daftar pustaka -...
TRANSCRIPT
64
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Panjaitan, R. Pharmaceutical care untuk pasien penyakit artritis rematik.
Jakarta: Direktorat Bina Farmasi Komunitas dan Klinik, Ditjen Bina
Kefarmasian dan Alat Kesehatan, Departemen Kesehatan; 2006.
2. Andriyasa, K, Tjokorda Raka Putra. Korelasi antara derajat beratnya
osteoartritis lutut dan cartilage oligomeric matrix protein serum. J Peny
Dalam. 2012: 13(1):10.
3. M.A., Sabara-Saga. Diet intensif dan aktifitas fisik untuk wanita lansia
penderita osteoartritis dengan obesitas. Medula. 2013: 2(1):115.
4. Nursyarifah, R.S. Hubungan antara obesitas dengan kejadian osteoartritis
lutut di RSUP dr. Kariadi Semarang. Semarang: Universitas
Muhammadiyah Semarang; 2012.
5. Koentjoro, Sara Listyani, J. Adji Suroso, Bantar Suntoko. Hubungan
antara indeks massa tubuh (IMT) dengan derajat osteoartritis lutut menurut
Kellgren-Lawrence. Semarang: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas
Diponegoro; 2010.
6. Altman, R.D. Criteria for the classification of osteoarthritis of the knee
and hip. Scand J Rheumatology. 1987; (Suppl.65):31-39.
7. Soeroso J, Isbagio H, Kalim H, Broto R, Pramudiyo R. Osteoartritis. In:
Sudoyo AW, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I, Simadibrata M, Setiati S, editors. Buku
ajar ilmu penyakit dalam. 4th
ed. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Ilmu Penyakit
Dalam Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia; 2006. p. 1195-1201.
8. Firestein Gary S, Ralph C.Budd, Edward D. Harris, Iain B.McInnes,
Shaun Ruddy, John S.Sergent. Kelley’s textbook of rheumatology 8th
edition volume II. Canada: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.
9. Moskowitz, Roland W., David S. Howell, Roy D. Altman, Joseph A.
Buckwalter, Victor M. Goldberg. Osteoarthritis 3rd
edition diagnosis and
medical / surgical management. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company;
2001.
65
10. Gabriella M van Dijk, Cindy Veenhof, Francous Shchellevis, Harry
Hulsmans, Jan PJ Bakker, Henk Arwert, et al. Comorbidity, limitations in
activities and pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. BMC
Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008;9:95.
11. Palmer, Keith T. Occupational activities and osteoarthritis of the knee.
British Medical Bulletin. 2012; 102:147-170.
12. Kulcu, Duygu Geler, Burcu Yanik, Hakan Atalar, Gulcin Gulsen.
Associated factors with pain and disability in patients with knee
osteoarthritis. Turkish Journal of Rheumatology. 2010; 25(2):077-081.
(Abstrak)
13. Kalim, Handono, Sri Andarini, Faradiana Rasyidi. Hubungan indeks
massa tubuh (IMT) dengan derajat nyeri pada penderita osteoartritis lutut.
Malang: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya; 2012.
14. Reijman, M., H A P Pols, A P Bergink, J M W Hazes, J N Belo, A M
Lievense et al. Body mass index associated with onset and progression of
osteoarthritis of the knee but not of the hip: The Rotterdam Study. Ann
Rheum Dis. 2007; 66:158-162.
15. Koesoemawati, Herni, Huriawati Hartanto, Ivo Novita Salim, Lyana
Setiawan, Valleria, Wanny Suparman. Kamus kedokteran Dorland edisi
29. Jakarta: EGC; 2000.
16. Marsland, Daniel, Sabrina Kapoor. Crash course rheumatology and
orthopaedics 2nd
edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008.
17. Price, Sylvia A, Lorraine M. Wilson. Patofisiologi konsep klinis proses-
proses penyakit edisi 6. Jakarta: EGC; 2003.
18. Sadhana, Udadi. Patologi anatomi 2. Semarang: Badan Penerbit
Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2011.
19. Adnan HM. Diagnosis arthritis rheumatoid dan perbandingannya arthritis-
arthritis lain. Kongres Nasional I, Ikatan Reumatologi Indonesia,
Semarang, 1983 : 43-57.
66
20. Fauci, Anthony S., Dennis L. Kasper, Dan L. Longo, Eugene Braunwald,
Stephen L. Hauser, J. Larry Jameson et al. Harrison’s principles of general
medicine 17th
edition. 2008. p. 2159-2161.
21. Maharani, Eka Pratiwi. Faktor-faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut. Semarang:
Universitas Diponegoro Semarang; 2007.
22. Soejoto, Soetedjo, Sultana MH Faradz, RB Bambang W, Neni
Susilaningsih, Ratna D Purnawati et al. Lecture notes histologi I.
Semarang: Bagian Histologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro
Semarang; 2011.
23. JF, Woessner, Gunja-Smith Z. Role of metalloproteinases in human
osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991; 27:99-101.
24. Patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: an important subgroup of knee
osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2007; 46(7):1057-1062.(Abstrak)
25. Wahyuningsih, Nur Aini Sri. Hubungan obesitas dengan osteoartritis lutut
pada lansia di Kelurahan Puncangsawit Kecamatan Jebres Surakarta.
Surakarta: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta;
2009.
26. Ambardini, Rachmah Laksmi. Peran Latihan Fisik dalam Manajemen
Terpadu Osteoartritis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
27. Waddell D.D. Integrating viscosupplementation into a comprehensive
osteoarthritis treatment program. Medscape Multispecialty; 2014.
28. Cooper C et al. in: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander LS, eds,
Osteoarthritis. Oxford, NY. Oxford University Press; 1998, page 237-249
29. Marc C. Hochberg et al. Recommendations for the use of
nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip,
and knee. Arthritis Care & Research. 2012; 64(4):465-474.
30. Syarif, Amir, Ari Estuningtyas, Arini Setiawati, H. Armen Muchtar,
Azalla Arif, Bahroelim Bahry et al. Farmakologi dan terapi edisi 5.
Jakarta: Departemen Farmakologi dan Terapeutik Fakultas Kedokteran
Universitas Indonesia; 2007.
