-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

•

•

•

-

-

-

No Kegiatan Penanggung Jawab Waktu

1 Pendaftaran Peserta Tim Koordinasi Seminar

13.00 – 13.30

2 Pembukaan dan Sambutan

– Penyambutan dan ucapan terima kasih kepada peserta yang telah berkenan untuk terlibat dalam proses penyusunan strategi ketahanan kota

– Kemajuan dan kegiatan yang telah dilakukan hingga

CRO, Will Symons, dan Wicaksana Sarosa

13.30 – 14.00

saat ini terkait perwujudan Jakarta sebagai Kota Berketahanan

– Pengenalan istilah-istilah 100RC terkait PRA dan area temuan

3 Gambaran Umum Kegiatan Working Session

– Ulasan singkat dari program Jakarta Berketahanan

– Perkenalan metode untuk memilih area fokus dari strategi ketahanan kota

Will Symons dan Wicaksana Sarosa

14.00 – 14.15

4 Menampilkan Gambaran Umum dari Temuan dan Output Tahap I

1. Berbagai Output:

o Output 1 – Konteks Kota

o Output 2 – Daftar Kegiatan/Aksi Kota

o Output 3 – Penilaian Pemahaman/Pandangan Kota

o Output 4 – Aset, Guncangan, & Tekanan Kota

o Output 5 – Penilaian Ketahanan Awal (PRA) & Area Temuan

2. Diskusi dan Komentar dari Peserta Working Session

Will Symons dan Wicaksana Sarosa

14.15 – 15.00

5 Kegiatan 1 – Menentukan Pertanyaan Kunci

– Menampilkan daftar panjang kemungkinan Area Temuan (discovery areas).

– Memilih dan finalisasi 5 (lima) pertanyaan kunci yang akan dikembangkan menjadi area temuan (discovery areas)

Will Symons dan Wicaksana Sarosa

15.00 – 16.00

6 Sesi Istirahat

– Tim strategy partner menyusun dan mengembangkan daftar 5 (lima) pertanyaan terpilih

16.00 – 16.15

7 Kegiatan 2 – Mengidentifikasi Pertanyaan Analisis (Diagnostic Questions/Sub-questions)

- Proses berpikir dan diskusi bersama untuk merumuskan pertanyaan analisis untuk 5 (lima) pertanyaan terpilih dari kegiatan 1.

Will Symons dan Wicaksana Sarosa

16.15 – 17.15

8 Kesimpulan, Langkah Selanjutnya, dan Penutupan

CRO dan Wicaksana Sarosa

17.15 – 17.30

Resilient Jakarta Phase 1Preliminary Resilience Assessment (PRA) and Discovery Areas (DA) working session

September 26, 2017

01 Welcome & Introductions

01 Registration 13:00

02 Welcome and opening remarks 13:30

03 Working session overview 14:00

04 Overview of Phase 1 outputs and findings 14:45

05 Activity 1 – Present long list and determine short list 15:00 (1 hour)

06 Break – coffee time 16:00

07 Activity 2 – Brain storm on sub-questions 16:15 (1 hour)

08 Summary, next steps and closing 17:15

Today’s Agenda

URBAN RESILIENCE

is the capacity of individuals,

communities, institutions, businesses,

and systems within a city to survive,

adapt, and thrive no matter what kinds

of chronic stresses and acute shocks

they experience.

