where do i start the story of my scientific communication research? this study shows podcast –...

Where Do I Start the Story ofMy scientific communicationResearch ? This Study ShowsPodcast An Academic presentation byDr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, PubricaGroup:  www.pubrica.comEmail: sales@pubrica.com

Bijou Solutions, Inc. | 2020

Today's OutlineIn briefIntroductionQualitative process researchUseful guidelinesPodcasts about science: a look at globalproduction and outputScience podcastingConclusion About pubrica

In briefMany businesspeople have already seen thepractical impact of storytelling, having witnessedhow fascinating a well-crafted story can be.

But, on the other hand, recent scientific researchfocuses on how stories affect our attitudes,beliefs, and behaviours.

IntroductionStories have also been found to be beneficial withincorporations, according to research. People are farmore driven by their organization’s transcendentmission (how it affects lives) than by its transactionalgoal, according to research (how it sells goods andservices).

The transcendent purpose is best communicatedthrough stories, such as explaining the disturbingsituations of real-life clients and how your effortshelped them overcome their difficulties.

Make your employees sympathize with thecustomer’s distress, and they’ll enjoy the satisfactionof its resolution - much more so if any heroics wereinvolved in alleviating suffering or bringing delight.

Many of us know from work that enduring storieshave a dramatic arc in which a character suffers andfinally discovers previously undiscovered skills theyutilize to overcome hardship; my Research paperwriting services demonstrates that the brain is drawnto this story type.

Qualitativeprocess research

Although qualitative process research paper support is growing more common,writers frequently struggle to create an effective report.

Process articles must show a tight connection between process facts andprocess theory while also engaging the reader.

This necessitates weighing the pros and cons of various alternatives forproducing narratives, ideas, and theoretical process models.

According to this article, inductive, conceptualization,and model-led are three compositional structuresthat writers might employ to write their results.

We go through their essential qualities, advantagesand disadvantages, and requirements for efficientusage and provide examples for inspiration.

Except for a few personal explanations, the excellentinstructions on writing up qualitative managementresearch give little direction on communicating thefindings from qualitative process research. Furthermore,

researchers have differing (sometimes implicit)perspectives on how to write good qualitative processresearch articles, scientific Communication which cancause reviewers and editors to push in opposite ways,even for the same study.

Useful guidelines

For example, we’ve been told to incorporate analytical “telling” into anempirical story while still separating them; alternatively, we’ve beentold to start with facts and then theory, or the other way around.

Although a generally established style for publishing findings maymake readers’, authors’, reviewers’, and editors’ lives easier, it isineffective for qualitative research and scientific writing.

To harness the complexity and influence of process research andaccommodate diversity in phenomena, viewpoints, and study aims,variety in reporting findings is required.

Podcasts about science: a lookat global production and output

Podcasts have been gaining popularity as a new decentralized media for freeand autonomous communication with worldwide audiences since 2004.

Podcasts are generally audio-only, hosted online, and delivered to listenersvia direct, on-demand audio and video downloads to PCs, MP3 players,interactive media devices, and cell phones.

Episodes of a podcast series can be spontaneously downloaded to app-enabled devices via a free opt-in subscription to certain audio series ‘feeds.

Audiences find audio podcasts particularly useful since they can be listened towhile doing other things without glancing at a screen.

Podcasts may also provide supplemental “show notes,”including text, hyperlinks,and photos.

Podcasts are handy for content creators since they may be made using littleequipment, such as a microphone, audio recording/editing software, a hosting webservice, or even a single smartphone (3).

Like broadcast radio programmes, podcasts may be produced with high-endprofessional production standards despite minimum technological needs.

Science podcastingFor the first time, large-scale patterns in science podcasting have beenhighlighted in this study. Between 2004 and 2010, the overall number of sciencepodcast series increased linearly, and between 2010 and 2018, it increasedexponentially.

There were 952 science podcast series that fulfilled the study’s inclusioncriteria, putting a lowerbound on the number of English-language sciencepodcasts accessible at the start of 2018.

The majority of science podcast series (87%) are audio-only, with the number ofnew video-format science podcast series decreasing from over 30% in 2007 tobarely 5% in 2017.

This might indicate that podcast listeners prefer to listen to podcasts whiledoing things incompatible with seeing video material.

Various particular disciplines were well represented by specialized audio series,although one-third of scientific podcast series included many fields of science.

Chemistry appears to be under-represented as a topic, with just 3% of podcastseries devoted to it, compared to 18% for ‘physics and astronomy’ and 13% for‘biology.’

This apparent underrepresentation in podcasting might be a reflection of long-termtendencies in scientific communication, where chemistry has beenunderrepresented as a distinct discipline.

This might also reflect the belief that visual mediums, rather than just auditorypodcasts, are superior for presenting chemistry Scientific research support

ConclusionIn the future, a combination of quantitative and qualitativeapproaches may be required to gain more insight into sciencepodcasters’ motivations,

why they choose to produce the podcasts that they do, and howscience podcasts are meeting the need for science communicationacross geographic boundaries.

About pubricaScience can be communicated in several ways and Pubricamedical communication team offers the best integrated andcustomised solutions in medico-market and convert into tingsolutions to healthcare/pharmaceutical companies/food andbeverage companies.

We serve pharmaceutical, medical device manufacturers,hospital, medical advertising, publishers, managed careorganisation, academic medical centers, Information TechnologyHealthcare products /websites association.

+44- 7424810299UNITED KINGDOM

+91-9884350006INDIA

EMAILsales@pubrica.com

Contact Us