja 2 ½ - 4 tahun Implanon implant 1 batang (2-3 tahun)
2. Biogradable Implanta. Capronor Levonorgestrel daya kerja 18 bulanb. Pellets Noretindrone dan kolesterol daya kerja 1 tahun
IMPLANT (SUBDERMAL)= AKBK
Efektifitas Implant1. Angka kegagalan < 1 per 100
wanita per tahun dalam 5 tahun(pearl index).
2. Efektifitas berkurang sedikit setelah 5 tahun tahun ke 6 + 2,5-3% hamil.
3. Norplant 2 sama efektif dengan norplant, untuk 3 tahun pertama.
IMPLANT (SUBDERMAL)= AKBK
Mekanisme kerja implant1. Mekanisme kerja belum jelas benar2. Mencegah terjadinya kehamilan dengan cara:
a. cegah ovulasi b. merubah kekentalan lendir serviks pergerakan spermatozooa c. hambat perkembangan
siklis endometrium
METODE KONTRASEPSI PIL KOMBINASI
Pil Oral Kombinasi Mengandung
estrogen dan progesteron
Mencegah ovulasi
PIL KOMBINASI Mengandung hormon Estrogen dan Progesteron
Tiga macam kemasan :- 21 tablet mengandung hormon dan 7 non hormon- 21 tablet mengandung hormon.
- 24 tablet mengandung hormon dan 4 non hormon
Cara kerja ;Estrogen menghambat ovulasi.
Progestin mengentalkan lendir serviks sehingga menyulitkan masuknya sperma.
Efektifitas : 99,9 % efektif bila digunakan dengan benar
Efficacy (modified from trussell, et. al 1990)
Failure Rate (Percent) During First Year of Use
Pearl Index :
Angka kegagalan metode kontrasepsi :
Angka kehamilan yang terjadi pada 100 wanita setelah menggunakan suatu metode kontrasepsi selama 1 tahun
P.I.(Pearl Index)
1. Pil Kombinasi (Estrogen+ Progesteron)
0.1
2. Pil Sequential (Estrogen + Progesteron bertahap)
2.0
3. POP = Progesterone Only Pill (Progesteron saja)
2.3
SUNTIKAN 1 bulan (estrogen + progesteron) 0.7 - 1.03 bulan (depot progesteron) 0.7 - 1.1
SUSUK / IMPLAN Depot Progesteron 0.7 - 1.0
1. Spiral (IUD = Intra Uterine Device AKDR = Alat Kontrasepsi Dalam Rahim)
1.0 - 2.0 (tembaga)1.0 - 5.0 (plastik)
2. Kondom 103. Diafragma 204. Spermatisida 205. Diafragma +Spermatisida 12
1. Sanggama terputus (Coitus Interruptus) 172. Kalender / Pantang berkala 23
TANPA KONTRASEPSI 80
HORMONAL
MEKANIK
TEKNIK
NON-KONTR.
KONTRASEPSIORAL
ALAT - ALATMEKANIK
TEKNIK
METODE KONTRASEPSI
Kesimpulan : Pemilihan kontrasepsi yang paling tepat
bersifat individual sesuai kebutuhan masing-masing
Pil kontrasepsi kombinasi merupakan pilihan tepat bagi yang tidak ada kontra indikasi
Manfaat non kontrasepsi pil kombinasi dan LNG IUS dapat digunakan untuk PUD/ gangguan siklus haid, endometrium, dismenorhea, PMS/ PMDD.