67
31. Dieppe, Paul A., Lohmander L. Stefan. Pathogenesis and management of
pain in osteoarthritis. The Lancet. 2005; 365 : 965 – 973.
32. Lequesne MG. The algofunctional indices for hip and knee osteoarthritis.
J Rheumatol. 1997; 24(4):779-81.
33. Basaran, S., Rengin Guzel, Gulsah Seydaoglu, Fusun Guler-Uysal.
Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index
and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee
osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 29:749-756.
34. Murphy L, Bolen J, Helmick CG, Brady TJ. Comorbidities are very
common among people with arthritis. Poster 43. 20th National Conference
on Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, CDC. Feb 2009.
35. Sabah J-M AL Rubiae, Ali AL-Qazaz. The frequency of comorbidities
associated with knee osteoarthritis in men and women in Babylon and
their impact on pain. Medical Journla of Babylon. 2014; 8:4.
36. Leite, Alice Abath, Aline Jurema Gesteira Costa et al. co morbidities in
patients with osteoarthritis: frequency and impact on pain and physical
function. Rev Bras Reumatol 2011;51(2):113-123.
37. Schmitt, Laura C et al. Instability, laxity, and physical function in patients
with medial knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. Dec 2008; 88(12): 1508-1516.
38. Kim KW, Han JW, Cho HJ, Chang CB, Park JH, Lee JJ et al. Association
between comorbid depression and osteoarthritis symptom severity in
patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 2011 Mar
16;93(6):556-63. (Abstrak)
39. Mansournia MA et al. Effect of physical activity on functional
performance and knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis : analysis with
marginal structural models. Epidemiology. 2012 Jul;23(4):631-40.
40. Bosomworth, N.J. Exercise and knee osteoarthritis: benefit or hazard?
CFP (Canadian Family Physician). 2009 Sept:55(9):871-878.(Full text)
41. Niu J, Zhang YQ, Torner J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, et al. Is
obesity a risk factor for progressive radiographic knee osteoarthritis.
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar 15;61(3):329-35.(Abstrak)
68
42. Graverand MPHL, Brandt K, Mazzuca SA, Raunig D, Vignon E.
Progressive increase in body mass index is not associated with a
progressive increase in joint space narrowing in obese women with
osteoarthritis of the knee. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
2009;68:1734-1738.(Abstrak)
43. N. Belo J, Berger MY, Reijman M, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM.
Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a
systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb
15;57(1):13-26.(Abstrak)
44. Manninen, P., H. Riihimäki, M. Heliövaara, O. Suomalainen. Physical
exercise and risk of severe knee osteoarthritis requiring arthroplasty.
Oxford Journals. Rheumatology (2001) 40 (4): 432-437.
69
Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearance
70
Lampiran 2. Ijin penelitian
71
72
Lampiran 3. Sampel Informed consent
JUDUL PENELITIAN : Hubungan antara Faktor Risiko Osteoartritis Lutut
dengan Nyeri, Disabilitas, dan Berat Ringannya
Osteoartritis
INSTANSI PELAKSANA : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
PENELITI : Maya Yanuarty (CP : 085642993128)
Persetujuan Setelah Penjelasan
(INFORMED CONSENT) Bapak/Ibu Yth :
Peneliti tersebut di atas adalah Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas
Diponegoro yang bermaksud ingin melibatkan Bapak/Ibu untuk menjadi responden
dalam penelitian ini dengan tujuan mengetahui hubungan antara faktor risiko osteoartritis
lutut dengan nyeri, disabilitas, dan berat ringannya osteoartritis. Osteoartritis sendiri
merupakan peradangan pada sendi yang menyebabkan timbulnya rasa nyeri dan kaku
pada sendi yang terkena. Penelitian ini bermanfaat dalam bidang akademik yaitu sebagai
sumbangan ilmu pengetahuan. Keuntungan yang dapat diperoleh dari penelitian ini
adalah Bapak/Ibu dapat mengetahui faktor risiko osteoartritis lutut yang Bapak/Ibu miliki
yang berkaitan dengan nyeri dan kaku sendi, apabila Bapak/Ibu menghubungi peneliti
dalam waktu minimal 3 bulan setelah penelitian. Penelitian ini juga dapat bermanfaat
dalam bidang pelayanan kesehatan, yaitu sebagai pertimbangan penerapan terapi dan
edukasi lebih lanjut pada pasien osteoartritis lutut selanjutnya.
Peneliti akan melakukan wawancara, pengukuran tinggi dan berat badan kepada
Bapak/Ibu, dan mengumpulkan data yang ada di rekam medis tentang berat ringannya
osteoartritis lutut. Peneliti menjamin kerahasiaan identitas dan informasi yang diberikan.
Informasi tersebut hanya digunakan untuk kepentingan penelitian serta pengembangan
ilmu kedokteran. Apabila dalam perjalanan nantinya, Bapak/Ibu menghendaki
mengundurkan diri, maka peneliti menghormati keinginan tersebut.
Pada akhir wawancara, peneliti akan memberikan sebuah souvenir / bingkisan
sebagai ungkapan terima kasih atas kerjasama Bapak/Ibu.
