assalamu’alaikum wr - eprints.ums.ac.ideprints.ums.ac.id/49282/25/lampiran.pdfadapun pertanyaan...
TRANSCRIPT
99
LAMPIRANKepada
Yth. Sdr/i Mahasiswa fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Bojonegoro
Assalamu’alaikum wr.wb
Dengan segala kerendahan hati, Saya mengharapkan kesediaan
saudara/i mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bojonegoro untuk
meluangkan waktunya guna mengisi daftar pertanyaan ini dengan sesungguhnya
tanpa beban apapun, sehingga dapat membantu melengkapi data yang sangat saya
butuhkan. Adapun pertanyaan ini saya buat dalam rangka penyusunan Tesis
dengan judul “Analisis Bauran Pemasaran terhadap Keputusan Mahasiswa
Memilih Program Studi ( Studi Kasus di Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas
Bojonegoro)”
Selanjutnya Tesis ini disusun guna melengkapi sebagian persyaratan guna
memperoleh gelar Magister Administrasi Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah
Surakarta. Jawaban yang Saudara berikan merupakan bantuan yang sangat
berharga bagi penelitian saya dan akan memberikan banyak manfaat bagi
perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan. Oleh karena itu, atas kesediaan dan bantuannya
saya ucapkan terima kasih.
Wassalamu’alaikum wr.wb.
Hormat Saya,
Asih Handayani
NIM. Q100200010
100
Nama :
Jenis Kelamin : L / P
Usia :
Kuesioner Penelitian
Analisis Bauran Pemasaran terhadap Keputusan Mahasiswa Memilih
Program Studi ( Studi Kasus di Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bojonegoro)
PetunjukPengisianKuisioner :
Jawablah pertanyaan dibawah ini dengan memberikan tanda (√) pada kolom
pernyataan (yang paling sesuai dengan kondisi anda),
Contoh:
Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bojonegoro mempunyai reputasi yang baik di
Bojonegoro
Jawaban : jika menurut anda Sangat Setuju maka centang (√) pada kolo SS
(5)
Jika jawaban anda tidak setuju bisa memilih centang (√) pada kolo
STS (1)
Angka 1 – 5 menunjukan semakin besar persetujuan dari anda.
Keterangan Bobot nilai:
STS (1) = Sangat Tidak Setuju
TS (2) = Tidak Setuju
R (3) = Ragu-Ragu
S (4) = Setuju
SS (5) = Sangat Setuju
101
BAURAN PEMASARAN
Variable Pertanyaan JawabanSTS TS R S SS
1 2 3 4 5Produk(X1)
1. Fakultas Ekonomi mempunyai reputasiyang baik di Bojonegoro
2. Setelah lulus kuliah saya yakin akanmudah mendapatkan pekerjaan
3. Pilihan konsentrasi bervariasi sesuaidengan minat saya
Harga (X2) 1. Biaya kuliah di sini sangat terjangkau2. Ada beasiswa yang ditawarkan untuk
mahasiswa3. Prosedur pembayaran sangat mudah4. Pembayaran biaya kuliah bisa dicicil
Lokasi(X3)
1. Lokasi kampus dekat dengan pusat kota2. Lokasi kampus memudahkan untuk parkir3. Lokasi kampus mudah dijangkau
kendaraan umum (Bis, angkot dansebagainya)
4. Lingkungan kampus kondusif ( tidak adagangguan suara, polusi dsb)
Promosi(X4)
1. Periklanan lewat media elektronik (TV,Radio, SosMed, dsb) membuat sayamengetahui tentang Fakultas EkonomiUniversitas Bojonegoro
2. Saya mengetahui Fakultas EkonomiUniversitas Bojonegoro dari promosipenjualan (seperti pameran dan invitasi)
3. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bojonegoromelakukan kontak langsung dengan calonmahasiswa untuk memperkenalkanprogram Program Studinya.
4. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bojonegoromelakukan kegiatan hubungan masyarakatyang sangat baik
Orang (X5) 1. Kwalitas dosen baik cara mengajar sangatbaik
2. Pelayanan karyawan sangat baik
Bukti Fisik(X6)
1. Prodi Ekonomi Pembangunan UniversitasBojonegoro memiliki bangunan fisik(gedung perkuliahan) yang bagus
2. Prodi Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas
102
Bojonegoro memiliki sarana penuunjangperkuliahan seperti tempat ibadah,olahraga dll) yang memadai
Proses (X7) 1. Proses administrasi berlangsung dengantertib
2. Proses perkuliahan berjalan dengan baik
Variabel Pertanyaan JawabanSTS TS R S SS
1 2 3 4 5KeputusanMemilih Prodi (Y)1. Pengenalan
Kebutuhan 1. Program Studi di FakultasEkonomi Universitas Bojonegorosudah sesuai dengan yang sayabutuhkan
2. PencarianInformasi
2. Saya sudah memperoleh informasiyang lengkap tentang ProgramStudi di Fakultas EkonomiUniversitas Bojonegoro
3. EvaluasiAlternatif
3. Saya mempertimbangkan beberapaalternative program studi yang lainsebelum memilih Program Studi diFakultas Ekonomi UniversitasBojonegoro
4. KeputusanPembelian
5. Melanjutkan studi di ProgramStudi Ekonomi PembangunanUniversitas Bojonegoromerupakan pilihan yang tepat
5.Perilaku PascaPembelian
6. Saya merasa puas memilihProgram Studi di FakultasEkonomi Universitas Bojonegorodan akan merekomendasikankepada teman, saudara dan oranglain yang saya kenal
103
DESKRIPSI JAWABAN RESPONDEN
Frequency Table
x1.1Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
2 3 3.0 3.0 3.03 18 18.0 18.0 21.04 68 68.0 68.0 89.05 11 11.0 11.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x1.2Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
2 3 3.0 3.0 3.03 9 9.0 9.0 12.04 64 64.0 64.0 76.05 24 24.0 24.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x1.3Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
2 3 3.0 3.0 3.03 13 13.0 13.0 16.04 57 57.0 57.0 73.05 27 27.0 27.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x2.1Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 11 11.0 11.0 11.02 24 24.0 24.0 35.03 29 29.0 29.0 64.04 31 31.0 31.0 95.05 5 5.0 5.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
104
x2.2Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 3 3.0 3.0 3.03 34 34.0 34.0 37.04 44 44.0 44.0 81.05 19 19.0 19.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x2.3Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 13 13.0 13.0 13.03 10 10.0 10.0 23.04 66 66.0 66.0 89.05 11 11.0 11.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x2.4Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 2 2.0 2.0 2.02 9 9.0 9.0 11.03 20 20.0 20.0 31.04 57 57.0 57.0 88.05 12 12.0 12.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x3.1Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 5 5.0 5.0 5.02 6 6.0 6.0 11.03 6 6.0 6.0 17.04 81 81.0 81.0 98.05 2 2.0 2.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x3.2Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 16 16.0 16.0 16.03 7 7.0 7.0 23.04 72 72.0 72.0 95.05 5 5.0 5.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x3.3
105
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 12 12.0 12.0 12.02 39 39.0 39.0 51.03 13 13.0 13.0 64.04 36 36.0 36.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x3.4Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 19 19.0 19.0 19.03 23 23.0 23.0 42.04 58 58.0 58.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x4.1Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 4 4.0 4.0 4.02 3 3.0 3.0 7.03 27 27.0 27.0 34.04 58 58.0 58.0 92.05 8 8.0 8.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x4.2Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 16 16.0 16.0 16.03 46 46.0 46.0 62.04 32 32.0 32.0 94.05 6 6.0 6.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x4.3Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 2 2.0 2.0 2.03 25 25.0 25.0 27.04 66 66.0 66.0 93.05 7 7.0 7.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
106
x4.4Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 1 1.0 1.0 1.02 7 7.0 7.0 8.03 16 16.0 16.0 24.04 69 69.0 69.0 93.05 7 7.0 7.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x5.1Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 5 5.0 5.0 5.03 25 25.0 25.0 30.04 64 64.0 64.0 94.05 6 6.0 6.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x5.2Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 1 1.0 1.0 1.02 12 12.0 12.0 13.03 27 27.0 27.0 40.04 54 54.0 54.0 94.05 6 6.0 6.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x6.1Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 7 7.0 7.0 7.03 27 27.0 27.0 34.04 48 48.0 48.0 82.05 18 18.0 18.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x6.2Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 3 3.0 3.0 3.03 20 20.0 20.0 23.04 72 72.0 72.0 95.05 5 5.0 5.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x7.1
107
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 6 6.0 6.0 6.03 37 37.0 37.0 43.04 57 57.0 57.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
x7.2Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 2 2.0 2.0 2.03 30 30.0 30.0 32.04 61 61.0 61.0 93.05 7 7.0 7.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
y1Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid3 17 17.0 17.0 17.04 83 83.0 83.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
y2Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 3 3.0 3.0 3.03 22 22.0 22.0 25.04 75 75.0 75.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
y3Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 5 5.0 5.0 5.03 7 7.0 7.0 12.04 88 88.0 88.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
y4Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 5 5.0 5.0 5.03 5 5.0 5.0 10.04 90 90.0 90.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
y5Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
2 2 2.0 2.0 2.03 4 4.0 4.0 6.04 94 94.0 94.0 100.0Total 100 100.0 100.0
108
LAMPIRANOUTPUT UJI VALIDITAS
Correlations
Correlationsx1.1 x1.2 x1.3 tx1
x1.1Pearson Correlation 1 .724** .758** .896**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 100 100 100 100
x1.2Pearson Correlation .724** 1 .657** .855**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100
x1.3Pearson Correlation .758** .657** 1 .880**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100
tx1Pearson Correlation .896** .855** .880** 1Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 100 100 100 100**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlations
Correlationsx2.1 x2.2 x2.3 x2.4 tx2
x2.1Pearson Correlation 1 .365** .368** .215* .759**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .032 .000
N 100 100 100 100 100