Levonogestrel – Intrauterin System
(LNG-IUS, MIRENA® )Manfaat Kontrasepsi dan Non
Kontrasepsi
Gunawan D P, MDSpecialist in Ob&Gyn,Reproductive Endocrinology ConsultantCentral Army Hospital-Gatot Soebroto, Jakarta 2009
Indikasi Levonogestrel Intra Uterine System (LNG-IUS) :
1.Kontrasepsi2.Menoragia3.Dismenorhea : adenomiosis/ endometriosis4.Hiperplasia endometrium
Kontrasepsi Pil IUD
• Efektivitas tinggi
• Jumlah darah haid berkurang
• Menurunkan PID
• Tanpa motivasi harian
• Jangka panjang
• Estrogen-free
• Reversibelitas cepat
Levonorgestrelintrauterine system
T-frame 32 x 32mm, impregnated with Barium Sulphate Hormone cylinder 19mm in length, covered with a PDMS membrane Total amount of Levonorgestrel 52mg 2 polyethylene removal threads
MIRENA®
The levonorgestrel intrauterine system
Levonorgestrelintrauterine
system
Detail
Hormone cylinderRate-controllingmembrane
Uterinewall
Section ofsystem
Mode of action: the endometrium
After a few weeks, the endometrium becomes inactive. Morphological changes are uniform from the 1st
month
Days
Days
LNG IUS
Menstrual cycle
Nilsson et al., 1978
Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrelafter Mirena® insertion
Continuous drug delivery LNG-IUS does not cause ‘peaks and
troughs’, as with oral progestogen dosing Much higher endometrial levels of the
progestogen than with oral preparation:Levonorgestrel concentration
(ng/g wet tissue)LNG-IUS (30μg/day)
Oral preparation
(250μg)Endometrium 808 3.5
Nilsson et al., 1982
LNG IUS
Bleeding & spotting days per month
LNG IUS (n = 1495)Nova-T (n = 739)
8
6
4
2
0Mea
n nu
mbe
r of d
ays
Months
Mea
n nu
mbe
r of d
ays
0
4
8
12
16
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Bleeding per month in 1st year
Andersson, Contraception 1994;49:56–72
p < 0.001
Bleeding days per month
Mirena®: Changes in bleeding pattern
0–3 months 3–6 months After 6 monthsMuch spotting Less spotting and Amenorrhea
which progressively less menstrual (± 20%) ordecreases blood loss oligomenorrhea
Bleeding pattern during 5 years of use
Amenorrhea26%
Infrequent3.7%
Regular70.3%
Rönnerdag M, Odlind V. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:716–21
Mirena® vs Cu IUD
Discontinuation due to heavy or prolonged bleeding is more common with Cu IUD
Andersson et al. Contraception 1994; 49: 56–72
Problems
• Prolonged spotting: advice
encouragement bleeding diary
• Late bleedings: ultrasonography hysteroscopy
histology
Ultrasound detection of MIRENA®
MIRENA® on X-ray examination
Contraceptive efficacy of LNG IUS
• Overall pregnancy rate: 0.16 per 100 woman-years
• European multicentre study: cumulative gross pregnancy rate – 1-year rate LNG IUS: 0.1% Cu IUD: 1.0%– 5-year rate LNG IUS: 0.5% Cu IUD: 5.9%
• Risk of ectopic pregnancy: 0.06 per 100 woman-years. Ectopic rate for women not using any contraception: 0.3-0.5 per 100 woman-years
Comparison of Mirena® and sterilization
Mirena Sterilization Efficacy +++ +++ Reversibility Yes No Bleeding Reduced No effect Pain Reduced No effect Cost Low High Complications Rare Rare
Pakarinen et al. Semin in Repr Med 2001;19:365-71
Return of fertility after Mirena®
use Cyclic ovarian function is immediately
restored The endometrium recovers quickly and
normal menstruation is established within 30 days
Overall fertility is unaffected Cumulative conception rate after removal
79─96 per 100 women after 12 months Pregnancies progress as normal
Andersson K, et al. Contraception 1992; 45: 575–584Sivin I, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166: 1208–13Belhadj H, et al. Contraception. 1986; 34: 261–7
Return of fertility after removal of thelevonorgestrel intrauterine system
0
20
40
60
80
100
3 6 9 12Months
Cum
ulat
ive
preg
nanc
y ra
te (%
)
Levonorgestrelintrauterine systemCopper IUD
Andersson et al., 1992
The levonorgestrel intrauterine system andcopper-releasing IUD during 5 years of use
a randomized comparative trial
Participants: 10 clinics in Denmark,Finland, Norway, Sweden andHungary
Number: Nova T, n = 937Levonorgestrel intrauterinesystem, n = 1821
Andersson et al., 1994
5-year cumulative gross termination ratesNova T Levonorgestrel p
intrauterine system
Pregnancy 5.9 0.5 ***Expulsion 6.7 5.8 nsBleeding problems 20.9 13.7 **Absence of bleeding 0 6.0 ***Pain 5.8 5.9 nsHormonal 2.0 12.1 ***Pelvic inflammatory disease 2.2 0.8 *Other medical 10.6 7.7 nsPersonal 5.9 4.4 nsContinuation rate 53.1 55.5
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001Andersson et al., 1994
Hormonal reasons5-year cumulative gross termination rates
