studi pei gkata kierja bak pege dap i pegolaha air...
TRANSCRIPT
STUDI PEIGKATA KIERJA BAK PEGEDAP I
PEGOLAHA AIR LIMBAH PABRIK GULA PESATRE
BARU KEDIRI
STUDY O THE IMPROVEMET THE PERFORMACE
PRIMARY TREATMET OF PESATRE BARU SUGAR
COMPAY I KEDIRI
Abdulloh Muzakky dan Wahyono Hadi
Jurusan Teknik Lingkungan FTSP-ITS Surabaya
[email protected] dan [email protected]
Pabrik Gula Pesantren Baru telah melakukan pengelolaan limbah, tetapi IPAL yang ada
belum efektif untuk mengurangi kadar bahan organik yang terkandung dalam air limbah tersebut.
Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka diperlukan evaluasi Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah (IPAL)
Pabrik gula Pesantren Baru, sehingga dapat ditentukan langkah untuk memperbaiki IPAL
tersebut
Bak pengendap I di evaluasi dengan perhitungan teknis. Hasil evaluasi digunakkan untuk
mengusulkan perbaikkan bangunan tersebut. Agar usulan perbaikkan memenuhi syarat yang
diijinkan maka dilakukan percobaan menggunakan reaktor skala laboratorium. Berdasarkan hasil
evalusi, bak pengendap I tidak memenuhi syarat. Jadi bak pengendap I di prioritaskan untuk
PEGOLAHA AIR LIMBAH PABRIK GULA PESATRE
BARU KEDIRI BARU KEDIRI
STUDY O THE IMPROVEMET THE PERFORMACE
PRIMARY TREATMET OF PESATRE BARU SUGAR
COMPAY I KEDIRI
Abdulloh Muzakky dan Wahyono Hadi Abdulloh Muzakky dan Wahyono Hadi
Jurusan Teknik Lingkungan FTSP-ITS Surabaya Jurusan Teknik Lingkungan FTSP-ITS Surabaya
[email protected] dan [email protected] dan [email protected] [email protected]
Pabrik Gula Pesantren Baru telah melakukan pengelolaan limbah, tetapi IPAL yang ada
belum efektif untuk mengurangi kadar bahan organik yang terkandung dalam air limbah tersebut.
Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka diperlukan evaluasi Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah (IPAL)
Pabrik gula Pesantren Baru, sehingga dapat ditentukan langkah untuk memperbaiki IPAL
tersebut tersebut
Bak pengendap I di evaluasi dengan perhitungan teknis. Hasil evaluasi digunakkan untuk
mengusulkan perbaikkan bangunan tersebut. Agar usulan perbaikkan memenuhi syarat yang
diijinkan maka dilakukan percobaan menggunakan reaktor skala laboratorium. Berdasarkan hasil
evalusi, bak pengendap I tidak memenuhi syarat. Jadi bak pengendap I di prioritaskan untuk
dilakukan perbaikan mengingat effluen di bangunan ini menjadi beban pada bangunan
selanjutnya.
Dari hasil perhitungan teknis maupun percobaan laboratorium menunjukkan bahwa
Anaerobik Baffle Reaktor (ABR) mampu memperbaiki kinerja bak pengendap I dengan
pengurangan bahan oraganik sampai 90%.
Kata Kunci: Bahan Organik, IPAL, Evalausi Bak Pengendap I, ABR
Abstrack
Sugar company of Pesantren Baru has made waste management, but the existing
wastewater treatment plant has not been effective to reduce the amount of organic material
contained in the waste water. Based on this it is necessary to repair in wastewater treatment
plant at sugar company of Pesantren Baru, so it can be determined steps to improve wastewater
treatment plant.
Primary treatment had been in the evaluation of the technical calculations. The
evaluation results suggest to use repair the building. To be eligible the proposed repair is was
prored through an experiment using laboratory scale reactor. Based on the result of the
evaluation, the primary settling tank does not work properly. Therefore, it becomes a priority to
be modified since the effluent on this building will be the loading for the next plants.
From the technical calculation result, as well as the result of the laboratory work, it can
be concluded that an ABR is capable to improve the performance of the primary settling tank by
reduced organik content down to 90%.
Keyword: Organic Matter, Wwtp, Evaluation of Primary Settling Tank, ABR.
selanjutnya. selanjutnya.
Dari hasil perhitungan teknis maupun percobaan laboratorium menunjukkan bahwa
naerobik Baffle Reaktor (ABR) mampu memperbaiki kinerja bak pengendap I dengan naerobik Baffle Reaktor (ABR) mampu memperbaiki kinerja bak pengendap I dengan naerobik Baffle Reaktor
pengurangan bahan oraganik sampai 90%. pengurangan bahan oraganik sampai 90%.
Kata Kunci: Bahan Organik, IPAL, Evalausi Bak Pengendap I, ABR Kata Kunci: Bahan Organik, IPAL, Evalausi Bak Pengendap I, ABR
Abstrack
Sugar company of Pesantren Baru has made waste management, but the existing
wastewater treatment plant has not been effective to reduce the amount of organic material
contained in the waste water. Based on this it is necessary to repair in wastewater treatment
plant at sugar company of Pesantren Baru, so it can be determined steps to improve wastewater
treatment plant.
Primary treatment had been in the evaluation of the technical calculations. The
evaluation results suggest to use repair the building. To be eligible the proposed repair is was
prored through an experiment using laboratory scale reactor. Based on the result of the
evaluation, the primary settling tank does not work properly. Therefore, it becomes a priority to
be modified since the effluent on this building will be the loading for the next plants.
