abstrak - sinta.unud.ac.id · pdf file4.3 hasil perbandingan sistem gugur dengan sistem gdss...

Download ABSTRAK - sinta.unud.ac.id · PDF file4.3 Hasil Perbandingan Sistem Gugur dengan Sistem GDSS ... 2.2 Skala Penilaian Perbandingan Pasangan ... 2.5 Perbandingan Skala Penilaian antar

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: vuongthuan

Post on 07-Feb-2018

233 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • viii

    ABSTRAK

    Begitu banyaknya penawaran yang masuk dalam E-procurement pekerjaan

    konstruksi membuat Kelompok Kerja ULP mengalami kesulitan dalam evaluasi

    penawaran untuk menentukan pemenang penyedia pekerjaan konstruksi. Sistem

    pendukung keputusan kelompok merupakan suatu sistem yang dapat membantu

    Kelompok Kerja ULP Pemerintah Provinsi Bali dalam mengambil keputusan

    dengan kemampuan analisa pemilihan penyedia pekerjaan konstruksi dengan

    metode kriteria AHP dan Borda. Pokja ULP dapat mengambil keputusan pada

    evaluasi penawaran penyedia pekerjaan konstruksi secara obyektif berdasarkan

    multi kriteria yang ditetapkan dan meningkatkan kualitas dalam perbaikan proses

    pengambilan keputusan kelompok. Kedua metode tersebut digunakan karena

    terdapat dua tahap dalam pengambilan keputusan yaitu individual decision dan

    group decision. Hasil pengujian sistem menunjukkan bahwa GDSS dapat

    diterapkan sebagai sistem pendukung keputusan dalam evaluasi penawaran

    penyedia pekerjaan konstruksi dan memutuskan perusahaan yang paling layak

    untuk menjadi pemenang.

    Kata Kunci : GDSS, AHP, Borda, Evaluasi Penawaran.

  • ix

    ABSTRACT

    So many bids in E-procurement of construction work of the Working Group ULP

    create difficulties in evaluating the bids to determine the winner of construction

    work providers. A group decision support system is a system that can help the

    Working Group ULP Bali provincial government in making decisions with the

    ability to analyze the construction work provider selection criteria with AHP and

    Borda method. WG ULP can take a decision on the bid evaluation provider of

    construction work objectively based multi criteria set and improve quality in the

    improvement process of group decision-making. Both methods are used because

    there are two stages in the decision-making that decision of individual and group

    decision. The test results show that the system can be applied GDSS as decision

    support systems in the bid evaluation provider of construction work and decided

    the company's most worthy to be a winner.

    Keywords: GDSS, AHP, Borda, Bid Evaluation.

  • x

    DAFTAR ISI

    SAMPUL UTAMA.

    SAMPUL KEDUA.

    LEMBAR PENGESAHAN..

    LEMBAR PANITIA PENGUJI.

    SURAT PERNYATAAN BEBAS PLAGIAT

    UCAPAN TERIMA KASIH.

    ABSTRAK.

    ABSTRACT

    DAFTAR ISI...................................................................................................

    DAFTAR TABEL...........................................................................................

    DAFTAR GAMBAR......................................................................................

    BAB I PENDAHULUAN..............................................................................

    1.1 Latar Belakang..................................................................................

    1.2 Rumusan Masalah.............................................................................

    1.3 Tujuan Penelitian...............................................................................

    1.4 Manfaat Penelitian.............................................................................

    1.5 Batasan Penelitian.............................................................................

    1.6 Keaslian Penelitian............................................................................

    BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA.....................................................................

    2.1 State of The Art Review.....................................................................

    2.2 Sistem Pendukung Keputusan...........................................................

    i

    ii

    iii

    iv

    v

    vi

    viii

    ix

    x

    xiv

    xv

    1

    1

    9

    10

    10

    11

    11

    14

    14

    20

  • xi

    2.2.1 Tujuan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan....................................

    2.2.2 Proses Pengambilan Keputusan..............................................

    2.3 Group Decision Support System (GDSS)...........................................

    2.4 Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)...................................

    2.4.1 Penyusunan Hirarki...............................................................

    2.4.2 Prinsip Dasar AHP................................................................

    2.4.3 Prosedur AHP........................................................................

    2.5 Metode Borda.....................................................................................

    2.6 Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa.................................................................

    2.7 E-Procurement.....................................................................................

    2.8 Pekerjaan Konstruksi...........................................................................

    2.9 Evaluasi Penawaran.............................................................................

    2.9.1 Koreksi Aritmatik...................................................................

    2.9.2 Evaluasi Administrasi............................................................

    2.9.3 Evaluasi Teknis......................................................................

    2.9.4 Evaluasi Harga.......................................................................

    2.9.5 Evaluasi Kualifikasi...............................................................

    2.10 ULP dan Kelompok Kerja (Pokja).......................................................

    BAB III METODE PENELITIAN.................................................................

    3.1 Gambaran Umum Sistem.....................................................................

    3.2.1 Sistem Existing.......................................................................

    3.2.2 Sistem Usulan........................................................................

    3.2 Instrumen Penelitian.........................................................................

    20

    21

    22

    24

    26

    27

    28

    34

    34

    36

    37

    37

    38

    38

    39

    40

    42

    42

    46

    46

    46

    48

    50

  • xii

    3.3 Data dan Teknik Pengumpulan Data..................................................

    3.3.1 Data Primer.............................................................................

    3.3.2 Data Sekunder.........................................................................

    3.4 Analisa Sistem............................................................................

    3.4.1 Analisis Masalah.....................................................................

    3.4.2 Hirarki Pemilihan Penyedia Pekerjaan Konstruksi.................

    3.4.3 Prosedur Sistem......................................................................

    3.4.4 Rancangan Sistem GDSS........................................................

    3.4.5 Pengujian Sistem...................................................................

    3.5 Tempat dan Jadwal Penelitian.............................................................

    BAB IV HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN.......................................................

    4.1 Implementasi Sistem.....................................................................

    4.1.1 Database Sistem......................................................................

    4.1.2 Fitur Login..............................................................................

    4.1.3 Data SKPD..............................................................................

    4.1.4 Data Pokja ULP......................................................................

    4.1.5 Data Penyedia.........................................................................

    4.1.6 Paket Pekerjaan.......................................................................

    4.1.7 Proses Evaluasi Penawaran.....................................................

    4.2 Pengujian Sistem.........................................................................

    4.3 Hasil Perbandingan Sistem Gugur dengan Sistem GDSS...............

    BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN........................................................

    5.1 Kesimpulan..................................................................................

    50

    51

    51

    51

    51

    54

    65

    65

    70

    76

    78

    79

    79

    80

    81

    82

    83

    85

    91

    116

    119

    119

  • xiii

    5.2 Saran............................................................................................

    DAFTAR PUSTAKA.....................................................................................

    LAMPIRAN....................................................................................................

    120

    122

    125

  • xiv

    DAFTAR TABEL

    2.1 Pemetaan Penelitian Terdahulu..........................................................

    2.2 Skala Penilaian Perbandingan Pasangan.............................................

    2.3 Daftar Indeks Random Konsistensi.....................................................

    2.4 Kriteria Penilaian Sederhana dan Nilai...............................................

    2.5 Perbandingan Skala Penilaian antar Elemen Kriteria..........................

    2.6 Perbandingan antar kriteria.................................................................

    2.7 Matriks Nilai