x2.2Pearson Correlation .365** 1 .405** .078 .642**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .441 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
x2.3Pearson Correlation .368** .405** 1 .352** .749**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
x2.4Pearson Correlation .215* .078 .352** 1 .592**
Sig. (2-tailed) .032 .441 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
tx2Pearson Correlation .759** .642** .749** .592** 1Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
N 100 100 100 100 100**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
109
Correlations
Correlationsx3.1 x3.2 x3.3 x3.4 tx3
x3.1Pearson Correlation 1 .144 .041 .172 .468**
Sig. (2-tailed) .154 .685 .087 .000
N 100 100 100 100 100
x3.2Pearson Correlation .144 1 .426** .495** .742**
Sig. (2-tailed) .154 .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
x3.3Pearson Correlation .041 .426** 1 .444** .755**
Sig. (2-tailed) .685 .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
x3.4Pearson Correlation .172 .495** .444** 1 .756**
Sig. (2-tailed) .087 .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
tx3Pearson Correlation .468** .742** .755** .756** 1Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
N 100 100 100 100 100**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlations
Correlationsx4.1 x4.2 x4.3 x4.4 tx4
x4.1Pearson Correlation 1 .455** .726** .467** .855**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
N 100 100 100 100 100
x4.2Pearson Correlation .455** 1 .340** .433** .737**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .001 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
x4.3Pearson Correlation .726** .340** 1 .423** .772**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .001 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
x4.4Pearson Correlation .467** .433** .423** 1 .745**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100
tx4Pearson Correlation .855** .737** .772** .745** 1Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
N 100 100 100 100 100**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
110
Correlations
Correlationsx5.1 x5.2 tx5
x5.1Pearson Correlation 1 .619** .875**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 100 100 100
x5.2Pearson Correlation .619** 1 .922**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000N 100 100 100
tx5Pearson Correlation .875** .922** 1Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 100 100 100**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlations
Correlationsx6.1 x6.2 tx6
x6.1Pearson Correlation 1 .493** .912**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 100 100 100
x6.2Pearson Correlation .493** 1 .807**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000N 100 100 100
tx6Pearson Correlation .912** .807** 1Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 100 100 100**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Correlations
Correlationsx7.1 x7.2 tx7
x7.1Pearson Correlation 1 .583** .888**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 100 100 100
x7.2Pearson Correlation .583** 1 .891**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000N 100 100 100
tx7Pearson Correlation .888** .891** 1Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 100 100 100**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
111
Correlations
Correlationsy1 y2 y3 y4 y5 ty
y1Pearson Correlation 1 .637** .169 .137 .209* .561**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .094 .175 .037 .000
N 100 100 100 100 100 100
y2Pearson Correlation .637** 1 .567** .689** .566** .945**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100 100
y3Pearson Correlation .169 .567** 1 .532** .039 .678**
Sig. (2-tailed) .094 .000 .000 .702 .000N 100 100 100 100 100 100
y4Pearson Correlation .137 .689** .532** 1 .672** .834**
Sig. (2-tailed) .175 .000 .000 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100 100
y5Pearson Correlation .209* .566** .039 .672** 1 .637**
Sig. (2-tailed) .037 .000 .702 .000 .000N 100 100 100 100 100 100
tyPearson Correlation .561** .945** .678** .834** .637** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
N 100 100 100 100 100 100**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
112
LAMPIRANOUTPUT UJI RELIABILITAS
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing SummaryN %
CasesValid 100 100.0Excludeda 0 .0Total 100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.879 3
Item StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
x1.1 3.87 .630 100x1.2 4.09 .668 100x1.3 4.08 .720 100
Scale StatisticsMean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
12.04 3.291 1.814 3
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing SummaryN %
CasesValid 100 100.0Excludeda 0 .0Total 100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.621 4
113
Item StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
x2.1 2.95 1.095 100x2.2 3.79 .782 100x2.3 3.75 .821 100x2.4 3.68 .875 100
Scale StatisticsMean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
14.17 6.082 2.466 4
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing SummaryN %
CasesValid 100 100.0Excludeda 0 .0Total 100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.608 4
Item StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
x3.1 3.69 .825 100x3.2 3.66 .807 100x3.3 2.73 1.081 100x3.4 3.39 .790 100
Scale StatisticsMean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
13.47 5.747 2.397 4
114
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing SummaryN %
CasesValid 100 100.0Excludeda 0 .0Total 100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.776 4
Item StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
x4.1 3.63 .837 100x4.2 3.28 .805 100x4.3 3.78 .596 100x4.4 3.74 .733 100
Scale StatisticsMean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
14.43 5.359 2.315 4
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing SummaryN %
CasesValid 100 100.0Excludeda 0 .0Total 100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.753 2
115
Item StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
x5.1 3.71 .656 100x5.2 3.52 .822 100
Scale StatisticsMean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
7.23 1.775 1.332 2
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing SummaryN %
CasesValid 100 100.0Excludeda 0 .0Total 100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.632 2
Item StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
x6.1 3.77 .827 100x6.2 3.79 .574 100
Scale StatisticsMean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
7.56 1.481 1.217 2
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing SummaryN %
CasesValid 100 100.0Excludeda 0 .0Total 100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.