73
74
Lampiran 4. Spreadsheet data
No Nama Usia Sex BB TB IMT Kriteria IMT Komorbid
1 K 59 P 73 1.52 31.6 Obesitas derajat 2 0
2 P 55 P 48.5 1.455 22.9 Normal <3
3 W 61 P 54 1.45 25.7 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
4 S 66 P 74 1.45 35.2 Obesitas derajat 2 > 3
5 M 58 L 58 1.59 22.9 Normal > 3
6 M 69 P 66 1.53 28.2 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
7 MD 68 L 79 1.7 27.3 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
8 P 57 P 54.5 1.51 23.9 Overweight > 3
9 S 51 L 116 1.63 43.7 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
10 EY 54 P 62 1.55 25.8 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
11 Z 58 P 43 1.55 17.9 Underweight 0
12 W 67 L 57 1.7 19.7 Normal <3
13 PN 61 P 58 1.54 24.5 Overweight <3
14 SS 65 P 71.5 1.495 32 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
15 JH 57 P 61 1.55 25.4 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
16 S 74 P 66 1.515 28.8 Normal <3
17 SH 74 L 66 1.6 25.8 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
18 SW 52 P 87 1.69 30.5 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
19 I 62 P 51.5 1.47 23.8 Overweight <3
20 ES 56 P 65 1.38 34.1 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
21 S 58 P 57 1.485 25.8 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
22 S 60 P 76.5 1.62 29.1 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
23 NM 52 P 76 1.43 37.2 Obesitas derajat 2 > 3
24 S 66 L 60 1.67 21.5 Normal <3
25 SR 60 P 54 1.485 24.5 Overweight 0
26 S 66 P 52 1.455 24.6 Overweight > 3
27 EI 57 P 67 1.54 28.3 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
28 S 73 P 34 1.435 16.5 Underweight > 3
29 SM 51 P 58 1.51 25.4 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
30 MA 65 P 68 1.5 30.2 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
31 M 52 P 76 1.56 31.2 Obesitas derajat 2 > 3
32 S 68 P 72 1.59 28.5 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
33 TNS 58 P 70 1.52 30.3 Obesitas derajat 2 > 3
75
No Aktivitas Fisik Riwayat
Fisioterapi
Nyeri Disabilitas Kriteria
skor
WOMAC
Grade OA
1 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 2
2 No weight bearing ya Berat Berat Berat Grade 1
3 No weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4
4 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 3
5 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 1
6 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 4
7 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Sedang Grade 3
8 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 3
9 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Sedang Grade 4
10 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4
11 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1
12 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
13 No weight bearing ya Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 3
14 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Sedang Grade 4
15 No weight bearing ya Berat Sedang Sedang Grade 1
16 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
17 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3
18 Weight bearing tidak Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3
19 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
20 No weight bearing ya Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 2
21 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Ringan Grade 2
22 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
23 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Sedang Grade 1
24 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3
25 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
26 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 3
27 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3
28 No weight bearing tidak Berat Sedang Sedang Grade 3
29 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 2
30 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
31 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 1
32 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1
33 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Sedang Grade 1
76
No Nama Usia Sex BB TB IMT Kriteria IMT Komorbid
34 AEL 54 P 74 1.51 32.5 Obesitas derajat 2 > 3
35 S 76 L 42 1.59 16.6 Underweight > 3
36 AR 51 P 81.5 1.48 37.2 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
37 S 74 L 71 1.65 26.1 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
38 R 55 P 89 1.54 37.5 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
39 KM 64 L 72 1.635 26.9 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
40 MYS 56 P 74 1.58 29.6 Obesitas derajat 1 > 3
41 SD 57 P 57.5 1.57 23.3 Overweight > 3
42 W 68 P 49 1.44 23.6 Overweight <3
43 A 68 L 68 1.62 25.9 Overweight > 3
44 S 53 L 65.5 1.66 23.8 Overweight 0
45 R 69 P 53 1.46 24.9 Overweight <3
46 R 51 P 81 1.495 36.2 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
47 R 72 L 80 1.72 27 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
48 IS 64 P 68 1.5 30.2 Obesitas derajat 2 0
49 TMK 51 P 77 1.44 37.1 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
50 M 64 P 63 1.515 27.4 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
51 S 53 L 69 1.53 29.5 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
52 N 51 P 71 1.48 32.4 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
53 SBW 60 P 71 1.62 27.1 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
54 R 55 P 84 1.56 34.5 Obesitas derajat 2 > 3
55 R 51 P 60 1.535 25.5 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
56 SM 59 P 62 1.51 27.2 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
57 M 55 P 90 1.49 40.5 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
58 K 66 P 59 1.47 27.3 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
59 S 64 L 96 1.68 34 Obesitas derajat 2 > 3
60 I 67 P 63 1.52 27.3 Obesitas derajat 1 <3
61 RO 56 P 55 1.56 22.6 Normal <3
62 MK 74 L 48 1.61 18.5 Normal 0
63 M 64 P 54.5 1.48 24.9 Overweight <3
64 SN 70 P 84.5 1.46 39.6 Obesitas derajat 2 <3
65 MSH 60 P 46 1.53 19.7 Normal <3
77
No Aktivitas Fisik Riwayat
Fisioterapi
Nyeri Disabilitas Kriteria
skor
WOMAC
Grade OA
34 No weight bearing ya Berat Sedang Sedang Grade 2
35 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Ringan Grade 2
36 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Sedang Grade 4
37 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Sedang Grade 2
38 No weight bearing ya Berat Sedang Sedang Grade 4
39 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
40 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
41 Weight bearing tidak Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
42 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Berat Grade 1
43 No weight bearing ya Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 3
44 No weight bearing ya Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 1
45 No weight bearing tidak Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1
46 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 3
47 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Sedang Grade 3
48 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4
49 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4
50 No weight bearing tidak Ringan Sedang Ringan Grade 3
51 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4
52 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1
53 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1
54 No weight bearing ya Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 1
