ind rockliffe 11

25
Aspek Sosial Ekonomi pada preservasi dan pemeliharaan aset Nigel Rockliffe Arif Wismadi

Upload: indonesia-infrastructure-initiative

Post on 06-Jul-2015

222 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ind rockliffe 11

Aspek Sosial Ekonomi pada preservasi dan pemeliharaan aset

Nigel Rockliffe

Arif Wismadi

Page 2: Ind rockliffe 11

2

Tujuan

1. Suatu proyek percontohan untuk ‘pengembangan dan pemeliharaan suatu kebijakan uji coba yang komprehensif dan [PPB] prosedur dan perangkat ... dan untuk menyediakan dan mengkoordinasikan dukungan dalam pelatihan dan penyebarluasan semua kegiatan. "

2. Suatu strategi 'sosialisasi' untuk mempromosikan penerapan sikap budaya dan norma mengenai pentingnya pemeliharaan jalan.

3. Mendukung sosialisasi manfaat pemeliharaan dan preservasi jalan, berdasarkan implikasi biaya siklus umur rencana jalan ... .. untuk mendukung tujuan pembangunan nasional dan regional

Page 3: Ind rockliffe 11

3

Part 1

Roads in service

Page 4: Ind rockliffe 11

4

Roads in service

The Goldilocks principle

Page 5: Ind rockliffe 11

5

Hailan Haiwe, PNG

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

Option 0 (Base) Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5

Road agency

Road user

0 – Minimum1 – High repairs2 – Scheduled seal + high3 – KRGMP pre-emptive 4 – KRGMP pre-emptive + shape5 – Min + structural overlay

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2004/Dec 2005/Dec 2006/Dec 2007/Dec 2008/Dec 2009/Dec

Ro

ugh

ne

ss (

IRI)

↙ Slow response

↖ Rapid response

Page 6: Ind rockliffe 11

6

Treatment options

1 Minimum repairs

2 Intermediate repairs

3 High repairs

4 Pre-emptive repairs

5 Pre-emptive and periodic

6 Pre-emptive and full menu

7 Business as usual (national)

8 Business as usual (provincial)

9 Pre-emptive and modified full menu

Page 7: Ind rockliffe 11

7

Comparing treatment options

0

2 000

4 000

6 000

8 000

10 000

12 000

Repairs only (intermediate) Unconstrained BAU National Unconstrained Full pre-emptive

Unconstrained BAU Provincial

Co

st (

$m

)

RAC

RUC

• Undertaking major works saves money in the long run.

• Optimal option is ‘Full-pre-emptive’.

Page 8: Ind rockliffe 11

Two kinds of efficiency

TTC

RAC

RUC

Cost

Level of service

Technical efficiency

Allocative efficiency

Better ride quality

Where we

are now

Where we

want to be

• Maximise technical efficiency.

• Maximise allocative efficiency by...

• trading off RUCs and RACs to minimise total transport cost.

• This is the optimal level of service.

Page 9: Ind rockliffe 11

9

Roads in service

A stitch in time saves nine

Page 10: Ind rockliffe 11

10

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

10 450

10 500

10 550

10 600

10 650

10 700

10 750

2 6 12

Dis

cou

nte

d R

AC

($ m

illio

ns)

Dis

cou

nte

d R

UC

an

d T

TC ($

mill

ion

s)

Response time (months)

RUC

TTC

RAC

It pays to be on time

• Conducting repairs promptly is often win-win.

• Even when it’s win-lose, it’s beneficial overall. So road users can pay for it and still be ahead.

• It reduces costs for road users and the road agency alike.

Page 11: Ind rockliffe 11

How routine maintenance affects defects

Area affected by defects (%)

Age of pavement

Poor maintenance

Good maintenance

• Once they start, defects grow explosively.

• Good routine maintenance can delay their onset.

Page 12: Ind rockliffe 11

How routine maintenance affects roughness

Roughness

Age of pavement

• As defects grow, roughness rises, which increases

• vehicle operating cost

• travel time

• discomfort.

• Good routine maintenance keeps pavements smoother longer.

Poor maintenance

Good maintenance

Page 13: Ind rockliffe 11

All maintenance must be timely

Life-cycle cost

Age of pavement

Routine Periodic

Routine Periodic

Routine

Periodic

Routine

Periodic

Policy space

• Both routine and periodic maintenance must be on time.

