kuliah penyajian data

8/9/2019 Kuliah Penyajian Data

1/24

Penyajian data

Retno Wahyuningsih

Bagian Parasitologi FKUKI


2/24

PENYAJIAN DATA

1.Untuk publikasi tertulis

2.Untuk presentasi oral


3/24

Presentasi oral

Ujian

Seinar

Siposiu Biasanya disajikan dala bentuk

!igital " po#er point

Berisikan teks dan angka !isusun dala bentuk kaliat$ tabel$

%hart$ bar graph dsb.


4/24

Presentasi dg po#er point

Kata kun%i& sederhana

'idak saa dengan publikasi tertulisdala jurnal iliah

'etapkan topik$ abil data penting dan(okus pada data tsb.

)angan *enupuk+ banyak data

dala satu slide

gra,k-bar-%hart& pilih yang sederhana


5/24

Urutan

)udul

aa presenter

Pendahuluan /terasuk tujuan0 etode

asil

!iskusi Kesipulan


6/24

!ata dala bentuk angka

'abel&

)ulah angka tidak terlalu besar

'ekstular

3abar harus berhubungan dgpresentasi

Boleh 4dihias5 naun janganengalahkan isi


7/24

PUBLIKASI TERTULIS

!iterbitkan dala jurnal iliah

Buku


8/24

)urnal iliah

Se%ara uu enganut standar yang saa)udul

aa penulis

6,liasi penulis

6bstra%t

Pendahuluan

etode-bahan dan %ara

asil

!iskusi dan kesipulan

U%apan teria kasih !e%laration o( interest

!a(tar pustaka

3abar dan tabel


9/24

JUDUL: Siple and Rapid !ete%tion o(Candida albicans

!6 in Seru by P7R (or !iagnosis o( In8asi8e 7andidiasis.

-'itle %ase& huru( besar di a#al kata ke%uali kata

sabung-!eskripti(& enjelaskan isi

-1291: kata& singkat padat


10/24

seua naa peneliti$ urutantergantung kontribusi dalapenelitian dan penulisan akalah

RETNO WAHYUNINGSIH,1,2 * HANS-JOACHIM FREISLEBEN,2HANS-GUNTHER SONNTAG,3AND PAUL SCHNITZLER

D!"#$%&!'% () P#$#+%((., U'+/!$+%# K$+%!' I'0('!+#,1#'0

F#%. () M!0++'!, U'+/!$+%. () I'0('!+#,2

J##$%#, I'0('!+#, #'0D!"#$%&!'% () H.+!'! #'0 M!0+# M+$(4+((.3#'0 D!"#$%&!'%() 5+$((., H.+!'! I'%+%%!, U'+/!$+%. () eidelberg$ H!+0!4!$,G!$'.

aa dana,liasi&


11/24

6bstrak

Ringkasan naskah /2;;9


12/24

6bstrak

S#% "#$#$#)

=atar belakang 'ujuan

etode

asil

!iskusi

Kesipulan

T!$%$%$

=atar belakang 'ujuan

etode

hasil

Kesipulan


13/24

7ontoh& abstrak satuparagra(

Interpretive agreements among the results of fluconazole broth microdilution

tests, Etests, and disk diffusion tests were documented by evaluating 495

Candida spp.icrodilution reference test results were in agreement with 9!" of

the Etest results# most discrepancies were minor differences. $luconazole

resistance of Candida krusei strains often re%uired a full 4& h of incubation in

order to be observed by the standard method. $or the disk diffusion tests thatwere performed on ueller'(inton agar with glucose and methylene blue, 9)"

of results were in agreement with those of the reference test, especially when

zones of inhibition were measured after the first *4 h of incubation. +ome

Candida glabrata isolates failed to grow satisfactorily until a full 4& h of

incubation was completed. recision was determined by testing 5- selected

isolates in triplicate in each of three laboratories. he reproducibility of results of

disk diffusion tests was comparable to that of the reference method. /ith all

procedures, determination of test results was particularly challenging with some

strains, and new methods are needed in order to improve endpoint definition.