55 Weight bearing tidak Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1
56 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 2
57 Weight bearing tidak Sedang Sedang Sedang Grade 4
58 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 2
59 No weight bearing ya Berat Berat Berat Grade 4
60 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 4
61 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 3
62 No weight bearing ya Sedang Berat Berat Grade 3
63 No weight bearing ya Ringan Sedang Ringan Grade 2
64 No weight bearing tidak Sedang Ringan Ringan Grade 4
65 No weight bearing ya Ringan Ringan Ringan Grade 1
78
Jenis Kelamin
15 23.1 23.1 23.1
50 76.9 76.9 100.0
65 100.0 100.0
pria
wanita
Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Lampiran 5. Output analisis data
Frequencies
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
a Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Usia .105 65 .071 .945 65 .006
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Usia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid 51 7 10.8 10.8 10.8
52 3 4.6 4.6 15.4
53 2 3.1 3.1 18.5
54 2 3.1 3.1 21.5
55 4 6.2 6.2 27.7
56 3 4.6 4.6 32.3
57 4 6.2 6.2 38.5
58 4 6.2 6.2 44.6
59 2 3.1 3.1 47.7
60 4 6.2 6.2 53.8
61 2 3.1 3.1 56.9
62 1 1.5 1.5 58.5
64 5 7.7 7.7 66.2
65 2 3.1 3.1 69.2
66 4 6.2 6.2 75.4
67 2 3.1 3.1 78.5
68 4 6.2 6.2 84.6
69 2 3.1 3.1 87.7
70 1 1.5 1.5 89.2
72 1 1.5 1.5 90.8
73 1 1.5 1.5 92.3
74 4 6.2 6.2 98.5
76 1 1.5 1.5 100.0
Total 65 100.0 100.0
Statistics
Usia
N Valid 65
Missing 0 Mode Minimum
51 51
Maximum 76
79
Riwayat Fisioterapi
51 78.5 78.5 78.5 14 21.5 21.5 100.0 65 100.0 100.0
ya tidak Total
Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Kriteria IMT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Underweight 3 4.6 4.6 4.6
Normal 8 12.3 12.3 16.9
Overweight 11 16.9 16.9 33.8
Obesitas derajat 1 22 33.8 33.8 67.7
Obesitas derajat 2 21 32.3 32.3 100.0
Total 65 100.0 100.0
Penyakit Komorbid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak ada 6 9.2 9.2 9.2
Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
36 55.4 55.4 64.6
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
23 35.4 35.4 100.0
Total 65 100.0 100.0
Aktivitas Fisik
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Weight bearing
9 13.8 86.2 86.2
No weight bearing
56 86.2 13.8 100.0
Total 65 100.0 100.0
Nyeri
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Ringan 32 49.2 49.2 49.2
Sedang 27 41.5 41.5 90.8
Berat 6 9.2 9.2 100.0
Total 65 100.0 100.0
80
Disabilitas
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Ringan 30 46.2 46.2 46.2
Sedang 27 41.5 41.5 87.7
Berat 8 12.3 12.3 100.0
Total 65 100.0 100.0
Grade OA Lutut
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Grade 4 14 21.5 21.5 21.5
Grade 3 16 24.6 24.6 46.2
Grade 2 19 29.2 29.2 75.4
Grade 1 16 24.6 24.6 100.0
Total 65 100.0 100.0
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Crosstabulation
Nyeri
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Kriteria IMT Underweight Count 2 0 1 3
Expected Count 1.5 1.2 .3 3.0
% within Nyeri 6.3% .0% 16.7% 4.6%
% of Total 3.1% .0% 1.5% 4.6%
Normal Count 5 2 1 8
Expected Count 3.9 3.3 .7 8.0
% within Nyeri 15.6% 7.4% 16.7% 12.3%
% of Total 7.7% 3.1% 1.5% 12.3%
Overweight Count 5 6 0 11
Expected Count 5.4 4.6 1.0 11.0
% within Nyeri 15.6% 22.2% .0% 16.9%
% of Total 7.7% 9.2% .0% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 15 6 1 22
Expected Count 10.8 9.1 2.0 22.0
% within Nyeri 46.9% 22.2% 16.7% 33.8%
% of Total 23.1% 9.2% 1.5% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 13 3 21
Expected Count 10.3 8.7 1.9 21.0
% within Nyeri 15.6% 48.1% 50.0% 32.3%
% of Total 7.7% 20.0% 4.6% 32.3%
Total Count 32 27 6 65
Expected Count 32.0 27.0 6.0 65.0
% within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0%
81
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 14.361a 8 .073
Likelihood Ratio 16.247 8 .039 Linear-by-Linear Association
1.695 1 .193
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .28.
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri Crosstabulation
Nyeri
Total Ringan Sedang / Berat
Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Count 7 4 11
Expected Count 5.4 5.6 11.0
% within Nyeri 21.9% 12.1% 16.9%
% of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9%
Overweight Count 5 6 11
Expected Count 5.4 5.6 11.0
% within Nyeri 15.6% 18.2% 16.9%
% of Total 7.7% 9.2% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 15 7 22
Expected Count 10.8 11.2 22.0
% within Nyeri 46.9% 21.2% 33.8%
% of Total 23.1% 10.8% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 16 21
Expected Count 10.3 10.7 21.0
% within Nyeri 15.6% 48.5% 32.3%
% of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3%
Total Count 32 33 65
Expected Count 32.0 33.0 65.0
% within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 49.2% 50.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.567a 3 .023
Likelihood Ratio 9.941 3 .019
Linear-by-Linear
Association
3.496 1 .062
N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 5.42.
82
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Crosstabulation
Nyeri
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada Count 2 4 0 6
Expected Count
3.0 2.5 .6 6.0
% within Nyeri
6.3% 14.8% .0% 9.2%
% of Total 3.1% 6.2% .0% 9.2%
Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 20 14 2 36
Expected Count
17.7 15.0 3.3 36.0
% within Nyeri
62.5% 51.9% 33.3% 55.4%
% of Total 30.8% 21.5% 3.1% 55.4%
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Count 10 9 4 23
Expected Count
11.3 9.6 2.1 23.0
% within Nyeri
31.3% 33.3% 66.7% 35.4%
% of Total 15.4% 13.8% 6.2% 35.4%
Total Count 32 27 6 65
Expected Count
32.0 27.0 6.0 65.0
% within Nyeri
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.500a 4 .343
Likelihood Ratio 4.690 4 .321 Linear-by-Linear Association
.740 1 .390
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .55.
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri Crosstabulation
Nyeri
Total Ringan Sedang /
Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 12 17 29
Expected Count
14.3 14.7 29.0
% within Nyeri 37.5% 51.5% 44.6%
% of Total 18.5% 26.2% 44.6%
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Count 20 16 36
Expected Count
17.7 18.3 36.0
% within Nyeri 62.5% 48.5% 55.4%
% of Total 30.8% 24.6% 55.4%
83
Total Count 32 33 65
Expected Count
32.0 33.0 65.0
% within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 49.2% 50.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.291a 1 .256
Continuity Correctionb .787 1 .375
Likelihood Ratio 1.296 1 .255 Fisher's Exact Test .321 .188
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.272 1 .259
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.28. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri Crosstabulation
Nyeri
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Aktivitas Fisik Weight bearing
Count 3 6 0 9
Expected Count 4.4 3.7 .8 9.0
% within Nyeri 9.4% 22.2% .0% 13.8%
% of Total 4.6% 9.2% .0% 13.8%
No Weight bearing
Count 29 21 6 56
Expected Count 27.6 23.3 5.2 56.0
% within Nyeri 90.6% 77.8% 100.0% 86.2%
% of Total 44.6% 32.3% 9.2% 86.2%
Total Count 32 27 6 65
Expected Count 32.0 27.0 6.0 65.0
% within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.089a 2 .213
Likelihood Ratio 3.765 2 .152 Linear-by-Linear Association
.108 1 .743
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .83.