From the technical calculation result, as well as the result of the laboratory work, it can
be concluded that an ABR is capable to improve the performance of the primary settling tank by
reduced organik content down to 90%.
Keyword: Organic Matter, Wwtp, Evaluation of Primary Settling Tank, ABR.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alamudi I. Dan Ricky.2005. Kerja Praktek. Produksi Bersih PG. Pesantren Baru Kediri. Teknik
Lingkungan. FTSP-ITS, Surabaya
Benefield, L.D And Randall, C.W. 1980. Biological Process Design For Wastewater Treatment.
Prantice Hall. New Jersey, USA.
Bodkhe, S. 2006. “ Development of An Improved Anaerobic Filter for Municipal Wastewater
Treatment” Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) hal. 222-226
Eckenfelder, W.W. 2000. Industrial water pollution control. 3 th
edition McGraw Hill. New York
Farah I. 2007. Tugas Akhir: Perencanaan Ulang IPAL PG. Pesantren Baru Kediri. Teknik
Lingkungan FTSP-ITS, Surabaya
Horan, N.J. 1990. Biological Wastewater Treatment System Theory And Operation. John Wiley
& Sons. Inc.USA
Kobayashi, H. A., Stenstrom, M. K., Mah, R. A. 1983 “Treatment of Low Strength
Wastewater Using The Anaerobic Filter”. Water Resource.Vol 17, No. 8, hal 903-
909.
Metcalf & Eddy, inc. 1991. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal And Reuse, 3rd
Edition. Mc Graw Hill. New York
Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. 2003. Wastewater Engineering Treatment, Disposal And Reuse, 4rd
Edition. Mc Graw Hill. New York
Okun Et. Al.1996. Water And Wastewater Engineering Volume I: Water Supply And
Wastewater Removal. John Wiley & Sons. New York. USA
Prasetyawati, E. 2006. Tugas Akhir: Perencanaan Ulang IPAL PG. Watoetoelis Krian. Teknik
Lingkungan FTSP-ITS, Surabaya
Qasim. Syed R ( The University Of Texas At Arlington).1985.Wastewater Treatment Plants:
Planning, Design And Operation CBS College Publishing. 2nd
Edition. PWS Publishing
Co. Boston. USA
Reynold, T.D. and Richards, P.A.1996.unit operation and process in environmental
engineering.2nd
. edition PWS. Publishing CO. Boston, USA
Saravanan, V., dan Sreekrishnan, T. R.. 2006. “Modelling Anaerobic Biofilm Reactors: A
Review”. Journal of Enviromental Management 81/2008, hal 1-18
Sasse, L. 1998 DEWATS; Decentralised Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries
Delhi: BORDA
Sundstrom,D.W. and Herbert E.K,1979. Wastewater treatment. Prentice hall, inc. London
Alamudi I. Dan Ricky.2005. Kerja Praktek. Produksi Bersih PG. Pesantren Baru Kediri. Teknik
Lingkungan. FTSP-ITS, Surabaya
Benefield, L.D And Randall, C.W. 1980. Biological Process Design For Wastewater Treatment.
Prantice Hall. New Jersey, USA.
Bodkhe, S. 2006. “ Development of An Improved Anaerobic Filter for Municipal Wastewater
Treatment” Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) hal. 222-226
Eckenfelder, W.W. 2000. Industrial water pollution control. 3 th
edition McGraw Hill. New York
Farah I. 2007. Tugas Akhir: Perencanaan Ulang IPAL PG. Pesantren Baru Kediri. Teknik
Lingkungan FTSP-ITS, Surabaya
Horan, N.J. 1990. Biological Wastewater Treatment System Theory And Operation. John Wiley
& Sons. Inc.USA
Kobayashi, H. A., Stenstrom, M. K., Mah, R. A. 1983 “Treatment of Low Strength
Wastewater Using The Anaerobic Filter”. Water Resource.Vol 17, No. 8, hal 903-
909.
Metcalf & Eddy, inc. 1991. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal And Reuse, 3
Edition. Mc Graw Hill. New York
Metcalf & Eddy. Inc. 2003. Wastewater Engineering Treatment, Disposal And Reuse, 4
Edition. Mc Graw Hill. New York
Okun Et. Al.1996. Water And Wastewater Engineering Volume I: Water Supply And
Wastewater Removal. John Wiley & Sons. New York. USA
Prasetyawati, E. 2006. Tugas Akhir: Perencanaan Ulang IPAL PG. Watoetoelis Krian. Teknik
Lingkungan FTSP-ITS, Surabaya
Qasim. Syed R ( The University Of Texas At Arlington).1985.Wastewater Treatment Plants:
Planning, Design And Operation CBS College Publishing. 2nd
Edition. PWS Publishing
Co. Boston. USA
Reynold, T.D. and Richards, P.A.1996.unit operation and process in environmental
engineering.2nd
. edition PWS. Publishing CO. Boston, USA
Saravanan, V., dan Sreekrishnan, T. R.. 2006. “Modelling Anaerobic Biofilm Reactors: A
Review”. Journal of Enviromental Management 81/2008, hal 1-18
Sasse, L. 1998 DEWATS; Decentralised Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries
Delhi: BORDA
Sundstrom,D.W. and Herbert E.K,1979. Wastewater treatment. Prentice hall, inc. London