output hasil

Upload: ibowl-deewee

Post on 03-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Output Hasil

    1/7

    Explore

    Case Processing Summary

    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

    30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%

    Pre Test Pengetahuan

    Post Test Pengetahuan

    Pre Test Sikap

    Post Test Sikap

    Pre Test Praktek

    Post Test Praktek

    N Percent N Percent N Percent

    Valid Missing Total

    Cases

  • 8/12/2019 Output Hasil

    2/7

    Descriptives

    1 4.1 33 3 .4 81 22

    13.1491

    15.1175

    14.2593

    15.0000

    6.947

    2.63574

    8.00

    18.00

    10.00

    3.25

    -.772 .427

    .323 .833

    1 4.1 33 3 .3 34 71

    13.4488

    14.8179

    14.1852

    14.0000

    3.361

    1.83328

    10.00

    17.00

    7.00

    2.25

    -.354 .427-.366 .833

    1 0.8 33 3 .6 30 79

    9.5432

    12.1234

    11.0000

    12.0000

    11.937

    3.45496

    3.00

    15.00

    12.00

    5.25

    -.752 .427

    -.524 .833

    1 1.4 33 3 .7 10 65

    9.9799

    12.8868

    11.5926

    12.0000

    15.151

    3.89237

    4.00

    16.00

    12.00

    5.25

    -.656 .427

    -.654 .833

    5 9.0 00 0 1 .1 09 00

    56.7318

    61.2682

    58.8889

    60.0000

    36.897

    6.07425

    50.00

    70.00

    20.00

    2.50

    .040 .427

    -.081 .833

    6 6.0 00 0 1 .5 61 02

    62.8074

    69.1926

    66.4815

    70.0000

    73.103

    8.55006

    40.00

    80.00

    40.00

    10.00

    -.865 .427

    1 .858 .833

    Mean

    Lower Bound

    Upper Bound

    95% Confidenc e

    Interva l for Me an

    5% Trimmed Mean

    Median

    Variance

    Std. Dev iation

    Minimum

    Maximum

    Range

    Interquar tile R ange

    Skewness

    Kurtosis

    Mean

    Lower Bound

    Upper Bound

    95% Confidenc e

    Interva l for Me an

    5% Trimmed Mean

    Median

    Variance

    Std. Dev iation

    Minimum

    Maximum

    Range

    Interquar tile R ange

    SkewnessKurtosis

    Mean

    Lower Bound

    Upper Bound

    95% Confidenc e

    Interva l for Me an

    5% Trimmed Mean

    Median

    Variance

    Std. Dev iation

    Minimum

    Maximum

    Range

    Interquar tile R ange

    Skewness

    Kurtosis

    Mean

    Lower BoundUpper Bound

    95% Confidenc eInterva l for Me an

    5% Trimmed Mean

    Median

    Variance

    Std. Dev iation

    Minimum

    Maximum

    Range

    Interquar tile R ange

    Skewness

    Kurtosis

    Mean

    Lower Bound

    Upper Bound

    95% Confidenc e

    Interva l for Me an

    5% Trimmed MeanMedian

    Variance

    Std. Dev iation

    Minimum

    Maximum

    Range

    Interquar tile R ange

    Skewness

    Kurtosis

    Mean

    Lower Bound

    Upper Bound

    95% Confidenc e

    Interva l for Me an

    5% Trimmed Mean

    Median

    Variance

    Std. Dev iation

    Minimum

    Maximum

    Range

    Interquar tile R ange

    Skewness

    Kurtosis

    Pre Test Pengetahuan

    Post Test Penge tahuan

    Pre Test Sik ap

    Post Test Sikap

    Pre Test Praktek

    Post Test Praktek

    Statistic Std. Error

  • 8/12/2019 Output Hasil

    3/7

    UjiNormalitas

    NPar Tests

    Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test

    Tests of Normality

    .196 30 .005 .927 30 .040

    .148 30 .090 .955 30 .233

    .266 30 .000 .892 30 .005

    .179 30 .016 .900 30 .008

    .332 30 .000 .766 30 .000

    .280 30 .000 .840 30 .000

    Pre Test Pengetahuan

    Post Test Pengetahuan

    Pre Test Sikap

    Post Test Sikap

    Pre Test Praktek

    Post Test Praktek

    Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

    Kolmogorov-Smirnova

    Shapiro-Wilk

    Lilliefors Significance Correctiona.