City Resilience Strategy Process

INS

TIT

UT

ION

AL

IZE

AN

D IM

PL

EM

EN

T

City Resilience

StrategyOpportunity

Assessment

Preliminary

Resilience

Assessment

+ Discovery

Areas

City’s

custom

scope of

work

Stakeholder

Engagement

City Context

Assets,

Shocks, &

Stressess

Resilience

perceptions &

actions

inventory

Discovery

area analysis

Discovery

area analysis

Discovery

area analysis

Discovery

area analysis

Phase I

To Phase II

1 year ++

Jakarta

was s

ele

cte

d

Ag

en

da S

ettin

g W

ork

sh

op

Stra

teg

y k

ick-o

ff

Phase I : 2-3 months Phase II : 4-6 Months

Past Activities

Agenda Setting Workshop – 17 November 2016 Nexus Game – 19 January 2017

The first official involvement between Jakarta and 100 RC and the first step

towards the development of Jakarta's resilience strategy

Focus group discussions used a city board game simulation as a tool to

generate active discussion among participants regarding the concept of

resilience, for example the economic sector faces energy, water and food

pressures

Past Activities

Opportunities for the new CRO to explore his roles and understand how to utilize

100RC resources to develop knowledge and skills in generating city resilience

strategies

CRO Orientation & Launch Meeting – May 2017

Bellagio CityXChange Summit –May 2017

Visit to Semarang (Maret 2017)New York Global Summit– July 2017

The sharing and learning sessions between Jakarta

and Semarang on challenges and resilience

opportunities, understanding of strategy

development and implementation processes,

providing examples of team organizational

structures, and initial identification of collaborative

activities between Semarang and Jakarta to

improve resilience.

Nearly 500 urban resilience leaders from around

the world, including 80 Chief Resilience Officers

(CROs) share ideas and innovations from their

cities, collaborated on new solutions in city

resilience

This activity aims to change the way cities define

and solve problems based on "Opportunities for

Innovation" for cities and produce road map to

guide technology collaboration and other cities

Past Activities

Training of Resilient Jakarta Secretariat – September 2017

Past Activities

Past Activities

City Perception Workshop – September 2017

Past Activities

Assets and Risks Workshop on Assets and Shocks – September 2017

Past Activities

Assets and Risks Working Session on Stresses – September 2017

Working Session Overview

Determine key questions– Present pre-developed long list (approximately 20 questions)

– Select and finalize five key questionsActivity 1

Identify diagnostic questions / sub-questions– Brainstorm on sub-questions for selected five key questions from Activity 1Activity 2

Phase 1 Outputs and FindingsPhase 1

Outputs

2City Actions and

City Context

Agenda Setting

Workshop 431

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings – Agenda Setting Workshop

0Stakeholder

Engagement Plan

City Perceptions

Assessment

Assessment of City

Assets, Shocks, and

Stresses

Speakers panels from

various cities on

resilience challenges

Shocks and stresses

prioritisation exercise

identify Jakarta’s

strengths and

weaknesses

Key shocks and stresses Strengths and weaknesses

Stakeholder

Engagement Plan

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings – Stakeholder Engagement Plan

2City Actions and

City Context

Agenda Setting

Workshop 4310City Perceptions

Assessment

Assessment of City

Assets, Shocks, and

Stresses

The stakeholder engagement plan describes

the process for producing the following

outputs:

The process includes working together with Bappeda on data gathering and various stakeholders.

City Context and

City Actions List

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings – City Context and City Actions List

2Agenda Setting

Workshop 430City Perceptions

Assessment

Assessment of City

Assets, Shocks, and

Stresses 1

Stakeholder

Engagement Plan

LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGY

• In contrast to other Indonesian

provinces, the mayors and

regent are appointed, not

elected.

• Indonesia's performance has

shown a steady improvement

with measures being made to

reduce corruption

• Reducing corruption is a focus

for the community, and

frequently features as a political

issue during elections.

INFRASTRUCTURE &

ENVIRONMENT

• Pedestrian walkways are far

below standard, with reports

that from total of 4,500 miles of

capital road only 7% has

sidewalks

• Currently only 9.98% of Jakarta

area has been utilized as green

space.

• Water catchments are highly

contaminated by domestic

pollution.

• Aging infrastructure especially

in drainage systems bring

additional stress to

environment.

• No comprehensive disaster risk

management program or

disaster response plan

ECONOMY & SOCIETY

• Jakarta’s dominant economy

sector is the service and trade

sector,

• Jakarta contributes 17% of the

national economy

• 35.93% of the population did

not attend school or progress

beyond primary education.