Frequencies
Aktivitas Fisik N
Nyeri dimension1
Weight bearing 9
No weight bearing 56
Total 65
84
Test Statisticsa
Nyeri
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .185
Positive .185
Negative -.107 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .514 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .954
a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri Crosstabulation
Nyeri
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 27 19 5 51
Expected Count 25.1 21.2 4.7 51.0
% within Nyeri 84.4% 70.4% 83.3% 78.5%
% of Total 41.5% 29.2% 7.7% 78.5%
tidak Count 5 8 1 14
Expected Count 6.9 5.8 1.3 14.0
% within Nyeri 15.6% 29.6% 16.7% 21.5%
% of Total 7.7% 12.3% 1.5% 21.5%
Total Count 32 27 6 65
Expected Count 32.0 27.0 6.0 65.0
% within Nyeri 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 49.2% 41.5% 9.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.792a 2 .408
Likelihood Ratio 1.771 2 .413 Linear-by-Linear Association .540 1 .462 N of Valid Cases 65 a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.29.
Frequencies
Riwayat Fisioterapi N
Nyeri dimension1
ya 51
tidak 14
Total 65
Test Statistics
a
Nyeri
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .172
Positive .172
Negative -.027 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .571 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .900
a. Grouping Variable: Riwayat Fisioterapi
85
Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Crosstabulation
Disabilitas
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Kriteria IMT
Underweight Count 1 2 0 3
Expected Count 1.4 1.2 .4 3.0
% within Disabilitas 3.3% 7.4% .0% 4.6%
% of Total 1.5% 3.1% .0% 4.6%
Normal Count 5 1 2 8
Expected Count 3.7 3.3 1.0 8.0
% within Disabilitas 16.7% 3.7% 25.0% 12.3%
% of Total 7.7% 1.5% 3.1% 12.3%
Overweight Count 7 3 1 11
Expected Count 5.1 4.6 1.4 11.0
% within Disabilitas 23.3% 11.1% 12.5% 16.9%
% of Total 10.8% 4.6% 1.5% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 12 9 1 22
Expected Count 10.2 9.1 2.7 22.0
% within Disabilitas 40.0% 33.3% 12.5% 33.8%
% of Total 18.5% 13.8% 1.5% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 12 4 21
Expected Count 9.7 8.7 2.6 21.0
% within Disabilitas 16.7% 44.4% 50.0% 32.3%
% of Total 7.7% 18.5% 6.2% 32.3%
Total Count 30 27 8 65
Expected Count 30.0 27.0 8.0 65.0
% within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 11.119a 8 .195
Likelihood Ratio 12.344 8 .136 Linear-by-Linear Association
1.905 1 .167
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .37.
Kriteria IMT * Disabilitas Crosstabulation
Disabilitas
Total Ringan Sedang /
Berat
Kriteria IMT Underweight / Normal Count 6 5 11
Expected Count 5.1 5.9 11.0
% within Disabilitas 20.0% 14.3% 16.9%
% of Total 9.2% 7.7% 16.9%
Overweight Count 7 4 11
Expected Count 5.1 5.9 11.0
% within Disabilitas 23.3% 11.4% 16.9%
% of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9%
86
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 12 10 22
Expected Count 10.2 11.8 22.0
% within Disabilitas 40.0% 28.6% 33.8%
% of Total 18.5% 15.4% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 16 21
Expected Count 9.7 11.3 21.0
% within Disabilitas 16.7% 45.7% 32.3%
% of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3%
Total Count 30 35 65
Expected Count 30.0 35.0 65.0
% within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.507a 3 .089
Likelihood Ratio 6.776 3 .079 Linear-by-Linear Association
3.844 1 .050
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.08.
Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Crosstabulation
Disabilitas
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada Count 3 2 1 6
Expected Count 2.8 2.5 .7 6.0
% within Disabilitas
10.0% 7.4% 12.5% 9.2%
% of Total 4.6% 3.1% 1.5% 9.2%
Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 22 8 6 36
Expected Count 16.6 15.0 4.4 36.0
% within Disabilitas
73.3% 29.6% 75.0% 55.4%
% of Total 33.8% 12.3% 9.2% 55.4%
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Count 5 17 1 23
Expected Count 10.6 9.6 2.8 23.0
% within Disabilitas
16.7% 63.0% 12.5% 35.4%
% of Total 7.7% 26.2% 1.5% 35.4%
Total Count 30 27 8 65
Expected Count 30.0 27.0 8.0 65.0
% within Disabilitas
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0%
87
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 15.702a 4 .003
Likelihood Ratio 16.171 4 .003 Linear-by-Linear Association
1.202 1 .273
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .74.
Penyakit Komorbid * Disabilitas Crosstabulation
Disabilitas
Total Ringan Sedang /
Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 12 17 29
Expected Count 13.4 15.6 29.0
% within Disabilitas
40.0% 48.6% 44.6%
% of Total 18.5% 26.2% 44.6%
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Count 18 18 36
Expected Count 16.6 19.4 36.0
% within Disabilitas
60.0% 51.4% 55.4%
% of Total 27.7% 27.7% 55.4%
Total Count 30 35 65
Expected Count 30.0 35.0 65.0
% within Disabilitas
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .480a 1 .488
Continuity Correctionb .196 1 .658
Likelihood Ratio .481 1 .488 Fisher's Exact Test .618 .329
Linear-by-Linear Association
.473 1 .492
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.38. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Aktivitas Fisik * Disabilitas
Aktivitas Fisik * Disabilitas Crosstabulation
Disabilitas
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Aktivitas Fisik Weight bearing
Count 4 5 0 9
Expected Count 4.2 3.7 1.1 9.0
% within Disabilitas 13.3% 18.5% .0% 13.8%
% of Total 6.2% 7.7% .0% 13.8%
88
No weight bearing
Count 26 22 8 56
Expected Count 25.8 23.3 6.9 56.0
% within Disabilitas 86.7% 81.5% 100.0% 86.2%
% of Total 40.0% 33.8% 12.3% 86.2%
Total Count 30 27 8 65
Expected Count 30.0 27.0 8.0 65.0
% within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.786a 2 .409
Likelihood Ratio 2.846 2 .241 Linear-by-Linear Association
.246 1 .620
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.11.