    Descriptive Statistics

    30 14.1333 2.63574 8.00 18.00

    30 10.8333 3.45496 3.00 15.00

    30 59.0000 6.07425 50.00 70.00

    30 14.1333 1.83328 10.00 17.00

    30 11.4333 3.89237 4.00 16.00

    30 66.0000 8.55006 40.00 80.00

    Pre Test Pengetahuan

    Pre Test Sikap

    Pre Test Praktek

    Post Test Pengetahuan

    Post Test Sikap

    Post Test Praktek

    N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

    Ranks

    13a

    14.77 192.00

    14b

    13.29 186.00

    3c

    30

    11d

    14.95 164.50

    17e

    14.21 241.50

    2f

    30

    3g

    8.00 24.00

    18h

    11.50 207.00

    9i

    30

    Negative Ranks

    Positive Ranks

    Ties

    Total

    Negative Ranks

    Positive Ranks

    Ties

    Total

    Negative Ranks

    Positive Ranks

    Ties

    Total

    Post Test Pengetahuan

    - Pre Test Pengetahuan

    Post Test Sikap - Pre

    Test Sikap

    Post Test Praktek- PreTest Praktek

    N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

    Post Test Pengetahuan < Pre Test Pengetahuana.

    Post Test Pengetahuan > Pre Test Pengetahuanb.

    Post Test Pengetahuan = Pre Test Pengetahuanc.

    Post Test Sikap < Pre Test Sikapd.

    Post Test Sikap > Pre Test Sikape.

    Post Test Sikap = Pre Test Sikapf.

    Post Test Praktek< Pre Test Praktekg.

    Post Test Praktek> Pre Test Praktekh.

    Post Test Praktek= Pre Test Prakteki.

  • 8/12/2019 Output Hasil

    4/7

    Hasiluji Wilcoxon perbandinganantara score pre danposttestkelompokperlakuanmenunjukkantidakadaperbedaan yangbermaknapadapengetahuandansikapdengantarafsignifikansi ( 0.942 dan 0.378> 0.05)Untukpraktekadaperbedaan yang bermakna (0.001 < 0.05)

    Frequencies

    Frequency Table

    Test Statisticsc

    -.073a

    -.882b

    -3.334b

    .942 .378 .001

    Z

    Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

    Post Test

    Pengetahuan

    - Pre Test

    Pengetahuan

    Post Test

    Sikap - Pre

    Test Sikap

    Post Test

    Praktek - Pre

    Test Praktek

    Based on posi tive ranks.a.

    Based on neg ative ranks.b.

    Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Testc.

