biokompatibilitas
DESCRIPTION
biokompatibilitasTRANSCRIPT
Definisi:Bio: jaringan hidupKompatibel: cocok/sesuai
Dapat menyesuaikan diri dengan jaringan hidup yang berhubungan dengan material
Semua bahan /sediaan yang berkontak langsung …..dengan tubuh manusia …..melalui suatu uji biologis atau juga disebut dengan uji biokompatibilitas.
Definisi: Kemampuan bahan untuk bereaksi sesuai dengan
fungsi …..pengobatan ….tdk menimbulkan pengaruh lokal maupun sistemik terhadap jaringan tubuh …..dapat meningkatkan kesesuaian bahan dengan jaringan selular pada situasi khusus dan mengoptimalkan fungsi bahan secara klinis (William, 2008a; William, 2008b).
BIOKOMPATIBILITAS
BAHAN KG KONTAK LANGSUNG DNG JARINGAN HIDUP (BIOMATERIAL)
1. KOMPOSIT2. POLIMER3. LOGAM4. KERAMIK
SIFAT MEKANIS, FISIK, KIMIAWI, BIOLOGIS
Sifat biologis adalah sifat yang berhubungan langsung dengan reaksi bahan dengan jaringan hidup (Anusavice, 2009).
1. Tidak membahayakan pulpa dan jaringan lunak.2. Tidak mengandung bahan toksik yang dapat berdifusi, terlepas dan diabsorbsi dalam sistem sirkulasi.3. Bebas dari agent yang dapat menyebabkan reaksi alergi.4. Tidak berpotensi sebagai bahan karsinogenik.
Syarat biokompatibilitas bahan kedokteran gigi
Anusavice (2009) :1. bagian luar tubuh manusia (kulit, mokosa
membran, beberapa permukaan tubuh); 2. bagian dalam tubuh (ujung pembuluh
darah, tulang, dentin, jaringan lunak, sistem sirkulasi darah);
3. tertanam di dalam tubuh (implan).
Klasifikasi bahan berdasarkan kontak dengan jaringan hidup
Ferracane (2001) 1. Uji Primer…. bahan langsung diuji dengan
biakan sel jaringan… IN VITRO2. Uji Sekunder…. bahan diuji potensi dalam
sensitivitas, alergi dan toksisitas sistemik… IN VIVO
3. sebelum bahan dilemparkan ke pasaran binatang coba atau primata yang lebih besar sebagai subyek uji dengan keadaan serupa dengan keadaan aplikatifnya pada manusia
Evaluasi biokompatibilitas
Bahan kedokteran gigi tidak boleh mengandung material yang berbahaya, dapat lepas atau dapat terserap oleh sistem sirkulasi tubuh, bebas dari agen yang menyebabkan sensitif atau alergi atau memberikan reaksi lokal dan sistemik (Kasten dkk., 1989).
Keselamatan pasien, operator serta untuk membuat suatu regulasi/aturan kesehatan
Manfaat evaluasi bahan:
Bahan dari pabrik sdh di uji apa belumAdanya tambahan bahan aditif, proses
kontaminasi dan zat sisa/residu ada saat pembuatan
Apakah ada bahan yang larut Degradasi produkSifat dari sediaan/bahan
Pertimbangan sebelum release produk/bahan
Short-term effect - acute toxicity, irritation (to the skin, eye,
mucosal surface), sensitization, haemolysis, thrombogeni- city.