Frequencies
Aktivitas Fisik N
Disabilitas dimension1
Weight bearing 9
No weight bearing 56
Total 65
Test Statistics
a
Disabilitas
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .143
Positive .020
Negative -.143 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .398 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .997
a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Disabilitas
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Disabilitas Crosstabulation
Disabilitas
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 24 19 8 51
Expected Count 23.5 21.2 6.3 51.0
% within Disabilitas 80.0% 70.4% 100.0% 78.5%
% of Total 36.9% 29.2% 12.3% 78.5%
tidak Count 6 8 0 14
Expected Count 6.5 5.8 1.7 14.0
% within Disabilitas 20.0% 29.6% .0% 21.5%
% of Total 9.2% 12.3% .0% 21.5%
Total Count 30 27 8 65
Expected Count 30.0 27.0 8.0 65.0
% within Disabilitas 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.2% 41.5% 12.3% 100.0%
89
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.284a 2 .194
Likelihood Ratio 4.891 2 .087 Linear-by-Linear Association .303 1 .582 N of Valid Cases 65 a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.72.
Kriteria IMT * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Kriteria IMT * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Kriteria
IMT
Underweight Count 2 1 0 3
Expected Count 1.6 1.2 .2 3.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
5.9% 3.7% .0% 4.6%
% of Total 3.1% 1.5% .0% 4.6%
Normal Count 5 1 2 8
Expected Count 4.2 3.3 .5 8.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
14.7% 3.7% 50.0% 12.3%
% of Total 7.7% 1.5% 3.1% 12.3%
Overweight Count 8 2 1 11
Expected Count 5.8 4.6 .7 11.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
23.5% 7.4% 25.0% 16.9%
% of Total 12.3% 3.1% 1.5% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat
1
Count 14 8 0 22
Expected Count 11.5 9.1 1.4 22.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
41.2% 29.6% .0% 33.8%
% of Total 21.5% 12.3% .0% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat
2
Count 5 15 1 21
Expected Count 11.0 8.7 1.3 21.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
14.7% 55.6% 25.0% 32.3%
% of Total 7.7% 23.1% 1.5% 32.3%
Total Count 34 27 4 65
Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0%
90
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 19.106a 8 .014
Likelihood Ratio 19.504 8 .012 Linear-by-Linear Association 1.975 1 .160 N of Valid Cases 65 a. 10 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .18.
Kriteria IMT * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total Ringan Sedang/Berat
Kriteria
IMT
Underweight /
Normal
Count 7 4 11
Expected Count 5.8 5.2 11.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
20.6% 12.9% 16.9%
% of Total 10.8% 6.2% 16.9%
Overweight Count 8 3 11
Expected Count 5.8 5.2 11.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
23.5% 9.7% 16.9%
% of Total 12.3% 4.6% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 14 8 22
Expected Count 11.5 10.5 22.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
41.2% 25.8% 33.8%
% of Total 21.5% 12.3% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 5 16 21
Expected Count 11.0 10.0 21.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
14.7% 51.6% 32.3%
% of Total 7.7% 24.6% 32.3%
Total Count 34 31 65
Expected Count 34.0 31.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 52.3% 47.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.373a 3 .016
Likelihood Ratio 10.765 3 .013 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.151 1 .013 N of Valid Cases 65 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.25.
91
Penyakit Komorbid * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Penyakit Komorbid * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada Count 3 2 1 6
Expected Count 3.1 2.5 .4 6.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
8.8% 7.4% 25.0% 9.2%
% of Total 4.6% 3.1% 1.5% 9.2%
Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 24 10 2 36
Expected Count 18.8 15.0 2.2 36.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
70.6% 37.0% 50.0% 55.4%
% of Total 36.9% 15.4% 3.1% 55.4%
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Count 7 15 1 23
Expected Count 12.0 9.6 1.4 23.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
20.6% 55.6% 25.0% 35.4%
% of Total 10.8% 23.1% 1.5% 35.4%
Total Count 34 27 4 65
Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.592a 4 .048
Likelihood Ratio 9.284 4 .054 Linear-by-Linear Association
1.596 1 .206
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 5 cells (55.6%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .37.
92
Penyakit Komorbid * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total Ringan Sedang /
Berat
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 14 15 29
Expected Count 15.2 13.8 29.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
41.2% 48.4% 44.6%
% of Total 21.5% 23.1% 44.6%
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Count 20 16 36
Expected Count 18.8 17.2 36.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
58.8% 51.6% 55.4%
% of Total 30.8% 24.6% 55.4%
Total Count 34 31 65
Expected Count 34.0 31.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 52.3% 47.7% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .341a 1 .559
Continuity Correctionb .112 1 .738
Likelihood Ratio .341 1 .559 Fisher's Exact Test .622 .369
Linear-by-Linear Association
.336 1 .562
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.83. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
93
Aktivitas Fisik * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Aktivitas Fisik * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Aktivitas Fisik Weight bearing
Count 4 5 0 9
Expected Count 4.7 3.7 .6 9.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
11.8% 18.5% .0% 13.8%
% of Total 6.2% 7.7% .0% 13.8%
No weight bearing
Count 30 22 4 56
Expected Count 29.3 23.3 3.4 56.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
88.2% 81.5% 100.0% 86.2%
% of Total 46.2% 33.8% 6.2% 86.2%
Total Count 34 27 4 65
Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.260a 2 .532
Likelihood Ratio 1.776 2 .412 Linear-by-Linear Association
.008 1 .928
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .55.
Frequencies
Aktivitas Fisik N
Kriteria Skor WOMAC dimension1
Weight bearing 9
No Weight bearing 56
Total 65
Test Statistics
a
Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .091
Positive .091
Negative -.071 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .254 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
94
Chi-Square Tests
1.424a 2 .491
2.253 2 .324
.070 1 .791
65
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .86.
a.
