output hasil
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Output Hasil
1/7
Explore
Case Processing Summary
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Pre Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Pengetahuan
Pre Test Sikap
Post Test Sikap
Pre Test Praktek
Post Test Praktek
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
-
8/12/2019 Output Hasil
2/7
Descriptives
1 4.1 33 3 .4 81 22
13.1491
15.1175
14.2593
15.0000
6.947
2.63574
8.00
18.00
10.00
3.25
-.772 .427
.323 .833
1 4.1 33 3 .3 34 71
13.4488
14.8179
14.1852
14.0000
3.361
1.83328
10.00
17.00
7.00
2.25
-.354 .427-.366 .833
1 0.8 33 3 .6 30 79
9.5432
12.1234
11.0000
12.0000
11.937
3.45496
3.00
15.00
12.00
5.25
-.752 .427
-.524 .833
1 1.4 33 3 .7 10 65
9.9799
12.8868
11.5926
12.0000
15.151
3.89237
4.00
16.00
12.00
5.25
-.656 .427
-.654 .833
5 9.0 00 0 1 .1 09 00
56.7318
61.2682
58.8889
60.0000
36.897
6.07425
50.00
70.00
20.00
2.50
.040 .427
-.081 .833
6 6.0 00 0 1 .5 61 02
62.8074
69.1926
66.4815
70.0000
73.103
8.55006
40.00
80.00
40.00
10.00
-.865 .427
1 .858 .833
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidenc e
Interva l for Me an
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Dev iation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquar tile R ange
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidenc e
Interva l for Me an
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Dev iation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquar tile R ange
SkewnessKurtosis
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidenc e
Interva l for Me an
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Dev iation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquar tile R ange
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
Lower BoundUpper Bound
95% Confidenc eInterva l for Me an
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Dev iation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquar tile R ange
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidenc e
Interva l for Me an
5% Trimmed MeanMedian
Variance
Std. Dev iation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquar tile R ange
Skewness
Kurtosis
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidenc e
Interva l for Me an
5% Trimmed Mean
Median
Variance
Std. Dev iation
Minimum
Maximum
Range
Interquar tile R ange
Skewness
Kurtosis
Pre Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Penge tahuan
Pre Test Sik ap
Post Test Sikap
Pre Test Praktek
Post Test Praktek
Statistic Std. Error
-
8/12/2019 Output Hasil
3/7
UjiNormalitas
NPar Tests
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
Tests of Normality
.196 30 .005 .927 30 .040
.148 30 .090 .955 30 .233
.266 30 .000 .892 30 .005
.179 30 .016 .900 30 .008
.332 30 .000 .766 30 .000
.280 30 .000 .840 30 .000
Pre Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Pengetahuan
Pre Test Sikap
Post Test Sikap
Pre Test Praktek
Post Test Praktek
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Shapiro-Wilk
Lilliefors Significance Correctiona.
Descriptive Statistics
30 14.1333 2.63574 8.00 18.00
30 10.8333 3.45496 3.00 15.00
30 59.0000 6.07425 50.00 70.00
30 14.1333 1.83328 10.00 17.00
30 11.4333 3.89237 4.00 16.00
30 66.0000 8.55006 40.00 80.00
Pre Test Pengetahuan
Pre Test Sikap
Pre Test Praktek
Post Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Sikap
Post Test Praktek
N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum
Ranks
13a
14.77 192.00
14b
13.29 186.00
3c
30
11d
14.95 164.50
17e
14.21 241.50
2f
30
3g
8.00 24.00
18h
11.50 207.00
9i
30
Negative Ranks
Positive Ranks
Ties
Total
Negative Ranks
Positive Ranks
Ties
Total
Negative Ranks
Positive Ranks
Ties
Total
Post Test Pengetahuan
- Pre Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Sikap - Pre
Test Sikap
Post Test Praktek- PreTest Praktek
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Post Test Pengetahuan < Pre Test Pengetahuana.
Post Test Pengetahuan > Pre Test Pengetahuanb.
Post Test Pengetahuan = Pre Test Pengetahuanc.
Post Test Sikap < Pre Test Sikapd.
Post Test Sikap > Pre Test Sikape.
Post Test Sikap = Pre Test Sikapf.
Post Test Praktek< Pre Test Praktekg.