Nova T Levonorgestrelintrauterine system
Depression 0 2.9 ***Acne 0.4 2.3 *Headache 0.2 1.9 **Weight change 0 1.5 **Breast tenderness 0 0.8 *
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Perforation rate Incidence in Mirena clinical studies < 1 /
1000 Perforation rate is similar with all IUDs/IUSs. Lack of experience is associated with higher
risk Some reports on increased perforation rate
with IUDs in postpartum/during lactation, data inconsistent
No increased risk in insertions after abortion, after previous CS
Andersson Contraception1998;57:251-5; Chi Contracept Deliv Syst 1984;5:123-130; Grimes 2003.The Cochrane Library, Issue 3; Chi Contraception 1984;30:209-214
WHO recommendation on progestin-only contraception during lactation
to be started ≥ 6 wk post partum to diminish the exposition of the baby to steroids
Does not have a negative influence in the milk production when initiated after 6 weeks postpartum
Progestins are transferred into the breast milk and the infant. No deleterious effects on infant growth or development
Insertion of IUD ≥ 4 wk after delivery
WHO: Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use,2004WHO Contraception 1994;50:35-68
MIRENA® after delivery
Insertion should be postponed ≥ 6 weeks after delivery
Bleeding pattern compared to CuIUD: with the exception of the first month post-insertion, menses-like bleeding significantly more common in the Cu-IUD users, compared to both LNG-IUD users. However, initial spotting observed more frequently observed in the LNG-IUD users
Heikkila et al. Contraception 1982:25:561-72
MIRENA® after delivery
Randomized comparative trial of Mirena (n=163) vs CuT380A (n=157) in breast-feeding women: no difference between the groups in Continuation of breast-feeding (full or part-
time) Weaning Continuation rate of the method Infant growth and development (physical
parameters & developmental tests)
Sharmaash et al Contraception 2005:72:346-51
Postabortal insertion of Mirena®
• Fears: uterine perforation, expulsion or infection (PID)
• No increased risk of perforation or PID• Menstrual pattern similar to interval insertion. • Expulsion risk slightly higher than after interval
insertion
Heikkilä et al. Contraception 1982;26:245-59, Andersson et al. Contraception 1994;49:56-72, Ortayli et al Contraception 2001;63:309-14, Pakarinen et al. Contraception 2003;68:31-4
Postabortal insertion of Mirena®:Cumulative discontinuation rate /100 women at 5 years
Pregnancy 9.5 0.8 0.00004Expulsion 15.4 10.5 nsBleeding 22.6 13.7 nsAmenorrh. 0 2.1 nsPain 10.8 5.5 nsPID 2.3 0.7 nsHormonal 3.9 15.9 0.0054
Reason Cu IUD Mirena® P
Pakarinen P et al. Contraception 2003;68:31-4
Postabortal insertion of Mirena® : Conclusions
Safe Effective Special attention should be paid to the
insertion technique Motivation for effective contraception
high after termination of pregnancy High rate of removals for planning
pregnancy highlight the importance of reversibility
Pakarinen P et al., Contraception 2003 68:31-4
Mirena® in clinical practice
Backman et al. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 608–13
Mirena® use is associated with high usersatisfaction in clinical practice
MIRENA® Continuation Rate is high In early clinical studies continuation at 5 years ca. 50% Cumulative continuation rates according to Backman et al
2000
Yearly continuation rate over 90% in every year Relevant counselling significantly increases the
continuation
65%75%
81%
93%87%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year
Backman et al. 1992
Amenorrhea rate increases in long-term use
Continuation rates very high Weight and blood pressure change
consistently with aging No difference in body weight increase
compared to Cu IUD
Long-term use of Mirena®
Rönnerdag Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:716-21.
Andersson Contraception 1994;49:56–72
65
64
63
62
610 12 24 36 48 60
Wei
ght (
kg)
Months
Copper IUD
LNG-IUS
Body weight in a randomized comparative trial Mirena ® vs Cu IUD
MIRENA®:
• No difference in body weight compared to Cu IUD
• Endogenous estradiol levels within normal limits irrespective of bleeding pattern
• No adverse effect on bone mineral density• Minimal metabolic effects on
– carbohydrate metabolism– lipid profile
Rönnerdag Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:716–21; Luukkainen Ann Med 1990; Bahamondes Hum Repr 2006 in press; Rogovskaya Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:811-5; Raudaskoski BJOG 2002;109:136-44
Terima Kasih