HEALTH AND WELLBEING

• It is estimated that there has

been a housing shortage of

700,000 over the past 10 years.

• Jakarta has a slum area of

1204,52 hectares.

• The energy demand keeps

increasing each year by 7-8%

and is reliant on energy being

supplied from other regions.

• At least 70% of Jakarta air

pollution is from private

vehicles,

• 58% of all illnesses among

people living in Jakarta were

related to air pollution

• Low education level

HEALTH AND WELLBEING

• Five (5) administrative cities

and one (1) administrative

district

• The two roles, as a capital city

and as an autonomous regional

authority contribute to complex

issues that differ from other

Indonesian provinces

• Jakarta is one of the biggest

urban concentrations in the

world.

City ContextData was gathered through Bappeda’s RPJMD (mid-term development planning) and working sessions; as well as with various stakeholders that represent various sectors.

The contents starts with an introduction on Jakarta’s resilience and its involvement in Resilience strategy, as well as its demographics and geography condition. It is then

structured primarily using the dimensions of City Resilience Framework (CRF):

City Context and

City Actions List

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings – City Context and City Actions List

2Agenda Setting

Workshop 430City Perceptions

Assessment

Assessment of City

Assets, Shocks, and

Stresses 1

Stakeholder

Engagement Plan

Interview with Bappeda

and relevant

stakeholders

City Actions List

Data was gathered through Bappeda’s RPJMD (mid-

term development planning) and working sessions; as

well as with various stakeholders that represent

various sectors.

A total of 213 city actions were gathered, and 154

prioritized actions were selected.

The Jakarta City Actions List includes heavily on

actions that categorized in ‘empowering a broad range

of stakeholders,’ which also has the most prioritized

actions.

City Perceptions

Assessment

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings – City Perceptions Assessment

City Actions and

City Context2Agenda Setting

Workshop 430Assessment of City

Assets, Shocks, and

Stresses 1

Stakeholder

Engagement Plan

500-sample online

survey

Select five (5) top

drivers

Identify factors

Rate the factors

Find the connections

between the drivers

from the factors

Workshop

Based on online survey

and workshop, ‘reliable

communication and

mobility’ is the most

important driver in

Jakarta; however, it

requires attentions.

Most discussed key

issues during the

workshop was:

1. Integrated planning

2. Effective leadership

3. Community

participation /

engagement

Assessment of City

Assets, Shocks, and

Stresses

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings – Assessment of City Assets, Shocks, and Stresses

City Perceptions

Assessment

City Actions and

City Context2Agenda Setting

Workshop 430 1Stakeholder

Engagement Plan

Bappeda working

session

Four (4) groups of

asset groups

Rate the assets

Rate the shocks

(online survey)

Matrix of top assets

and shocks

Workshop

Trunk sewersTreatment plants

Water pipe

Drainage assets

Public parks and recreational

trails

Tunnels

Ports

Air quality monitoring station

Green open space

Main roads

Workshop result

Vu

lnera

bilit

y

Asset

Co

nd

itio

n

CITY ASSETS

Pre-developed result

ElectricityTransmission tower

Water storages

Railways

Tunnels

Main roads

Places of worship

Childcare and Pre-Primary

Education Facilities

Higher Education Facilities

Drainage assets

vs

Treatment plantGreen open space

River, lake, and coastal

Waste processing facility

Railways

Water storages

Commercial buildings

Terminal

Airports

Industrial buildings

Workshop resultPre-developed result

ElectricityFood bank

Police departments

Water storages

Airports

Childcare and Pre-Primary

Education Facilities

Primary education

Places of worship

Main roads

Hospitals

vs

Assessment of City

Assets, Shocks, and

Stresses

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings – Assessment of City Assets, Shocks, and Stresses

City Perceptions

Assessment

City Actions and

City Context2Agenda Setting

Workshop 430 1Stakeholder

Engagement Plan

Bappeda working

session

Four (4) groups of

asset groups

Rate the assets

Rate the shocks

(online survey)