• If either is late, RUC and RAC are higher than they need be.

• Prompt routine maintenance extends road life and requires less frequent periodic maintenance .

Page 14: Ind rockliffe 11

14

Jalan dalam pelayanan

Ambillah Pesan

1. Goldilocks menunjukkan bahwa melaksanakan ‘major works’ akan menyelamatkan uang dalam jangka lama ke depan.

2. Pemeliharaan yang tepat dancepat adalah ‘win-win’: tindakan ini dapat mengurangi biaya pengguna jalan maupun yang harus dipikul oleh pemerintah.

Page 15: Ind rockliffe 11

15

Part 2

Roads in crisis

Page 16: Ind rockliffe 11

16

Roads in crisis

A little goes a long way

Page 17: Ind rockliffe 11

17

The demand for trips

Source: Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS)

Exponent is ‘price elasticity of demand’ and measures

responsiveness of travel to changes in price. ↓

↙ Distance is a proxy for price.

• Demand is relatively inelastic (–0.46), typical of a ‘necessary’ good like healthcare.

• ‘Discretionary’ trips, such as VFR, are expected to be far more price-elastic.

y = 19.973x-0.46

R² = 0.5943

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Dis

tan

ce (

km

)

Demand (trips/million population)

Exponent is ‘price elasticity of demand’ and measures responsiveness of travel to changes in price. ↓

↙ Distance is a proxy for price.

• Demand for Puskesmas trips is relatively inelastic (–0.5), typical of a ‘necessary’ good like healthcare.

• ‘Discretionary’ trips, such as VFR, are expected to be far more price-elastic.

Page 18: Ind rockliffe 11

18

Benefit

Social benefit

Outcomes

Health• Morbidity• Mortality• Life expectancy

Education• Attendance• Attainment

Income • Poverty rate• Surat k. miskin

Other

Inputs, outputs, outcomes and benefit

Outputs

‘Consumption’ of trips

Demand curve

Distance to destination

Road condition

‘Price’ of trip

Inputs

Page 19: Ind rockliffe 11

19

The social benefit of trips

Price

Trips per person

Partial access

Full access

No motorable access

Page 20: Ind rockliffe 11

20

No motorable

access

Partial access (95% of time)

A little maintenance goes a long way

Benefit

Cost

Marginal benefit

Total benefit

Partial access (99% of time)

Full access

Page 21: Ind rockliffe 11

21

Roads in crisis

Roads are good for people

Page 22: Ind rockliffe 11

22

Poor roads are linked to poverty...

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Sealed Unsealed Earth

Ho

use

ho

lds

in p

ove

rty

(%)

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

Sealed Unsealed Earth

Ho

use

ho

lds

rece

ivin

g su

rat

kete

ran

ga

n m

iski

n(%

/y)

Sealed roads are associated with

← fewer households in poverty...

↓ and fewer surat keterangan miskin.

But...

• Poverty is not all attributable to road condition; other facilities must change too.

• Causality is not one-way: the poor may lack good roads for other reasons.

Source: Potensi Desa (Podes)

Page 23: Ind rockliffe 11

23

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Sealed Unsealed Earth

Mo

rtal

ity

(de

ath

s/1

00

00

0 h

hld

/y)

... and to poor health

0

5

10

15

20

25

Sealed Unsealed Earth

Dis

tan

ce t

o n

ear

est

Pu

ske

smas

(km

)

← Sealed roads are associated with greatly reduced mortality.

But is this because they are nearer to medical

facilities (Puskesmas)?→

Source: Potensi Desa (Podes)

Page 24: Ind rockliffe 11

24

Jalan dalam krisis

PESAN UNTUK DIBAWAH PULANG1. Suatu pemeliharaan jalan lebih ilaksanakan secara

menyeluruh dan terpadu dari pada dilaksanakan secara sepotong-sepotong.

2. Penetapan kebutuhan perjalanan adalah hal yang penting yang dapat mempermudah perhitungan manfaat sosial, yang akan mengarah pada perhitungan kebutuhan sumber daya.

3. Ada hubungan antara kondisi jalan dengan kesejahteraan masyarakat

Page 25: Ind rockliffe 11

25

Thank you