14/24

7ontoh& abstrak terstruktur

Objective0 he activity of voriconazole against 1spergillus spp. 2n 3 ))

was tested by the Etest, disc diffusion and the 667+ 8&'1 methods.

Methods0 $our hizomucor spp. isolates were included to study the

suitability of the three susceptibility testing methods to detect isolates

resistant to voriconazole. he disc diffusion method performed onueller:(inton agar 2;ifco supplemented with *" glucose and

ethylene cellent correlation with the

Etest and the 667+ methods. Conclusion: ?n the basis of our results, it appears that the disc diffusion

test is a useful method for testing the activity of voriconazole against

Aspergillusspp.


15/24

Introdu%tion-pendahuluan

In(orasi *luas+ tentang topik yang diteliti Riset terdahulu

In(orasi dipersepit

anya yang diteliti

Fo%us penulisan akalah ipotesis

Ringkasan asalah dan tujuanpenelitian/selling point0


16/24

Pendahuluan

6ompromised patients, such as those infected with human immunodeficiency virus, are

often colonized by and=or infected with fungi, especially Candida spp. 6onse%uently,

they fre%uently receive antifungal agents such as fluconazole for relatively long

periods of time during hospitalization. rolonged e>posure to an azole such as

fluconazole can select strains with diminished susceptibilities 2!, ), and

conse%uently, increasing doses may be necessary. $or this reason, the susceptibilitiesof isolates recovered from compromised patients receiving prolonged fluconazole

treatment should be monitored in order to determine when strains with decreased

susceptibilities have been selected 28. In order to do this in a cost'effective way,

simple, ine>pensive testing procedures are needed, but such tests must be accurate

and precise. he purpose of this report is to document the relative levels of accuracy

and precision of three procedures for testing fluconazole0 broth microdilution, Etest,

and disk diffusion. he accuracy of each procedure was assessed by comparing the

results to those obtained by the 4&'h micro'dilution reference method of the ational

6ommittee for 6linical 7aboratory +tandards 2667+ 2&. recision was measured

by performing replicate tests in three separate laboratories.


17/24

ethods and aterials

Instruksi jelas tentang %ara elakukanpenelitian sehingga orang lain dapatengulanginya Subjek penelitian Pengupulan dan pengolahan sapel

6sal sapel

'epat penelitian

7ara pengupulan data

7ara engolah data dan analisis statistik

Progra koputer yang dipakai

Penjelasan tentang bahan dan alat yang dipakai


18/24

asil

Penyajian data hasil penelitian

Bersi(at >bjekti(

'anpa diskusi 7atatan& pada akalah pendek adajurnal iliah yang enyatukan hasildan diskusi


19/24

!iskusi

Interpretasi hasil 6pakah penelitian eneria atau enolak hipotesis?

)ika tidak apakah bisa interpretasi lain-hipotesis alternati(

!ibandingkan dengan hasil penelitianlain-terdahulu@ saa-berbeda?

Bila saa apa penjelasannya

Bila berbeda apa penjelasannya

Pengaruh penelitian saudara dala bidangyang diteliti

Usulan untuk perbaikan-riset lebih lanjut


20/24

Kesipulan

erupakan bagian akhir diskusi

'idak selalu diperlukan saran


21/24

U%apan teria kasih

Pada penyandang dana

Pada yang enyediakan ateripenelitian

Pada kolega yang eberikan telaahkritis

Pada yang ebantu penelitiantetapi kontribusinya tidak %ukupuntuk diasukkan sebagai penulis.


22/24

!e%laration o( interest

enyatakan ada-tidak ada %onAi%t i(interest para peneliti terhadap*sesuatu+ yang akan engakibatkan

bias terhadap hasil penelitian


23/24

!a(tar pustaka

Banyak digunakan siste 8an%ou8er

=ihat %ontoh pada akalah yang adadi tangan Saudara


24/24

'eriakasih

kuliah penyajian data

Documents