Matrix of top assets

and shocks

Workshop

TOP SHOCKS

Rainfall Flooding

Riot / Civil Unrest

Cyber Attack

Disease Outbreak

Infrastructure Failure

Drought

Land subsidence

Financial / Economic Crisis

Fire

Earthquake

Power Outage

Terrorist Attack

High tide

Community riot

Hig

he

st r

isk

Lo

we

r ri

sk

TOP STRESSES

Top 5 current stresses

1. Food safety, quality, and hygiene

2. Displaced Populations / Migrants

3. Environmental Degradation

4. Management capacity related to the credibility of

leaders and the need for integrated planning

5. Critical thinking towards cyber information

Top 5 future stresses

1. High level of social competition

2. Poverty / inequality

3. Unsustainable water supply

4. Increased mobility

5. Quality of education and character

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings - Shocks

Cyber attackDemonstrationRainfall flooding

Fire Disease outbreak Infrastructure failure

Increase mobility

Environmental Degradation Social Discrepancy

Food quality

Urbanization

Unsustainable water supply

system

Phase 1 Outputs and Findings – Stress

What are Discovery Areas?

Discovery Areas are key questions about the resilience of the cities – targeted areas where

the city needs to better understand:

• What are the critical risks and interdependencies?

• What additional data, insights or perspectives are needed to understand new solutions to old

problems?

• What are resilience building opportunities or solutions that we don’t fully understand

and wish to explore?

Discovery Areas set the framework and focus the city’s new learning for the work in Phase II and

will be further refined in Phase II.

Working Session Overview

Determine key questions– Present pre-developed long list (approximately 20 questions)

– Select and finalize five key questionsACTIVITY 1

Identify diagnostic questions / sub-questions– Brainstorm on sub-questions for selected five key questions from Activity 1ACTIVITY 2

Good Practices: Discovery Areas

Dakar Norfolk Rotterdam Da nang

What entry points in

the water-waste-health

nexus can efficiently

address multiple related

challenges to ensure the

health and quality of life

for Dakar’s residents?

Given our risk of

economic stagnation,

can we deepen our

understanding and

assessment of the city’s

economic baseline, and

determine the

businesses in the city

driving the growth and

their trajectory?

What is the state of

critical city and port

infrastructures with

regard to illegal human

cyber activities and how

can we strengthen and

protect these

infrastructures? Which

risks and opportunities

exist with regard to ICT,

technological

developments and (big)

data?

How can Da Nang

integrate public

communications and

shared data through

information technologies

to better prepare for

emergencies and reduce

losses to residents and

businesses?

How can Bangkok

be better protected

from flooding now

and into the future?

How can Bangkok

residents be better

supported to

reduce the impacts

of shocks and

bounce back

stronger?

How can mobility

be better improved

across Bangkok?

How can the

economic

prosperity and

equality of

Bangkok residents

be improved?

How can the

health and

wellbeing of

Bangkok

residents be

better supported?

1

2

3

4

5

Bangkok PRA 2016

Neighbor City: Bangkok Discovery Areas

Activity: Selecting Discovery Areas

Add

• Are we missing any critical risks and interdependencies?

• What additional data, insights or perspectives are needed to understand new solutions to old problems?

• What are resilience building opportunities or solutions that we don’t fully understand and wish to explore?

Can anything be removed?

• Are some of these questions already being addressed by other programs?

• Is it not the right time to address some of these questions?

• Are some of them less important than others? Do they affect less people or more specific?

Can we combine any?

• Do some of these have the same root cause?

• Are some of them sub-issues of the other?

• Are some the same?