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Nyeri dan Disabilitas
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Kriteria Skor WOMAC Crosstabulation
Kriteria Skor WOMAC
Total Ringan Sedang Berat
Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 27 20 4 51
Expected Count 26.7 21.2 3.1 51.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 79.4% 74.1% 100.0% 78.5%
% of Total 41.5% 30.8% 6.2% 78.5%
tidak Count 7 7 0 14
Expected Count 7.3 5.8 .9 14.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 20.6% 25.9% .0% 21.5%
% of Total 10.8% 10.8% .0% 21.5%
Total Count 34 27 4 65
Expected Count 34.0 27.0 4.0 65.0
% within Kriteria Skor WOMAC 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 52.3% 41.5% 6.2% 100.0%
Frequencies
Fisioterapi N
Kriteria Skor WOMAC dimension1
ya 51
tidak 14
Total 65
Test Statistics
a
Kriteria Skor
WOMAC
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .078
Positive .029
Negative -.078 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .260 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
a. Grouping Variable: Fisioterapi
95
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Lutut
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Lutut Crosstabulation
Grade OA Lutut
Total Grade
4 Grade
3 Grade
2 Grade
1
Kriteria IMT
Underweight Count 0 1 1 1 3
Expected Count .6 .7 .9 .7 3.0
% within Grade OA Lutut
.0% 6.3% 5.3% 6.3% 4.6%
% of Total .0% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 4.6%
Normal Count 0 3 2 3 8
Expected Count 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.0 8.0
% within Grade OA Lutut
.0% 18.8% 10.5% 18.8% 12.3%
% of Total .0% 4.6% 3.1% 4.6% 12.3%
Overweight Count 0 4 4 3 11
Expected Count 2.4 2.7 3.2 2.7 11.0
% within Grade OA Lutut
.0% 25.0% 21.1% 18.8% 16.9%
% of Total .0% 6.2% 6.2% 4.6% 16.9%
Obesitas derajat 1
Count 5 5 8 4 22
Expected Count 4.7 5.4 6.4 5.4 22.0
% within Grade OA Lutut
35.7% 31.3% 42.1% 25.0% 33.8%
% of Total 7.7% 7.7% 12.3% 6.2% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2
Count 9 3 4 5 21
Expected Count 4.5 5.2 6.1 5.2 21.0
% within Grade OA Lutut
64.3% 18.8% 21.1% 31.3% 32.3%
% of Total 13.8% 4.6% 6.2% 7.7% 32.3%
Total Count 14 16 19 16 65
Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0
% within Grade OA Lutut
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13.800a 12 .314
Likelihood Ratio 17.555 12 .130
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.434 1 .035
N of Valid Cases 65
a. 14 cells (70.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .65.
96
Kriteria IMT * Grade OA Crosstabulation
Grade OA
Total Grade
3/4 Grade
2 Grade
1
Kriteria IMT
Underweight / Normal / Overweight
Count 8 7 7 22
Expected Count 10.2 6.4 5.4 22.0
% within Grade OA
26.7% 36.8% 43.8% 33.8%
% of Total 12.3% 10.8% 10.8% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 1 Count 10 8 4 22
Expected Count 10.2 6.4 5.4 22.0
% within Grade OA
33.3% 42.1% 25.0% 33.8%
% of Total 15.4% 12.3% 6.2% 33.8%
Obesitas derajat 2 Count 12 4 5 21
Expected Count 9.7 6.1 5.2 21.0
% within Grade OA
40.0% 21.1% 31.3% 32.3%
% of Total 18.5% 6.2% 7.7% 32.3%
Total Count 30 19 16 65
Expected Count 30.0 19.0 16.0 65.0
% within Grade OA
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 46.2% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.026a 4 .553
Likelihood Ratio 3.097 4 .542
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.463 1 .227
N of Valid Cases 65
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 5.17.
97
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Lutut
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Crosstabulation
Grade OA
Total Grade
4 Grade
3 Grade
2 Grade
1
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada Count 1 1 2 2 6
Expected Count
1.3 1.5 1.8 1.5 6.0
% within Grade OA
7.1% 6.3% 10.5% 12.5% 9.2%
% of Total 1.5% 1.5% 3.1% 3.1% 9.2%
Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 10 9 10 7 36
Expected Count
7.8 8.9 10.5 8.9 36.0
% within Grade OA
71.4% 56.3% 52.6% 43.8% 55.4%
% of Total 15.4% 13.8% 15.4% 10.8% 55.4%
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Count 3 6 7 7 23
Expected Count
5.0 5.7 6.7 5.7 23.0
% within Grade OA
21.4% 37.5% 36.8% 43.8% 35.4%
% of Total 4.6% 9.2% 10.8% 10.8% 35.4%
Total Count 14 16 19 16 65
Expected Count
14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0
% within Grade OA
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.629a 6 .854
Likelihood Ratio 2.715 6 .844 Linear-by-Linear Association
.379 1 .538
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 5 cells (41.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.29.
Penyakit Komorbid * Grade OA Crosstabulation
Grade OA
Total Grade
4 Grade
3 Grade
2 Grade
1
Penyakit Komorbid
Tidak ada / Memiliki 1-3 penyakit komorbid
Count 10 5 5 9 29
Expected Count
6.2 7.1 8.5 7.1 29.0
% within Grade OA
71.4% 31.3% 26.3% 56.3% 44.6%
% of Total 15.4% 7.7% 7.7% 13.8% 44.6%
98
Memiliki > 3 penyakit komorbid
Count 4 11 14 7 36
Expected Count
7.8 8.9 10.5 8.9 36.0
% within Grade OA
28.6% 68.8% 73.7% 43.8% 55.4%
% of Total 6.2% 16.9% 21.5% 10.8% 55.4%
Total Count 14 16 19 16 65
Expected Count
14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0
% within Grade OA
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.681a 3 .034
Likelihood Ratio 8.897 3 .031 Linear-by-Linear Association .646 1 .422 N of Valid Cases 65 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.25.