116
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.736 2
Item StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
x7.1 3.51 .611 100x7.2 3.73 .617 100
Scale StatisticsMean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
7.24 1.194 1.093 2
Reliability
Scale: ALL VARIABLES
Case Processing SummaryN %
CasesValid 100 100.0Excludeda 0 .0Total 100 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.
Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items
.792 5
Item StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
y1 3.83 .378 100y2 3.72 .514 100y3 3.83 .493 100y4 3.85 .479 100y5 3.92 .339 100
Scale StatisticsMean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
19.15 2.715 1.648 5
117
LAMPIRANOUTPUT UJI REGRESI LINIER BERGANDA
Regression
Descriptive StatisticsMean Std. Deviation N
Keputusan Memilih Prodi (Y) 3.8300 .32952 100Produk (X1) 4.0133 .60473 100Harga (X2) 3.5425 .61654 100Lokasi (X3) 3.3675 .59930 100Promosi (X4) 3.6075 .57872 100Orang (X5) 3.6150 .66612 100Bukti Fisik (X6) 3.7800 .60853 100Proses (X7) 3.6200 .54643 100
Variables Entered/Removeda
Model Variables Entered VariablesRemoved
Method
1
Proses (X7), BuktiFisik (X6), Harga(X2), Orang (X5),Lokasi (X3),Produk (X1),Promosi (X4)b
. Enter
a. Dependent Variable: Keputusan Memilih Prodi (Y)b. All requested variables entered.
Model Summaryb
Model R R Square Adjusted RSquare
Std. Error of theEstimate
Durbin-Watson
1 .751a .564 .531 .22562 2.231a. Predictors: (Constant), Proses (X7), Bukti Fisik (X6), Harga (X2), Orang (X5), Lokasi (X3), Produk(X1), Promosi (X4)b. Dependent Variable: Keputusan Memilih Prodi (Y)
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1
Regression 6.067 7 .867 17.027 .000b
Residual 4.683 92 .051
Total 10.750 99
a. Dependent Variable: Keputusan Memilih Prodi (Y)b. Predictors: (Constant), Proses (X7), Bukti Fisik (X6), Harga (X2), Orang (X5), Lokasi (X3), Produk (X1),Promosi (X4)
118
Coefficientsa
Model UnstandardizedCoefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig. Correlations CollinearityStatistics
B Std.Error
Beta Zero-order
Partial Part Tolerance
VIF
1
(Constant) 1.349 .231 5.829 .000
Produk (X1) .097 .043 .179 2.275 .025 .464 .231 .157 .767 1.304Harga (X2) .090 .039 .168 2.330 .022 .364 .236 .160 .906 1.103Lokasi (X3) .103 .044 .188 2.332 .022 .447 .236 .160 .727 1.375Promosi (X4) .104 .049 .182 2.118 .037 .542 .216 .146 .641 1.560Orang (X5) .073 .038 .147 1.924 .057 .417 .197 .132 .806 1.241Bukti Fisik (X6) .104 .042 .192 2.488 .015 .441 .251 .171 .795 1.257Proses (X7) .108 .050 .180 2.152 .034 .507 .219 .148 .680 1.470
a. Dependent Variable: Keputusan Memilih Prodi (Y)
NPar Tests
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov TestUnstandardized
ResidualN 100
Normal Parametersa,b Mean .0000000Std. Deviation .21749284
Most Extreme DifferencesAbsolute .099Positive .072Negative -.099
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .990Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .281a. Test distribution is Normal.b. Calculated from data.
Nonparametric Correlations
119
120