Activity 1 – Determine Key Questions

Key Issues

• Potable water supply: reducing subsidence, health and economic impacts

• Wastewater treatment: environmental quality, health and economic impacts

• Flooding: clogged waterways, drainage infrastructure, sea level rise, permeable areas

• Mobility: air quality, economic impacts, safety, jobs distant from homes, long commute

times

• Waste management: landfill almost at capacity, air quality, environmental degradation,

inefficient resource use

• Access to green space: impermeable surfaces, air quality, amenity

• Civil unrest and extremist acts: labor/wage disputes, corruption, intolerance, mental

health, fundamentalism

• Pandemic disease: monitoring, sanitation, effective response

• Inward migration: planning, control

• Earthquakes: soft ground, proximity of fault-lines, liquefaction

Activity 1 – Determine Key Questions

Discovering issues based on the most interconnected drivers

Issues Interconnected drivers

11 Empowers a broad range of stakeholders 4 Promotes cohesive & engaged communities

2 Supports livelihoods & employment 6 Fosters economic prosperity

12 Fosters long-term & integrated planning 10 Promotes leadership & effective management

7 Maintains & enhances protective natural & manmade

assets8 Ensures continuity of critical services

9 Provides reliable communication & mobility 8 Ensures continuity of critical services

Activity 1 – Determine Key Questions

Long list of questions

1. How can Jakarta be better protected from flooding now and into the future?

2. How can mobility be improved across Jakarta?

3. What are the impacts of civil unrest in Jakarta? What more can be done to reduce impacts caused?

4. How can Jakarta provide drinking water, and treat wastewater, for all?

5. How can we increase the quality and nutritional value of food in Jakarta?

6. How can Jakarta survive when food supply is blocked?

7. How can Jakarta better plan for and control inward migration?

8. How can we improve the governance and management capacity of government?

9. What are the causes of limited integrated planning?

10. How can we provide higher quality information to residents, in good times and bad?

11. What are the main factors of Jakarta’s social competition?

12. How can Jakarta provide for future solid waste disposal, whilst reducing waste production?

13. What opportunities are there to provide more green space in Jakarta?

14. How can Jakarta better prepare for, and respond to, pandemic disease?

15. What is the seismic risk in Jakarta and how can we be better prepared?

16. How can we increase the quality of, and equity of access to, education to prepare people for the jobs of

the future, and to contribute positively to society?

Coffee Break

Activity 2 – Brainstorm on Sub-questions

• What more do we need to understand about these issues/questions?

• What do we need to know to determine the root causes of the problem?

• What additional data, insights or perspectives are needed to understand new solutions?

• Are some of our Discovery Areas actually sub-questions, can the be considered together?

1. Planning and Capacity How can we improve the governance and management capacity of government? How can Jakarta better plan for and

control inward migration? What are the main factors of Jakarta’s social competition?

1. DQ – better anticipation of planning issues

2. DQ – better prepare migrants and locals for competing/being successful in Jakarta

3. DQ – education and training – quality, equity of access – including for better food quality and nutrition

4. DQ – What are the causes of limited implementation of integrated and long term planning?

2. Risk Reduction and Preparedness: How can we reduce the exposure of people and assets to disaster risk (flood, seismic, fire, pandemic

disease etc.), now and into the future. How can we provide better risk information to people?

1. DQ – pandemic disease risk, monitoring, response, recovery (see Governor decree).

2. DQ – drivers of changing risk exposure (globalisation, climate change, migration/travel)

3. DQ – provision of higher quality risk information, including dealing with mis/dis-information

3. Water and waste:

1. DQ – Potable water supply for all

2. DQ – access to wastewater treatment

3. DQ – Flood protection, now and future

4. DQ – access to more green space

5. DQ – solid waste disposal, reducing waste production

4. Mobility How can mobility be improved across Jakarta – quality and quantity of transport options?

1. DQ – affordability of housing near jobs

2. DQ – use of technology to provide travel information and reduce the need to travel

3. DQ – food supply chain vulnerability, alternative sources, local production

5. Civil Unrest

1. DQ – impacts of civil unrest in Jakarta? What more can be done to reduce impacts caused?

2. DQ – increase social cohesion and tolerance

3. DQ – how to leverage ‘interest based social cohesion’ for enhanced resilience

Leaders

hip

Partic

ipatio

n E

ngagem

ent

Discovery Areas

Thank You

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o