Aktivitas Fisik * Grade OA Lutut
Aktivitas Fisik * Grade OA Crosstabulation
Grade OA
Total Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1
Aktivitas Fisik
Weight bearing
Count 2 2 3 2 9
Expected Count 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.2 9.0
% within Grade OA
14.3% 12.5% 15.8% 12.5% 13.8%
% of Total 3.1% 3.1% 4.6% 3.1% 13.8%
No weight bearing
Count 12 14 16 14 56
Expected Count 12.1 13.8 16.4 13.8 56.0
% within Grade OA
85.7% 87.5% 84.2% 87.5% 86.2%
% of Total 18.5% 21.5% 24.6% 21.5% 86.2%
Total Count 14 16 19 16 65
Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0
% within Grade OA
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .111a 3 .990
Likelihood Ratio .110 3 .991 Linear-by-Linear Association
.002 1 .968
N of Valid Cases 65 a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.94.
99
Frequencies
Aktivitas Fisik N
Grade OA dimension1
Weight bearing 9
No weight bearing 56
Total 65
Test Statistics
a
Grade OA
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .028
Positive .020
Negative -.028 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .077 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000
a. Grouping Variable: Aktivitas Fisik
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Grade OA Lutut
Riwayat Fisioterapi * Grade OA Crosstabulation
Grade OA
Total Grade 4 Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1
Riwayat Fisioterapi ya Count 10 12 16 13 51
Expected Count 11.0 12.6 14.9 12.6 51.0
% within Grade OA 71.4% 75.0% 84.2% 81.3% 78.5%
% of Total 15.4% 18.5% 24.6% 20.0% 78.5%
tidak Count 4 4 3 3 14
Expected Count 3.0 3.4 4.1 3.4 14.0
% within Grade OA 28.6% 25.0% 15.8% 18.8% 21.5%
% of Total 6.2% 6.2% 4.6% 4.6% 21.5%
Total Count 14 16 19 16 65
Expected Count 14.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 65.0
% within Grade OA 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 21.5% 24.6% 29.2% 24.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .968a 3 .809
Likelihood Ratio .968 3 .809 Linear-by-Linear Association .676 1 .411 N of Valid Cases 65 a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.02.
Frequencies
Fisioterapi N
Grade OA Lutut dimension1
ya 51
tidak 14
Total 65
100
Test Statisticsa
Grade OA Lutut
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .140
Positive .000
Negative -.140 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .464 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .982
a. Grouping Variable: Fisioterapi
101
Lampiran 6. Kuesioner penelitian
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
HUBUNGAN ANTARA FAKTOR RISIKO OSTEOARTRITIS LUTUT
DENGAN NYERI, DISABILITAS, DAN BERAT RINGANNYA
OSTEOARTRITIS
Tanggal diisi : …. / …. / ….
DATA UMUM
DATA IDENTITAS PASIEN KODE
1 No. ID Pasien : …………………………………………….
2 Nama Pasien : …………………………………………….
3 Alamat : …………………………………………………..
RT …. RW …. Desa/Kel ………………………………….
Kec. ………………….... Kota ……………………………
4 Jenis Kelamin :
1. Pria 2. Wanita
5 Usia : ……………………………………………….. tahun
6 Tinggi Badan : ……………………………………... cm
Berat Badan : ……………………………………… kg
7 Status pernikahan :
1. Menikah 2. Belum menikah 3. Duda / Janda
8 Nomer telepon yang dapat dihubungi : …………………..
102
Kuesioner WOMAC untuk pengukuran nyeri dan disabilitas pasien OA lutut
1. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri
pada saat berjalan?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
2. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri
pada saat naik tangga?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
3. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri
pada malam hari?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
4. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri
pada saat beristirahat?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
5. Apakah Anda merasa nyeri
pada sendi-sendi?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
6. Apakah Anda merasakan
kekakuan sendi pada pagi
hari?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
7. Apakah Anda merasakan
kekakuan sendi pada
sore/malam hari?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
8. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
menuruni tangga?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
9. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
menaiki tangga?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
10. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
103
saat berdiri dari duduk? - Sedang - Amat sangat
11. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
berdiri?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
12. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
saat membungkuk ke lantai?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
13. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
berjalan di permukaan datar?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
14. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
saat masuk / keluar dari
mobil?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
15. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
berbelanja?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
16. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
memakai kaos kaki?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
17. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
berbaring di tempat tidur?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
18. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
melepas kaos kaki?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
19. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
saat bangun dari tempat
tidur?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
104
20. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
mandi?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
21. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
duduk?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
22. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik saat
ke toilet?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
23. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
saat melakukan pekerjaan
rumah tangga yang berat?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
24. Apakah Anda merasakan
keterbatasan fungsi fisik pada
saat melakukan pekerjaan
rumah tangga yang ringan?
Tidak Ya, . . .
- Sedikit - Sangat
- Sedang - Amat sangat
Keterangan :
Apabila jawaban “ya”, maka sebagai berikut.
- Sedikit apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor lebih dari 0 hingga
kurang dari 3.
- Sedang apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 3 hingga kurang
dari 7.
- Sangat apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 7 hingga kurang
dari 9.
- Amat sangat apabila dengan menggunakan VAS didapatkan skor 9 hingga 10.
105
Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi penelitian
106
Lampiran 8. Biodata mahasiswa
Identitas
Nama : Maya Yanuarty
NIM : 22010110110125
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Pekalongan, 20 Januari 1993
Jenis kelamin : Perempuan
Alamat : Jl. Kemakmuran no.1J, Pekalongan
Nomor Telepon : -
Nomor HP : 085642993128
e-mail : [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD : SD Pius Pekalongan Lulus tahun : 2004
2. SMP : SMP Pius Pekalongan Lulus tahun : 2007
3. SMA : SMA 1 Pekalongan Lulus tahun : 2010
4. FK UNDIP Masuk tahun : 2010
Keanggotaan Organisasi
1. OSIS SMA 1 Pekalongan Tahun 2008 s/d 2010
2. HIMA KU UNDIP Tahun 2010 s/d 2011
3. PSM FK UNDIP Tahun 2011 s/d 2013
3. PRMK FK UNDIP Tahun 2011 s/d 2013
4. OMK Banyumanik Tahun 2013 s/d sekarang
Pengalaman penelitian
-
Pengalaman publikasi tulisan ilmiah
-
Pengalaman presentasi karya ilmiah
-
Pengalaman mengikuti lomba karya ilmiah
-