    Statistics

    60 60 60 60

    0 0 0 0

    Valid

    Missing

    N

    Kelompok Pengetahuan Sikap Praktek

    Kelompok

    30 50.0 50.0 50.0

    30 50.0 50.0 100.0

    60 100.0 100.0

    Kontrol

    Perlakuan

    Total

    Valid

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Pengetahuan

    27 45.0 45.0 45.0

    33 55.0 55.0 100.0

    60 100.0 100.0

    Buruk

    Baik

    Total

    Valid

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Sikap

    23 38.3 38.3 38.3

    37 61.7 61.7 100.0

    60 100.0 100.0

    Buruk

    Baik

    Total

    Valid

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

  • 8/12/2019 Output Hasil

    5/7

    Crosstabs

    Kelompok * Pengetahuan

    Praktek

    24 40.0 40.0 40.0

    36 60.0 60.0 100.0

    60 100.0 100.0

    Buruk

    Baik

    Total

    Valid

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent

    Cumulative

    Percent

    Case Processing Summary

    60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%

    60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%

    60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%

    Kelompok* Pengetahuan

    Kelompok* Sikap

    Kelompok* Praktek

    N Percent N Percent N Percent

    Valid Missing Total

    Cases

    Crosstab

    12 18 30

    13.5 16.5 30.0

    40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

    20.0% 30.0% 50.0%

    15 15 30

    13.5 16.5 30.0

    50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

    25.0% 25.0% 50.0%

    27 33 60

    27.0 33.0 60.0

    45.0% 55.0% 100.0%

    45.0% 55.0% 100.0%

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Kontrol

    Perlakuan

    Kelompok

    Total

    Buruk Baik

    Pengetahuan

    Total

    Chi-Square Tests

    .606b

    1 .436

    .269 1 .604

    .607 1 .436

    .604 .302

    .596 1 .440

    60

    Pearson Chi-Square

    Continuity Correction a

    Likelihood Ratio

    Fisher' s Exact Test

    Linear-by-Linear

    Association

    N of Valid Cases

    Value df Asymp. Sig.

    (2-si ded)Exact Sig.(2-sided)

    Exact Sig.(1-sided)

    Computed onlyfor a 2x2 tablea.

    0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.

    50.

    b.

  • 8/12/2019 Output Hasil

    6/7

    Kelompok * Sikap

    Symmetric Measures

    .100 .436

    60

    Contingency CoefficientNominal by Nominal

    N of Valid Cases

    Value Approx. Sig.

    Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

    Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

    Crosstab

    14 16 30

    11.5 18.5 30.0

    46.7% 53.3% 100.0%

    23.3% 26.7% 50.0%

    9 21 30

    11.5 18.5 30.0

    30.0% 70.0% 100.0%

    15.0% 35.0% 50.0%

    23 37 60

    23.0 37.0 60.0

    38.3% 61.7% 100.0%

    38.3% 61.7% 100.0%

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Kontrol

    Perlakuan

    Kelompok

    Total

    Buruk Baik

    Sikap

    Total

    Chi-Square Tests

    1.763b

    1 .184

    1.128 1 .288

    1.773 1 .183

    .288 .144

    1.733 1 .188

    60

    Pearson Chi-Square

    Continuity Correction a

    Likelihood Ratio

    Fisher' s Exact Test

    Linear-by-Linear

    Association

    N of Valid Cases

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig.

    (2-si ded)

    Exact Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Exact Sig.

    (1-sided)

    Computed onlyfor a 2x2 tablea.

    0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.

    50.

    b.

    Symmetric Measures

    .169 .184

    60

    Contingency CoefficientNominal by Nominal

    N of Valid Cases

    Value Approx. Sig.

    Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

    Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.

  • 8/12/2019 Output Hasil

    7/7

    Kelompok * Praktek

    Hasiluji Chi Square (Pearson Chi Square) menunjukkantidakadahubunganantaraKelompok

    (pelakuandankontrol)terhadaptingkatpengetahuan (sig. 0.432 > 0.05) Sikap (sig. 0.148 > 0.05) Pengetahuan (sig.

    1.00 > 0.05).

    Crosstab

    12 18 30

    12.0 18.0 30.0

    40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

    20.0% 30.0% 50.0%

    12 18 30

    12.0 18.0 30.0

    40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

    20.0% 30.0% 50.0%

    24 36 60

    24.0 36.0 60.0

    40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

    40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Count

    Expected Count

    % within Kelompok

    % of Total

    Kontrol

    Perlakuan

    Kelompok

    Total

    Buruk Baik

    Praktek

    Total

    Chi-Square Tests

    .000b

    1 1.000

    .000 1 1.000

    .000 1 1.000

    1.000 .604

    .000 1 1.000

    60

    Pearson Chi-Square

    Continuity Correction a

    Likelihood Ratio

    Fisher' s Exact Test

    Linear-by-Linear

    Association

    N of Valid Cases

    Value df

    Asymp. Sig.

    (2-si ded)

    Exact Sig.

    (2-sided)

    Exact Sig.

    (1-sided)

    Computed onlyfor a 2x2 tablea.

    0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.

    00.

    b.

    Symmetric Measures

    .000 1.000

    60

    Contingency CoefficientNominal by Nominal

    N of Valid Cases

    Value Approx. Sig.

    Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.

    Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.