1 o ptca (n=516)
DESCRIPTION
Randomize. CADILLAC. Study Design. Stone et al.Circulation 2000; 102: II-664. AMITRANSCRIPT
11oo PTCA PTCA(n=516)
MultiLink stentMultiLink stent+ Abciximab+ Abciximab
(n=525)
11oo PTCA PTCA+ Abciximab+ Abciximab
(n=529)
MultiLink stentMultiLink stent(n=512)
AMI <12 hours, any age, cardiogenic shock excludedAMI <12 hours, any age, cardiogenic shock excludedn=2,665 at 76 centers in N.A., S.A. and Europen=2,665 at 76 centers in N.A., S.A. and Europe
AngiographyAngiographyAngiographyAngiography
nonononoRegistryRegistry
n=583 (22%)n=583 (22%)RegistryRegistry
n=583 (22%)n=583 (22%)
RandomizeRandomizeRandomizeRandomize
Met angiographic criteriaMet angiographic criterian=2,082 (78%)
Met angiographic criteriaMet angiographic criterian=2,082 (78%)
CADILLACCADILLACCADILLACCADILLAC
Study DesignStudy Design Stone et al.Circulation 2000; 102: II-664Stone et al.Circulation 2000; 102: II-664
yesyesyesyes
• 1961 patients with acute MI1961 patients with acute MI• Target lesion 2.5-4 mm, < 70 mm lengthTarget lesion 2.5-4 mm, < 70 mm length• Randomized:Randomized:
Stent vs. PTCAStent vs. PTCAAbciximab vs. placeboAbciximab vs. placebo
• Shock excludedShock excluded• Rx ASA, ticlopidine, heparinRx ASA, ticlopidine, heparin
ACT 200-300 w/abciximabACT 200-300 w/abciximabACT >350 w/placeboACT >350 w/placebo
• Primary endpointPrimary endpoint6 month death/MI/urgent intervention6 month death/MI/urgent intervention
Stone. Oral presentation. AHA 1999.Stone. Oral presentation. AHA 1999.CADILLACCADILLAC
• No difference between groups in mortality, strokeNo difference between groups in mortality, stroke
• Trend toward fewer reinfarctions in stent ptsTrend toward fewer reinfarctions in stent pts
• Trend toward less ischemia-driven TVR in stent ptsTrend toward less ischemia-driven TVR in stent pts
• No difference between groups in ICHNo difference between groups in ICH
Stone. Oral presentation. AHA 1999.Stone. Oral presentation. AHA 1999.
CADILLACCADILLAC [ Presentation of acute safety / outcome data ][ Presentation of acute safety / outcome data ][ Presentation of acute safety / outcome data ][ Presentation of acute safety / outcome data ]
Stent/AStent/A Stent/PStent/P PTCA/APTCA/A PTCA/PPTCA/P
TIMI 3 flowTIMI 3 flow 96.7% 96.7% 92.1%92.1% 95% 95% 94.8% 94.8%
Rec ischRec isch 1.2% 1.2% 3.9% 3.9% 1.4% 1.4% 4% 4%
BleedingBleeding 4.5% 4.5% 3.5% 3.5% 5.1% 5.1% 3.1% 3.1%
Stone, TCT 2000Stone, TCT 2000 CADILLAC
• 2082 patients with acute MI 2082 patients with acute MI (2.5-4.5 mm vessels)(2.5-4.5 mm vessels)
• Shock excludedShock excluded
• Randomized to :Randomized to :PTCAPTCA
PTCA + abciximabPTCA + abciximab
Stent (Multi-link)Stent (Multi-link)
Stent + abciximabStent + abciximab
• Crossover allowedCrossover allowed
• Primary endpoint : MACE at 6 mo Primary endpoint : MACE at 6 mo (stent vs PTCA)(stent vs PTCA)
Stone, TCT 2000Stone, TCT 2000
PTCA(n=516)
PTCA+Abcix(n=529)
Stent(n=512)
Stent+Abcix(n=525)
MACE 19.3 % 15.2 % 10.9 % 10.8 %
Mortality 4.3 % 2.3 % 2.8 % 3.8 %
Ischemia-driven TVR
14.2 % 12.1 % 7.4 % 5.0 %
LOS (days) 3.9 3.4 3.9 3.3
PTCA(n=516)
PTCA+Abcix(n=529)
Stent(n=512)
Stent+Abcix(n=525)
MACE 19.3 % 15.2 % 10.9 % 10.8 %
Mortality 4.3 % 2.3 % 2.8 % 3.8 %
Ischemia-driven TVR
14.2 % 12.1 % 7.4 % 5.0 %
LOS (days) 3.9 3.4 3.9 3.3
CADILLAC
Outcomes at 6 MonthsOutcomes at 6 Months
19.3%19.3%
10.9%10.9%
PTCA, no abciximabPTCA, no abciximab Stent, no abciximabStent, no abciximab
0%0%
5%5%
10%10%
15%15%
20%20%