Post Test Praktek> Pre Test Praktekh.
Post Test Praktek= Pre Test Prakteki.
-
8/12/2019 Output Hasil
4/7
Hasiluji Wilcoxon perbandinganantara score pre danposttestkelompokperlakuanmenunjukkantidakadaperbedaan yangbermaknapadapengetahuandansikapdengantarafsignifikansi ( 0.942 dan 0.378> 0.05)Untukpraktekadaperbedaan yang bermakna (0.001 < 0.05)
Frequencies
Frequency Table
Test Statisticsc
-.073a
-.882b
-3.334b
.942 .378 .001
Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Post Test
Pengetahuan
- Pre Test
Pengetahuan
Post Test
Sikap - Pre
Test Sikap
Post Test
Praktek - Pre
Test Praktek
Based on posi tive ranks.a.
Based on neg ative ranks.b.
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Testc.
Statistics
60 60 60 60
0 0 0 0
Valid
Missing
N
Kelompok Pengetahuan Sikap Praktek
Kelompok
30 50.0 50.0 50.0
30 50.0 50.0 100.0
60 100.0 100.0
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Pengetahuan
27 45.0 45.0 45.0
33 55.0 55.0 100.0
60 100.0 100.0
Buruk
Baik
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Sikap
23 38.3 38.3 38.3
37 61.7 61.7 100.0
60 100.0 100.0
Buruk
Baik
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
-
8/12/2019 Output Hasil
5/7
Crosstabs
Kelompok * Pengetahuan
Praktek
24 40.0 40.0 40.0
36 60.0 60.0 100.0
60 100.0 100.0
Buruk
Baik
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Case Processing Summary
60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%
60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%
60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%
Kelompok* Pengetahuan
Kelompok* Sikap
Kelompok* Praktek
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
Crosstab
12 18 30
13.5 16.5 30.0
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
20.0% 30.0% 50.0%
15 15 30
13.5 16.5 30.0
50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
25.0% 25.0% 50.0%
27 33 60
27.0 33.0 60.0
45.0% 55.0% 100.0%
45.0% 55.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Kelompok
Total
Buruk Baik
Pengetahuan
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.606b
1 .436
.269 1 .604
.607 1 .436
.604 .302
.596 1 .440
60
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher' s Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-si ded)Exact Sig.(2-sided)
Exact Sig.(1-sided)
Computed onlyfor a 2x2 tablea.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.
50.
b.
-
8/12/2019 Output Hasil
6/7
Kelompok * Sikap
Symmetric Measures
.100 .436
60
Contingency CoefficientNominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
Crosstab
14 16 30
11.5 18.5 30.0
46.7% 53.3% 100.0%
23.3% 26.7% 50.0%
9 21 30
11.5 18.5 30.0
30.0% 70.0% 100.0%
15.0% 35.0% 50.0%
23 37 60
23.0 37.0 60.0
38.3% 61.7% 100.0%
38.3% 61.7% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Kelompok
Total
Buruk Baik
Sikap
Total
Chi-Square Tests
1.763b
1 .184
1.128 1 .288
1.773 1 .183
.288 .144
1.733 1 .188
60
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher' s Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-si ded)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Computed onlyfor a 2x2 tablea.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.
50.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.169 .184
60
Contingency CoefficientNominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.
-
8/12/2019 Output Hasil
7/7
Kelompok * Praktek
Hasiluji Chi Square (Pearson Chi Square) menunjukkantidakadahubunganantaraKelompok
(pelakuandankontrol)terhadaptingkatpengetahuan (sig. 0.432 > 0.05) Sikap (sig. 0.148 > 0.05) Pengetahuan (sig.
1.00 > 0.05).
Crosstab
12 18 30
12.0 18.0 30.0
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
20.0% 30.0% 50.0%
12 18 30
12.0 18.0 30.0
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
20.0% 30.0% 50.0%
24 36 60
24.0 36.0 60.0
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Kelompok
% of Total
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Kelompok
Total
Buruk Baik
Praktek
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.000b
1 1.000
.000 1 1.000
.000 1 1.000
1.000 .604
.000 1 1.000
60
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction a
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher' s Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-si ded)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Computed onlyfor a 2x2 tablea.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.
00.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.000 1.000
60
Contingency CoefficientNominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value Approx. Sig.
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.b.