Long-term effect - subchronic & chronic toxic effect, sensitization, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and effect on reproduction
THE RANGE POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL HAZARD:
Standard & Testing
Physical & chemical properties
SpecificationClinical studies
Clinical uses
Biological test(primary, secondary, usage test)
The selecting materials use of
Biological standardization testing materials
Safety
Effectiveness
Risk classificationClass I : low risk
Class II: must safety the requirementClass III: full safety & efficiency assessment
Report side effect of medical disease(system for individual/field)
Record system
Data base
The types of regulating cation in the future
(low occurs)
Questionaire
Don’t provide objective- Varying ability to observe
- Evaluate & clearly describe symptom- Symptom by factor the treatment
Safety information
Epidemiological studies(systematic, cross sectional, longitudinal)
Side effect : - to be rare or mild - relative biocompatility Approach :- evaluate in dental patient- retrospective dentist record
depend on :- chemical composition- degradation product
- absorption accumulation- leachable
Don’t provide objective may be :
In vitro test Advantages: - quick to perform - lest expensive - can be standardized - large scale screening - good experiment control - good excellence for mechanism
of interaction Disadvantages : relevance to in vivo is
questionable
Advantages and Disadvantages
In vivo test : Advantages: - allows complex systemic interaction - response more comprehensive - more relevant Disadvantages: - relevance to use of materials questionable - time consuming - legal / ethical concerns - difficult to control - difficult to interpret and quantity
Usage test Advantages : - relevance to use of material is assured
Disadvantages: - very expensive - very time consuming - major legal/ethical issue - can be difficult to control - difficult to interpret and quantity
The reason
The vast advance of cellular & molecular biology
The variety of test available for assessing biocompatibility of material
The lack of standardization of these test
Standard that regulate the measurement of biocompatible
ADA Specification 41
3 category of test (1982):
- initial test …in vitro - secondary test….in vivo - usage test :
a. placement of the materials in intended
b. first in larger animal / primates c. Food & drug Administration approval
Initials Tests - Short term systemic toxicity test: Oral
route - Acute systemic toxicity test: Intravenous
route - Inhalation toxicity test - Hemolysis test - Ames mutagenicity test - Styles cell transformation test - Dominant lethal test (LD50) - In vitro cytotoxicity test (Cr release) - Cytotoxicity test (Millipore filter) - Tissue culture agar overlay test
Recommended Levels of Biologic Testing(ADA)
Secondary Tests - Subcutaneous implant test - Bone Implant - Sensitization test - Oral mucous membrane irritation test Usage Test - Oral mucous membrane irritation test - Pulp and dentin test - Pulp capping and pulpotomy test - Endodontic usage test - Bone implant usage test
The use of cell culture technique Determine the lysis or death of cell, inhibition of
cell growth Other effect on cell caused by medical device,
materials and or their extract
Cytotoxicity Test
These tests estimate Using an appropriate model The potential of: medical device, materials
and or extracts for contact sensitization Are appropriate because exposure or contact
to even minute amounts of potential leachable can result in allergic or sensitization reactions
Sensitization Test
These tests estimate the irritation potential of medical devices, material and or extracts
Using appropriate sites for implant tissue in suitable model
Performed should be appropriate for the route and duration of exposure or contact for determine irritant effect
Irritation Test
These tests estimate the potential harmful effect of single or multiple exposure
A period of less than 24 hour to medical device, material and or extracts in an animal model
Are appropriate where contact allows potential absorption of toxic leachable and degradation product
Systemic Toxicity (Acute Toxicity)
Diffusion oxygen and metals ion into tissue Diffusion hydrogen and oxygen into tissue
to form hydroxides Diffusion of mineral or atoms from
electrolyte in to the oxides Dissolution of oxide metal ion (corrosion) Adsorption at biomolecular Desorption for replacement of biomolecular Fragmentation of modification of
biomolecular
Attachment between metal and tissue
Steam Sterilization (autoclave)
Ethylene Oxide Sterilization (EtO)
Radiation Sterilization - gamma X-ray - electron beam
Processing to improve biocompatibility
Sterilization
1. Anusavice KJ, 2009, Phillips Buku Ajar Ilmu Bahan Kedokteran Gigi, EGC2. Williams DF, 2008a, On the Mechanisms of Biocompatibility, Biomaterial Vol 29 3.Williams DF, 2008b, Dorland’s Medical dictionary, Biomaterial Vol 294. Ferracane JL, 2001, Materials Dentistry, Principles and Application, 2nd edition, Lippincott Williams & Williams, Philadelpia5. Kasten FH, Pineda LF, Schneider PE, Rawls HR, Foster TA, 1989, Biocompatibility testing of an experimental fluoride releasing resin using human gingival ephitelial cells in vitro, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology 25 (1)