00 3030 6060 9090 120120 150150 180180
Days to eventDays to event
p = 0.001p = 0.001
Inci
den
ceIn
cid
ence
CADILLACCADILLACCADILLACCADILLAC
Primary Endpoint - MACE at 6 MonthsPrimary Endpoint - MACE at 6 Months
Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664
0%0%
5%5%
10%10%
15%15%
20%20%
00 3030 6060 9090 120120 150150 180180
Days to eventDays to event
15.2%15.2%
10.9%10.9%
CADILLACCADILLACCADILLACCADILLAC
Primary Endpoint - MACE at 6 MonthsPrimary Endpoint - MACE at 6 Months
Stent, no abciximabStent, no abciximabPTCA, abciximabPTCA, abciximab
Inci
den
ce
(%
)In
cid
enc
e (
%)
Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664
7.17.1
5.05.0
00
22
44
66
88
1010
Death, Disabling Stroke, Re-MI or Ischemic TVRDeath, Disabling Stroke, Re-MI or Ischemic TVR
CADILLACCADILLAC
MACE at 30 DaysMACE at 30 Days
% o
f P
atie
nts
% o
f P
atie
nts
Secondary EndpointSecondary Endpoint
p = 0.04p = 0.04
No AbciximabNo Abciximab
Abciximab Abciximab
Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664
0%0%
5%5%
10%10%
15%15%
20%20%
00 3030 6060 9090 120120 150150 180180
Days to eventDays to event
15.2%15.2%
19.3%19.3%
10.8%10.8%10.9%10.9%
CADILLACCADILLACCADILLACCADILLAC
Seconday Endpoint - MACE at 6 MonthsSeconday Endpoint - MACE at 6 MonthsIn
cid
enc
e (
%)
Inci
den
ce
(%
)
Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664
PTCA, no abxPTCA, no abx PTCA, abxPTCA, abx Stent, no abxStent, no abx Stent, abxStent, abx
CADILLACCADILLACCADILLACCADILLAC
• Thrombotic bailoutThrombotic bailout
• Subacute ThrombosisSubacute Thrombosis
• Ischemic TVRIschemic TVR
• Registry PatientsRegistry Patients
Additional Benefits of AbciximabAdditional Benefits of Abciximab
Stone, TCT 2000Stone, TCT 2000
PTCA(n=516)
PTCA+Abcix(n=529)
Stent(n=512)
Stent+Abcix(n=525)
Stent 19.9 % 16.4 % 99.4 % 99.5 %
Abciximab 9.1 % 99.4 % 6.1 % 99.5 %
PTCA(n=516)
PTCA+Abcix(n=529)
Stent(n=512)
Stent+Abcix(n=525)
Stent 19.9 % 16.4 % 99.4 % 99.5 %
Abciximab 9.1 % 99.4 % 6.1 % 99.5 %
Treatment ReceivedTreatment Received
CADILLAC
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
PTCA, No Abx PTCA, Abx Stent, No Abx Stent, Abx
Inci
den
ce (
%)
30 Day Subacute Thrombosis30 Day Subacute ThrombosisCADILLACCADILLACCADILLACCADILLAC
1.7%1.7%
0.6%0.6%
1%1%
0%0%
p=0.03p=0.03
P=0.07P=0.07
Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664
5.4
14.2
3.2
12.1
2.9
7.4
1.5
5
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
30 Day 6 Month
Inci
den
ce (%
)
PTCA PTCA+Abx Stent Stent+AbxStone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664
p<0.02p<0.02 p=NSp=NS
p=0.04p=0.04
p=NSp=NS
p=0.12p=0.12
p<0.001p<0.001
Ischemic TVRIschemic TVRCADILLACCADILLACCADILLACCADILLAC
2.8%
4.1%
1.5%
9.0%
6.5%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
Rand Reg Med PCI CABG
In-hospital mortality
Medical31%
PCI40%
CABG29%
Treatment Treatment receivedreceived(n=583)(n=583)
Treatment Treatment receivedreceived(n=583)(n=583)
47% received Abx;47% received Abx;Mortality = 4.7% w/AbxMortality = 4.7% w/Abx
vs. 8.3% w/o Abx, p = 0.22vs. 8.3% w/o Abx, p = 0.22
47% received Abx;47% received Abx;Mortality = 4.7% w/AbxMortality = 4.7% w/Abx
vs. 8.3% w/o Abx, p = 0.22vs. 8.3% w/o Abx, p = 0.22
Angiographic Exclusion Registry: Hospital MortalityAngiographic Exclusion Registry: Hospital MortalityAngiographic Exclusion Registry: Hospital MortalityAngiographic Exclusion Registry: Hospital MortalityCADILLACCADILLAC
Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664Stone et al. Circ 2000; 102: II-664